1 of 106

Community-First Autonomy

Seattle Department of Transportation

Putting People at the Core of Autonomous Transportation

Armand Shahbazian, Electric and Automated Mobility Policy Advisor

March 2025

2 of 106

Our Vision, Mission, Values, & Goals

2

Seattle is a thriving equitable community powered by dependable transportation. We're on a mission to deliver a transportation system that provides safe and affordable access to places and opportunities. 

Core Values & Goals:

Equity, Safety, Mobility, Sustainability, Livability, and Excellence. 

3 of 106

The transportation system is not static

3

1906

Today

4 of 106

Innovation is changing how we access places and opportunities

4

Lime Glider seated scooter

Metro Flex on-demand shuttle

5 of 106

More choices = more opportunities to access places and opportunities

5

6 of 106

More choices = more opportunities to access places and opportunities

6

7 of 106

More choices = more opportunities to access places and opportunities

7

8 of 106

Autonomous vehicles, also called AVs or self-driving cars, are now providing passenger services in numerous cities across the United States

8

9 of 106

How did we get autonomous vehicles?

9

10 of 106

AVs, GPS, and the Internet

10

11 of 106

AVs, GPS, and the Internet

11

12 of 106

12

Examples of Autonomous Vehicles

13 of 106

13

Examples of Autonomous Vehicles

14 of 106

14

Examples of Autonomous Vehicles

15 of 106

15

Examples of Autonomous Vehicles

16 of 106

How are AVs regulated in the United States?

16

17 of 106

There are no federal safety standards that concern the capabilities of automated driving systems.

17

18 of 106

In the absence of federal standards, states rely on industry ‘self-certification’ or assurance from the industry that their technology is ready for public roadways without external vetting.

18

19 of 106

Washington State allows autonomous vehicles to test on public roads.

19

20 of 106

20

Autonomous Vehicle Regulation in the U.S.

© GeoNames, Microsoft, TomTom

Powered by Bing

21 of 106

21

States that allow testing only

© GeoNames, Microsoft, TomTom

Powered by Bing

22 of 106

22

States that allow for AV deployment

© GeoNames, Microsoft, TomTom

Powered by Bing

23 of 106

23

States that have public AV service

© GeoNames, Microsoft, TomTom

Powered by Bing

24 of 106

Preemption

24

A legal doctrine that allows upper levels of government (state) to restrict or prevent a lower-level government (city or county) from self-regulating.

25 of 106

AV companies are seeking legislation to fully deploy these vehicles for commercial service in Washington State.

25

Proposed legislation includes preemption of local regulations.

26 of 106

26

Looking back: Uber, Lyft, and TNCs

27 of 106

27

TNC Playbook: “Move fast and break things”

Rapid scale

Public pressure

Lobbying state governments

Leveraging legal challenges

Implementing regulatory preemption

28 of 106

28

What happened with TNCs?

TNCs will…

Result

AV Passenger Services

Reduce congestion

No. TNCs accounted for approximately 50% of overall increases in congestion.

??

Reduce vehicle miles traveled

No. TNCs are as much as 14% of VMT in core city areas. Dead-heading (no passenger) represents as much as 59% of TNC VMT.

??

Facilitate car-free lifestyle

No. TNCs have had an insignificant change in vehicle ownership rates.

??

Carry more passengers

No. 49 – 61% of TNC trips substitute for transit, walk, or bike travel, or would not have been made at all. TNC passenger occupancy is similar to private vehicles.

??

Expand mobility for non-drivers

Limited. Currently, 4% of adults 65 and older use TNCs. Wheelchair accessible trips required legislative mandates and years of advocacy.

??

29 of 106

What did cities learn?

29

30 of 106

30

Adapting to new transportation technologies

Cities learned from TNC Playbook

Cities were more aggressive with micromobility

Cities implemented permits and other regulations quickly

Data sharing and digital tools were created and implemented

Active management and coordination was an expectation

31 of 106

Concerns and opportunities

31

32 of 106

There are no available or planned purpose-built autonomous vehicles that are wheelchair accessible.

32

33 of 106

Some tasks are difficult to automate, such as securing wheelchairs or other mobility devices.

33

34 of 106

Regulatory preemption prevents cities and counties from requiring discount programs or integration with existing fare systems.

34

35 of 106

Challenges with curb loading, including double parking and stopping in travel lates, may result in access and safety issues.

35

36 of 106

Congestion may increase without local input on fleet size, deployment areas, and routing.

36

AVs may ‘deadhead’, or drive without being in service, in similar fashion as TNCs.

37 of 106

AVs may offer safety benefits that include quick reaction times, driving the speed limit, and not driving drunk or drowsy.

37

38 of 106

What have we seen in peer cities?

38

39 of 106

39

Cautionary tale: Cruise in San Francisco

40 of 106

On October 2, 2023, a pedestrian in a crosswalk was hit by a human driven vehicle.

40

A Cruise AV in the adjacent lane hit the pedestrian and ultimately dragged her for approximately 20 feet.

41 of 106

The Cruise automated driving system (ADS) accelerated toward a pedestrian directly in front of it in a crosswalk, potentially reducing reaction time available following the initial collision of the pedestrian with the adjacent vehicle.

41

Cautionary tale: Cruise in San Francisco

42 of 106

The Cruise ADS continued to accelerate as it tracked the pedestrian through impact with the vehicle in the adjacent lane.

42

Cautionary tale: Cruise in San Francisco

43 of 106

The Cruise ADS had a visual view of the legs of the pedestrian being dragged in one of the vehicle’s cameras, but the ADS did not consider this as the vehicle made continued forward movement with the pedestrian trapped underneath.

43

Cautionary tale: Cruise in San Francisco

44 of 106

Exponent states that, “after the AV contacted the pedestrian, an alert and attentive human driver would be aware that an impact of some sort had occurred and would not have continued driving without further investigating the situation.”

44

Cautionary tale: Cruise in San Francisco

45 of 106

October 2, 2023 Incident Findings

“The reasons for Cruise’s failings in this instance are numerous: poor leadership, mistakes in judgment, lack of coordination, an “us versus them” mentality with regulators, and a fundamental misapprehension of Cruise’s obligations of accountability and transparency to the government and the public.”

45

Cautionary tale: Cruise in San Francisco

46 of 106

October 2, 2023 Incident Findings

“The DMV Suspension Order is a direct result of a proverbial self-inflicted wound by certain senior Cruise leadership and employees who appear not to have fully appreciated how a regulated business should interact with its regulators.

46

Cautionary tale: Cruise in San Francisco

47 of 106

What can our region do to prepare for AVs?

47

48 of 106

48

49 of 106

49

Strategic Vision: Regional Collaboration

50 of 106

“Managing the advancement and utilization of technologies such as AVs … requires a cohesive vision, collaborative partnerships, and conscientious decision-making about what regional priorities are supported by policy.”

50

51 of 106

“Managing the advancement and utilization of technologies such as AVs … requires a cohesive vision, collaborative partnerships, and conscientious decision-making about what regional priorities are supported by policy.”

51

52 of 106

Regional priorities

52

53 of 106

53

1. LEVERAGE STRATEGIC COLLABORATIONS:

Develop attributes for a successful strategic collaboration between the public and private sector using input from both the community and AV industry.

Engage communities in decision-making.

Collaborate with AV industry to form beneficial alliances.

Establish two-way communication with community and AV industry.

Establish mutually beneficial data-sharing requirements.

54 of 106

54

1. LEVERAGE STRATEGIC COLLABORATIONS:

2. ENSURE SAFETY

Establish and implement a regulatory and legal framework for the safe testing and commercial operations of AVs on city streets across multiple jurisdictions.

Establish permit requirements for AV testing and operations.

Collaborate with regional, state, and federal agencies to maximize consistency.

Ensure transparent data sharing and reporting for AV testing and operations.

55 of 106

55

3. SHAPE INNOVATION

Invest in infrastructure and policy to streamline integration of emerging transportation technology within the region’s transportation network.

Monitor advancements in the AV industry in other relevant cities and at the national level.

Ensure emerging mobility options are accessible to all.

56 of 106

56

4. ENSURE TRANSPORTATION EQUITY

Drive performance goals to ensure equitable distribution of AV benefits and commit to ongoing monitoring of AV impacts.

Provide public outreach and education opportunities to further understanding of AV capabilities and limitations.

Formalize key performance indicators to evaluate effectiveness of AV deployments and their ability to meet city goals.

57 of 106

57

5. INCREASE MOBILITY OPTIONS

Identify and advocate for communities and user groups that can benefit the most from AVs.

Identify high priority community-focused use cases for AVs.

Search for commonalities in goals among neighboring jurisdictions and stakeholders that inform policy decisions.

Champion projects that are a right fit.

58 of 106

58

6. ENHANCE SUSTAINABILITY

Work proactively to shape the future land use and sustainability impacts of AVs.

Emphasize need to reduce deadhead miles.

Assess curbside assets and set policies for use.

Determine changes needed to parking regulations.

59 of 106

What is Seattle doing to advance these priorities?

59

60 of 106

Testing permit program

60

61 of 106

61

62 of 106

Supplementary to state self-certification

    • Coverage of Level 3 vehicles*
    • Test driver requirement and driver training program
    • First responder interaction and disengagement plan
    • First responder demonstration event
    • Insurance
    • Indemnification

*does not include unmodified vehicles for retail sale

62

SDOT AV Testing Permit

63 of 106

AV Permittees in Seattle

63

Zoox, Inc. (Testing Level 3)

Permit issued: March 2023 

Zoox aims to provide mobility-as-a-service ride-hailing for users. 

NVIDIA Corporation (Testing Level 3)

Permit issued: June 2023

NVIDIA DRIVE aims to provide an end-to-end platform for the transportation industry to develop autonomous vehicles.

64 of 106

Zoox First Responder Event

64

Seattle Police, Fire, and Transportation staff had hands-on time with the Zoox test vehicle to learn more about its sensors and how to interact with the vehicle in the case of a collision.

Seattle Police, Fire, and Transportation staff learned more about Zoox’s testing methodology, including how Zoox vehicles react to first responder vehicles and other scenarios.

65 of 106

Community-led engagement

65

66 of 106

To address the specific challenges and opportunities that come with autonomous vehicles, we established the Autonomous Vehicle Inclusive Planning Cohort.

66

67 of 106

The cohort was a group dedicated to ensuring that the introduction of AVs in Seattle benefits everyone and aligns with our safety, sustainability, and equity goals.

67

68 of 106

The AV Inclusive Planning Process is an opportunity to demonstrate what it looks like when those most affected by potential impacts lead in setting community priorities for local and state government responses.

68

69 of 106

Who is the AV Inclusive Planning Cohort?

69

70 of 106

Community members with personal and professional expertise; and those who represent local community-based organizations, coalitions, and networks.

70

71 of 106

What did the cohort do?

71

6-month series of facilitated discussion. Partners include Uncommon Bridges, an experienced facilitation consultant, and the University of Oregon’s Urbanism Next Center, an academic leader in emerging mobility.

Cohort was compensated for sharing their lived experiences and time.

Cohort arrived at seven priorities to guide discussions and recommendations.

SDOT developed a Racial Equity Toolkit (RET). The City uses the RET to lay out a process and a set of questions to guide the development implementation, and evaluation of policies, initiatives, and program to address the impacts on racial equity.

SDOT actively provides regular updates and opportunities for cohort participation.

72 of 106

Community voices are at the forefront of the City’s expectations of AV industry deployment standards and ongoing decisions about program evaluations and investments.

72

Management and Accountability

73 of 106

“[AV company] Reps should come with their A-game [when engaging with underserved communities]. They are asking questions of people who may never benefit from their services.”

73

74 of 106

Worker benefits are prioritized in the implementation and evaluation of AV deployment strategies, particularly for [historically marginalized groups].

Job displacement is counteracted by job creation and opportunities for displaced and at-risk workers.

74

Workforce Protection and Development

75 of 106

“Should the AV companies have a responsibility or hand in retraining or workforce development? Can this be required?”

75

76 of 106

“Creating job training is fine, but it might not be the same skillset you are interested in doing, or same needs from your body, or same pay... jobs aren’t just transferable... they are not all the same...”

76

77 of 106

“Be conscious of the timelines for communities and opportunities… there is evidence that by the time people have caught up, the job market might be oversaturated, moving on, etc.”

77

78 of 106

All communities achieve equal access to these services through SDOT prioritizing vulnerable communities with the greatest barriers and needs and holistically addressing their accessibility and affordability barriers. 

78

Accessibility and Affordability

79 of 106

“Accessibility is such a multi-dimensional topic. I want to be open to experimentation, but as far as subsidizing things that don't live up to ADA, oh heck no!”

79

80 of 106

AV operators surpass safety benchmarks that have been created using community insights and reflect public safety concerns.

AV operators and SDOT work to build and evaluate trust at all stages of testing, deployment, and operation.

80

Safety

81 of 106

“Who is liable in incident scenarios? It should be realistic for people to pursue claims – particularly with the power imbalance between an individual and a large AV company.”

81

82 of 106

“Vehicles need to follow all traffic laws. There should be less leniency for AV companies than human drivers... they should do better and follow rules better.”

82

83 of 106

The deployment of AVs in Seattle has a positive environmental impact by helping the City achieve One Seattle Climate Justice Agenda and Green New Deal objectives, which include intersectional health and equity criteria.

83

Environmental Impacts

84 of 106

“I feel the AV movement will accelerate the electrification of cars in this country, since electric cars are better to be used as AV. This has a big environment impact.”

84

85 of 106

“[It is important to] address the oppression from gathering the materials needed for these technologies.”

85

86 of 106

Future AV deployment is planned through an intersectional equity lens, holistically considering social identities and impacts.

AV deployment corrects past discrimination, serves underserved community members, and mitigates future harm to historically vulnerable groups.

86

Intersectional Equity

87 of 106

“The City needs to motivate or require AV vendors to answer key inclusivity and racial equity questions. This would help communities feel good about the future and opportunities of AVs.”

87

88 of 106

While it might not be predictable or linear, communities and SDOT are able to build trust and collaboration through a process that includes proactive educational touchpoints aimed at workforce development and welcoming all communities into the AV space.

88

Education to Community

89 of 106

“Seattle residents make decisions off of affordability, access, and company ethic… they care about environmental impacts, vehicle life cycle, and company values.”

89

90 of 106

Using data to improve operations

90

91 of 106

AVs struggle with interpreting human traffic control commands, recognizing first responders, and they may not detect fire hoses and emergency tape.

91

92 of 106

AVs may receive remote fleet support, but the ultimate driving task must be executed by the ADS. If this is not successful, fleet support must travel to retrieve the vehicle.

92

93 of 106

What’s happening now?

93

Graphic from City & County of San Francisco: Driverless AV Safety and First Responders; August 7, 2023

94 of 106

What tools can we leverage?

94

95 of 106

95

96 of 106

From SMS to MDS

96

97 of 106

97

Example – Building Fire

98 of 106

98

Example – Building Fire

  1. Dispatch sends multiple units to major building fire
  2. Data Platform translates key information into MDS Policy
    1. Number of units responding
    2. Location
    3. Emergency type
  3. A geofence is created based on the information
    • Slow-zone/caution geofence surrounding emergency (yellow)
    • No-go-zone geofence nearest to the emergency (red)
  4. Fleets, such as AVs, can use info to reroute vehicles away
  5. Geofence is closed as the incident is closed in dispatch
  6. Data Platform can verify which fleets ingested the policy should an obstruction be reported

99 of 106

99

Example – Building Fire

  1. Dispatch sends multiple units to major building fire
  2. Data Platform translates key information into MDS Policy
    1. Number of units responding
    2. Location
    3. Emergency type
  3. A geofence is created based on the information
    • Slow-zone/caution geofence surrounding emergency (yellow)
    • No-go-zone geofence nearest to the emergency (red)
  4. Fleets, such as AVs, can use info to reroute vehicles away
  5. Geofence is closed as the incident is closed in dispatch
  6. Data Platform can verify which fleets ingested the policy should an obstruction be reported

100 of 106

100

Example – Building Fire

  1. Dispatch sends multiple units to major building fire
  2. Data Platform translates key information into MDS Policy
    1. Number of units responding
    2. Location
    3. Emergency type
  3. A geofence is created based on the information
    • Slow-zone/caution geofence surrounding emergency (yellow)
    • No-go-zone geofence nearest to the emergency (red)
  4. Fleets, such as AVs, can use info to reroute vehicles away
  5. Geofence is closed as the incident is closed in dispatch
  6. Data Platform can verify which fleets ingested the policy should an obstruction be reported

101 of 106

Using data to improve access

101

102 of 106

Data sharing can lead to incentives and other collaborative services.

102

103 of 106

Autonomous Vehicles are coming.

103

Cities need to have a seat at the table to uplift what we hear and need for our communities.

104 of 106

If we wait for AVs to come rather than prepare for them now, we lose the opportunity to shape AV applications the to benefit of the region.

104

105 of 106

If we shape it, we can guide the deployment of AVs to provide safe and affordable access to places and opportunities.

105

106 of 106

Thank you!

DOT_AutomatedMobility@seattle.gov

https://seattle.gov/transportation/projects-and-programs/programs/autonomous-vehicles

106

Seattle Department of Transportation

Mobility Solutions Team