1 of 54

Solid State Detectors for Low-Mass Dark Matter Searches

Miriam Diamond University of Toronto Physics Dept &

Arthur B. McDonald Canadian Astroparticle Physics Research Institute

2 of 54

The Dark Matter Question

So far, evidence for existence of DM comes from astrophysics

How to look for it in particle physics experiments?

2

2

you are here

~ 27%

~ 68%

+

=

?

3 of 54

Come to the (Solid) Dark Side

  • What are we looking for?
  • How are we looking for it?
  • The solid program of solid-state detectors
  • SuperCDMS: apparatus, sensitivity, results with prototypes

3

4 of 54

“What are we looking for?”

?

5 of 54

“Beyond the Standard Model” Searches

5

5

DM searches BSM particle(s) that are:

  • Cold (non-relativistic)
  • Stable on cosmological timescales
  • Gravitationally interacting
  • Plus feeble, if any, non-gravitational interactions with each other / with luminous matter

What mass scale?

What interactions with SM?

Are there “dark forces”?

How many new particle species?

Happy Valentine’s Day courtesy of Symmetry magazine

6 of 54

Thermal Production of DM Particles?

6

6

  1. DM initially in thermal equilibrium with SM, in hot “soup”
  2. Universe cools, SM no longer energetic enough to produce DM pairs, DM begins annihilating away
  3. Universe expands, DM stops annihilating (“freeze-out”)

A general, simple possibility for DM production in early universe:

time (ns)

temperature (GeV)

DM # density

Relative DM fraction

1

2

3

relic abundance

7 of 54

WIMP Miracle?

7

7

avg cross section

times velocity

“relic abundance”

of DM particle 𝜒

weak scale

“Weakly Interacting Massive Particles” (WIMPs)

time (ns)

temperature (GeV)

DM # density

Relative DM fraction

1

2

3

relic abundance

8 of 54

WIMPing out?

8

8

But… searches where we most expected to find WIMPs haven’t found them!

Lots of WIMPy candidates:

  • Supersymmetric partners
  • Additional Higgs bosons
  • Kaluza-Klein modes
  • … etc

weak scale

arxiv.org/abs/1310.8327

9 of 54

Now what?

9

9

arxiv.org/abs/2209.07426

10 of 54

My Favourite Park in the Particle Zoo

  • “Light WIMP-like DM” requires new, low-mass “dark mediators” (dark force carriers)
  • e.g. “Hidden Valley” / “Mirror Universe” models with “dark photons”
  • Look for the sub-GeV DM and also the mediators

10

10

“Light DM”

WIMP DM

too hot

too much

CMB/BBN

  • Stick with thermal relic DM, it works (theoretically) at least down to 2me

11 of 54

“How are we looking for it?”

12 of 54

Search Strategies

12

12

Complementarity between different types of experiments

SM

SM

χ

χ

Collider

SM

SM

χ

χ

Direct

SM

SM

χ

χ

Indirect

13 of 54

Search Strategies

13

13

Complementarity between different types of experiments

SM

SM

χ

χ

Collider

SM

SM

χ

χ

Direct

SM

SM

χ

χ

Indirect

SM

DM

14 of 54

Direct Detection

14

14

Collisions of galactic DM with SM particles in detector on Earth

v ~ 270 km/s

15 of 54

Direct Detection

15

15

DM particles collide with SM particles in detector “target” and are absorbed, or cause nuclear and/or electronic recoils

Nuclear Recoil Electron Recoil

16 of 54

The GeV-Scale & Sub-GeV Detection Challenge

16

Light DM (~2me) stretches traditional WIMPy direct detection techniques, which rely extensively on inelastic nuclear recoil

R. Essig

proton

mass

Not enough energy transfer

Can’t see recoil of nucleus

17 of 54

The GeV-Scale & Sub-GeV Detection Challenge

For ~meV – keV dark mediators, need absorption searches

17

BRN for DM Small Projects New Initiatives https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1659757

proton

mass

electron

mass

18 of 54

The GeV-Scale & Sub-GeV Detection Challenge

18

Lowering mass and/or interaction thresholds

BRN for DM Small Projects New Initiatives https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1659757

19 of 54

Solid-State Detectors

20 of 54

3 Channels for Next-Generation Detectors

20

Silicon /

DM

Low thresholds

ER vs NR discrimination

21 of 54

Many Next-Generation Detectors are Solid-State

21

Silicon /

DM

22 of 54

Many Next-Generation Detectors are Solid-State

Categorized by electron recoil energy (ΔE) and mDM detectable:

22

(R&D) (speculative “exotic”)

R. Essig

23 of 54

Many Next-Generation Detectors are Solid-State

Categorized by electron recoil energy (ΔE) and mDM detectable:

23

(R&D) (speculative “exotic”)

R. Essig

24 of 54

Many Next-Generation Detectors are Solid-State

24

25 of 54

Many Next-Generation Detectors are Solid-State

25

26 of 54

Underground Shielded Secret Lairs

Hide the detectors in shielding and bury them in an underground clean-room.

Why?

26

27 of 54

Underground Dark Shielded Lairs

Backgrounds, backgrounds, backgrounds!

Cosmogenic

  • Cosmic ray muons
  • Spallation neutrons
  • Activated materials

Environmental

  • Airborne radon & daughters
  • Radio-impurities in materials

27

28 of 54

Charge-Coupled Devices (Semiconductor Pixels)

  • Take a photo of DM, like with your cellphone camera!
  • Ionization events induced by DM (instead of photons) in bulk Si of CCD pixels

28

29 of 54

Charge-Coupled Devices (Semiconductor Pixels)

  • Pixels ~15 x 15 μm2 , hundreds of μm thick
  • “Skipper” CCDs reliably detect excitations as small as 1 electron in a pixel

29

30 of 54

Charge-Coupled Devices (Semiconductor Pixels)

  • Liquid nitrogen temperatures
  • Hour[s] of “exposure time” per “image”

30

  • DAMIC (Dark Matter in CCDs)
  • SENSEI (Sub-Electron-Noise Skipper-CCD Experimental Instrument)
  • OSCURA (Observatory of Skipper CCDs Unveiling Recoiling Atoms)

DAMIC SNOLAB

31 of 54

Cryogenic Semiconductor Crystals

31

  • Collect phonons as well as electrons
  • Calorimetry rather than tracking/imaging
  • Operated at tens of mK

32 of 54

Cryogenic Semiconductor Crystals

32

SuperCDMS

33 of 54

Cryogenic Semiconductor Crystals

33

Combination of phonon and ionization channels allows NR vs ER discrimination

  • EDELWEISS (Expérience pour Detecter Les WIMPs En Site Souterrain) @ Modane
  • SuperCDMS

34 of 54

Cryogenic Scintillating Crystals

Along with phonon signal: instead of collecting electrons in semiconductor crystals, collect light in scintillating crystals, operated at ~5 mK

34

35 of 54

Cryogenic Scintillating Crystals

35

β/γ

NR oxygen

NR tungsten

Combination of phonon and light channels allows ER & gammas vs NR discrimination

  • CRESST-III (Cryogenic Rare Event Search with Superconducting Thermometers) @LNGS

36 of 54

37 of 54

SuperCDMS (Super Cryogenic Dark Matter Search)

Operated in a Soudan, Minnesota underground lab until 2015

More powerful version now being constructed in Canada’s world-leading astroparticle physics facility, 2 km underground in the Vale Creighton Mine near Sudbury

37

38 of 54

SuperCDMS (Super Cryogenic Dark Matter Search)

Operated in a Soudan, Minnesota underground lab until 2015

More powerful version now being constructed in Canada’s world-leading astroparticle physics facility, 2 km underground in the Vale Creighton Mine near Sudbury

38

39 of 54

SuperCDMS@SNOLAB

  • kg-scale Si and Ge detector modules
  • 6 modules per “tower”, 4 “towers” in cryostat

39

40 of 54

SuperCDMS@SNOLAB

First full science run expected next year

41 of 54

CUTE (Cryogenic Underground TEst) Facility @SNOLAB

41

One tower now being tested in CUTE user facility

  • Calibrations
  • Detector response
  • Background measurements
  • “Early science data”!

https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.07930

42 of 54

Charge Channels: High Electron Mobility Transistors

Low-noise amplifiers to read out small ionization signals

42

Ge or Si

43 of 54

Phonon Channels: Transition Edge Sensors + SQUIDs

43

  • Phonon energy deposits cause TESs operated near critical temp to transition from superconducting to normal state
  • Signal amplification by Superconducting Quantum Interference Devices

44 of 54

New in SuperCDMS: Phonon Signal Amplification

  • Drifting charges across a Vb generates cascade of “Luke phonons”
  • Lowers recoil energy threshold
  • But “true calorimetry” and NR vs ER discrimination lost

44

Primary recoil energy

Luke phonon energy

Total phonon energy

Si / Ge

45 of 54

SuperCDMS Detector Types

45

Interleaved Z-sensitive Ionization & Phonon: both HEMTs and TESs

  • ER vs NR discrimination, especially useful for background rejection

High Voltage: only TESs

  • lower energy threshold

46 of 54

SuperCDMS@SNOLAB Sensitivity Projections

46

Spin-independent nucleon-coupled DM

Neutrino fog

Projection for setup under construction

Possible with near-term upgrades

Possible with longer-term upgrades

Already

excluded

arxiv.org/abs/2203.08463

47 of 54

SuperCDMS@SNOLAB Sensitivity Projections

47

Dark Photon Axion-Like Particle DM

Already

excluded

Already

excluded

arxiv.org/abs/2203.08463

48 of 54

Results from Prototypes at Test Facilities are Exciting!

“HVeV”, “CPD” Si prototypes: gram-scale devices

48

49 of 54

Results from Prototypes at Test Facilities are Exciting!

Few eV phonon resolution, can see single electron-hole pairs

49

Laser calibration

Total phonon energy [eV]

50 of 54

Nuclear Recoil & Electron Recoil Limits

50

SuperCDMS

HVeV Run 2

Nuclear Recoil Electron Recoil

51 of 54

Dark Absorption: Dark Photon & Axion-Like Limits

51

SuperCDMS HVeV Run2

SuperCDMS

HVeV Run2

Dark Photons Axion-Like Particles

kinetic mixing

e- coupling

52 of 54

Come to the (Solid) Dark Side, We Have Cookies

  • Direct detection of WIMP-like DM at the GeV- and sub-GeV scale, through NR and/or ER, is a well-motivated challenge
  • Especially when accompanied by searches for low-mass mediators, at the eV to keV scale, through dark absorption
  • Solid-state technologies, including cryogenic semiconductor / scintillating crystals and charge-coupled devices, provide many advantages for such searches …
  • … As demonstrated in recent world-leading limits on low-mass NR, ER, dark photons, axion-like particles, …
  • Including prototype and R&D devices, promising further discovery potential in the near future

52

 

 

53 of 54

@SuperCDMS

https://www.snolab.ca/experiment/supercdms/

54 of 54

Shedding Light on Low-Energy Backgrounds

  • Low-energy background events, of unknown origin, observed in:
    • XENON1T, DarkSide-50 (liquid nobles)
    • SENSEI, DAMIC, SuperCDMS, EDELWEISS, CRESST-III (solid-state)
  • Possible explanations in solid-state detectors include:
  • Cherenkov radiation
  • Transition radiation
  • Cracking/micro-fracturing of crystals or holders
  • Luminescence & phonons from recombination

54