1 of 24

Inclusive and Culturally Competent Pedagogy in the Earth Sciences

2 of 24

Zoom Protocol

  • Please mute your microphone
  • Turn on your video if possible - to promote a more connected community.
  • Unless called upon, please use the raise hand function to contribute questions or opinions
  • Use the chat freely to add to discussion or amplify points

3 of 24

Who are we?

A group of graduate students who are interested in inclusive, culturally competent, and anti-racist pedagogy. We want to learn more about this practice with our Lamont community.

Nathan Lenssen

Clara Chang

Julian Spergel

Jonathan Lambert

4 of 24

How did this workshop come to be?

This is a 6-month collaborative effort with the Columbia Center for Teaching and Learning.

A big thank-you to Ian Althouse from the Center for Teaching and Learning!

5 of 24

What is the purpose of this workshop?

We hope you will…

  • Continue learning and working towards understanding broadly inclusive pedagogy practices.
  • Critically review your own course material for this coming semester.
    • Consider concrete tools mentioned today
  • Self reflect on your teaching practices to continually develop an inclusive, culturally competant, and anti-racist classroom environment.
  • Connect with colleagues interested in learning more about inclusive pedagogy.

6 of 24

Schedule

Breakout rooms: Introductions

Discussion of workshop context and definitions

Large group reflections

Breakout rooms case studies (30 minutes)

Break

Breakout rooms syllabi (30 minutes)

Large group reflections

Wrap up

7 of 24

Code of Conduct

  • Treat others with respect and consideration
  • Be considerate, collegial, and collaborative
  • Communicate openly, with civil attitudes, critiquing ideas rather than individuals.
  • Avoid personal attacks.
  • Do not engage in harassment, intimidation, bullying, or discrimination in any form.
  • Avoid all slurs.
  • Do not make verbal comments related to gender, sexual orientation, disability, physical appearance, body size, race, religion, or national origin.

Modified from the AAPI in Geoscience code of conduct, based on the GSA code of conduct

8 of 24

Introduce Yourself to your Breakout Rooms (5 minutes)

Introduce yourself (~30 seconds) and share your answer to Question 2.5 from the HW:

What action(s) that anyone (teacher or student) took during the course did you find most affirming or helpful?

9 of 24

Why do we care?

Results found that students in the courses with increased cultural relevancy experienced a 30% increase in the science learning content and underrepresented minority students were eight times more likely to earn an ‘A’. (Lee, 2020).

Bernard and Cooperdock, 2018

10 of 24

Some helpful (and imperfect) definitions

Inclusive Pedagogy

A philosophy of teaching that provides equal opportunities for all students to have a successful learning experience (Sheridan Center for Teaching and Learning, 2017)

Culturally responsive pedagogy

Culturally responsive teaching is defined as using the cultural characteristics, experiences, and perspectives of ethnically diverse students as conduits for teaching them more effectively. It is based on the assumption that when academic knowlege and skills are situated on the lived experiences and frames of reference of students, they are more personally meaningful, have higher interest appeal, and are learned more easily and thoroughly (Gay, 2000).

11 of 24

Some helpful (and imperfect) definitions

Antiracist:

One who is expressing the idea that racial groups are equals and none need developing, and is supporting policy that reduces racial inequity
 (Ibram X. Kendi)

Anti-racist pedagogy

Anti-racist pedagogy is an intentional and strategic organizing effort in which we incorporate anti-racist approaches into our teaching as well as apply anti-racist values into our various spheres of influences. It requires the professors humility, critical reflection of our social position, and commitment as we begin and continue to confront our internalized racial oppressional or internalized racial superiority and how those impact our teaching, research, and work in the university and community (Kishimoto, 2018)

12 of 24

Menti Response 1

What is one thing you have learned from the Kishimoto (2018) paper?

What is one thing you still have questions about?

www.menti.com

51 20 63 2

13 of 24

Introduction to Case study

Let’s look at one professor’s method of incorporating these culturally-responsive concepts:

Dr. Annette Lee, Lakota and Ojibwe, Associate Professor of Astronomy & Physics at St. Cloud State University (SCSU).

*Watched video clip from Dr. Lee which discusses Lakota knowledge in relation to the Thunderbird constellation and astronomical processes*

14 of 24

Breakout Rooms: Case Study

Now, we will sort you into breakout rooms for 30 minutes to complete a case study.

Link to case study

15 of 24

Take a 5 minute break

16 of 24

Inclusive Pedagogy and Course Climate

Inclusive pedagogy promotes a learning experience that is meaningful, relevant, and accessible to all (Hocking, 2010).

Part of delivering this learning experience is promoting a positive course climate, which is “...the intellectual, social, emotional, and physical environment in which students learn.” (Ambrose et al., 2010, p. 170).

Course climate is influenced by aspects of the course such as the syllabus, curricula, assessments, etc.

17 of 24

Intro: Inclusive and Student-Centered Syllabi

The syllabus particularly influences course climate before the course has convened and on “syllabus day”

A student-centered syllabus contributes to a positive course climate and is associated with better relationships between students and teachers, as well as increased motivation, achievement, and empowerment (Richmond, 2016)

18 of 24

Breakout Rooms: Syllabus Analysis

Now, we will sort you into breakout rooms for 20 minutes to use modified elements from Richmond (2016) to assess your own syllabus. You may assess the HIST 332 syllabus if you do not have a syllabus handy.

  1. Take some quiet time for 5-8 minutes to use the table on Page 1 of this PDF and explore the example syllabus additions on Page 2
  2. Discuss questions/comments about the table and example changes
  3. (If time allows at the end) take a few minutes to individually strategize ways to incorporate some of these practices into your syllabus

19 of 24

Menti Reflection 2

What is one thing you learned today?

What is one thing you may change in your syllabus or teaching this semester?

www.menti.com

51 20 63 2

20 of 24

Continuing Efforts

Poll in zoom on how we want to continue

21 of 24

Critical Incident Questionnaire

  • “A critical incident is an unplanned and unanticipated event that occurs during a lesson and that serves to trigger insights about some aspect of teaching and learning” (Richards and Farrell, 2010)�
  • (Brookfield 1990) provides a 5-question survey to identify critical incidents and “see the classroom through the students’ eyes”�
  • The reflection pre-assignment was a modified version of this questionnaire!

22 of 24

Critical Incident Questionnaire + Feedback

23 of 24

Further Resources

Note: use your lion mail (columbia.edu) email to access this

24 of 24

Thank you!