1 of 16

Multi-Criteria Analysis for the assessment of risk mitigation strategies:

from the single risk to the multi-risk approach

Simona Muratori - Poliedra

Daniela Molinari - Polimi

Alice Gallazzi - Polimi

2 of 16

Single risk approach MCA procedure for the assessment of flood risk mitigation measures

Multi risk approach Flood, Drought, Earthquake, Volcano, Landslide

3 of 16

SINGLE RISK PROCEDURE DEVELOPMENT

LITERATURE ANALYSIS

EXPERTISE

DEFINITION OF THE MCA PROCEDURE STRUCTURE

  • PROCEDURE STEPS AND FLOW CHART
  • ATTRIBUTES to be considered at each step
  • INDICATORS to assess the attributes

TEST ON 3 CASE STUDIES at different levels of design

  • check of the procedure structure
  • check of the attributes
  • Identification of indicators

4 of 16

Design level?

preliminary

final

PROCEDURE 1

PROCEDURE 2

NO

YES

Final design financed

NO

YES

Realization financed

PROCEDURE FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF FLOOD RISK MITIGATION MEASURES – STEP0

5 of 16

PROCEDURE FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF FLOOD RISK MITIGATION MEASURES

STEP1 – PROJECT QUALITY

STEP2 – FEASIBILITY AND RELIABILITY

STEP5 – STRATEGIC ASSESSMENT

STEP4 – ENVIRONMENTAL & SOCIAL IMPACTS

STEP3 – FLOOD RISK MITIGATION

no

no

no

no

no

yes

yes+

yes+

yes

yes+

6 of 16

MULTI-RISK APPROACH WITHIN THE RETURN PROJECT

Defining national guidelines for the evaluation of the effectiveness of alternatives of intervention in natural risks management, by considering in detail Multi Criteria Analysis

by characterizing intervention alternatives, in terms of:

  • A set of technical, economic, cultural (social, ethical, legal), and environmental attributes and indicators
  • Spatial and temporal scale of analysis.

- multi-risk context

- different phases of the risk chain

- structural and non- structural measures

The reference context is a coexistence of different risks; we do not consider the dynamics of a single event

The evaluation is always carried out ex-ante to assess the effectiveness of an intervention strategy 🡪 definition of indicators

7 of 16

STARTING POINT THE MCA FLOWCHART

8 of 16

STARTING POINT THE MCA FLOWCHART

The matrix “Hazards-Impacts” as foundation for implementing MCA in natural risk management

9 of 16

Matrix hazards-impacts

Abacus of alternatives

Performance matrix

Characterization of interventions in terms of phase, spatial and temporal scale of effectiveness, and risk reduction (in a multi-risk context)

Definition of attributes and indicators significant for Multi-Criteria Analysis (MCA) purposes

Definition of exposed elements and expected impacts (attributes and their respective indicators)

METHODOLOGY

10 of 16

Individual well- being

Built environment

Public services

Environmental systems

Communities

Businesses activities

Financial system

Direct and indirect impact on physical and mental health, displacement of people and disruption of socio-economic well-being of individuals

Physical and economic impact on on built environment, from residential, production and cultural use, to infrastructure building

Economic impact of production factors, including industrial, agricultural, cultural and touristic activities

Impact on public services availability that does not have a pure physical component

Impact on ecosystems and natural biodiversity

Impact on the capacity of the population to identify as part of a community

Impact on the credit worthiness and reputation of companies

CLASSIFICATION OF THE EXPOSED ELEMENTS

Matrix Hazards -Impacts

11 of 16

DEFINITION OF ATTRIBUTES AND INDICATORS FOR INDIVIDUAL RISK

Matrix Hazards -Impacts

12 of 16

DEFINITION OF ATTRIBUTES AND INDICATORS FOR INDIVIDUAL RISK

Individual well-being

Deaths and injuries

Impact on physical and mental health

Affected people

Impact on economic well-being

Built environment

Damage to private commercial assets

Damage to private industrial assets

Damage to private agricultural assets

Damage to public assets

Damage to liefelines

Damage to cultural heritage

Damage to non-productive private assets

Businesses activities

Impact on primary sector

Impact on secondary sector

Impact on tertiary sector

Public services

Disruption of public utility services

Disruption of utility services

Impact on emergency cost

Environmental systems

Impact on surface hydrosphere

Impact on underground hydrosphere

Impact on geosphere

Impact on atmosphere

Impact on biosphere

Communities

Impact on society

Impact on cultural identity

Financial system

Impact on financial stability

Impact on economic reputation/worthiness

Matrix Hazards -Impacts

  • “common patterns” in expected damages to support the standardization of the MCA process
  • specificities of individual hazards

MERGE/ADAPTATION TO MULTI-RISK CONTEXT

13 of 16

DEFINITION OF ATTRIBUTES AND INDICATORS FOR INDIVIDUAL RISK

TWO-LEVEL ATTRIBUTES

Individual well-being

Deaths and injuries

Impact on physical and mental health

Affected people

Impact on economic well-being

Deaths

Injuries

Impact on infectious diseases

Impact on mental health problem

Impact on respiratory diseases

Impact on eye diseases

Impact on skin diseases

Directly affected people

Indirectly affected people

Evacuated people

Relocated people

Impact on consumption costs

Impact on employment/income

Impact on poverty

Matrix Hazards -Impacts

14 of 16

DEFINITION OF ATTRIBUTES AND INDICATORS FOR INDIVIDUAL RISK

ONGOING/NEXT STEPS

1. Definition of indicators for the Italian context (data, evaluation method, metric)

- based on available (free) data

- spatial scales: Sub-municipality, Municipality, Multi-municipality, National, Global

- quantitative (when possible)

- use of proxy

2. Link with abacus of alternatives

3. Definition of the MCA procedure and methodology

15 of 16

SIMONA MURATORI

POLIEDRA

+39 02 2399 2908

simona.muratori@polimi.it

www.poliedra.polimi.it

facebook.com/consorziopoliedra

linkedin.com/company/consorzio-poliedra

twitter.com/cpoliedra

Contact details

16 of 16