What Is Holding Up OMR?
Heinz Roggenkemper
Music 254
April 27, 2021
OMR review 2001
OMR review 2019
The C’t magazine reviewed OMR software again in August 2019. The three products that were rated ‘+’ in terms of note recognition were PhotoScore, SharpEye and SmartScore.
In November 2019 I posted the following note accuracy results on omr-research.net:
Obstacles (1)
Byrd/Simonsen: Towards a standard testbed for Optical Music Recognition (2015):
OMR is small: small market (maybe 20 full-time developers for commercial products), not many researchers
Other Obstacles (1)
Architecture: OMR requires complex systems with corresponding maintenance effort
Lack of transparency: it is difficult to find out what capabilities OMR systems have, and how well they do. (Solution: automated assessments, based on substantial ground truth)
Other Obstacles (2)
Obstacle Summary
Some obstacle are big unmovable objects (complexity of CWMN, size of market/space)
No other obstacle has an oversized impact.
There is interdependency between obstacles.
Therefore breakthrough progress in the short term (next 3 years) is unlikely.
What Could Help?
Create the testbed, and make it easy to use
Deeper understanding of user behavior
Get more out of OMR results: