1 of 35

PART 2 | GOVERNANCE IN PRACTICE

Academic Governance: Structures, Policy and Practice

From shared governance to NEP 2020 and quality culture

Dr. Naraginti Amareswaran Reddy | Dept. of Education, NEHU, Shillong

UGC-MMTTC, Gauhati University, Guwahati | 30 September 2026

2 of 35

Recap of Part 1

  • Context: loosely coupled, professional
  • Lenses: four frames
  • Styles: transformational, servant, distributed, adaptive
  • Human side: trust, conflict, decisions

3 of 35

Learning Outcomes: Part 2

  • Understand governance models and bodies
  • Read NEP 2020 as a leader
  • Build a quality and ethics culture
  • Lead change with evidence

4 of 35

1

Governance Structures

Who decides what

5 of 35

Governance Models

  • Collegial: consensus among scholars
  • Bureaucratic: rules and hierarchy
  • Political: bargaining among groups
  • Cybernetic: self-correcting systems
  • Real universities blend all four

Birnbaum (1988)

6 of 35

Shared Governance

  • Faculty lead on curriculum and research
  • Board and administration lead on finance and law
  • Trust and communication hold it together
  • Joint statement of principles: AAUP (1966)

AAUP (1966)

7 of 35

Statutory Bodies (Central University)

Top Bodies

  • Court
  • Executive Council
  • Academic Council

Support Bodies

  • Finance Committee
  • Planning Board
  • Selection Committees

Names and powers depend on your Act and Statutes: verify

8 of 35

Academic Bodies

Academic

  • Board of Studies
  • School Board
  • Research Committee

Quality and Welfare

  • IQAC
  • Grievance Cell
  • Internal Committee

9 of 35

Decision Rights: Clarity Prevents Conflict

  • Map each decision: who proposes, approves, implements
  • Follow the Act, Statutes and Ordinances
  • Record reasons in minutes
  • Review overlapping powers regularly

10 of 35

Transparency and Accountability

  • Right to Information: proactive disclosure
  • Publish policies, admissions and results on time
  • Open selection criteria
  • Accountability builds legitimacy

RTI Act (2005)

11 of 35

IKS

Indian Roots of Governance

Assemblies, saṅgha, gurukula and modern builders

12 of 35

Sabha and Samiti: Ancient Deliberation

  • Vedic assemblies debated and advised rulers
  • Dharma set limits even on the king
  • Modern link: collegial and shared governance

Atharva Veda; Jayaswal (1924)

13 of 35

Sangha: Consensus in Buddhist Monasteries

  • Decisions taken in assembled meetings with rules of procedure
  • Dissent heard, agreement recorded
  • Nalanda and Takshashila: renowned learning centres
  • Modern link: Boards of Studies and committees

Vinaya tradition; Nalanda records

14 of 35

Arthashastra: Administration and Audit

  • Defined duties for each official
  • Regular inspection and accountability of officers
  • Revenue and expenditure recorded
  • Modern link: audit, RTI and transparency

Kautilya, Arthashastra

15 of 35

Institution Builders of Modern India

  • Ashutosh Mukherjee: Calcutta University, scholar-administrator
  • Radhakrishnan: University Education Commission (1948)
  • Vikram Sarabhai: PRL, ISRO, IIM Ahmedabad
  • Lesson: vision, autonomy and trust in talent

16 of 35

IKS in NEP 2020

  • NEP encourages Indian Knowledge Systems in curricula
  • Ethics, values and constitutional duties in education
  • Local languages and traditions in teaching
  • Leader task: integrate IKS with rigour, not ritual

NEP 2020

17 of 35

2

NEP 2020: Governance Reform

Autonomy, accountability, accreditation

18 of 35

What NEP 2020 Asks of Leaders

  • Empowered Boards of Governors
  • Merit-based appointment of leaders
  • Light but tight regulation
  • Multidisciplinary institutions
  • Leaders as facilitators

NEP 2020, Section 19

19 of 35

Graded Autonomy

  • Academic autonomy: curriculum, pedagogy
  • Administrative autonomy: structure, staffing
  • Financial autonomy: resources and use
  • Linked to accreditation and performance

NEP 2020

20 of 35

Autonomy With Accountability

Autonomy Gives

  • Innovation
  • Faster decisions
  • Curriculum freedom

Accountability Demands

  • Outcome data
  • Public disclosure
  • Ethical conduct

Balance is the leader's central task

21 of 35

3

Quality Culture

NAAC, NIRF, outcomes

22 of 35

IQAC: From Documents to Daily Practice

  • Plan, act, review, improve continuously
  • Involve all faculty, not only the coordinator
  • Use feedback from students and alumni
  • Evidence over ritual

23 of 35

Outcome-Based Education

  • Programme Outcomes to Course Outcomes
  • Assessment aligned to outcomes
  • Attainment analysis
  • Close the loop: improve teaching

24 of 35

NAAC and NIRF: Use Them Wisely

  • Accreditation checks quality, ranking compares
  • Metrics guide, they must not replace purpose
  • Data quality and honesty matter
  • Celebrate improvement, not only position

25 of 35

4

Ethics and Integrity

Trust is the licence to lead

26 of 35

Ethical Leadership

  • Transparency in appointments and purchases
  • Fair workload and credit for work
  • Protect whistle-blowers
  • Ethics is what leaders tolerate

Northouse (2021)

27 of 35

Conflict of Interest

  • Declare relationships and interests
  • Recuse from decisions involving them
  • Keep records
  • Apply the same rule to everyone

28 of 35

Responsible AI in Academic Governance

  • Use AI to support, not replace, judgement
  • Disclose AI use in teaching and research
  • Verify outputs, protect data
  • Set an institutional AI policy

29 of 35

Student Voice and Grievances

  • Accessible grievance channels
  • Time-bound redressal
  • Student representation in bodies
  • Safe campus: anti-ragging, gender sensitivity

30 of 35

5

Leading Change

Turning policy into practice

31 of 35

Kotter's 8 Steps, Academic Style

  • Create urgency with data
  • Build a coalition of respected faculty
  • Form a vision and communicate it
  • Enable action, remove barriers
  • Win small, then anchor in culture

Kotter (1996)

32 of 35

Resistance Is Information

  • Ask what people fear losing
  • Involve sceptics early
  • Offer training and time
  • Do not confuse silence with consent

33 of 35

ACTIVITY | Case: Implementing NEP 2020 in a Department (20 min)

  • Choose one reform: multidisciplinary courses or credit transfer
  • List stakeholders and likely concerns
  • Plan first three steps

34 of 35

ACTIVITY | Action Plan (20 min)

  • One governance issue at your institution
  • One leadership move, one policy fix, one metric
  • 60-second pitch to a colleague

35 of 35

"Great universities are built by leaders who make others leaders."

Thank you | Questions and Discussion