1 of 28

Coastal Wetland Restoration a Nature Based Decarbonization Multi-Benefit Climate Mitigation Solution

UC-Labs Award L22CR4529 Internet: Eduroam or UCSC Guest

Kickoff Meeting – April 15, 2022 Zoom: Join Zoom Meeting

Parking: SM9973https://ucsc.zoom.us/j/93918104409?pwd=U2hOWnhieEFQMjZZRWczSXlGNmtMZz09

2 of 28

AGENDA

10-10:30 - Coffee and welcome

10:30-11:00 - Introductions -�

11:00-11:30 - Project goals and work packages - Paytan

11:30-11:45 - Physical Science Overview - Paytan, Pett-Ridge, Arias-Ortiz

11:45-12:00 - Social Science Overview - Arnold, Matthew, Seto, Plantinga

12:00-12:15 - Modeling Overview - Mekonen, Moulton

12:15-12:30 - Education and Outreach - Paytan

12:30-1:30 - Lunch �

1:30-2:30 - Break Groups (Physical Science, Social Science, Modeling)�

2:30-2:45 - Project Integration - Arora

2:45-3:00 - Discussion/Questions

3 of 28

Introductions

Name

Institute/Department

Area of Research

Role in the Project

Something that happened in the world the year you were born

4 of 28

Motivation

Effective restoration and management of coastal wetlands can help decrease atmospheric greenhouse gas (GHG) concentrations and slow climate change (nature-based decarbonization solution) while providing additional ecosystem services to coastal communities.

Implementing wetland restoration for decarbonization is not trivial as it involves complex natural and social considerations

5 of 28

Goals

This project seeks to provide policy and management guidelines that will maximize C sequestration in coastal wetland, while ensuring social and environmental justice and ecological sustainability (co-benefits for humans and nature).

We will use the information/data/results to construct a set of recommendation that will enable wetland restoration projects to consider C sequestration in their design/management.

6 of 28

Outcomes

The project will assess the natural and human dynamics relevant for including coastal wetland restoration as a decarbonization solution, harnessing blue-carbon nature-based solutions that also offer adaptation opportunities and enhance community resilience and environmental justice to safeguard livelihoods in the face of climate change.

7 of 28

Work Packages

8 of 28

Field Sites

Diverse coastal wetlands where eddy covariance towers are operational allowing for constraining carbon budget. Sites with restoration project ongoing that focused on different ecosystem services and involve different communities and stakeholders.

9 of 28

(1) Obtain quantitative information on natural below ground and above ground processes that control C cycling in coastal wetlands and quantify net C sequestration across a range of representative environmental conditions. Outcomes: Data to improve models and inform the design of restoration and conservation guidelines that address multiple benefits including C sequestration.

(2) Quantify the economic value of C storage and other ecosystem services from coastal wetlands. Outcomes: economic C tracking guidelines and assessment of the value of C storage and other ecosystem services.

(3) Evaluate barriers and opportunities within current C policy and management that impact the use of wetland restoration as nature-based solution for combating climate change. Outcomes: a policy and governance framework that can facilitate effective design and implementation of restoration projects.

(4) Assess impacts and benefits of coastal wetland restoration practices and policy on coastal communities. Outcomes: adaptation guidelines and priorities that enhance community resilience and improve environmental equity, helping to safeguard livelihoods in the face of climate change.

(5) Use the ecosys and ATS models to investigate how different coastal wetland restoration options and projected climate change scenarios (sea level and temperature rise) will impact net C sequestration potential of coastal wetlands. Outcomes: enhancement of current ecosystem and earth system models to include coastal wetlands.

(6) Develop and teach a climate and data literacy course for UC undergraduate students and develop teaching modules for high school students and distribute relevant information materials on wetlands, C, and climate. Outcomes increase climate and data literacy of students and awareness of the broader community.

How

10 of 28

11 of 28

Timeline

Kickoff Meeting – Introduction, tools and work plans

To ensure continues communication and exchange

Monthly WP meetings

Quarterly WP lead meetings

Quarterly webinars (workshop on mentoring this quarter)

Annual all participant meeting

Conference participation (Delta, AGU)

Project Website (student or postdoc)

Field work C dynamics -

Ecosystem Services -

Policy, Governance and Social Justice -

Modeling -

12 of 28

Physical Science – C Budget

 

 

13 of 28

Sub surface processes –

Porewater Chemistry

Carbon burial (wt% C, MAR)

Soil and landscape properties

Pore water properties

Microbial community

14 of 28

15 of 28

Porewater Reaction Transport Model

16 of 28

Above surface processes –

eddy covariance gas exchange

17 of 28

The carbon balance in a wetland

18 of 28

3 restored tidal wetlands

5 restored nontidal wetlands

3 Agricultural/pasture sites

Salinity gradient

San Francisco Bay-Delta

1 historic tidal wetland

19 of 28

Eddy Covariance

20 of 28

Most agricultural sites are strong sources of GHG

21 of 28

Wetlands can be sinks of GHG but there is high interannual variability

22 of 28

Coastal wetland can be large sources of CH4

23 of 28

Radiative forcing of wetland restoration

Arias-Ortiz et al. 2021

24 of 28

Atmospheric Carbon Fluxes at Eden Landing and Rush Ranch

  • Average annual removal of CO2= 407.4 g C-CO2 m-2 yr-1 (SD= 47.1)
  • Average Annual emission of CH4 = 0.6 g C-CH4 m-2 yr-1 (SD=0.3)
  • Average Annual removal of CO2= 287.3 g C-CO2 m-2 yr-1 (SD= 94.5)
  • Average Annual emission of CH4 = 0.91 g C-CH4 m-2 yr-1 (SD=0.3)

25 of 28

Estimating Net Ecosystem Balance

Rush Ranch (US-Srr) and Eden Landing (US-Edn)

Combining soil sediment, lateral and atmospheric carbon fluxes to estimate NECB

Bogard et al. 2020 US-Srr

  • Atmospheric removal = -255 g C m-2 y-1
  • Lateral export = 105 g C m-2 y-1

Arias-Ortiz et a. 2021 US-Edn

  • Atmospheric removal= 386 g C m-2 y-1
  • Soil organic carbon = 70 g C m-2 y-1
  • Estimated Lateral export= 316 g C m-2 y-1

26 of 28

Long-term measurements

US-Myb Annual budgets: nontidal managed wetland, decreasing CH4 emissions with time

Matsumura et al. in prep

27 of 28

Ecosystem Services -

Policy, Governance and Social Justice -

Modeling -

Integration -

28 of 28

Logistics

Looking for qualified PhD students and postdocs for the project

Payee 204 form

Post Travel Expense form refer to

Trip #V0131504

https://financial.ucsc.edu/Financial_Affairs_Forms/Post_Travel_Expense.pdf