Reflections
T.MacKinnon
Childs,M. 2010. A conceptual framework for mediated environments. Educational Research Vol 2 Issue 52 pp197-213.
contributing factors to experience of mediated environment |
| relevance to Clavier and EWC activity | |
characteristics of participant | degree of naturalisation |
| especially difficult for Clermont students, but also unfamiliarity with VLE use at Warwick |
| tendancy (narrative,immersive etc) |
| individual difference |
roles and conventions | maximising copresense |
| synchronous tools and activities available to reduce this, used mainly by staff. |
| relationship to environment |
| access locations differed French students had access during class time, English students had limited class time and were expected to engage during their own time. |
| relationship to technology |
| technology choices appropriate, no significant technological restraints and support was available. (eg. video clip tutorials) |
learning activity | teaching approach |
| greater diversity as team increases, tasks well designed. |
| teaching technique |
| greater diversity as team increases, staff familiarity with the purpose of the exchange has evolved over time. |
| stage in presence development |
| this was considered in task sequence design, graduating tasks in complexity over time. |
community | trajectory |
| launch event at warwick to raise awareness, institutional publicity in Clermont |
| boundaries |
| open and fluid, this was a fundamental premis. |
presence (situated experience) | mediated presence | the sense of being somewhere else | open - synchronous and asynchronous, language use (French/English) not stipulated, students free to communicate however they felt appropriate and to use media such as images and video. |
| social presence | ability to project oneself | lots of opportunities for informal connections eg. Twitter, FB, FIFA tournament, initial activity centres on creation of a profile. |
| copresence | sense of being together | availability of Instant Messenger and online classroom to increase this, sharing of external activity back into EWC builds visibility of interaction. |
| embodiment |
| profile creation activity, students not restricted in choice of avatar, supported to reflect on appropriacy. |
characteristics of environment | realness |
| institutional platform but with holes in the walls, accpetance that students may prefer their own tools. |
| interactivity |
| tasks designed to promote both formal and informal learning. |
| unobtrusiveness |
| french students had to email in english to get technical support. |
| persistence |
| increased by using communication channels such as Facebook and Twitter |
| communication channels |
| most effective when communcation moves into students' own channels |
| navigation |
| most challenging for french students but also warwick students had to access mahara through Languages@Warwick and cope with a new navigation. |
| narrative |
| aggregation tools (storify, RSS feeds) used to emphasise this in EWC. |
identity | concept of self |
| students were encouraged to discuss as part of setting up profile. |
| representation of self |
| most engaged to some extent and had well developed profiles across networks, reports of continued interaction beyond the end of the course. |
| aspects of self |
| individual difference |