The Transition from Pre-Service to In-Service:�Investigating Experiences of �Beginning Music Teachers
CHARLES E. PATTERSON, III
PHD CANDIDATE - UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA
FMEA CONFERENCE - FRIDAY, JANUARY 13, 2023
RATIONALE
Pre-Preservice
(Undergraduate Coursework)
Preservice
(Student Teaching)
Inservice
(Full-time Teaching)
Departure
(Leaving the Profession)
Spring 2021 Study
Dissertation
Spring 2022 Pilot Study
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND AND PARADIGM
IMPORTANT TOPICS
Job Satisfaction
Conway, 2002
Goldhaber, Krieg, & Theobald, 2017
Hoy & Woolfolk, 1990
Isbell, 2008
Lam & Yan, 2011
Sindberg, 2011
Mental Health, Wellbeing, & Burnout
Adams, 2006
Bubb & Earley, 2004
Hamann, Daugherty, & Mills, 1987
Hamann & Gordon, 2000
Scheib, 2003
Schlichte, Yssel, & Merbler, 2005
Reflection Practices
Baumgartner, 2011b
Borko, Michalec, Timmons, & Siddle, 1997
Koerner, 2017
Stegman, 2007
Professional Development
Baumgartner & Councill, 2017
Berg & Miksza, 2010
Borko, 2004
Conkling & Henry, 1999
Garet, Porter, Desimone, Birman, & Yoon, 2001
The Triad: Cooperating Teacher, University Supervisor, and Intern (Mentoring)
Barrows, 1979
Baumgartner, 2011a
Borko & Mayfield, 1995
Bullough & Draper, 2004
Ingersoll & Kralik, 2004
Morin, 2000
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
Music-Making and Identities (Pellegrino, 2015)
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
Factors that influence retention, turnover, and attrition of K–12 music teachers (Gardner, 2010)
Teacher attributes
(age, experience, education)
Job attributes (admin support, parent support, instructional control)
Teacher opinions & perceptions of workplace
Job/career satisfaction
Teacher status (stay or move/leave)
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
Relationship model of mental health, work pressure, and job burnout (Yang, 2020) |
PREVIOUS STUDY (SPRING 2021)
Hannah
Departure
Benjamin
Sugar-coated Outlook
Disrespect
Lack of Interper-sonal Skills
Classes didn’t transfer
Poor Mental Health
Harsh Time Commitments
Larger Issues
Professors need more experience
Education needs more desirability
Educator vs. Performer
PILOT STUDY (SPRING 2022)
3 Participants
Each participant completed:
Goals:
PILOT STUDY MATERIALS
Interview Questions
Focus Group Questions
PILOT STUDY RESULTS
Participant | Theme | Count |
Paula (interview and journal) | Planning | 23 |
| Stress | 17 |
Jim (interview and journal) | Time | 13 |
| Stress | 11 |
Sarah (interview and journal) | Stress | 19 |
| Student(s) | 18 |
Focus Group | Classes | 34 |
| Teaching | 30 |
| Time | 18 |
DISSERTATION (SPRING AND FALL 2023)
RESEARCH QUESTIONS
What are the experiences of job satisfaction or dissatisfaction of (three) pre-service and first-year in-service music teachers at different schools in the United States?
How do the teachers describe and process their experiences in terms of mental health?
POTENTIAL TAKE-A-WAYS
This research will generate implications and questions for the outlooks of first-year music teachers.
The participants’ experiences will guide topics of discussion.
Generalization is a not a goal.
METHODOLOGY
Emergent, narrative inquiry design
Interviews and focus groups
Personal journals of the participants (during each stage)
Reflective journal of the researcher (after each session and during the data analysis)
DATA COLLECTION TIMELINE
Stage 1
Interview #1
Focus Group #1
Interview #2
Focus Group #2
Interview #3
Stage 2
Interview #4
Focus Group #3
Interview #5
Focus Group #4
Interview #6
Spring Semester (Student Teaching)
February and March
Fall Semester (First Year)
August and September
= Personal Interviews
= Focus Group Sessions
DESIGN
Participants
Analysis
Reflexivity
DESIGN
Validity
Ethics
SELECT REFERENCES
Baumgartner, C. M. (2011a). Creating a positive internship for student and cooperating teachers: Five steps for success. Missouri School Music Magazine, 66, 24-26.
Baumgartner, C. M. (2011b). An examination of a pre-service music teacher’s reflection across consecutive teaching placements. Visions of Research in Music Education, 18. http://www-usr.rider.edu/~vrme/v18n1/index.html
Baumgartner, C. M., & Councill K. H. (2017, September). Music student teachers’ perceptions of their seminar experience: A focus group pilot study. Paper presented at the Symposium on Music Teacher Education, Minneapolis, MN.
Berg, M. H., & Miksza, P. (2010). An investigation of preservice music teacher development and concerns. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 20, 39-55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083710363237
Conway, C. (2002). Perceptions of beginning teachers, their mentors, and administrators regarding preservice music teacher preparation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 50, 20-36. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345690
Goldhaber, D., Krieg, J. M., & Theobald, R. (2017). Does the match matter: Exploring whether student teaching experiences affect teacher effectiveness. American Educational Research Journal, 54, 325-359. https://doi.org/10/3102/0002831217690516
Koerner, B.D. (2017). Beginning music teacher mentoring: Impact on reflective practice, teaching efficacy, and professional commitment (Doctoral dissertation, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database) (10642603).
Lam, B., & Yan, H. (2011). Beginning teachers’ job satisfaction: The impact of school-based factors. Teacher Development, 15(3), 333-348. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2011.608516
Sindberg, L. (2011). Alone all together: The conundrum of music teacher isolation and connectedness. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 189, 7-22. https://doi.org/10.5406/bulcouresmusedu.189.0007
Stegman, S. F. (2007). An exploration of reflective dialogue between student teachers in music and their cooperating teachers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 55, 65-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/002242940705500106
THANK YOU!
Questions?
Contact: