1 of 31

TRANSFUSION TRANSMISSIBLE INFECTIONS AMONG BLOOD DONORS FROM A SUB-HIMALAYAN RURAL TERTIARY CARE CENTRE IN DARJEELING, INDIA��(RUPALI MANDAL , KRISHNENDU MONDAL)

PRESENTED BY : DENNLIE LESLIE

MLT U29

2 of 31

INTRODUCTION

  • Transfusion therapy has been mainstay of several medico-surgical therapeutics since 1930 .
  • 3 types of blood donors :

a) voluntary/unpaid donor

b) family/replacement donor

c) paid donor

3 of 31

INTRODUCTION

  • According to WHO Global Database on Blood Safety (GSBS) 2008 , total around 91.8 million blood donations are collected annually.

  • With almost 9.8 millions units of yearly collections and 84% voluntary donors , India is expected to bang on the WHO target of 100% voluntary donors by 2020.

4 of 31

INTRODUCTION

  • Blood transfusion aggravates the risk of transfusion-transmissible infections (TTIs) like Hepatitis B (HBV) , Hepatitis C (HCV) , and Human Imunodeficiency Virus (HIV).

  • Globally , HbsAg prevalence varies between 0.1 and 11.7 %. Amongst Indian general population and blood donors, it lingers within 2-8% and 1-2% respectively.

5 of 31

INTRODUCTION

  • Accordingly , worldwide 0.4-19.2% blood donors test positively for HCV and a low cumulative HCV prevalence below 2% has been reported from this country .

  • As for 2009 , around 2.5 million Indians were infected with HIV. Succumbing to a prevalence of 0.3 % , India presently stands third on planet, in numerical terms of HIV-infected people.

6 of 31

INTRODUCTION

  • Darjeeling district in India has a high HIV prevalence of >1% much higher than national distribution .

  • Despite that ,very little is learnt about the seroprevalence of HIV and others TTIs among blood donors here.

7 of 31

MATERIALS & METHODS

  • Study was executed in Department of Blood bank, North Bengal Medical College & Hospital , Darjeeling , India.

  • Various immunological screening methods were performed on all donated samples for HIV-1 & 2 , HBsAg, HCV (by ELISA) , and syphilis (by VDRL) .

8 of 31

MATERIALS & METHODS

  • Data from three consecutive years of 2010-2012 was retrieved from various documents maintained by blood bank authority.

9 of 31

MATERIALS & METHODS

10 of 31

MATERIALS & METHODS

Age and sex distribution of blood donors in three years (2010-2012)

11 of 31

MATERIALS & METHODS

12 of 31

RESULTS

  • Total of 28,364 donors were screened during the period of January 2010 to December 2012.

  • Most of the donors were aged 35 years or less , and a mere 4.27% (1210) donors were living beyond their mid-forties.

  • Male were the dominant cohort , while female constituted only 10.04% (2847) of the study population .

13 of 31

RESULTS

    • Total of 476 blood donation camp were arranged, which collectively compiled 20985 (73.98%) voluntary donations .

    • Astonishingly, the voluntary donors’ strength drastically declined in 2012 than its yesteryears, which actually reflected the reduction in donation camps instituted that years .

14 of 31

RESULTS

15 of 31

RESULTS

  • As a whole 832 seropositive donors were identified corresponding to a summed-up seroprevalence of 2.93% .

  • Seroprevalence of HIV, HBV, HCV, and syphilis among studied donors were 0.42% (118) , 1.24% (353), 0.62% (175) , and 0.65% (185) respectively .

16 of 31

RESULTS

17 of 31

RESULTS

  • The overall seroprevalence of TTIs was significantly more pronounced among replacement donors (3.28%) than their voluntary (2.81%)counterparts .

18 of 31

RESULTS

19 of 31

RESULTS

  • Altogether the highest prevalence for each TTI was observed in the 26-35 years age group , followed by the 36-45 years age group.

  • Seropositivity among discussed donors dipped lowest for the >45 years age group.

20 of 31

DISCUSSION

  • Blood transfusion is a life-saving integral remedy in current medical practices, but also carries contemporary risk of transmitting dreadful TTIs like HIV , Hepatitis B and C .

  • The overall seroprevalence of various TTIs among studied donors figured out as 2.93 % (Table 2) with a significant dwinding trend over successive years, which intimately stimulated previous observations by Mathai et al (3.1%) , Karmakar et al (2.79%) , and Koshy et al (2.9%) .

21 of 31

DISCUSSION

  • The infectivity of HBV, HCV, HIV and syphilis amongst Indian donors has been documented as 0.66-12%, 0.5-1.5%, 0.084-3.87% and 0.85-3% respectively.

  • HBV was the most frequent (1.24%) TTI encountered in presently concluded study, recapitulating earlier Indian literatures accomplished in similar context.

22 of 31

DISCUSSION

  • Mathai et al , Gupta et al , and Koshy et al encountered HCV as the commonest TTI in their respective studies.

  • On the contrary , 0.62% subjects were tested reactive for HCV , which lagged third behind HBV and syphilis in the list of TTIs. Chattoraj et al also experienced identical order of seropredominance among their examined donor.

23 of 31

DISCUSSION

  • Serological evidence for syphilis turned to be affirmative in 0.65% of currently studied donations . Gupta et al encountered higher of 0.85% syphilis patients in their observed group.

  • Although HIV-prevalence in Darjeeling (1%) is much higher than whole Indian (0.3%) scenario . Still HIV-seroprevalence in discussed donors was quantified as 0.42% only, least of the chief four TTIs.

24 of 31

DISCUSSION

  • In this on-going study most of the donors were males and the seroreactivity for HBsAg and VDRL was found to be significantly higher among males.

  • Such gender variation in seroresponsiveness could be attributed to their heterogeneous risk-behavior.

25 of 31

DISCUSSION

  • Koshy et al noted most of their studied seropositive donor to be aged between 18-30 years while Karmakar et al noted donor from 21-40 years age group . In the present study , most of the infected donor are from 26-35 years age group .

  • In the earlier study, RD frequently out-numbered the VD. Whatsoever in correspondence to existing worldwide trend, VD were profusely predominant in discussed study population.

26 of 31

CONCLUSION

  • This study highlight that blood transfusion is one of the major modes to contact HIV, HBV, HCV and syphilis.

  • Males as much as the voluntary donors overwhelmingly predominate the donor subpopulation in modern world.

  • HBV is the most and HIV is the least common TTIs affecting blood donors .

27 of 31

CONCLUSION

  • Therefore :
    1. immaculate eligibility criteria should be adopted while selecting blood
    2. Augments the pool of voluntary donors
    3. Increase the feminine participation in nationalized blood donation campaign.

28 of 31

National Blood Centre�Prevalence of TTIs among blood donors in PDN

Statistic

TTIs

YEARS

TOTAL

(N=549891)

2016 (N=180051)

2017

(N=180650)

2018

(N=189190)

HBsAg

220 (0.12%)

183 (0.10%)

373 (0.20%)

776 (0.14%)

HIV

279 (0.15%)

258 (0.14%)

205 (0.11%)

742 (0.13%)

HCV

314 (0.17%)

271 (0.15%)

535 (0.28%)

1120 (0.20%)

Syphilis

210 (0.12%)

212 (0.11%)

249 (0.13%)

671 (0.12%)

TOTAL

1023 (0.57%)

924 (0.51%)

1362 (0.72%)

3309 ( 0.60%)

29 of 31

National Blood Centre

  • Based on NBC’s statistic , a total of 180051, 180650 and 189190 of blood donation are collected in 2016 , 2017 ,and 2018 respectively .

  • As a whole 3309 seropositive donors were identified corresponding to a summed-up seroprevalence of 0.60% .

  • Seroprevalence of HIV, HBV, HCV, and syphilis among studied donors were 0.13%, 0.14%, 0.20%, and 0.12% respectively .

30 of 31

National Blood Centre

  • HCV is the most and syphilis is the least common TTIs affecting blood donors in National Blood Centre for the 3 consecutives years .

  • This study also shows an increasing prevalence from 2016 to 2018 . Therefore, more awareness campaigns among community should be done and immaculate eligibility criteria should be adopted while selecting blood .

31 of 31