1 of 19

Laura Davies

Assistant Director, Senior Lecturer of EAP at Duke Kunshan University

Duke Kunshan University

Integrating Generative AI within EAP Pedagogy: Strategies to Reduce the Cognitive Load

2 of 19

Overview

  • The Context

  • Opportunities: How GenAI was used

  • Implementation challenges and suggestions for improvement

  • Final thought

3 of 19

Context

4 of 19

Context

  • Sino-US JVU, access to internal ChatGPT tool
  • 2.5 hours p/w, 12 students, Chinese L2 English users
  • EAP course – first year students, 17 professors
  • 7-week schedule, session 3
  • Community-Based Learning (CBL) project
  • Team research project (assignment)
    • NOT a research methods class.

5 of 19

Key Points

Important!

NOT the first encounter with GenAI

Essential:

Raise awareness of ethics & self-directed learning

Need:

Promote the efficiency of using GenAI

    • offset the cognitive load
    • 7-week course

Understand:

Promote the effectiveness of using GenAI – Bloom’s Taxonomy

Support:

Provide appropriate scaffolding/ guidance

Choice:

Create space for autonomy

    • Not used by all instructors (17 total)
    • Student-experimentation with input
    • Student-driven critique and enhancement

6 of 19

OPPORTUNITIES

7 of 19

What and Why

The Problem

  • Time: 7-week schedule
  • Timeline: National holiday conflict
  • Need to develop an ethical understanding of using such tools

Learning Objective

  • Primary data collection – survey development
  • Community-based learning –
    • Engaging the local community partner
    • High School students
    • English L2
  • Ethics of using AI

8 of 19

Two Examples of Ethics

The Garbage Bin

The Internal Platform

9 of 19

What we did and why

10 of 19

Task Example:

Understanding and analyzing

Examining prompts, experimenting with AI

Application

Experiment and generate example survey questions (practice)

Evaluation and Creation

Critique generated survey questions, enhance them

“offsetting the cognitive load” – not starting from the beginning

Analyze

Pilot survey

Creation

Enhance and finalize survey questions

Understand

Additional resources

11 of 19

Task Example:

  • Select the ‘right’ tool: accessible, safe
  • APPLY: Give the AI clear instructions
  • ANALYZE: Compare input prompts and results – enhance cognition
  • EVALUATE: Critique generated results, make recommendations for change, discuss, pilot
  • CREATE: The final survey

12 of 19

Task Example:

  • Ask DKU’s Local Chat GPT tool (assessable through the intranet) to create survey questions for your research question.

  • Ask the AI tool to create survey questions for you by typing in your instructions. See the template below:

  • [Please create survey questions to gather data about [your research question)]

13 of 19

Task Example:

14 of 19

CHALLENGES

15 of 19

Implementation Challenges and Suggestions for Improvement

  • “Allow” use much earlier and with more frequency

  • Further scaffolding:
    • Enhance AI instructions (following a framework)

  • (Possibly) create, generate, compare and enhance survey questions (time dependent)

  • Potential to examine greater range of AI tools

16 of 19

CONCLUSION

17 of 19

Final Thought

We need to be experimental and teachable

18 of 19

Bibliography

Bearman, M., Dawson, P., Ajjawi, R., Tai, J., and Bowd D. Eds. Re-imagining University Assessment in a Digital World. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41956-1

Bloxham, S., & Campbell, L. (2010). Generating dialogue in assessment feedback: exploring the use of interactive cover sheets. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), 291-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602931003650045

Speicher, S. (2022, December). AI Assignments: 10 best practices for higher Ed instructors. ACUE. https://acue.org/blog/unlocking-human-ai-potential-10-best-practices-for-ai-assignments-in-higher-ed/

19 of 19

Thank you for Listening

Are there any questions?

Laura Davies

Assistant Director, Senior Lecturer of EAP at Duke Kunshan University

Laura.davies@dukekunshan.edu.cn