What Has Changed in XRF Technology in the Last 20 Years?
My XRF Time Line
My XRF Time Line
My XRF Time Line
Technology Changes�Different energy dispersive detector
Parameter | Prop-Counter | PIN-diode | SDD |
Sensitive area | 1100 mm² | 25 mm² | 30 mm² |
Captured angle | 0.36 | 0.022 | 0.033 |
Energy resolution | About 950 eV | 190 eV | 150 eV |
Count rate capability | Typ. 10 000 cps Up to 50 000 cps | 12 – 15 000 cps | > 200 000 cps |
For Cu-Ka for 40 kV, 1 mA Incoming counts Detected counts | 13 300 11 900 | 7 900 4 300 | 9 400 9 300 |
Technology Changes�Proportional Counter v SDD
SDD detector ( Si(Li)) vs Pin diode
Technology Changes
Silicon Drift Detector
Introduction to µ-XRF�Type of µ-XRF
Typical spot size and analytical task
20 – 60 mm | (50 µm) 0.1 – 1.0 mm | 25 – 100 µm |
Large areas | Small areas | Smallest spot |
Homogeneous material | Small areas, position sensitive for jewelry and coatings | Very small spots, distribution analysis, smallest particles and inclusions |
Poly-capillary focusing optics
5 mm
300 μm
10 μm
Poly-capillary focusing optics
X-ray source
foutput
finput
Typical Scanning Applications �PCB of a PDA with integrated circuits – look inside
Mapping area: 116x68 mm², Step size: 90 µm Measuring time: 15 ms/pixel, 5.5 h total
Technology Changes
Technology Changes
Technology Changes
Technology Changes
Technology Changes
Technology Changes
The New Hobby, Home XRF
Typical Early Fe Making Slag Find
Sample Crushing
Fe Slag Sample Analysis
My Geological Reference Materials
Type English | Na | Mg | Al | Si | P | S | K | Ca | Ti | Mn | Fe |
Granite | 2.25 | 0.13 | 6.83 | 34.69 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 4.30 | 0.70 | 0.13 | 0.03 | 1.37 |
Gneiss | 2.25 | 1.31 | 8.57 | 30.71 | 0.07 | 0.0453 | 2.24 | 1.49 | 0.43 | 0.06 | 3.83 |
Peridotite | 0.04 | 29.49 | 0.21 | 19.49 | 0.00 | 0.012 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.09 | 5.18 |
Nosean | 5.56 | 0.28 | 11.11 | 24.03 | 0.35 | 0.0601 | 7.23 | 1.74 | 0.28 | 0.21 | 2.53 |
Greywacke | 2.00 | 1.18 | 7.36 | 32.58 | 0.04 | 0.032 | 1.55 | 0.50 | 0.35 | 0.04 | 3.34 |
Gabbro | 1.01 | 5.26 | 7.83 | 24.78 | 0.03 | 0.0356 | 0.67 | 8.00 | 0.29 | 0.14 | 5.60 |
Tonalite | 2.86 | 0.70 | 8.04 | 32.07 | 0.04 | 0.0961 | 1.99 | 1.89 | 0.26 | 0.03 | 1.93 |
Basalt | 4.09 | 2.81 | 7.62 | 17.30 | 0.46 | 0.0489 | 3.14 | 9.93 | 1.28 | 0.26 | 7.41 |
Shale | 0.89 | 1.51 | 10.06 | 27.91 | 0.07 | 0.0681 | 2.78 | 0.81 | 0.52 | 0.08 | 4.91 |
Copper Slate | 0.36 | 3.15 | 4.29 | 13.42 | 0.05 | 0.3204 | 1.74 | 15.72 | 0.02 | 0.08 | 1.97 |
Fe2O3 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5.49 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.05 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 0.20 | 66.10 |
Home Made Reference Materials
No. | ID | g Fe2O3 | g Standard | STD Used |
1 | Iron Ore -1 | 5.06 | 0.5 | Gabbro |
2 | Iron Ore -2 | 5.01 | 1.16 | Gabbro |
3 | Iron Ore -3 | 5 | 1.55 | Basalt |
4 | Iron Ore -4 | 5.07 | 2.09 | Gabbro |
5 | Iron Ore -5 | 5.01 | 1.75 | Gabbro |
6 | Iron Ore -6 | 5.06 | 2.99 | Gabbro |
7 | Iron Ore -7 | 5.04 | 3.55 | Gabbro |
8 | Iron Ore -8 | 5 | 4 | Gabbro |
9 | Iron Ore -9 | 4.8 | 4.1 | Gabbro |
10 | Iron Ore -10 | 3.9 | 4 | Gabbro |
11 | Iron Ore -11 | 5.04 | 0.284 | Granite |
12 | Iron Ore -12 | 5.02 | 1.02 | Cordereite Gneiss |
13 | Iron Ore -13 | 5 | 1.27 | Peridotite |
14 | Iron Ore -14 | 5.01 | 2.66 | Nosean Phonolite |
15 | Iron Ore -15 | 5 | 5.52 | Greywacke |
16 | Iron Ore -16 | 5.01 | 2.53 | Gabbro |
17 | Iron Ore -17 | 5.02 | 4.51 | Tonalite |
18 | Iron Ore -18 | 5.08 | 1.03 | Basalt |
19 | Iron Ore -19 | 5.03 | 2.56 | Shale |
20 | Iron Ore -20 | 2.57 | 3.82 | Granite |
21 | Iron Ore -21 | 1.52 | 4.03 | Granite |
22 | Iron Ore -22 | 3 | 3.09 | Basalt |
23 | Iron Ore -23 | 2.03 | 5.03 | Basalt |
24 | Iron Ore -24 | 1.08 | 3.76 | Granite |
25 | Iron Ore -25 | 0.52 | 3.75 | Granite |
26 | Iron Ore -26 | 0.4 | 3.76 | Granite |
Comparison of Fe calibration Graphs Using the Same Spectra, Loose Powders
As Fe Regression = 0.992892
As Fe2O3 Regression = 0.952421
Fe Slag Sample Analysis, Sample Cups
Eventually I ran out of all the spare cups I had acquired.
Got these off an auction site, plastic cups for beauty products
Use an “O” ring to hold on the Mylar type film
Pressed Pellets
Pressed Pellets
Pressed Pellets
Fused Beads
Fused Beads
Fused Beads
Fused Beads
Cu 22mm Plumbing Stop End
0.4g Fe2O3 Fused in 4g Borax, Cast into Cu “Mould”
Blue spectrum top of the bead, Red spectrum bottom
Unfiltered X-Ray tube so will see Cu and Ni from the tube
0.4g Fe2O3 Fused in 4g Borax, Cast into Cu “Mould”, Expanded View
0.4g Fe2O3 Fused in 4g Borax, Cast into Al and Cu “Mould”, Expanded View
Blue spectrum top of the bead cast into Al mould
Red spectrum top of the bead cast into Cu mould
Unfiltered X-Ray tube so will see Cu and Ni from the tube
Conclusion
20 Years of XRF