1 of 32

Bond Oversight Committee

Bond Premium Recommendation

February 5, 2024

2 of 32

Agenda

  • Background & Context
  • Recommendation of Premium dollars
    • Safety Allocation
    • Final 2020 Inflationary overages
  • Prioritization based on Recommendation
    • Bond Oversight Committee Prioritization Process
      • Criteria
      • Engagement
      • Committee Recommendation
      • School Allocations based on Buckets
  • Questions

2

2

3 of 32

Background & Context

In August 2020, the Board of Education approved a $795 million bond package of specific project and use funds

  • Projects included allocations to project contingencies as well as contributions to the bond program’s overall reserves

Upon voter approval in November 2020, bonds were sold in a favorable interest rate environment, generating an additional $176 million over the $795 million par amount

  • To date, $131 million of these additional funds have been used to ensure the completion of the 2020 General Obligation Bonds (GOB), primarily to address large inflationary overages that the district experienced over the last few years

Our Bond Oversight Committee is responsible for making recommendations regarding additional investments for the use of any residual unallocated bond premium funds, in addition to oversight of the implementation of the voter approved 2020 bond projects

*Bond funds are one-time and can only be used on capital investments such as critical maintenance, technology, and facility improvements. Bond funds cannot be used for ongoing operating expenses.

3

4 of 32

Recommendation of Premium Allocation

4

5 of 32

Final Premium Allocation

5

Sources/Uses

Budget

Notes

Recommended Sources:

Premium

2020 Underspend Existing Approved Projects

$176.3 M

$19 M

$150.3 M

$45 M Remaining

Safety

$5.04 Million

Operational improvements and capital needs based on the Safety Plan

2020 Project Overages

$16.5 Million

Inflationary & Underfunded Projects

Bond Oversight Committee Recommendation

$21.2 Million

Some projects include playgrounds, chillers, black top & parking lot, etc.

Remaining Premium Funds

$2.2 Million

BOC will revisit remaining premium in June 2024 after CPAC is completed

Previous approved 2020 premiums by the Board of Education

January 2022 Premium 1st Round

December 2022 Premium 2nd Round

6 of 32

District Recommendations

6

7 of 32

Safety Premium Allocation

7

Project

Description

Amount

Dispatch System

DoCS Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) system will improve overall operations and provide technological improvements including GPS tracking, replacement of the end of life system, and efficient records management.

RFP Complete. Contract awarded and CAD system is being customized for DPS.

$ 457 K

Dispatch Center Remodel

DoCS Dispatch Center could improve efficiency and have additional dispatcher work stations.

Vendor identified. Planning in-progress.

$ 119 K

Secondary Dispatch Capabilities

Continuity of Operations and communication redundancy is vital in public safety. The DoCS has preliminarily explored a secondary dispatch work location at 780 Grant, in the event the primarily location needed to be evacuated or became inoperable. Vendor identified. Planning in-progress.

$ 100 K

Phone System

The current Dispatch Center phone system is antiquated. An upgrade to existing technology will terminate remaining analog phone lines, be compatible with CAD improvements, allow headset integration, and improve over efficiency and ergonomics for the staff. Developing RFP.

$ 250 K

CSO Radios

DoCS has determined that CSOs, who are unarmed should be equipped

with a radio to insure expedited communications with First

Responders should a critical incident occur at a school. Finalizing Purchase.

$ 248 K

Total

$1.174 MM

The recommendation was split into two parts; the BOC tentatively approved the start of these projects that are related to the district’s safety plan and commitment of the Superintendent and Board of Education.

8 of 32

Safety Premium Allocation

8

Project

Description

Amount

Key Boxes

Electronic key boxes will enable there to be key access by different departments and allow for tracking of who has keys at any time.

$ 1.0 MM

East High School Secure Vestibule

Conversion of the main entrance of East High School to enable a layered security approach to access control and visitor management.

$ 800 K

Door Replacement

Replacement of rusted and old doors at 9 identified schools including 118 single doors and 88 double doors.

$ 2.06 MM

Total

$ 3.860 MM

Approved Projects ($1.174 MM) + Proposed Projects ($3.860MM)

$ 5.034 MM

The final projects were presented to BOC in January to complete the commitment to Safety projects.

Safety Presentation to BOC

9 of 32

Economic Pressures Impacting Projecting Costs

Economic Pressures

  • Surging Global Inflation
    • Inflation at a 40 year high nationally
    • Consumer Price Index at 8.3% YOY (Aug 2022)
    • Decreased purchasing power
  • Rising Core Interest Rate
    • U.S. interest rates trending high
  • International Turmoil
    • European conflict
    • European energy crisis
    • COVID shutdowns
  • Supply Chain Disruptions
    • Demand is outpacing supply
    • Production delays
    • Increased transportation costs
    • Labor shortages

Navigating Economic Pressures

  • Early solicitation of projects
  • Delivery methods: where appropriate, a shift from hard bid, to Design-build & CMGC* to allow design and equipment lead times to run concurrently
  • Early procurement on materials and equipment
  • Following commodity pricing and the impact to material pricing

Project Specific Actions

  • Early solicitation of projects
  • Early procurement of materials
  • Reviewing substitute products
  • Value engineering

9

9

*Construction Manager/General Contractor

10 of 32

2020 Bond Inflationary Overages Projects

Year 4

10

Amesse

2020 GOB

$3,995,245

$5,500,000

$1,504,755

Inflation, underfunded scope

Archuletta

2020 GOB

$649,207

$950,000

$300,793

Inflation

Brown

2020 GOB

$576,665

$1,500,000

$923,335

Inflation, underfunded scope

CEC

2020 GOB

$943,506

$1,643,506

$700,000

Inflation, underfunded scope

DMLK (MEP)

2020 GOB

$2,460,210

$3,500,000

$1,039,790

Inflation, additional scope required

DSA South (Roof)

Unfunded

$0

$2,300,000

$2,300,000

Unforeseen infrastructure improvements required due to water intrusion

Evie Dennis

2020 GOB

$1,810,002

$3,567,491

$1,757,489

Inflation, underfunded scope

Holm

2020 GOB

$838,640

$966,133

$127,493

Inflation

Sub Total

(pg 1)

$11,273,475

$19,927,130

$8,653,655

Project Name

Funding Source

DPS Construction Budget

Estimate/Bid/GMP8

Delta:

Most recent milestone vs. DPS budget

Reason for Overages

*guaranteed maximum price

11 of 32

2020 Bond Inflationary Overages Projects

Year 4

11

Sub Total (pg 1)

$11,273,475

$19,927,130

$8,653,655

Lincoln/

McKinley

2020 GOB

$449,350

$659,320

$209,970

Inflation

Maxwell/

Oakland

2020 GOB

$667,326

$1,485,000

$817,674

Inflation, underfunded scope

Newlon

2020 GOB

$1,147,133

$1,500,000

$352,867

Inflation, underfunded scope

Place (MEP)

2020 GOB

$5,965,707

$8,885,000

$2,919,293

Underfunded scope

Schenck/ Munroe

2020 GOB

$1,566,753

$3,894,164

$2,327,411

Inflation, underfunded scope

Schmitt

2020 GOB

$757,702

$2,000,000

$1,242,298

Inflation, underfunded scope

Total Overages

requested

(pages 1 & 2)

$21,827,466

$38,350,614

$16,523,148

Project Name

Funding Source

DPS Construction Budget

Estimate/Bid/GMP*

Delta:

Most recent milestone vs. DPS budget

Reason for Overages

*guaranteed maximum price

12 of 32

School Based Prioritization based on Recommendations

12

13 of 32

Prioritization Process

Committee Members:

  • Dr. John Henry Adams III – Co-Chair
  • Veronica Booz
  • Matthew Carroll
  • Al Habercorn
  • Vernon Jones Jr.
  • Mia Martinez-Lopez
  • Ryan Nichols – Co-Chair
  • Rebecca Norris
  • Alicia Sierra
  • Taylor Tellez
  • Russell Welch

Board of Education Representatives:

  • Treasurer Sia
  • Director Esserman

13

13

Start of Premium Process

The committee discussed and received information around the BOC prioritization matrix and the Equity Index

October 2023

Knowledge Building

Committee received a mock prioritization process exercise with existing projects to better understand the process

Finalized the BOC prioritization matrix

School leaders were notified about project recommendations

November 2023

Proposed Projects

Reviewed project recommendations identified by DPS staff

Special Public Comment

December 2023

Decision Making

Committee deliberation on proposed projects

Finalize recommendations & notify school leaders

January 2024

Approval

BOC co-chairs present to Finance and Audit Committee

Board of Education vote on recommendation

February 2024

14 of 32

Engagement

Opportunities for Schools

In November, 79 schools were identified with a project(s) on the potential premium list. They were contacted and provided with information about the project up for consideration.

  • An option for public comment, letters, and videos was also included in the communication.

The Bond Oversight Committee heard public comment from school administrators, teachers, staff, parents, and community members from 20 schools. In addition, the committee received several letters, pictures, and videos from students and 16 schools (that did not participate in Public Comment) around the importance of critical maintenance.

The committee recognizes that not as many schools participated in this process. There is a need to engage with school communities and increase the number of schools who participate in public comment in the future.

14

15 of 32

Prioritization Criteria

15

Student Equity-  Providing the resources that students need for success. For measuring student equity, we used the following index:

School % High Poverty + %English Learner + %SPED +%Volatility

District Average % High Poverty + %English Learner + %SPED +%Volatility

This is in line with how DPS allocates student-based funding.

What is the Data?

  • District average Equity Index (EI) is 1.0
  • You can read an EI of 1.1 as that school having 10% above average population of students with greater needs. An EI of 0.7 indicates that school has 30% smaller than average population of harder-to-serve students.

As prioritization was evaluated, we used a method to evaluate district-wide equity and equality through an Equity Index that defines a baseline for ALL schools/programs with greater rigor beyond family income.

Approach to Equity - Equity Index

16 of 32

Prioritization Criteria

16

The Committee recommendations are based on projects aligning with the following key priorities:

Category

Weight

0

1

2

3

Life / Safety – Ability for School to Safely Operate

3x

Critical Maintenance/ Facility Does not impact safety

Addresses a life / safety concern that is low priority and does not impact the school’s ability to operate

Addresses a life / safety concern that is a medium priority due to the risk of impacting a school’s ability to operate

Addresses critical safety violation that directly risks a school’s ability to operate

Code or ADA Does not impact code or ADA

Addresses a low priority code or ADA issue under which DPS has no obligations and presents no negative impacts to students

Addresses a low or medium priority code or ADA issue under which DPS has no obligations but remedying would present a positive student impact

Addresses a high priority code or ADA issue in which DPS has an obligation to remedy the issue and/or would significantly improve the student experience

Student Safety Does not impact student safety/Mental and Behavioral Health

The project improves student safety/Mental and Behavioral Health (Nice to have)

Project expands existing student safety/Mental and Behavioral Health investment that is working and/or invests in piloting new work

Project will bring DPS facilities into

compliance with evolving standards for

student safety/Mental and Behavioral Health

Supporting Value of Equity

2x

The school has an equity index <0.5

Equity index between 0.51 - 1.0

Equity index between 1.01 - 1.5

Equity index > 1.51

Aligned with Instructional Priorities

2x

The project does not impact instruction and academics

The project will improve the student learning environment

The project improves the learning environment and supports new/different instruction

The project directly supports instruction and will support student learning

Time Sensitivity

1x

The project can wait for a future capital request without negatively impacting student experience

The project can wait for a future capital request but would positively impact student experience

The project would enhance the student experience in the near term and/or there is a risk of future cost being significantly higher beyond the rate of construction inflation

The project cannot wait for future funding and the district will fund elsewhere if not from premium to the detriment of other district funded programs

Each committee member used the following rubric to score all projects prior to deliberation. Categories are weighted based on the committee’s discussion of priorities.

17 of 32

Getting to the Recommendation

17

5

BOC Criteria - Urgency of Need for Projects

3

Life Safety & Student Impact

Assessing projects to ensure equity and equality across projects, like playgrounds, outside of the matrix ranking

1

High Priority Projects

Critical Maintenance, technology, sustainability, and playgrounds

4

Assessment of Lower rated Projects

Determine if projects should be prioritized by CPAC

2

Project Scope & Timing

Availability of resources for the projects to be completed in a timely manner (within 18 months after final approval)

The committee utilized the Equity Index and Prioritization Matrix before getting to this point.

18 of 32

Committee Recommendation

Based on Prioritization, Public Comment, and Recommendations from District Staff

18

Category (In no Particular Order)

Recommended Amount

Critical Maintenance - Chillers

$5,625,313

Critical Maintenance - Black Tops / Parking Lots

$4,697,951

Critical Maintenance - Playground Equipment

$3,964,290

Critical Maintenance - Roofing

$2,197,500

Critical Maintenance - Concrete

$650,174

Critical Maintenance - Interior Fixtures

$293,000

Technology - Chromebooks

$1,985,525

21st Century Updates for Athletics

$1,820,610

Total

$21,234,363

Of the 79 schools identified, 60 received project funding and the remaining 19 schools projects will be moved CPAC

19 of 32

Committee Recommendation

Critical Maintenance - Chillers

19

Building Name

Item Name

Equity Index

Recommended Amount

CEC MIDDLE COLLEGE

Cooling Systems - Air Cooled Chiller System

1.6

$957,523

COLLEGE VIEW

Cooling Systems - Air Cooled Chiller System

1.4

$939,409

LOWRY

Cooling Systems - Water Cooled Chiller System

1.01

$1,391,750

MCKINLEY THATCHER

Cooling Systems - Air Cooled Chiller System

0.49

$1,379,109

RANDOLPH

Cooling Systems - Water Cooled Chiller System

1.78

$957,523

Total

$5,625,313

20 of 32

Committee Recommendation

Critical Maintenance - Black Tops & Parking Lots

20

Building Name

Item Name

Equity Index

Recommended Amount

A LINCOLN HS

PARKING LOT

1.7

$1,184,291

AMESSE

BLACKTOP

1.42

$66,713

BLAIR

PARKING LOT

1.07

$51,623

CHELTENHAM

BLACKTOP

1.3

$109,102

CHELTENHAM

PARKING LOT

1.3

$151,096

CONSERVATORY GREEN

BLACKTOP

1.01

$49,457

COWELL

PLAYGROUND

1.58

$52,882

FORCE

BLACKTOP

1.35

$101,810

GARDEN PLACE

PARKING LOT

1.39

$85,633

GARDEN PLACE

BLACKTOP

1.39

$123,502

GILPIN (DLS)

PARKING LOT

0.26

$143,079

GILPIN (DLS)

BLACKTOP

0.26

$156,765

GOLDRICK

BLACKTOP

1.32

$238,954

GREENLEE

PARKING LOT

1.27

$66,381

GREENLEE

BLACKTOP

1.27

$175,701

21 of 32

Committee Recommendation

Critical Maintenance - Black Tops & Parking Lots

21

Building Name

Item Name

Equity Index

Recommended Amount

GUST

BLACKTOP

1.12

$95,818

JOHNSON

PARKING LOT

1.38

$44,251

King (MLK)

PARKING LOT

1.21

$111,093

KIPP SUNSHINE PEAK ACADEMY

DRIVE WAY

1.57

$105,784

KNAPP

BLACKTOP

1.5

$46,561

LAKE

BLACKTOP

1.37

$238,082

MANUAL

PARKING LOT

1.34

$24,094

MCMEEN

BLACKTOP

0.95

$97,217

PHILIPS (ODYSSEY)

BLACKTOP

0.39

$131,073

PIONEER BUILDING (UPREP)

BLACKTOP

1.2

$60,171

REMINGTON (RMP SUNNYSIDE)

BLACKTOP

1.45

$132,328

RISHEL (KIPP DCHS)

PARKING LOT

1.67

$285,019

STEELE

PARKING LOT

0.2

$108,149

SWIGERT-McAULIFFE (SMIS)

BLACKTOP

0.26

$68,576

TELLER

PARKING LOT

0.28

$90,964

22 of 32

Committee Recommendation

Critical Maintenance - Black Tops & Parking Lots

Critical Maintenance - Playgrounds

22

Building Name

Item Name

Equity Index

Recommended Amount

WESTERLY CREEK

BLACKTOP

0.32

$83,080

WHITTIER

BLACKTOP

1.31

$218,704

Total

$4,697,951

Building Name

Item Name

Equity Index

Recommended Amount

ARCHULETA

Playground Equipment and Structures

1.4

$439,500

BLAIR

Playground Equipment and Structures

1.07

$439,500

BROMWELL

Playground Equipment and Structures

0.27

$465,870

BROWN INTERNATIONAL

Playground Equipment and Structures

0.49

$36,625

FALLIS (DGS SE)

Playground Equipment and Structures

1.15

$109,875

FLORIDA PITT WALLER

Playground Equipment and Structures

1.22

$319,370

GILPIN (DLS)

Playground Equipment and Structures

0.26

$26,370

GRANT RANCH

Playground Equipment and Structures

0.81

$542,050

GREEN VALLEY

Playground Equipment and Structures

1.15

$487,845

23 of 32

Committee Recommendation

Critical Maintenance - Playgrounds

Critical Maintenance - Roofing

23

Building Name

Item Name

Equity Index

Recommended Amount

KNAPP

Roofing - EPDM Rubber Membrane

1.5

$952,250

MCMEEN

Roofing - EPDM Rubber Membrane

0.95

$1,245,250

Total

$2,197,500

Building Name

Item Name

Equity Index

Recommended Amount

HOLM

Playground Equipment and Structures

1.23

$139,175

KNAPP

Playground Equipment and Structures

1.5

$439,500

LOWRY

Playground Equipment and Structures

1.01

$26,370

MITCHELL (CASA)

Playground Equipment and Structures

1.59

$26,370

MONTCLAIR

Playground Equipment and Structures

1.18

$26,370

MUNROE

Playground Equipment and Structures

1.56

$439,500

Total

$3,964,290

24 of 32

Committee Recommendation

Critical Maintenance - Concrete

24

Building Name

Item Name

Equity Index

Recommended Amount

BEACH COURT

RIGHT OF WAY SIDEWALK

1.23

$30,328

COLUMBIAN

PEDESTRIAN WALK

1.05

$67,381

COLUMBINE

PEDESTRIAN WALK

0.75

$82,217

EAGLETON

PEDESTRIAN WALK

1.36

$117,573

EBERT (POLARIS)

PEDESTRIAN WALK

0.18

$18,119

HALLETT

PEDESTRIAN WALK

1.02

$44,019

PLACE BRIDGE

PEDESTRIAN WALK

1.59

$222,846

SUMMIT ACADEMY

RIGHT OF WAY SIDEWALK

1.56

$67,690

Total

$650,174

25 of 32

Committee Recommendation

Technology

Critical Maintenance - Interior Fixtures

25

Building Name

Item Name

Equity Index

Recommended Amount

All District

Chromebooks - Middle School Students

1.00

$1,985,525

Total

$1,982,525

Building Name

Item Name

Equity Index

Recommended Amount

BARNUM

Lunch Tables Affixed to the wall

1.36

$58,600

FAIRMONT

Lunch Tables Affixed to the wall

0.82

$58,600

GARDEN PLACE

Lunch Tables Affixed to the wall

1.39

$58,600

SMITH

Lunch Tables Affixed/ Anchor to the wall

1.28

$58,600

UNIVERSITY PARK

Lunch Tables Affixed/ Anchor to the wall

0.52

$58,600

Total

$293,000

26 of 32

Committee Recommendation

21st Century Updates - Athletics

26

Building Name

Item Name

Equity Index

Recommended Amount

East

Provide ADA accessibility to softball field

0.42

$148,500

Jefferson

Provide ADA access to multi-use field

0.93

$74,250

North

Provide ADA accessibility at softball field

1.01

$74,250

Randolph

Provide baseball bullpens

1.78

$22,275

Randolph

Provide batting cage at softball field

1.78

$74,250

Randolph

Provide masonry baseball dugouts with roof

1.78

$259,875

Randolph

Provide masonry softball dugouts with roof

1.78

$259,875

Randolph

Provide softball bullpens

1.78

$17,820

Washington

Provide softball batting cage

1.69

$74,250

Washington

Upgrade baseball dugouts to masonry with metal roof

1.69

$259,875

Washington

Upgrade softball bullpens

1.69

$17,820

Washington

Upgrade softball dugouts to masonry with metal roof

1.69

$259,875

West

Provide softball bullpens

1.51

$17,820

West

Upgrade shared baseball/softball dugouts to masonry with metal roof

1.51

$259,875

Total

$1,820,610

27 of 32

Thank you!!

27

28 of 32

Appendix

29 of 32

2020 Bond Premium Allocation - First Round (Jan 2022)

  • What is bond premium? Additional proceeds generated at the time of a bond sale that reflect interest rate expectations.

29

Sources/Uses

Budget

Notes

DSA (Johnson and Wales purchase)

$30M

Property acquisition

Montbello Project

$35M

Change to original scope, scope complexity, programmatic needs

Denver School of Arts

$10M

Programmatic needs, code upgrades

Inflationary Budget Overages

$10.5M

Total Budgeted Costs

$85.5M

30 of 32

2020 Bond Proposed Premium Allocation - 2nd Round

30

30

Sources/Uses

Budget

Notes

Recommended Sources:

Premium

2020 Underspend Existing Projects

$45.8M

$19M

$64.8M

$90.5M of total Premium remains after the initial allocation; using $45.8M of premium will leave $44.7M for a future process

Kepner debt service ($11MM) as part of the underspend

$30M remains in reserves to ensure original commitments are met

Recommended Uses:

Montbello Project

$20M

inflation, design refinement, subcontractor buyout

Ceylon E-5 Campus

$22.2M

Inflation, design refinement, subcontractor buyout

DSA Program Expansion

$6.6M

Inflation, design refinement, programmatic needs, code updates

Thomas Jefferson MEP

$6M

Inflation, design refinement, code updates

2023 Inflationary Budget Overages

$8.5M

Inflation, design refinement

2024 SDF 20% Inflation Add

$1.5M

Inflation

Total Budgeted Expenses

$64.8M

31 of 32

2020 Premium vs. Reserves

2020 Voter Approved Par Amount of Bonds - $795M

Bond Reserves

Premium funds -

  • Purpose - ensure all committed scopes of the 2020 bond are fulfilled; uphold the financial integrity of the bond program
  • Uses - overages, additional scope needed if found cost effective or, necessary to ensure fulfillment of intended scope, and/or new projects which would primarily have been classified as emergency, imminent failure, or critical maintenance needs, among others
  • Management - DPS Senior Leadership
    • Internal controls; weekly meetings; approval levels allow CFO to approve up to $500K and anything from $500K to under $1M requires COO and Deputy COO (note: with weekly meetings all opinions/concerns are voiced and addressed and taken into consideration)

Interconnection to BOC: Informative; transparent to BOC on monthly basis with dashboard - open forum for discussion

  • Purpose - allows for completion of 2020 scope or, as available, investment in additional capital needs of the district
  • Uses - TBD - vetted through BOC and application of the equity index, approved by BOE
  • Management - Allocated and managed in accordance with BOE approved investments

Interconnection to BOC: In conjunction with recommendations and information from DPS, BOC is responsible for ultimate list of allocations that will go to BOE for approval of additional funds

Regardless of use of Reserves or Premium, any allocation of funds greater than $1M would go to the FAC and ultimately the BOE for approval; for projects outside of original voted approved bond package or premium allocation:

    • BOC - information presented for informal discussion to move forward and to ensure prudent spend of funds
    • FAC - contracts and circumstances reviewed, project financially vetted, informal approval before proceeding to BOE
    • BOE - gives ultimate approval to proceed

32 of 32

2020 Bond & Mill Investments by Category

32