SAMPLE SIZE CALCULATION
Basic concepts and simplified guide
By
Dr. Mariam Alsayd Awad
Assistant Lecturer of Public Health and Community Medicine/ Damietta Faculty of Medicine/ Al-Azhar University
OUTLINES
Availability of resources sets upper limit of the sample size.
Required accuracy sets lower limit of sample size.
IMPORTANCE OF SAMPLE SIZE ESTIMATION
WHEN NOT TO CALCULATE SAMPLE SIZE?
BASIC INFORMATION NEEDED FOR SAMPLE SIZE�CALCULATION
1. What is the type of study?
2. What is the main (primary) outcome?
BASIC INFORMATION NEEDED FOR SAMPLE SIZE�CALCULATION
3. What is the expected variability between the subjects?
FROM THE ABOVE QUESTIONS WE GET THE FOLLOWING BASIC CONCEPTS IN SAMPLE SIZE CALCULATION
CONFIDENCE INTERVAL
POWER
Power = 1-β
SIGNIFICANCE LEVEL (ALPHA ERROR = TYPE I ERROR)
TYPICAL VALUES FOR SIGNIFICANCE LEVEL AND POWER
EFFECT SIZE
APPROACHES AND PROCEDURES FOR SAMPLE SIZE CALCULATION
SAMPLE SIZE CALCULATION FOR DIFFERENT STUDY DESIGNS
PREVALENCE STUDY (CROSS SECTIONAL SURVEY)
FORMULA (KISH L. 1965)
FORMULA (KISH L. 1965)
Refer to a Table in S.K. Lwanga, S. Lemeshaw 1991, Sample Size Determination in Health Studies, pg 25.
NOTES
COMPARATIVE CROSS-SECTIONAL AND COHORT STUDIES
I want to prove that Indians (ethnicity = risk) are at higher risk of having diabetes mellitus (outcome) compared to other races in Malaysia, using a cross-sectional study.
From literature review, identify the rate of disease and proportion of those with the risk factor.
I want to prove that Indians (ethnicity = risk) are at higher risk of having diabetes mellitus (outcome) compared to other races in Malaysia, using a cross-sectional study.
From literature review, identify the rate of disease and proportion of those with the risk factor.
CASE-CONTROL STUDIES
You want to prove that cataract patients (cases) have a higher rate of diabetes mellitus (risk factor) compared to patients with normal vision (controls).
From literature review, identify the rate of exposure among the cases (i.e. 50%) and among the controls (i.e. 8%). Decide on the ratio; i.e. 1:1
You want to prove that cataract patients (cases) have a higher rate of diabetes mellitus (risk factor) compared to patients with normal vision (controls).
From literature review, identify the rate of exposure among the cases (i.e. 50%) and among the controls (i.e. 8%). Decide on the ratio; i.e. 1:1
CLINICAL TRIAL
1. The standardized difference is calculated as;
Results from OpenEpi, Version 3, open source calculator--SSMean
Software or websites:
https://www.cdc.gov/epiinfo/index.html
ADJUSTMENT FOR LOSS OF FOLLOW UP
To Sum Up
Power of the study: set at 80% or 90%.
Confidence interval: set at 95% Enrollment ratio: 1:1
Expected effect size or Mean±SD
The crucial first step is to determine the study design
Then, the main objectives (Study outcomes)
THANK YOU