Simulation & Prediction of Performance of Oscillating Water Column based Wave Energy Plant
1
Project by:�Akshay Antrolia - M1810002
Prasad Chettiar - M1810062
Pushkar Raut - M1810073
Project guide: Dr. Balwant Bhasme
B.Tech. Project Presentation - Semester 8
(with National Institute of Ocean Technology,
Ministry of Earth Sciences, Government of India)
External guide: Mr. Prasad Dudhgaonkar � (NIOT)
Presentation Flow
2
3
Introduction-Ocean Energy
Wave Energy Devices
Tidal Barrage
Existing Commercial Technologies Around the World
4
5. Sihwa Lake tidal barrage station, South Korea
1. OWC at Islay, Scotland
2. Pelamis attenuator, Scotland
3. Eco Wave Power, Israel
4. Orbital Marine Power at Orkney, Scotland
5
Sr. No | Name of Author and Year of Publication | Title of paper | Details of Work | Main Findings | Conclusions |
1 | Abdul Salam, Prasad Dudhgaonkar - February, 2013 | Impulse Turbine for Oscillating Water Column(OWC) Based Energy Device- A Review | Experimental study on effects of guide vanes(G.V) on efficiency of turbines. | Self rectifying active pitch controlled G.V gave highest efficiency which lies in the range of 40-55% for turbine speeds at 400-800rpm. | Active pitch controlled G.V gives highest efficiency in conjunction with turbines but is expensive and complex. |
2 | Karthikeyan Thandayutham, Abdus Samad, A. Salam, D. Baruah, P. V. Dudhgaonkar - September, 2018 | Performance Analysis of an Air Turbine for Ocean Energy Extraction Using CFD Technique | Numerical study to compare the performance of unidirectional impulse turbines for different guide vane angles and turbine diameters using CFD | The turbine with the largest (298 mm) diameter showed maximum predicted efficiency. All simulated turbines performed at higher efficiency at a guide vane angle of 20 degree for a wide range of flow coefficients. | The findings suggest that bigger turbines are expected to produce relatively higher efficiencies and a guide vane angle of 20 degree could be used for achieving higher efficiencies. |
3 | Prasad Dudhgaonkar, V. Jayashankar, T. Setoguchi, S. Nagata and others- 2011 | Fluidic Components for Oscillating Water Column Based Wave Energy Plants | Experimental and numerical investigation in design of a fluidic diode to effectively utilize bidirectional flow | The design yields a quality factor of 7.5 and when coupled with the turbine in the twin unidirectional topology is expected to give a better result than having the turbine alone. | Fluidic diodes in conjunction with unidirectional turbines can result in high efficiency for the power module for a wave energy plant. |
Literature Review
6
Sr. No | Name of Author and Year of Publication | Title of paper | Details of Work | Main Findings | Conclusions |
4 | Prasad Dudhgaonkar, Nagasamy Duraisamy, Purnima Jalihal - December 2016 | Energy Extraction From Ocean Currents Using Straight Bladed Cross-Flow Hydrokinetic Turbine | Experimental open sea trial of cross-flow hydrokinetic ocean current turbine. | Coefficient of Performance of 0.22 as expected. Maximum electric power of 304W- huge margin above design power of 100W. Self starting above 0.8m/s. | The tests paved the way for scaling up off-grid units for remote coastal locations. |
5 | Paresh Halder, Mohamed H. Mohamed, Abus Samad - January, 2018 | Wave Energy Conversion: Design and Shape Optimization | Numerical analysis and optimization of existing wells turbine for OWC | Required pressure regions acquired and efficiency increased by 8%. | An optimization and analysis by numerical modelling of wells turbines have been done to improve efficiency of turbine. |
6 | A. Roberts, B. Thomas, P. Sewell, Z. Khan, S. Balmain, J. Gillman - March, 2016 | Current tidal power technologies and their suitability for applications in coastal and marine areas | Review of tidal barrages, tidal turbines and tidal kites to assess their suitability for smaller scale electricity generation. | Both vertically and horizontally oriented cross-flow turbines have relatively high power densities. Tidal kites require deep waters, and tidal barrages will require significantly more investment to generate comparable levels of power at small-scale. | Both vertically and horizontally oriented cross-flow turbines and oscillating hydrofoils are well suited to shallow waters and smaller scale applications. Tidal barrages and tidal kites are not suitable for the selected application |
Literature Review
Oscillating Water Columns
7
An animation on OWC. Credits: Voith Hydro
Problem Statement
8
Previous OWC installed at Vizhinjam, Kerala
NIOT may undertake future projects on OWC based wave energy plants.
Thus our objective is to:
Our motivation to take up this project:
Summary of Stage I - Agenda 1 & 2
9
Wave Simulation using Volume of Fluid Method
Agenda 1 - Determination of Porous Media Characteristics
Agenda 2 - Preliminary Wave Simulations
Pressure drop v/s Flow Rate
Agenda 3 - Sea Wave Simulation in Caisson
10
Having developed seawaves in a random geometry, the next step was to actually produce them inside the Caisson structure (Reinforced concrete chamber).
A CAD geometry of the caisson was developed with drawings of the plant.
OWC Structure Internal View
Caisson Drawings of NIOT Plant
Agenda 3 - Sea Wave Simulation in Caisson
11
Geometry: The entire geometry was created on CAD as per the dimensions provided by NIOT.
Here you can see an internal cross-section.
After a few cleanups in the CAD, the geometry was taken forward for CFD simulation.
Views of Caisson
Internal Cross Section View
Agenda 3- Sea Wave Simulation in Caisson
12
Geometry
Mesh Settings
1. An enclosure was created around the caisson leaving enough space in the vertical direction above the turbine.
2. The caisson was removed by boolean to create the fluid domain.
Enclosure with Caisson Boolean/ Fluid Domain
Details of Mesh
Sliced view of domain mesh
Skewness of domain
Agenda 3 - Sea Wave Simulation in Caisson
13
Boundary Conditions
Models
Cell Zone Conditions:
The following conditions were simulated.
Model Parameters
Boundary Condition Parameters
Cell Zone Parameters
Agenda 3 - Sea Wave Simulation in Caisson
14
Governing equations:
Momentum equation
Continuity equation:
Volume of fluid method equation:
Agenda 3- Sea Wave Simulation in Caisson
15
Results: Timestep calculations can be seen here. Two different settings were used for 5 sec each to quicken the simulation.
We animated a video of the seawave simulated within the caisson. Volume Rendering of the same can be seen here.
Timestep Parameters
Volume Rendering
Agenda 4 - Porous Media Simulation
16
Porous Media characteristics had to be added in order to simulate a pressure drop. However, in the Volume of Fluid Method, there isn’t an option to input porous media. One has to create a UDF (User Defined Function) to input Porous Media. Since this option wasn’t available, we were forced to skip this and jump to the turbine simulation.
Cell Zone Parameters in VOF method
Agenda 5 - Preliminary Turbine Simulation
17
Having developed seawaves in the caisson, the next step was to simulate a turbine rotating and measure the power produced by it.
Case 1 Turbine’s specifications are as follows:
NACA 0021
0.38 m chord (constant)
Tip dia = 2m
Hub dia = 1.2m
Blade material = stainless steel
This Wells turbine was selected by NIOT due to its unidirectional direction of rotation with regards to bidirectional flow of air in the caisson.
Turbine CAD
Agenda 5 - Preliminary Turbine Simulation
18
Geometry
Mesh Settings
1. An enclosure was created around the turbine to create a dynamic mesh
2. Another larger enclosure was created to define the fluid domain
3. A boolean was created around the turbine
1. Skewness was maintained as low as possible so that the simulation won’t diverge.
2. Lesser mesh elements would enable a smoother simulation.
Enclosure with Turbine Boolean
Mesh Settings
Sliced View of Domain Mesh
Skewness of Domain
Agenda 5 - Preliminary Turbine Simulation
19
The Dynamic Mesh method was utilized to simulate the rotating turbine. �Six DOF was given to the turbine, while defining it’s moment of inertia, it’s axis and the center of rotation.
Dynamic Mesh Properties:
�Rigid rotating body
1. External body contact surfaces with the turbine body
2. Main turbine body geometry
3. Internal of turbine geometry
4. Turbine walls
Stationary body
1. Internal of geometry other than turbine
Six DOF Parameters
Dynamic Mesh Parameters
Agenda 5 - Preliminary Turbine Simulation
20
Results: Following are the Power and Moment plots obtained in Fluent.
Results: On extracting individual datapoints at all timesteps from Fluent, we imported that data to Excel and plotted the same curves. They can be seen as follows.
These values are only test values to ensure reliability of the simulation method.
Results: The animation of the turbine simulation can be seen here.
Pressure Contour Rendering of the Turbine
Power vs Time Graph
Moment vs Time Graph
Agenda 6: Caisson - Turbine Coupling
21
The Caisson-turbine geometry meshing encountered multiple problems of high skewness, very high number of elements and the subsequent failure of simulation.
This was found to take place due to small faces and sharp edges on the turbine geometry which led to a high number of elements and high skewness.
Repairing of this was done in SpaceClaim by the tool of Small Faces and Merge Faces.
Turbine Geometry Issues
Cleaned Geometry
Agenda 6 - Caisson - Turbine Interaction
22
Geometry: A coupled turbine and caisson geometry was then developed.
Mesh Details
Agenda 6 - Caisson - Turbine Interaction
23
Models, Cellzone Conditions, Boundary Conditions, Dynamic Mesh settings have been kept in this simulation as mentioned in the above sections. Timestep Calculations and Solution Methods can be seen here.
Results: We animated a video of the seawaves simulated within the caisson with the dynamic mesh on the turbine. Volume Rendering of the same can be seen here.
Solution Methods and Timestep Calculations
Volume Fraction Rendering
Agenda 6 - Caisson - Turbine Interaction
24
Results: The following graphs were plotted with the simulation data in Fluent.
Agenda 6 - Caisson - Turbine Interaction
25
An attempt was made to develop a structured mesh of the caisson-turbine domain to obtain a better solution. This helped in reducing solution time and skewness.
Steps:
Structured Mesh Method
Agenda 6 - Caisson - Turbine Interaction
26
The following results were obtained in the form of graphs from Fluent over the entire 20 sec simulation.
Structured Mesh Method
Agenda 6 - Caisson - Turbine Interaction
27
Having obtained success in developing and simulating a structured mesh, with much lower runtimes and low skewness numbers, we decided to run a longer simulation and observe its effects.
Structured Mesh Method (Iteration 2)
Console scripts at the end of the simulation
Moment vs Time and Pressure vs Time graphs
Residuals and Velocity at the end of the blades
Conclusion
28
Scope of Improvement
29
30
Thank You
Equations
31
Momentum eqn
Continuity eqn
Vol of fluid method
32
Oscillating Water Columns (OWCs)
Credits: Voith Hydro
OWCs were focused upon in the project due to: �
33
Construction of an Oscillating Water Column
Construction and Working
34
Project Objectives
Flow & Agenda
Agenda 1-Porous Media
35
36
CFD Details for Porous Media Simulations
Mesh Details
Boundary Conditions
Outer Diameter | 1m |
Inner Diameter | 0.7m |
Length | 0.7m |
Nodes | 2754576 |
Elements | 2660560 |
Skewness | <0.485 |
Geometry Details
Models | Viscosity: SST k-omega |
Inlet | Mass Flow rate |
Outlet | Pressure Outlet |
Walls | Stationary, No slip |
CFD Results
Volume Rendering
Pressure Variation across axis
37
Results
38
Agenda 2- Wave Simulation
39
CFD Details for Wave Simulation
40
Geometry Details
Mesh Details
Boundary Conditions
Nodes | 619616 |
Elements | 597037 |
Skewness | < 1e-9 |
Length | 4m |
Breadth | 2m |
Height | 2m |
Models | Multiphase: Volume of fluid method Viscosity:SST K-Omega |
Inlet | Open Channel Wave BC:(Short gravity waves) Wave Height :2m Wave Length:20m |
Outlet | Open channel: Free surface:14m |
Atmos | Same as above |
Other walls | Stationary, No slip |
Converged | Yes |
Time Step | 0.01s |
No. of time steps | 100 |
Solution Details
CFD Details for Seawave Simulation
Summary
41
42
Progress & Future Course of Work
Aug-Sep
2021
Sep-Oct 2021
Oct-Jan 2021/22
Jan-Mar 2022
Feb-Apr 2022