1 of 23

Copyright © by Sai Sankalp Shekar and Matthew Clarke �Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., with permission.

Optimizing Thermal Management Systems to Augment the Operational Longevity of Electric Aircraft

Sai Sankalp Shekar

Graduate Student

Department of Aerospace Engineering

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Matthew Clarke

Assistant Professor

Department of Aerospace Engineering

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

AIAA SciTech Forum

8th January 2025

Author

Company/Organization

Conference Name, Conference Dates

Conference Location

Presentation Title

2 of 23

Primary Research Focus

  1. How does a thermal management system's operational capacity affect battery life, and what are the trade-offs between system mass and battery longevity in electric aircraft applications?
  2. What is the primary limiting factor in battery end-of-life: thermal constraints or capacity degradation, and how can this inform optimal thermal management system design?

2

3 of 23

Outline

  • Introduction to RCAIDE
  • An Electric Aircraft Test Bed
  • Battery model
  • Battery Thermal Management System (BTMS) for an e-Aircraft
  • Case Studies – Lifecycle Analysis
  • Optimization of Thermal Management System (TMS)
  • Results
  • Conclusion

3

4 of 23

RCAIDE – (Research Community Aircraft Interdisciplinary Design Environment)

  • RCAIDE is an open-source, python-based platform for designing, analyzing, and optimizing conventional passenger, drone, supersonic, and all/hybrid-electric aircraft.
  • RCAIDE is developed upon the principle of continuously building upon previously validated work to reduce latency in the design process.

4

  • Its user-friendly code has a trusted user base of over 10,000 worldwide.

5 of 23

The Electric Twin Otter

5

Viking DHC-6 Series 400 Twin Otter

  • Retrofitted with an all-electric powertrain
  • Electric motors with Hartzell HC-B3TN-3D Propellers
  • MTOW: 5670kg
  • Integrated battery pack
  • Integrated battery thermal management system.

6 of 23

Battery Discharge & Heat Generation Model

6

  • Battery type: LiNiMnCoO2 (NMC)
  • Cells in series/module: 12
  • Cells in parallel/module: 220
  • Number of modules: 12

Heat Generation Rate:

Battery Discharge Model:

7 of 23

Battery Degradation Model

A battery aging model is based off empirical relations

7

Calendar Aging

Cyclic Aging

8 of 23

Battery Thermal Management Model

8

  • The BTMS consists of
    • Heat Acquisition System (HAS)
    • Reservoir
    • Heat Exchanger System (HEX)
    • Heating Element/ Heat Pump
    • Pumps
    • Regulating Valves
    • Fans
    • Necessary Plumbing
  • The HEX has a dual inlet:
    • Ram Inlet (Cooling Drag)
    • Fan (Battery Power)

9 of 23

Operational Overview

9

10 of 23

Case Study- Aircraft Configurations

10

Configuration 1

Configuration 2

Configuration 3

Config.

HAS Capacity (W)

HEX Capacity (W)

Reservoir Capacity (m3)

TMS Weight

(kg)

Aircraft Weight (kg)

1

2918.08

2281.57

0.0021

229.71

5436.18

2

2245.39

6213.33

0.11

374.86

5581.33

3

2040.20

1290.32

0.054

275.46

5481.93

11 of 23

Performance Over a Single Flight

11

Cell level properties for a single flight

  • Configuration 1 having the lowest heat removal capacity results in the largest temperature profile.
  • Configuration 2 having the highest heat removal capacity doesn’t result in the smallest temperature profile.
  • Configuration 3 results in the “best” temperature profile here highlighting the balance between weight and heat removal capacity.

12 of 23

Lifecycle Analysis

  • The aircrafts operates six flights a day
  • The temperature of the battery pack resets to ambient temperature at the start of each day
  • The battery temperature for subsequent flights is the temperature of the battery after the cooldown period from the previous flight

12

13 of 23

Lifecycle Analysis

  • How do we determine the battery end of life?
    1. Capacity Limited: If the SOC of the battery is less than 20% at the end of any flight
    2. Thermally Limited: If during any point of the flight the temperature exceeds 50 ℃

13

14 of 23

Lifecycle Analysis - Results

14

  • At a 106 days Config. 1 has the highest IR Growth and capacity fade
  • Config. 3 having the longest life naturally has the highest internal resistance growth
  • Config. 2 & 3 reach a similar capacity fade factor indicating end of life

15 of 23

Lifecycle Analysis - Results

15

16 of 23

Preliminary Conclusion

16

TMS Heat Removal Ability

TMS Weight

Power Consumption

Aircraft Weight

Additional Power

Battery

Pack

Exit Condition

Thermally Limited

Capacity Limited

Thermal Profile

Current Profile

Battery

Life

System Dependency Diagram

17 of 23

Preliminary Conclusion

17

TMS design and battery life have a nonlinear relationship - small design changes can significantly impact performance

Best TMS design balances peak cooling capacity with overall flight efficiency, not just maximum cooling power

Battery life depends on combined thermal and current profiles across all flight phases

TMS weight and power consumption directly impact battery life - creating a critical design trade-off"

18 of 23

Design Space Sampling

  • Design space parameters define system boundaries and operational limits
  • TMS heat removal capabilities:
    • Heat Acquisition: 1,000W - 12,500W
    • Heat Exchanger : 500W - 9,000W
    • Reservoir Volume: 0.001m3 - 0.216m3

18

Design Space Exploration:

    • Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS) used to efficiently sample design parameters
    • Sampling shows uniform distribution across design space
    • No significant clustering or gaps found, confirming thorough exploration

19 of 23

Design Space Analysis

19

Analysis Results:

  • 75 designs sampled, 72 viable
  • Peak battery life: 195 days at 5,519.96 kg
  • Most designs: 160-180 days range

20 of 23

Sensitivity Analysis – Total Weight

20

`

  • Sobol sensitivity analysis is performed using the SALib python package
  • The reservoir has the highest impact on the total weight of the aircraft
  • There is minimal interdependence between the variable’s impact on the weight

21 of 23

Sensitivity Analysis – Battery Life

21

  • All the components have a significant impact on the final life of the battery
  • The second order sensitivity indices are a magnitude of order higher
  • Since the HAS and the HEX are not physically coupled the 2nd order index is low

22 of 23

Conclusion

  1. How does a thermal management system's operational capacity affect battery life, and what are the trade-offs between system mass and battery longevity in electric aircraft applications?

Analysis demonstrates that optimal balance exists between thermal management system mass and operational capacity. While increased thermal capacity extends battery life, our results show that moderate thermal management capacity could achieve near-optimal battery life while maintaining reasonable system mass.

  • What is the primary limiting factor in battery end-of-life: thermal constraints or capacity degradation, and how can this inform optimal thermal management system design?

The optimization study using Latin Hypercube Sampling shows that thermal limitations predominantly determine battery end-of-life. However, increasing thermal management capacity beyond certain thresholds leads to diminishing returns due to added mass and power requirements, demonstrating that optimal design requires controlled thermal operation to maximize useful battery life.

22

23 of 23

Scan to find out more!