1 of 26

CEIMVEN: An Approach of Cutting Edge Implementation of Modified Versions of EfficientNet (V1-V2) Architecture for Breast Cancer Detection and Classification from Ultrasound Images

Paper ID- 85

Presenter:

Sheekar Banerjee

Senior AI & ML Engineer, KaleidoSoft, Zagreb, Croatia

Research Advisor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, IUBAT

Co-author:

Md. Kamrul Hasan Monir

AI & ML Engineer, KaleidoSoft, Zagreb, Croatia

2 of 26

Contents

  • Introduction
  • Related Works
  • Dataset
  • Proposed Method
  • Results & Accuracies
  • Conclusion & Future Endeavors

3 of 26

Breast cancer is cancer that develops from breast tissue.

Image Source: Nevit Dilmen

Introduction

4 of 26

Breast Ultrasound Imagery

Image Source: DenseBreast info INC. and Dr. Ellen Mendelson

5 of 26

  • Automatic breast tumor screening of mammographic images with optimal convolutional neural network (2022)

  • Used BreakHis Dataset
  • Multi-layered CNN
  • Maximum 95.81 % of Accuracy

Literature Review

6 of 26

  • MultiNet: A deep neural network approach for detecting breast cancer through multi-scale feature fusion (2022)

  • VGG16, DenseNet-201 and NasNet-Mobile
  • Maximum 96.01 % of Accuracy

Literature Review (Con’t)

7 of 26

  • Multiclass classification of breast cancer histopathology images using multilevel features of deep convolutional neural network

  • Used “Amassed” Dataset
  • Xception’s six intermediate layers
  • Maximum 96.5 % of Accuracy

Literature Review (Con’t)

8 of 26

Motivation

  • Implementing a novel model by modifying the cutting-edge Efficient-Net-V1-V2 architecture.

  • Getting the most accurate possible prediction for breast cancer classification

  • A speedy and quick prediction

  • Testing the prediction of malignant cell with ROI Biomarker.

9 of 26

Dataset

  • Live breast ultrasound images.

  • 600 female patients, aged between 25 and 75.

  • 780 raw images, Augmented into 4500 more replicated images.

  • Al-Dhabyani W, Gomaa M, Khaled H, Fahmy A.: Dataset of breast ultrasound images. Data in Brief. 2020 Feb; 28:104863. DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2019.104863.

10 of 26

Methodology

  • Data Labelling

  • Architecture for modified Efficient-Net-V1

  • Architecture for modified Efficient-Net-V2

  • Model training and hyper-parameter tuning

  • Keras (Backend), Tensorflow JS and TF-Lite

11 of 26

Data Labelling

Masked Image

Raw Image

12 of 26

The architecture of our proposed modified EfficientNet-V1 (b0-b7)

13 of 26

The architecture of our proposed modified EfficientNet-V2 (b0-b3)

14 of 26

EfficientNet Model scaling for our proposed method

15 of 26

Modified Training:

- 5280 Images from the dataset (780 Raw, 4500 Augmented)

- Labeling and Annotating Images

  • Primary Training (20 Layers)

  • 10 Layers for Efficient-Net-V1 (B0-B7)

  • 10 Layers for Efficient-Net-V2 (B0-B3)

- Re-scaling (0.1/255)

- Hyper-parameter Tuning

16 of 26

Result Analysis

Testing the prediction of the classes (benign, malignant and normal)

17 of 26

Result Analysis (Con’t)

Breast cancer cell detection from ultrasound image as “Benign” with 95% confidence, “Malignant” with 96% confidence and “Normal” with 99% confidence.

18 of 26

Result Analysis (Con’t)

Table 1. Modified EfficientNet-V1 models’ average AUC (training, validation) for proposed breast cancer classification:

19 of 26

Result Analysis (Con’t)

Table 2. Modified EfficientNet-V1 models’ average Loss (training, validation) for proposed breast cancer classification:

20 of 26

Result Analysis (Con’t)

Table 3. Modified EfficientNet-V2 models’ average AUC (training, validation) for proposed breast cancer classification:

21 of 26

Result Analysis (Con’t)

Table 4. Modified EfficientNet-V2 models’ average Loss (training, validation) for proposed breast cancer classification:

22 of 26

Result Analysis (Con’t)

Table 5. Accuracies of Prediction and Detection, Precision and Recall rate for each classes:

23 of 26

Limitations

  • Slower Run Time
  • Less amount of GPU
  • Combination of more modified Neural Architecture is necessary
  • Limited Memory Space of Hardware Machinery.

24 of 26

Conclusion & Future Endeavors

  • Expand the boundaries of computer vision algorithmic approach into the field of medical image and deep learning.

  • Focusing to take our research at further level of implementation of new cutting-edge Neural Network Architectures such as: Inception-ResNet-V2, Fast-AI, Dense-Net (121, 169, 201) etc.

25 of 26

Any

Question?

26 of 26

Thank

You!