1 of 13

Attachment and Bonding

DAY FOUR

2 of 13

Attachment and bonding

  • As you will recall, 25% of all new cases coming into the dependency system involve children under one year old. ��
  • Children under one year old are at a critical stage of development: this is when they develop the critical skill of being able to form attachments to their caregiver(s).

3 of 13

Attachment & Bonding

  • �Although these terms are used somewhat interchangeably in our work, below are the definitions we will use.��Attachment: Care-seeking behavior. An instinct, throughout life, to seek proximity to a specific person who will comfort, protect and/or help organize one’s feelings.

  • Bonding: Care-giving behavior. An instinct to monitor a specific person and to comfort, protect and/or organize that person’s feelings when necessary.
  • In summary, children attach. Parents/care-givers bond.

4 of 13

Attachment – what it looks like

5 of 13

Negative attachment cycle

6 of 13

Attachment video – “Strange Situation”

7 of 13

Attachment – stages of development

Stage

Name

Age of child

Description

Stage 1

Asocial or Pre-attachment

Birth – 1.5 mos

Response to both social and nonsocial stimuli

Stage 2

Indiscriminate attachment or Attachment-in-the-making

1.6 – 6 mos

Strong preference to human social stimuli, but not to any particular person

Stage 3

Unique or Clear-cut attachment

7 – 18 mos

Separation anxiety for one particular person and growing anxiety for others

Stage 4

Multiple attachment or Reciprocal relationships

18+ mos

Separation anxiety for more than one person but one primary attachment figure

Based on work of Schaffer & Emerson, 1964

Critical stage for forming first attachment!

8 of 13

Types of attachment

  • The 4 types of attachment:

Type

All Kids

Child behaviors

Caregiver Behaviors

Child’s Thoughts

Secure

~60%

  • Feel confident that the attachment figure will be available to meet their needs.
  • Use the attachment figure as a safe base to explore the environment
  • Quick, sensitive and consistent

  • Believes and trusts needs will be met

Insecure:�Avoidant

~10-15%

  • Not distressed when caregiver leaves, does not seek out comfort
  • Prefers environment to caregiver
  • Minimal expression of need

  • Distant, disengaged
  • Needs won’t be met, so finds alternatives (strangers or environment)

Insecure:�Resistant/�Ambivalent

~10-15%

  • Clingy yet inconsolable
  • Keeps an inconsistent caregiver available through heightened displays of emotionality and dependence

  • Inconsistent. Sometimes sensitive, sometimes neglectful
  • “I’m mad at you for leaving, never, ever do it again!”
  • “Pull/Push”

Disorganized�(high degree of future psychopathy)

~10-15%

  • Frightened or traumatized by caregiver
  • Angry, depressed; completely passive, non-responsive
  • Extreme and erratic
  • Frightened and frightening
  • Flight, fight or freeze – usually all at once.

9 of 13

Attachment stability

�68-75% correspondence between infant and adult attachment classification (Hazan & Shaver, 1987).

Childhood

Adulthood

Secure

Secure

Distressed when mom leaves, comforted by her return

Comfortable in relationships, able to seek support

Avoidant

Avoidant

Not distressed when mom leaves, does not seek out comfort

High autonomy, emotionally disconnected

Resistant

Preoccupied

Upset at departure but inconsolable

Fears rejection, clingy but inconsolable

10 of 13

Attachment Difficulties

  • 85% of children in foster placement have attachment difficulties.
  • Signs of difficulties:
    • Unexplained withdrawal, fear, sadness or irritability
    • Sad and listless appearance
    • Not seeking comfort or showing no response when comfort is given
    • Failure to smile
    • Watching others closely but not engaging in social interaction
    • Failing to ask for support or assistance
    • Failure to reach out when picked up
    • No interest in playing peekaboo or other interactive games

11 of 13

What can advocates do?

  • Critical attachment age is between the ages of 6 – 18 months.
    • Ensure that there is a consistent “safe haven” attachment figure.
    • Minimize abrupt placement changes as much as possible.
  • ��And remember – “attachment” is a transferable skill once learned. At this phase, it’s more important that the child has formed a successful attachment more so than whom it is with.

12 of 13

Final Conclusions

  • Absence of attachment to caregivers is extremely rare and typically observed only among children who have had insufficient time to develop attachment relationships (e.g. due to recent placement in a new caregiving arrangement, like foster care) or among the very few children who have not had sufficient opportunities to identify any caregiver as familiar (e.g. due to institutional rearing.)�
  • Convergent evidence suggests that each attachment relationship is important, with children gaining benefits from having more than one safe haven.
  • ��Measures to assess attachment quality, when used by trained and certified coders in validated settings, are impressive tools for research on the group-level. Not at the individual child level.

13 of 13

Final Conclusions

  • “There is also likely to be no group of studies that can ever satisfy all of the particulars of an individual custody or child protection dispute. That is, at some point, experts and judges may have to move from the general to the particular, and sometimes even beyond extant data.” (Use of attachment theory should be in conjunction with other theories. Not by itself.)
  • �One data point (or even a number over a brief period of time) is not enough to evaluate attachment at the individual child level.�
  • Continuity of familiar "good enough" care is important in child development; every effort should made in child welfare to reduce unnecessary moves and abrupt moves from one home to another for whatever reason. �
  • Placement instability harms children's development. Child welfare agencies that cannot stabilize a child in a foster placement may be doing more harm than good to a child's development.