Therapeutic Photography:
Photo-Projective Techniques – An Autoethnographic Case Study
"It has been suggested that art may tell us more about psychology than psychology could ever tell us about art, so
perhaps photography may uniquely inform us about psychology."
Wheeler (2009)
"The focus is photography as communication - it is not about photographic techniques…. one need not be a photographer to do it. No technical expertise with cameras or photography is necessary. Any camera will do.“
Cluff (2016)
Neil Gibson:
Worked in Social Work and Criminal Justice System
Researcher of Therapeutic photography for 9 years to present
Developed ‘world first’ Therapeutic Photography Post-Graduate CPD Course
(2018)
Judy Weiser:
Psychologist, Art Therapist, Consultant, Lecturer and Teacher
One of the earliest pioneers of PhotoTherapy and Therapeutic Photography
Author of influential book, ‘PhotoTherapy Techniques’ (1993)
Study: Through the windows of the soul: A pilot study using photography to enhance meaning in life
Steger (2013)
Propositioned a new minimal photographic intervention technique involving 86 university students to take 9-12 photographs with a given brief titled, "Things that make your life feel meaningful" that they argue, "...offers rich, deeply personal information as a topic for exploration within therapy."
Their results showed that,
"Significant within-person improvements in levels of meaning in life, life satisfaction, and positive affect were observed following the intervention."
How even ‘minimal photographic interventions can have a positive impact:
Two Approaches:
Therapeutic Photography
And
Photo Therapy
Therapeutic Photography
Photography ‘AS’ therapy ‘OUTSIDE’ of therapy�
Although Gibson writes that an in-depth knowledge of Psychodynamic theory is not essential here, “…an awareness is very useful"
Weiser warns a lack of a “…protective counselling framework in place with which to immediately contain and resolve any emotional consequences that might erupt…”
Consequently…
"...doing Therapeutic Photography by oneself... may precipitate the need for a therapist to help ‘finish’ what has come to light during activities that took place without one!"
Example of Therapeutic Photography using the ‘Photo Voice Technique’
Study: A Snapshot Of My Life: Photovoice Photography Project
Schmid et al (2012)
Recognized a need to address the psychological wellbeing of patient's and families in a Bone Marrow Transplant Unit. Patients between the ages of 5 and 23 photographed their lives in hospital and they concluded, "As a result of the project, a deeper understanding of the emotional impact bone marrow transplant and subsequent treatment has on patients was gained. In addition, the therapeutic relationship between social worker and patient was positively impacted and the medical team gained insight into the psychological impact of treatment."
Photo Therapy
Photography ‘WITHIN’ therapy�
Goals:
Unlike traditional art created within a therapy room – clients have the power to choose which pictures to take, when, where and what to share.
Through building trust – confidence can grow
Positive feedback received can build self-esteem and self-efficacy helping to maintain change
Empowerment - developed by encouraging client in decision making processes (e.g., choosing a theme)
Resilience - developed by encouraging reflection
The Main 5 Photo Therapy Techniques:
Can also be explored in ‘Therapeutic Therapy’
Looking for patterns, themes, symbols, metaphors - bringing these into client awareness
Visual Identify – Perceptions of Self – how clients present themselves to the world
The client has full control in the photo making process
Self-exploration without being watched or judged
Exploring themes of Family, Home and Identity
Helps to explore meanings in life
"...it should be no surprise that photographs will often trigger deep memories and evoke strong feelings, along with related information that has long been buried from conscious recall. Though people rarely stop to think about why and how this happens, this is the main focus and purpose of photo-projective work.“
Weiser (2015) ‘Clients' Photo-Projective Interactions’
Study: The Clinical Use of Photography: A Single Case, Multi-method Study of the Therapeutic Process – (Used Spectro-Cards)
Saita et al (2014)
Concluded that, “… the human mind does not function using only a verbal code” and,
"...the use of Spectro Cards in clinical practice may activate a different and more immediate language, with a stronger symbolic and emotional value, and thus promote clinical improvement. Any kind of photography is able to transmit the concrete and objective reality of the content that is represented (denotative level); however, it engages other symbolic and subjective meanings, given that images are able to stimulate new associations and even very intense emotional reactions (connotative level)."
(Initially Intended) Method:
(Actual) Method:
Why choose my own? – Why not use Specrto-Cards?��A) - it’s mine!
(I made it, it belongs to me, and it represents me)
Why Photography?
B) - it’s grounded in something close to reality
(Kitchen Sink Realism)
Ulla Halkola: Spectro Cards – Photo-Projective Technique developed in 2013
I wanted to apply text but had difficulty thinking of something to write.
Began to feel frustrated with myself over this.
I felt something in the image but couldn’t express it in words, all I had in my head were pictures, colours, sounds, memories, experiences and emotions.
But no words.
I keep trying with words, but I get incredibly annoyed!
Forget the text and move on…
…but how do I ‘project’ and ‘reflect’ without words?
I had to think more in depth about ‘what’ I was projecting and ‘how’
I came to realize my initial ‘projections’ are ‘cultural references’
Projected ‘cultural references’ were a combination of:
So… How can I ‘add in’ these cultural references?
So, I chose to make a video, using the photograph as a ‘base’ in which to ‘house’ these cultural projections.
I set myself some rules.
1 – No longer than 30 seconds (to stop myself from overloading with text)
More Importantly…
2) – Focused on what I ‘projected’ onto the image and tried to ‘add’ these into my ‘construction’
The Final:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tb7qgUTPRfA
Video available to view at:
I created the video relatively quickly, trying to just ‘go with the flow’ of where my mind went without intention of over thinking anything, just letting myself ‘be creative’
Now to ‘Deconstruct’ my own ‘Construction’
I decided to ‘visualize’ this by creating a ‘mind map’, exploring the deeper meanings of the ‘cultural references’ that I’d placed into the images.
Was genuinely amazed by this scene, and wonder how I experienced this as a child…
Perhaps it was more impactful than I remember?
I stayed with this ‘deconstructed mind map’ for a while and felt a bit overwhelmed by it. Not really knowing how to respond to it and struggling to find the words to ‘reflect’ on it. The anxiety I felt whilst writing some of it made me feel like locking it away and turning my back on it.
I began re-reading Roland Bathes theory on photography and came up with the idea of ‘deconstructing’ each element into ‘sign-posts’ as an aid to reflection.
Signpost to:
Directly – Childhood / Education
Indirectly - Identity / Belonging
The Photograph itself.
Projection - Audio
Audio as signpost to:
Connects to the photograph as signpost to:
Projection - Audio
Audio as signpost to:-
Connects to a signpost ‘outside’ of the image
Projection - Film Scene
‘The Never-Ending Story’
Film as signpost to:
Connects to the signpost of:
Projection - Audio – ‘Shhh’ Sound Effect
Audio as signpost to:
I now had 3 sets of data to use for reflection:�
Written Reflection Summary:
Gender:
Shhh Sound:
Comedy:
Lying in school:
Symbolism from films:
Photographing The School:
The ‘Deeper Meaning’ / ‘Emotional Content’ within the Photograph
Through written reflection, I interpret something that suggests a pattern of anger
25th December 1996 - Letter from Child and Adolescent Psychiatrist
On his own Daniel is a delightful and most articulate boy. He was able to give a clear account of the difficulties that he has in the school situation because of his eyesight. He feels very angry at some of the incident in the past and the taunts that he has received, but he does not seem to have any bitterness. In his talk and thoughts, he showed normality in flow, form and content. His mood was euthymic today, but there are days when he becomes very low, which happen frequently. He does have suicidal thoughts and he has dreams in which his fears haunt him. He does have a very real fear of being shot or killed in the end because he is incapable of protecting himself.
Reviewing the experience of the process:
“….Because it's mine and no one can take that away from me.“ why is that so important?
Reviewing the experience of the process:
Questions I asked myself:
Potential Bias:
(Obviously would choose photography, but passionate about it and interested in phototherapy)
(Although guided by photographic theory and practice – phenomenological exploration not encouraged)
(Recognize this, although if some experiences were ‘zoned in on’ might provide wider cultural relevance e.g. children who lie / gender - My experience is also connected to others but aware of ethical implications)
(Readers must accept what is presented is a true representation and reflection - presentation would need expanding upon to evidence patterns)
(Have applied these same techniques to more images, but not comfortable discussing these in greater detail)
As example…