1 of 8

Results of DCMIP 2025 Test Cases with Gungho

Thomas Bendall

Dynamics Research, Met Office

www.metoffice.gov.uk

© Crown Copyright 2025, Met Office

2 of 8

Test Case 1: Breaking Gravity Wave

  •  

© Crown Copyright 2025, Met Office

thomas.bendall@metoffice.gov.uk

2

3 of 8

Test Case 1: Breaking Gravity Wave

  •  

 

© Crown Copyright 2025, Met Office

thomas.bendall@metoffice.gov.uk

3

4 of 8

Test Case 2a: Mountain Gap

  •  

© Crown Copyright 2025, Met Office

thomas.bendall@metoffice.gov.uk

4

5 of 8

Test Case 2a: Mountain Gap

This test showed up two issues!

  1. Monotonicity on potential temperature transport is necessary for stability (I haven’t seen a test demonstrating this before)

​

2) Conservative transport of potential temperature exposed a grid-scale computational mode, resulting in model failure (so mountain results use advective form). Something we need to go and fix!

​

Plot shows divergence just below the top of the model, with conservative potential temperature transport

​

© Crown Copyright 2025, Met Office

thomas.bendall@metoffice.gov.uk

5

6 of 8

Test Case 2b: Vortex Shedding

  •  

© Crown Copyright 2025, Met Office

thomas.bendall@metoffice.gov.uk

6

7 of 8

Test Case 3: Squall Line

Cloud and radar reflectivity,

at 5km and 10km

​

This looks very different from other dycores…

© Crown Copyright 2025, Met Office

thomas.bendall@metoffice.gov.uk

7

8 of 8

Test Case 3: Squall Line

I’m currently blaming different initial conditions in Gungho, likely:

(a) bugs in my initialisation procedure and/or (b) my confusions about moist variables

FV3 Initial T

Gungho Initial T

© Crown Copyright 2025, Met Office

thomas.bendall@metoffice.gov.uk

8