ERASMUS+ project “Transformative Digital Pedagogies for Higher Education” contract Nr. 2022-1-LV01-KA220-HED-000085277 (TDP4HE)
WP2: Theoretical and empirical framework of transformative digital pedagogical competences
Online meeting
O.Vindača, V. Ļubkina
Riga Technical University, Rezekne Academy of Technologies
February 2023
ACTIVITY WP2.2. Development of the TDP4HE project framework
This task consists of producing a theoretical assessment framework that will be used by the academic community in order to self-assess their competence in transformative digital pedagogies. The aim of the framework is to promote a consistency of practice through sharing best examples and will work towards delivering a relevant student-centred pedagogical assessment model. The TDP4HE project framework aims to provide a general reference frame for stakeholders in transformative and innovative pedagogies linked to the use of digital technologies for teaching purposes in higher education. For its purposes it will develop a methodology for transformative digital-pedagogies assessment as well as content of self-assessment tests. The framework will be built according to a hierarchical structure of several proficiency levels where the progression will be cumulative in the sense that each higher-level descriptor will comprise all lower-level descriptors.
Profile of Transformative Digital Pedagogical Competence in HE context (concept of O. Vindača)
TDPC
Teaching
OFFERED CRITERIA for Transfromative Digital Pedagogical Competence
Criteria | Indicators |
1. Learning and Assessment | 1.1. Individual differences of students, personalization |
1.2. Goals and learning outcomes | |
1.3. Study course content | |
1.4. Teaching methods, models and strategies | |
1.5. Assessment and feedback | |
1.6. Reflection | |
2. Research -innovative
| 2.1. Professional engagements |
2.2. Organizational communication | |
2.3. Professional collaboration | |
2.4. Reflective practice | |
2.5. Continuous self/professional development | |
3. Digital | 3.1. Selection of digital resources |
3.2. Creation and modification of digital resources | |
3.3. Management, protection and sharing of digital resources | |
3.4. Empowering learners for effective use of digital resources | |
3.5. Facilitating learner’s digital competence |
1.1. Individual differences of students, personalization (student-centered approach)
1.2. Appropriate goals and learning outcomes [understanding, setting, explaining, reaching, assessing)
1.3. Appropriate study course content, materials (interdisciplinarity)
1.4. Effective teaching methods, models, strategies, learning dynamics
1.5. Effective study environment (including online/in-person)
1.6. Appropriate assessment (types, frequency) and feedback
1.7. Reflection (self-assessment, students’ assessment, peer observation)
1.8. Effective communication/collaboration (team/individual/pair work)
1.9. Facilitating students’ learning (to facilitate this one, not digital competence)
1.10. Continuous teaching/learning development
1.11. Implementation of innovative teaching/learning
1.12. Support in teaching/learning
OFFERED CRITERIA for Transfromative Digital Pedagogical Competence
Criteria | Indicators |
1. Learning and Assessment | 1.1. Individual differences of students, personalization |
1.2. Goals and learning outcomes | |
1.3. Study course content | |
1.4. Teaching methods, models and strategies | |
1.5. Assessment and feedback | |
1.6. Reflection | |
2. Research -innovative
| 2.1. Professional engagements |
2.2. Organizational communication | |
2.3. Professional collaboration | |
2.4. Reflective practice | |
2.5. Continuous self/professional development | |
3. Digital | 3.1. Selection of digital resources |
3.2. Creation and modification of digital resources | |
3.3. Management, protection and sharing of digital resources | |
3.4. Empowering learners for effective use of digital resources | |
3.5. Facilitating learner’s digital competence |
2.1. Continuous self/professional development in research/innovations
2.2. Effective professional practice (collaboration/ communication/ networking/ exchange of ideas/ good practices/ engagement/creativity/ reflection/ commercialization)
OFFERED CRITERIA for Transfromative Digital Pedagogical Competence
Criteria | Indicators |
1. Learning and Assessment | 1.1. Individual differences of students, personalization |
1.2. Goals and learning outcomes | |
1.3. Study course content | |
1.4. Teaching methods, models and strategies | |
1.5. Assessment and feedback | |
1.6. Reflection | |
2. Research -innovative
| 2.1. Professional engagements |
2.2. Organizational communication | |
2.3. Professional collaboration | |
2.4. Reflective practice | |
2.5. Continuous self/professional development | |
3. Digital | 3.1. Selection of digital resources |
3.2. Creation and modification of digital resources | |
3.3. Management, protection and sharing of digital resources | |
3.4. Empowering learners for effective use of digital resources | |
3.5. Facilitating learner’s digital competence |
3.1. Appropriate and effective management of digital resources (selection, use, modification)
3.2. Facilitating effective use of digital resources
Bloom’s Taxonomy for Competence Formation �(adopted from Bloom, concept of O. Vindača)
Learning and Teaching Competence
Level of Progression | Descriptor | |
Indicator 1.1. Individual differences of students, personalization | ||
Level 1 (Basic) | Individual differences of students are considered (speed, special needs, cultural differences); clear understanding of different pedagogical strategies that can support personalization, by applying activities at different levels and speeds; | |
Level 2 (Intermediate) | Individual differences of learners are considered (speed, special needs, cultural differences) and the study process is accordingly adopted by applying corresponding learning activities (brainstorming, concepts mapping, pair-work; group-work, quizzes, games, etc.) that allow learners to proceed at different speeds, select different levels of difficulty and/or repeat activities previously not solved adequately; flexibly adapt strategies to changing circumstances or needs; the analyses are organized afterwards for evaluation of teaching/learning process. | |
Level 3 (Expert) | Individual differences of learners are considered (speed, special needs, cultural differences) and the effective interaction and positive study environment are provided by applying a huge variaty of pedagogical strategies; in case of necessity the individual learning plans are designed, based on detailed analyses and evaluation of teaching/learning process, which allow all students to follow their individual learning needs and preferences; to reflect on, discuss, re-design and innovate pedagogic strategies for personalizing education. | |
Learning and Teaching Competence
Level of Progression | Descriptor | |
Indicator 1.2. Appropriate goals and learning outcomes (understanding, setting, explaining, reaching, assessing) | ||
Level 1 (Basic) | Goals and learning outcomes are clearly considered, defined, directed and guided; all parties involved clearly understand them as they are accordingly explained | |
Level 2 (Intermediate) | Goals and learning outcomes are justified and grounded to enhance pedagogic strategies, basing on analyses, trying to apply effectively | |
Level 3 (Expert) | Goals and learning outcomes are strategically evaluated, fitted, linked together, regularly innovated and renewed according to the higher education trends; to experiment with and develop/create new goals and learning outcomes. | |
Learning and Teaching Competence
Level of Progression | Descriptor | |
Indicator 1.3. Appropriate study course content, materials (interdisciplinarity) | ||
Level 1 (Basic) | Study course content corresponds to the defined goals and learners’ needs (different level content) and is accordance to the specified topics/theme of the individual discourse, considering interdisciplinarity. | |
Level 2 (Intermediate) | Study course content is regularly analysed to promote the development of research-innovative competence of learners and secure research supportive environment, interdisciplinarity aspect is followed. | |
Level 3 (Expert) | Study course content is systematically innovated and renewed; to experiment/evaluate with and develop/create new formats for creation of study course content, new material is developed, following interdisciplinarity principle. | |
Learning and Teaching Competence
Level of Progression | Descriptor | |
Indicator 1.4. Effective teaching methods, models, strategies, learning dynamics | ||
Level 1 (Basic) | The use/apply of corresponding methods, models and strategies according to the defined learning goals and outcomes; to use available classroom technologies. | |
Level 2 (Intermediate) | The use/apply of big variety of methods, models and strategies for providing effective study environment; to use different approaches to increase methodological variation, by conducting regular analyses. | |
Level 3 (Expert) | The purposeful use of methods, models and strategies; teaching methods, models and strategies are systematically innovated, renewed and accordingly updated; to provide a full course of learning modules; to experiment/evaluate and develop/create new formats and pedagogical methods for instruction; to continuously evaluate the effectiveness of different teaching strategies and revise them accordingly. | |
Learning and Teaching Competence
Level of Progression | Descriptor | |
Indicator 1.5. Effective study environment (including online/in-person) | ||
Level 1 (Basic) | The features of online/offline study environment are considered and used/applied accordingly. | |
Level 2 (Intermediate) | The use/apply of big range of options offered by online/offline study environment for effective study process, analyzing features. | |
Level 3 (Expert) | The purposeful use/apply of big range of options offered by online/offline study environment, to experiment and develop/create new formats; to continuously evaluate the effectiveness and revise accordingly. | |
Learning and Teaching Competence
Level of Progression | Descriptor | |
Indicator 1.6. Appropriate assessment (types, frequency) and feedback | ||
Level 1 (Basic) | The use/apply of clear and appropriate assessment and regular feedback (one in semester; once in a study year). | |
Level 2 (Intermediate) | The use/apply of big variety of assessment and regular feedback (one in semester; once in a study year); the use of formative and summative assessment; to adapt assessment tools to support the specific assessment goals; to design assessment tools which are valid and reliable. | |
Level 3 (Expert) | The use/apply of innovative assessment regularly and critically reflected feedback; to use a variety of assessment formats, aligned with content and technology standards, and to be aware of their benefits and drawbacks; to develop/create new formats for assessment, which reflect innovative pedagogic approaches and allow for the assessment of corresponding competence. | |
Learning and Teaching Competence
Level of Progression | Descriptor | |
Indicator 1.7. Reflection (self-assessment, students’ assessment, peer observation) | ||
Level 1 (Basic) | The awareness and use/apply of traditional reflection; to compline an overview on learners’ progress for the further reflection provision. | |
Level 2 (Intermediate) | The awareness and use/apply of regular reflection and its integration to the study process; to remain update on progress and make informed choices on future learning priorities, optional subjects or future studies. | |
Level 3 (Expert) | The use/apply of critically reflective and innovative reflection with further actions planning for the effective study process; to assist learners in identifying areas for improvement and jointly develop/create learning plans to address these areas, based on the evidence available; to reflect on, discuss, re-design and innovate teaching strategies in response to the found evidence, as concerns learners’ preferences and needs as well as the effectiveness of different teaching interventions and learning formats. | |
Learning and Teaching Competence
Level of Progression | Descriptor | |
Indicator 1.8. Effective communication/collaboration (team/individual/pair work) | ||
Level 1 (Basic) | To consider different ways of effective communication and collaboration (team/individual/pair work), to understand the value of communicating and working collaboratively on learning and teaching practice. | |
Level 2 (Intermediate) | To consider various ways of effective communication and collaboration (team/individual/pair work), to understand the value of it, to implement detailed analyses, to apply different methods of collaboration on learning and teaching practices (e.g. face-to-face meetings, online communities of practices, groups on social media, sharing and exchanging documents and other material, etc.). | |
Level 3 (Expert) | To consider the variety of ways of effective communication and collaboration (team/individual/pair work), to implement detailed analyses, to apply different methods of collaboration on learning and teaching practices, additionally to create opportunities for effective communication/ collaboration on issues of learning and teaching and analyse and evaluate the results of these opportunities. | |
Learning and Teaching Competence
Level of Progression | Descriptor | |
Indicator 1.9. Facilitating students’ learning | ||
Level 1 (Basic) | To encourage learners to use digital technologies for information retrieval (on assignments). | |
Level 2 (Intermediate) | To implement learning activities in which learners use ICT for information retrieval; to teach learners how to find information, how to access its reliability, hot to compare and combine information from different sources; to use a range of different pedagogic strategies to enable learners to critically compare and meaningfully combine information from different sources; to teach learners how to quote sources appropriately. | |
Level 3 (Expert) | To reflect critically on how suitable pedagogic strategies are in fostering learners’ information and media literacy and adapt the strategies accordingly; to reflect on, discuss, re-design and innovate pedagogic strategies for fostering learners’ information and media literacy. | |
Learning and Teaching Competence
Level of Progression | Descriptor | |
Indicator 1.10. Continuous teaching/learning development | ||
Level 1 (Basic) | To consider opportunities for continuous teaching and learning development, to plan continuous teaching and learning development by primarily getting information and familiarising themselves with the basic principles of the teaching and learning practices and how to develop them. | |
Level 2 (Intermediate) | To and plan opportunities for continuous teaching and learning development, to analyse these opportunities and apply different activities for continuous teaching/ learning development (e.g. attending courses/ Conferences/ lectures/ seminars/ webinars, taking part in fora to develop their understanding of current trends in teaching and learning, etc.). | |
Level 3 (Expert) | To consider and plan opportunities for continuous teaching and learning development, to analyse these opportunities and apply different activities for continuous teaching/ learning development (e.g. attending courses/ Conferences/ lectures/ seminars/ webinars, taking part in fora to develop their understanding of current trends in teaching and learning, etc.), to create opportunities for continuous teaching/ learning development (e.g. create groups/ fora, establish networks, etc.) and to evaluate the results of these opportunities (e.g. through self-reflection, evaluation of their students’ results, etc.) | |
Learning and Teaching Competence
Level of Progression | Descriptor | |
Indicator 1.11. Implementation of innovative teaching/learning | ||
Level 1 (Basic) | Innovative teaching/ learning practices are considered and understood by academic staff at this level (e.g. latest teaching methods, the use of emerging technologies in teaching and learning, etc.. | |
Level 2 (Intermediate) | Innovative teaching/ learning practices are considered and understood by academic staff (e.g. latest teaching methods, the use of emerging technologies in teaching and learning, etc.. At this level academic staff are also able to analyse and apply innovative teaching and learning practices. | |
Level 3 (Expert) | Innovative teaching/ learning practices are considered and understood by academic staff (e.g. latest teaching methods, the use of emerging technologies in teaching and learning, etc.). Academic staff are also able to analyse and apply innovative teaching and learning practices. Finally, at this level they are also able to evaluate the results of these innovative teaching and learning practices (e.g. through self-reflection, evaluation of their students’ results, etc.). | |
Learning and Teaching Competence
Level of Progression | Descriptor | |
Indicator 1.12. Support in teaching/learning | ||
Level 1 (Basic) | To consider the support aspect in teaching and learning, by taking into account the individualization of the study process try to apply different support activities accordingly
| |
Level 2 (Intermediate) | To consider the support aspect in different dimensions of teaching and learning, by analysing the individualization of the study process different support activities are applied accordingly
| |
Level 3 (Expert) | To consider the support aspect in various dimensions of teaching and learning, by analysing and evaluating the individualization of the study process different support activities are created and applied accordingly.
| |
Research-innovative Competence
Level of Progression | Descriptor | |
Indicator 2.1. Continuous self/professional development in research/innovations | ||
Level 1 (Basic) | to understand opportunities for CPD, to plan for CPD by primarily getting information and familiarising themselves with the basic principles of research /innovation in pedagogy. | |
Level 2 (Intermediate) | to pursue opportunities for CPD. At this level they select, analyse and organise their CPD activities by attending Conferences/ lectures/ seminars/ webinars and taking part in fora to develop their understanding of current trends in research and practice in pedagogy. | |
Level 3 (Expert) | to take full advantage of opportunities for CPD, to evaluate and reflect on CPD and use gained experience to maximise opportunities for networking and collaboration in research and practice. | |
Research-innovative Competence
Level of Progression | Descriptor | |
Indicator 2.2. Effective professional practice (collaboration/ communication/ networking/ exchange of ideas/ good practices/ engagement/creativity/ reflection/ commercialization) | ||
Level 1 (Basic) | to understand different professional practices related to research and innovation, to get informed about opportunities for conducting and disseminating research and practice in various teaching contexts through collaboration and mobility, to consider different reflection tools and methods. | |
Level 2 (Intermediate) | to plan opportunities for professional engagements and sharing of good practices, by identifying gaps in research and practice, making plans for addressing these gaps through research and establishing collaborations towards that direction, to create opportunities for collecting and analysing data for reflection. | |
Level 3 (Expert) | to recognize and exploit opportunities for professional engagement by evaluating research conducted in professional engagements and applying findings and results in other contexts through the creation of opportunities for dissemination and mobility, through these actions to encourage and support networking and exchange of ideas, to evaluate reflection strategies employed in various contexts as well as advise less experienced professionals on how to establish reflection processes and use the findings to improve both theory and practice. | |
Digital Competence
Level of Progression | Descriptor | |
Indicator 3.1. Appropriate and effective management of digital resources (sharing, creation, protection) | ||
Level 1 (Basic) | Managing digital resources using basic strategies; to store and organize digital resources for own future use; to share educational content; to be aware that some resources distributed on the internet are copyrighted. | |
Level 2 (Intermediate) | To share educational content on virtual learning environments or by uploading, linking or embedding it; to effectively protect personal and sensitive content and restrict access; to understand the copyright rules that apply to the digital resources that are used for special purposes. | |
Level 3 (Expert) | To compile comprehensive digital content repositories and make them available to learners or other educators; to apply licenses to the resources published online; professionally publishing self-created content, annotating the resources digitally shared and enabled others to comment, rate, modify, re-arrange or add. | |
Digital Competence
Level of Progression | Descriptor | |
Indicator 3.2. Facilitating effective use of digital resources | ||
Level 1 (Basic) | To use/apply ICT to visualize and explain new concepts in a motivating and engaging way (by animation or video); to employ digital learning activities which are motivating and engaging (games, quizzes). | |
Level 2 (Intermediate) | To put learners’ active use of ICT at the center of the instructional process; to choose the most appropriate tool for fostering learner active engagement in a given learning context or for a specific learning goals and outcome; to use a range of digital technologies to create a relevant, rich and effective digital learning environment; to reflect on how effective the teaching strategies employed are in increasing learner engagement and active learning. | |
Level 3 (Expert) | To select, design, employ and orchestrate the use of ICT within the learning process according to their potential for fostering learners’ active, creative and critical engagement with the subject matter; to reflect on how suitable the different digital technologies are in increasing learners’ active learning and adapt the strategies and choices accordingly; to reflect on, discuss, re-design and innovate pedagogic strategies for actively engaging learners. | |
WP 2.2.
WP2.2. Development of the TDP4HE project framework. Led by RTU, with the participation of UTT and TUDublin. This subtask includes the following activities.
WP 2.2. – Indicators for each partner
TECHNOLOGIKO PANEPISTIMIO KYPROU (E10208024 - CY):
1.8. Effective communication/collaboration (team/individual/pair work)
1.9. Facilitating students’ learning (to facilitate this one, not digital competence)
1.11. Implementation of innovative teaching/learning
2.1. Continuous self/professional development in research/innovations
2.2. Effective professional practice (collaboration/ communication/ networking/ exchange of ideas/ good practices/ engagement/creativity/ reflection/ commercialization)
WP 2.2. – Indicators for each partner
TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY DUBLIN (E10184018 - IE)
1.5. Effective study environment (including online/in-person)
1.9. Facilitating students’ learning (to facilitate this one, not digital competence)
1.12. Support in teaching/learning
3.1. Appropriate and effective management of digital resources (selection, use, modification)
3.2. Facilitating effective use of digital resources
WP 2.2. – Indicators for each partner
RIGA TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY (LV)
1.1. Individual differences of students, personalization (student-centred approach)
1.2. Appropriate goals and learning outcomes [understanding, setting, explaining, reaching, assessing)
1.3. Appropriate study course content, materials (interdisciplinarity)
1.4. Effective teaching methods, models, strategies, learning dynamics
1.6. Appropriate assessment (types, frequency) and feedback
1.7. Reflection (self-assessment, students’ assessment, peer observation)
REFERENCES
1. Kobayashi et al. (2017). Building Academic Staff Teaching Competencies: How Pedagogic Continuous Professional Development for Academic Staff Can Be Organized and Developed in Research-Intensive Universities. In D. S. Kobayashi, Strengthening Teaching and Learning in Research Universities. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-56499-9_5
2. Ruutmann, T. (2020). Effective Tools and Models for Engineering Faculty MasteryTeaching Supporting Meaningful Learning. 2020 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON). EDUCON. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON45650.2020.9125266\
3. Vindaca, O., Lubkina, V. (2020). Transformative Digital Learning in the Context of Higher Education: Definition and Basic Concepts. Rural Environment. Education. Personality. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 13, pp. 177-184. Jelgava, Latvia. https://doi.org/10.22616/REEP.2020.021
4. Vindača, Ļubkina. (2022). TRANSFORMATIONAL CHALLENGES FOR PEDAGOGICAL COMPETENCE: THE PERSPECTIVE OF ACADEMIC STAFF. EDULEARN22, 4-6 July, (pp. 1890-1901). Palma de Malorca, Spain. Retrieved from https://re.public.polimi.it/bitstream/11311/1220453/1/Edulearn%202022_POSTPRINT_compressed.pdf�5. wvdevelopment.org. (n.d.). Introduction to the Competency Development Cycle. Retrieved from https://www.wvi.org/sites/default/files/Introduction_Competency_Development_Cycle.pdf ��
�
Thank You