1 of 213

2 of 213

EGYPT � ISLAMIC � CULTURAL � CENTER

3 of 213

PROJECT SCOPE

4 of 213

PROJECT LOCATION

  • Egypt Islamic Cultural Center is located in New Administrative Capital of EYGPT.

​

5 of 213

  • it exists in the middle of the governmental district

​

  • it is bounded by Sahet El-Shaab and road 11 from one side and Mohamed ben Zayed from the other side

PROJECT LOCATION

6 of 213

Project Overview

3B(LE)

440700 m²

32 Months

7 of 213

PROJECT COMPONENTS

EGYPT MOSQUE

TWO MINARETS

The West Service Building

The East Service Building

THE WEST HALL

THE EAST HALL

The Cultural Center

8 of 213

Graduation Project Scope

  • Egypt Mosque is selected to be our case study on graduation project.

​

19,100 m²

12,000 Prayer

656,400,000 LE

9 of 213

PROJECT PARTICIPANTS

Armed Forces Engineering Authority (owner)

Arab Contractors

(Main Contractor)

ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS GROUP (Consultant)

10 of 213

PROJECT CHARTER

  • Project Data

​

  • Project Description

Project Name

Egypt Islamic Cultural Center

Project Start Date

23/10/2019

Project Expected Finish Date

8/10/2021

Owner

Armed Forces Engineering Authority

Project Main Contractor

Arab Contractors

Project Consultant

ECG

Contract Type

Cost Plus

Project Description:

The Egypt Islamic Cultural Center is in the middle of the New Administrative Capital on a plateau 24 meters high in the middle of the government district, where the project overlooks from the south side the Green River and from the north side the presidential axle and Sahet El-Shaab, where the mosque accommodates a total of 12,000 prayers.

-Site Location:

Egypt Islamic Cultural Center is in New Capital of EYGPT, it exists in the middle of the governmental district, it is bounded by Sahet El-Shaab and road 11 from one side and Mohamed ben Zayed from the other side

11 of 213

PROJECT CHARTER

  • Project Goals and Purpose.

​

  • Deliverables

Project Goals and Purpose

  • Establishing of the Egypt Islamic Cultural Center parallel with the new administrative capital is considered as the main mosque of the modern Egyptian state in the third millennium and a symbol of modern Egypt.
  • The importance of the mosque comes from the simulation of El-Azhar mosque architecturally and historically.
  • Accommodate the largest number of prayers.
  • It was established to preserve the Islamic identity of Muslims so that their prayers and generations with their religion, faith and islamic nation are not interrupted, as well as by spreading islamic da'wa among non-Muslims who wish to learn about Islam.
  • Contribute to the promotion of the principle of freedom of difference with the other in opinion and vision that lead to greater cognitive richness

Deliverables

​

-Praying Square

-Hall of doctrines teaching

-Hall of Qur’an memorization

-Hall of sunnah teaching

-Occasions Hall

-Retail stories

-Restaurant

-The Cultural commercial center

-Parking spaces

-Building Services

12 of 213

PROJECT CHARTER

  • Scope Definition

Scope Definition

Construction of a mosque with an area of 19100 square meters to accommodate 12,000 prayers, two western and eastern halls with an area of 3055 square meters and 2800 square meters and two minarets with a height of 140 meters and an area of 1600 square meters each,

In scope:

Egypt Mosque

​

Out of scope:

​

The Cultural Center

Minarets

Landscaping

The East Hall

The West Hall

Parking

The West Service Building

The East Service Building

​

13 of 213

PROJECT CHARTER

  • Assumptions and Constraints.

​

  • Project High Level Risk.

Assumptions and Constrains

Assumptions:

  • Easy of obtaining permits.
  • Qualified Contractors are available and interested in the project.
  • Client deliverable will be made on time according to schedule.
  • Availability of water and electricity source.

Constrains:

  • Milestones dates must be followed.
  • The completion of the project must be on time 8/10/2021.

Success Criteria:

  • Achieving Islamic architecture in the general shape of the mosque to become an icon in the new administrative capital.
  • To be the largest mosque in AFRICA.

Project High Level Risk

  • Complexity of construction method
  • Delay in finish milestones.
  • Inflation
  • Execution at high elevations
  • COVID-19 first and second wave
  • Finishing and assembling the main dome, lifting, and fixing it

14 of 213

SITE MANAGEMENT

15 of 213

IMPORTANCE OF SITE ORGANISATION IN CONSTRUCTION

  • Increases safety
  • Enhances productivity
  • boosts profits
  • minimize hazards for workers and visitors
  • risk minimization
  • effective site communication
  • construction efficiency increased

​

16 of 213

PROJECT LAYOUT

17 of 213

ENTRANCES, EXITS AND MOVEMENT PATH

18 of 213

CARAVANS

19 of 213

MATERIALS STORAGE

20 of 213

CONSTRUCTION SITE STRATEGY

The West & East Hall

Egypt Mosque

The Minarets

The West & East Service Buildings

Parking

The Culture Centre

Landscape

21 of 213

CONSTRUCTION ALTERNATIVES STUDY

22 of 213

  • Better functional efficiency.
  • Cost effectiveness.
  • Better durability.
  • Ease of construction.
  • Better finish.
  • Minimum waste.
  • Less maintenance cost.
  • Minimum defects.
  • Less energy intensive.

Benefits of Construction Alternative study

23 of 213

The main stages of alternative study using VE:

Information

Phase

Creativity

Phase

Analysis

Phase

Development

Phase

Presentation

Phase

  1. Information Phase.
  2. Creativity Phase.
  3. Analysis Phase.
  4. Development Phase.
  5. Presentation Phase.

24 of 213

Value engineering potential saving during the project period:

25 of 213

Alternatives Case Study:

  • Cup-Lock Formwork :
  • Bailey Bridge Formwork:

26 of 213

Comparison between Cup-Lock Formwork & Bailey Bridge Formwork:

No.

Characteristics

Cup-Lock Formwork

Bailey Bridge Formwork

1

Re-usage value of formwork

100-250 times

100-350 times

2

Rate of production

4 Towers/Day

5 Towers/Day

3

Tools needed for demolition of formwork

A hammer is the only tool required for dismantle the system

Hammer, wrench

4

Specialty in construction

Scaffold system and horizontal buildings

Vertical buildings, bridges, chimneys and tanks

5

Labor & Equipment resource

2-4 workers

2workers & crane

6

Wastage of formwork material

Low

Very low

7

Spacing between elements

500 mm

100-300 mm

27 of 213

Alternative study for formwork:

Methods of evaluating alternatives will be according to: Scale: (1 → 5)

1. Economic Factors.

2. Engineering Factors.

​

The evaluation method steps:

1. The weighted of desired criteria.

2. The analysis of desired criteria.

​

The weighted evaluation method :

Criteria of evaluation :

A. Special Need.

B. Safety during construction.

C. Cost.

D. Rate of Production.

E. Easy of Construction.

F. Availability.

Criteria of evaluation

Row weight

Normalized weight

Special Need

12

31%

Safety during construction

10

25%

Cost

9

23%

Rate of Production

5

13%

Easy of Construction

3

8%

Availability

0

0%

Total

39

100%

28 of 213

Alternative study for formwork:

  • Then we would use The Bailey Bridge Formwork as it safer than the cup-lock till the height of 18 meters above the ground then we make plate form to establish the cup-lock formwork to execute the deep beam formwork and the Bailey bridge main use for the 26 meter
  • Then the Cup-lock form was dangerous and insecure and non-computable with the site working strategy.

Construction Material

Special Needs

Safety during construction

Cost

Rate of Production

Easy of Construction

Cup-Lock Formwork

5

4

5

3

2

Bailey-bridge Formwork

7

6

4

2

1

Evaluation Criteria

Normalized Weight

Alternatives

Cup-Lock Formwork

Bailey-bridge Formwork

Rank

Score

Rank

Score

Special Need

31%

5

155

7

217

Safety during construction

25%

4

100

6

150

Cost

23%

5

115

4

92

Rate of Production

13%

3

39

2

26

Easy of Construction

8%

2

16

1

8

Total

100%

425

493

29 of 213

Second: Alternatives for construction of the main dome:

30 of 213

Comparison between 3 methods that can be used for the main dome:

  • Method No. 1

(Fixing then Exterior GRC & Interior Finishes GRP)

  • Method No. 2

(Exterior Finishing GRC then Fixing and Interior Finishes GRP)

  • Method No. 3

(Exterior GRC & Interior GRP Finishes then Fixing)

Finishing & Fixing process for 3rd Method

31 of 213

Alternative study for Main Dome:

Methods of evaluating alternatives will be according to:

  • Economic Factors.
  • Engineering Factors.

The evaluation method steps:

  • The weighted of desired criteria.
  • The analysis of desired criteria.

The weighted evaluation method :

Criteria of evaluation :

  • Cost.
  • Time consumed.
  • Safety during construction.
  • Easy of Construction.
  • Availability.

Scale: (1 → 5)

​

Criteria of evaluation

Row weight

Normalized weight

Cost

10

37%

Time consumed

8

30%

Safety during construction

5

18%

Easy of Construction

4

15%

Availability

0

0%

Total

26

100%

32 of 213

Alternative study for Main Dome:

Then for our project we choose the 3rd method as it's the more safe, cost reduced, time consumption and suitable for our site working strategy to compensate the project's cost and time and to more likely to limit the risks which is our first priority.

Construction Material

Cost

Time consumed

Safety during construction

Easy of Construction

Method No. 1

3

2

2

1

Method No. 2

3

3

1

1

Method No. 3

4

3

2

2

Evaluation Criteria

Normalized Weight

Alternatives

Method No. 1

Method No. 2

Method No. 3

Rank

Score

Rank

Score

Rank

Score

Cost

37%

3

111

3

111

4

148

Time consumed

30%

2

60

3

90

3

90

Safety during construction

18%

2

36

1

18

2

36

Easy of Construction

15%

1

15

1

15

2

30

Total

100%

222

234

304

33 of 213

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

34 of 213

  • Materials
  • Labor
  • Equipment

RESOURCE ELEMENT

Resources classifications:

  • Consumable (Money, Material).
  • Non-Consumable (Labor, Equipment)

35 of 213

LABOR

EGYPT MOSQUE RESOURCE

36 of 213

EGYPT MOSQUE RESOURCE

EQUIPMENT

37 of 213

EGYPT MOSQUE RESOURCE

MATERIAL

38 of 213

EGYPT MOSQUE RESOURCE

Resource calculations for Pouring for foundation plan concrete :

  • Material :

1 m3 of plan concrete = 350 kg cement + 0.4 m3 sand + 0.8 m3 coarse aggregate + 200 L water

Cost of 1 m3 of plan concrete (ready mix) = 725 L.E

The price included 5% wastage of concrete.

Amount of concrete = 2118.87 m3

  • Labor :

Pouring crew = 2 skilled labor + 2 formers + 2 helper

Production rate for 1 crew = 140 m3 / Day

Cost for crew per day = 6 * 150 = 900 L.E

Number of crews needed = 4 crews / Day

39 of 213

EGYPT MOSQUE RESOURCE

  • Equipment :
  • Concrete pump PR = 500 m3 for Horizontal & 150 m3 Vertical per Day. Concrete pump cost = 500 L.E/Day
  • Vibrator PR = 500 m3 for Horizontal & 150 m3 Vertical per Day. Vibrator rent per day = 300 L.E/Day

Resource calculations for Pouring for foundation plan concrete :

40 of 213

Item

Activities

Laborer

Non-labor

 

Material

 

Crew

PR/Day

No. Of Crews

Equipment

Num

Duration

Item

Amount

Unit

 

Earthwork

Excavation

1 Surveyor

400

155

loader

155

5

 

310000

m³

 

1 Laborer

2 Truck

310

 

Soil replacement

3 Laborer

200

24

Loader

24

5

Clear Sand

24000

m³

 

Escort Roller

24

 

Backfilling

1 Surveyor

200

69

Loader

69

21

Clear Sand

286000

m³

 

1 Laborer

Escort Roller

69

 

Plain Concrete Works For Footing

Formwork Works

1 Carpenter

20

0

 

 

15

 

 

 

 

2 Helper

 

 

 

 

 

 

1 Laborer

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pouring

6 Laborer

140

4

Concrete pump

1

5

Ready Mix Concrete

2118.87

m³

 

​

Deshuttering Formwork

1 Carpenter

30

1

 

 

5

 

 

 

​

2 Helper

 

 

 

 

 

​

1 Laborer

 

 

 

 

 

​

Reinforced Concrete Works For Footings

Formwork Works

1 Carpenter

20

0

 

 

19

 

 

 

​

2 Helper

 

 

 

 

 

​

1 Laborer

 

 

 

 

 

​

Fixing Steel

4 Steel Fixer

1

16

 

 

21

Reinforcement Steel

334.0284

ton

​

6 Helper

 

 

​

Strengthening

1 Carpenter

20

1

 

 

7

 

 

 

​

2 Helper

 

 

 

 

 

​

1 Laborer

 

 

 

 

 

​

Pouring

6 Laborer

140

4

Concrete pump

1

5

Ready Mix Concrete

2783.57

m³

​

​

Curing

2 Skilled Laborer

 

1

 

 

10

 

 

 

​

Deshuttering Formwork

1 Carpenter

30

1

 

 

5

 

 

 

​

2 Helper

 

 

 

 

 

​

1 Laborer

 

 

 

 

 

​

RESOURCE PLANNING

Structure Example:

  • plain concrete works for footing (pouring)

Q= 2118.87

P.R=140 m/ day

D= 5 days

N.C= (Q / P.R*D) = 4 crews

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

41 of 213

RESOURCE PLANNING

Item

Activities

Laborer

Material

Crew

PR/Day

No. Of Crews

Duration

Item

Amount

Unit

Moisture Insulation

Walls

2 Laborer

100

3

64

APP Rolls

17155

m²

Floors

2 Laborer

100

2

34

4330

m²

Thermal Insulation

Floors

1 Technical

100

2

34

Polystyrene Rolls

4330

m²

2 Laborer

Screed Works For Roof

Roof Floor

2 Skilled Laborer

100

1

55

Concrete Foam

4330

m²

1 Helper

Masonry Works

Thickness = 100/200 mm

1 Skilled Laborer

25

3

562

Thickness = 100 mm

1074

m²

1 Semiskilled Laborer

Thickness = 200 mm

25300

1 Helper

Thickness = 200 mm

2950

Thickness = 200 mm

285

Handrails Works

Installations

1 Skilled Laborer

50

1

5

Handrails for Mihrab

68

m

1 Helper

Handrails for Entrances

115

Plastering Works

Plastering Works For Walls

1 Skilled Laborer

37

3

66

Mortar

7166

m²

1 Semiskilled Laborer

1 Helper

Plastering Works For Ceiling

1 Skilled Laborer

30

4

44

Mortar

5222

m²

1 Semiskilled Laborer

1 Helper

Painting Works

Painting

1 Skilled Laborer

100

2

120

Acrylic Painting

12388

m²

1 Helper

Architecture example:

  • Masonry Works

​

42 of 213

LABOR RESOURCE HISTOGRAM

Arches (Formwork crew – steel fixing crew concrete pouring crew - concrete curing crew) – Fire fighting crew – mechanical equipment fixation crew – BMS crew – Lighting crew

Slabs (Formwork crew – steel fixing crew concrete pouring crew - concrete curing crew)

43 of 213

EQUIPMENT RESOURCE HISTOGRAM

Man lift – Mobile crane – Concrete pump

Concrete Pump – Loader - Truck

44 of 213

CONSTRUCTION METHOD STATEMENT

45 of 213

  • The construction stage starts by the earthworks for overall area of the Mosque
  • Then the mosque was divided into several zones

CONSTRUCTION STRATEGY

46 of 213

  • Construction has begun in parallel for Zones 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5
  • After completing the construction of the previous five zones, construction began in zone 6 (Sahn El masjid)

​

CONSTRUCTION STRATEGY

47 of 213

  • Then the construction for Zone 6 (Sahn El Masjid) starts and it was divided into 8 parts (4 major directions and 4 minor directions), starting execution with the four major direction.

CONSTRUCTION STRATEGY

48 of 213

METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION

  • COLUMNS WORKS
  • Most of mosque columns have a high height within range of 15 to 30 meter.
  • the construction procedure will be deferent form the regular procedure of constructing.
  • the column is being executed at 4, 5, or 6 Parts.

​

49 of 213

METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION

  • COLUMNS WORK
  • The reason for this sequence is that at this height the probability of occurring vertical deformation to formwork or reinforcement is higher.

​

50 of 213

METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION

  • MAIN DOME WORKS

The main steel beam

The Secondary steel beam

Braces

Steel Plate

  • Metal frame and Finishes of Main Dome components

51 of 213

METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION

  • MAIN DOME WORKS

52 of 213

METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION

  • MAIN DOME WORKS
  • Brackets that has fixed on dome metal body and by which GRC or GRP will be fixed into dome body

53 of 213

METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION

  • MAIN DOME WORKS

54 of 213

METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION

  • MAIN DOME WORKS

55 of 213

Procurement & bailey bridge fixing

Assembling of 12 supplied segment (guide)

Assembling the twelve other segments in the site

Water leaking test

Trial lifting test

Install GRC as external finishing beginning from fourth ring to tenth ring

Install GRP as internal finishing for the dome

Lifting, fixing the dome

Continue GRC installation for first, second & third ring

METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION

  • MAIN DOME WORKS – Flow chart explain summery for relation

56 of 213

METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION

  • MARBLE CLADDING WORKS
  • Marble cladding using mechanical fixation method is being used for internal walls

57 of 213

METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION

  • MARBLE CLADDING WORKS
  • Marble cladding using mechanical fixation method is being used for and external walls

58 of 213

METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION

  • MARBLE CLADDING WORKS
  • Normal marble and marble with Islamic pattern

59 of 213

METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION

  • BLOCK WORKS
  • Due to high elevation so execution have made at parts

60 of 213

WBS & ACTIVITY LIST

61 of 213

PROJECT WBS

62 of 213

STRUCTURAL WORKS WBS

63 of 213

MEP WORKS WBS

64 of 213

ARCHITECTURAL WORKS WBS

65 of 213

Project Name

Project Phase

Disciplines

Project Zone

Level

Work package

MSQ

CST

STR

Z00

L00

XXX

WBS ID SYSTEM

Structural WBS

Project Name

Project Phase

Disciplines

Project Zone

Finishing description

Level

Work package

MSQ

CST

ARC

Z00

XXX

L00

XXX

Architectural WBS

Project Name

Project Phase

Disciplines

Project Zone

Level

MEP category

Work package

MSQ

CST

MEP

Z00

L00

XXX

XXX

MEP WBS

66 of 213

  • MEP WBS Example:- HVAC First Fix

EGYPT MOSQUE

    • MSQ

Construction

    • CST

MEP Works

    • MEP

Mihrab zone

    • Z01

Level 4.85

    • L04

Mechanical

    • MEC

HVAC

    • HVC

First Fix

    • 1FX

WBS ID SYSTEM

67 of 213

ACTIVITY LIST

Columns work

Shuttering counter for columns

Fixing steel for columns

Second shuttering and Strengthening counter formwork for columns

Pouring concrete for columns

Curing for columns

Deshuttering counter formwork for columns

68 of 213

Disciplines

Project Zone

Level

Work package

Numbering

ST

Z0

L00

XX

00000

Structural activity

Disciplines

Project Zone

Level

Finishing description

Work package

Numbering

AR

Z0

L00

XX

XX

00000

Architectural activity

Disciplines

Project Zone

Level

MEP category

Work package

Numbering

MP

Z0

L00

XX

XX

00000

MEP activity

ACTIVITY ID SYSTEM

69 of 213

  • Example: Installing Ducts for East entrance
  • ID : MP.Z2.L17.MC.HV.1710

MEP

    • MP

THE EAST ENTRANCE

    • Z2

Level 17.85

    • L17

Mechanical

    • MC

HVAC

    • HV

Numbering

    • 1710

ACTIVITY ID SYSTEM

70 of 213

QUANTITY SURVEYING

71 of 213

QUANTITY SURVEYING TYPES AND TOOLS

  • Used Software :
  • AutoCAD. 
  • Microsoft Excel. 

​

Quantity surveying

Initial survey

Preparation stage

Construction stage

Actual / Engineering surveying

Implementation stage

Delevering stage

72 of 213

UNITS USED IN EGYPT MOSQUE PROJECT

Meter

Square meter

Cubic meter

Number

Ton

73 of 213

METHODS OF QS

  • Calculations :

Footing: 

Quantity = (length * width * depth) * no. of model 

  

Tie Beam: 

Quantity = clear length * width * depth 

​

Columns for each level: 

Quantity = (length * width * clear height) * no. of model 

​

Slabs: 

Quantity = (area* thickness) + total drop panel vol. - opening vol. 

​

Beams: 

Quantity = length * width * depth*no. of beams 

​

74 of 213

FOUNDATION QS

Quantity = (length * width * depth) * no. of model 

75 of 213

PC & RC FOOTING CALCULATIONS EXAMPLE

76 of 213

RC TIE BEAM FOUNDATION

Quantity = clear length * width * depth 

RC Tie Beam Calculations Example

77 of 213

COLUMNS QS

Quantity = (length * width * clear height) * no. of model 

78 of 213

COLUMNS CALCULATION EXAMPLE

This example represents columns (from the foundation level to level 4.85) :

79 of 213

SLABS QS

Quantity = (area* thickness) + total drop panel vol. - opening vol. 

80 of 213

BEAMS QS

Quantity = length * width * depth*no. of beams 

81 of 213

FRAMES QS

Quantity = length * width * depth*no. of beams 

82 of 213

SLAB REINFORCEMENT QS

RFT weight / ton for slab (top or bottom) =

(total area * weight of bar /m * number of bar /m) /1000

​

Additional RFT weight / ton for slab (top or bottom) =

(Length of bar*number of bar /m * distribution distance * weight of bar /m *replication number) / 1000

​

RFT bar chair weight / ton for slab =

(Number of bar * length of bar * weight of bar /m) / 1000

83 of 213

SLAB REINFORCEMENT QS

Reinforcement for slab level (+9.35)

84 of 213

SLAB REINFORCEMENT QS EXAMPLE 

  • Main RFT In Slabs
  • Additional RFT (TOP)

85 of 213

SLAB REINFORCEMENT QS EXAMPLE 

  • Additional RFT (BOTTOM)
  • RFT FOR BAR CHAIR

86 of 213

TOTAL QS ERROR PERCENTAG TABLE

Item

Q.S

BOQ

Error %

PC Foundation (m³)

2118.87

2000

5.49

RC Foundation (m³)

7228.18

7550

-4.26

RC Columns (m³)

5369.5

5150

-4.26

SOG (m²)

15563.12

16500

-5.68

RC Slabs (m³)

8569.43

9400

-8.83

Pre-cast Ribs (m³)

991.45

1000

-0.86

Topping Slab for pre-cast rips (m²)

4845.75

4500

7.68

Arches (m³)

760.13

800

-4.98

Frames (m³)

2140.87

2050

4.43

87 of 213

TOTAL QS ERROR PERCENTAG DIAGRAM

88 of 213

TIME SCHEDULE

89 of 213

PROJECT CALENDAR

90 of 213

MAIN PROCESSES FOR TIME SCHEDULE

Develop schedule

Estimate activity duration

Sequence activities

Define activities

91 of 213

  • Example:- East Entrance

ACTIVITY SEQUENCE

Develop schedule

Estimate activity duration

Sequence activities

Define activities

92 of 213

ACTIVITY SEQUENCE

Develop schedule

Estimate activity duration

Sequence activities

Define activities

93 of 213

  • Example

ESTIMATE DURATION

Activity name: Installing Plaster coats for walls ground story

Quantity: 2913 m2

No. of crews: 4/Day

Production rate: 37 m2/d

Duration = 2913/ (4*37) = 19.682 d = 20 Day.

Duration = Quantity (Q) / Production Rate (PR) * No. Of Crews

Equation: -

Develop schedule

Estimate activity duration

Sequence activities

Define activities

94 of 213

DEVELOP SCHEDULE

Develop schedule

Estimate activity duration

Sequence activities

Define activities

95 of 213

PROJECT TOTAL DURATION

  • Project start date : 23 – Oct – 2019
  • Project finish date : 8 – Oct – 2021
  • Project total duration : 717 days

​

96 of 213

PROJECT GANNT CHART

97 of 213

TIME SCHEDULE EVALUATION

98 of 213

TIME SCHEDULE EVALUATION

  • No tasks with missing predecessors except project start
  • No tasks with missing successors except project completion
  • No SF relations
  • No negative floats
  • 90.8 % of activities relations are FS
  • 6% of activities relations are FF
  • 3.2% of activities relations are SS
  • Critical activity percentage % = 334/2506 = 13.33%
  • Number or Near Critical(1d to 4d) = 381/2506 =15.204%

�

FS (90.8%)

FF (6%)

SS (3.2%)

SF (0%)

99 of 213

COST ESTIMATION

100 of 213

INTRODUCTION

  • PRICE COMPONENTS

Bid Price = Direct Costs + Indirect Costs + Markup

BID PRICE

COST

DIRECT COST

LABOR

EQUIPMENT

MATERIAL

INDIRECT COST

Project overhead

General overhead

MARKUP

PROFIT

RISK CONTINGENCY

101 of 213

COST ESTIMATE

  • Direct cost
  • Example : Plastering works

1- Material

1 m2 of plastering = 0.03 m3 sand + 6 kg cement

  • Quantity of plastering = 12388 m2
  • Amount of sand = 12388 * 0.03 = 371.64 m3 (wastage = 10 %)
  • Total amount of sand = 371.64 * 1.1 = 408.80 m3
  • Amount of cement = 12388 * 6 = 74328 kg ≈ 74.33 ton (wastage = 5 %)
  • Total amount of cement = 78.0465 * 1.05 = 78.0465 ton
  • Amount of water = (408.804* 200)/1000=81.7608 m3
  • Cost of 1 m3 sand = 30 LE/m3
  • Cost of 1 m3 cement = 950 LE / ton
  • Cost of wire mesh = 2 LE / m2

102 of 213

  • Total cost of sand = 408.80 * 30 = 12264 (LE.)
  • Total cost of cement = 79 * 950 = 75050 (LE.)
  • Total Cost of water = 5596 (LE/m3)
  • Total cost of wire mesh = 12388 * 3 = 37164 (LE.)

Total cost of plastering materials =

12264+ 75050 + 5596 +37164= 130,074 (LE.)

  • Cost of material = 130,074/12388=10.5 LE/m2

2- labor

Crew consists of:

  • 1 Skilled Labor = 1*250 = 250 (LE/Day).
  • 1 Semi-Skilled Labor = 1 *220 = 220 (LE/Day).
  • 1 Helper = 1 *150= 150 (LE/Day).
  • Cost of one crew = 620 (LE/Day)

COST ESTIMATE

103 of 213

  • For walls (quantity = 7166m2)
  • Production rate = 37 m2 /day
  • No. of crews = 3 /day
  • Total costs of crews = No. of crews * cost of one crew * duration

= 3* 620*66=122,760 (LE.)

  • Total plastering cost for walls = Total cost of material + total cost of crews

= (7166*10.5) + 122,760 = 198,003(LE.)

Total direct Cost of 1m2 = 198003/7166 = 26.51 (LE.)

COST ESTIMATE

104 of 213

  • For ceiling (quantity = 5222m2)
  • Production rate = 30 m2 /day
  • No. of crews = 4 /day
  • Total costs of crews = No. of crews * cost of one crew * duration

= 4* 620*44=109,120 (LE.)

  • Total plastering cost for walls=Total cost of material + total cost of crews

= (5222*10.5) + 109,120 = 163,951 (LE.)

Total direct Cost of 1m2 = 163,951/5222 = 31.39 (LE.)

COST ESTIMATE

105 of 213

INDIRECT COST

PROJECT OVERHEAD

Project Overhead

Job Title

No.

Salary/month (L.E)

Total/month (L.E)

Project Manager

1

40,000.00

40,000.00

Construction Manager

3

20,000.00

60,000.00

Site Engineer

8

9,000.00

72,000.00

Technical office Engineer

4

8,000.00

32,000.00

Supervisor

8

6,500.00

52,000.00

Utilities

-

-

350,000.00

Caravans

9

10,000.00

90,000.00

Mobile crane

6

3,000.00

18,000.00

lift machine

5

2,000.00

10,000.00

First Aid Equipment

-

25,000.00

25,000.00

Tower Crane

4

500,000.00

2,000,000.00

GENERATOR

4

70,000.00

280,000.00

Consultant Requirements

-

50,000.00

50,000.00

Site Clearing

-

600,000.00

600,000.00

Site Fence

-

913,604.63

913,604.63

Total / Month (L.E)

3,079,000.00

Total Project Duration (month)

24

Total Project Overhead Cost (L.E)

75,409,604.63

106 of 213

INDIRECT COST

GENERAL OVERHEAD

General Overhead

Job Title

No.

Salary/month (L.E)

Total/month (L.E)

Board Member

1

95,000.00

95,000.00

Sector Manager

1

50,000.00

50,000.00

Deputy branch manager

1

45,000.00

45,000.00

Total / Month (L.E)

190,000.00

Total Project Duration (month)

24

Project Overhead Cost (L.E)

4,560,000.00

Relative weight for the MOSQUE

40%

Total Project Overhead Cost (L.E)

1,824,000.00

107 of 213

  • Recap sheet

BID PRICE

Item

Matrial

Labor

Equipment

Quantity

Lumpsum

Item Direct Cost

Item Price

Total Price

Unit Price

STRUCTURAL WORKS

Earthwork

9,300,000.00

943,600.00

8,931,200.00

620,000.00

 

19,174,800.00

28,344,961.72

45.72

Plain Concrete Works For Footing

6,882,089.76

123,000.00

1,500.00

2,000.00

 

7,006,589.76

10,357,423.21

5,178.71

Reinforced Concrete Works For Footings

14,219,867.35

764,960.00

3,000.00

4,000.00

 

14,987,827.35

22,155,610.10

5,538.90

Mass Reinforced Concrete Works For Footings

23,314,201.76

1,295,900.00

3,000.00

4,500.00

 

24,613,101.76

36,384,078.44

8,085.35

Jacketing Reinforced Concrete Works For Footings

692,900.00

18,240.00

600.00

200.00

 

711,740.00

1,052,122.74

5,260.61

Reinforced Concrete Works For Columns

37,980,521.64

3,400,240.00

32,400.00

5,150.00

 

41,413,161.64

61,218,603.66

11,887.11

Reinforced Concrete Works For SOG

16,541,124.78

675,000.00

20,500.00

16,500.00

 

17,236,624.78

25,479,873.04

1,544.23

Reinforced Concrete Works For Slabs, Beams and Stairs

54,738,943.81

2,709,700.00

108,600.00

10,400.00

 

57,557,243.81

85,083,436.21

8,181.10

Reinforced Concrete Works For Pre-cast Ribs

5,507,504.75

420,000.00

21,600.00

1,200.00

 

5,949,104.75

8,794,206.27

7,328.51

Reinforced Concrete Works For Topping Slab For Pre-cast Ribs

1,923,515.81

122,400.00

2,400.00

3,500.00

 

2,048,315.81

3,027,902.93

865.12

Reinforced Concrete Works For Archs

3,501,561.88

194,740.00

3,900.00

800.00

 

3,700,201.88

5,469,787.46

6,837.23

Reinforced Concrete Works For Frames

20,215,164.98

1,691,200.00

9,600.00

2,000.00

 

21,915,964.98

32,397,062.21

16,198.53

Metal Frame Works For Small and Middle Domes

2,438,646.00

211,800.00

72,000.00

66.00

 

2,722,446.00

4,024,429.34

60,976.20

Metal Frame Works For Main Dome

3,503,000.00

378,000.00

108,013.00

172.00

 

3,989,013.00

5,896,719.69

34,283.25

Insulation For Foundation

1,400,000.00

30,000.00

-

10,000.00

 

1,430,000.00

2,113,883.60

211.39

108 of 213

  • Recap sheet

BID PRICE

Item

Material

Labor

Equipment

Quantity

Lumpsum

Item Direct Cost

Item Price

Total Price

Unit Price

FINISHES WORKS

Moisture Insulation

966,825.00

78,000.00

-

21,485.00

 

1,044,825.00

1,544,502.40

71.89

Thermal Insulation

259,800.00

37,400.00

-

4,330.00

 

297,200.00

439,333.01

101.46

Screed Works For Roof

947,454.00

143,000.00

-

16,622.00

 

1,090,454.00

1,611,953.03

96.98

Masonry Works

2,159,373.50

1,045,320.00

-

29,609.00

 

3,204,693.50

4,737,307.02

160.00

Handrails Works

315,800.00

2,100.00

-

183.00

 

317,900.00

469,932.59

2,567.94

Plastering Works (for walls)

75,243.00

122,760.00

-

7,166.00

 

198,003.00

292,696.01

40.85

Plastering Works (for ceiling)

54,831.00

109,120.00

 

5,222.00

 

163,951.00

242,358.97

46.41

Floor Works (marble)

2,711,000.00

161,700.00

-

3,511.00

 

2,872,700.00

4,246,540.85

1,209.50

Floor Works (granite)

5,751,250.00

244,750.00

 

6,515.00

 

5,996,000.00

8,863,528.72

1,360.48

Floor Works (vynle)

12,500.00

550.00

 

50.00

 

13,050.00

19,291.04

385.82

Floor Works (epoxy)

1,584,980.00

61,050.00

 

3,686.00

 

1,646,030.00

2,433,227.85

660.13

Floor Works (carpet)

19,052,600.00

93,750.00

 

12,292.00

 

19,146,350.00

28,302,905.78

2,302.55

Floor Works (morter)

158,263.00

 

 

13,762.00

 

158,263.00

233,950.74

17.00

Painting Works

309,700.00

103,200.00

-

12,388.00

 

412,900.00

610,365.41

49.27

Marble Cladding Works

47,505,609.00

5,911,500.00

-

37,838.00

 

53,417,109.00

78,963,322.16

2,086.88

Doors Installation Works (Metal model 3)

100,000.00

3,000.00

-

5.00

 

103,000.00

152,258.75

30,451.75

Doors Installation Works (Metal model 3)

73,600.00

2,000.00

 

4.00

 

75,600.00

111,754.97

27,938.74

Doors Installation Works (Metal model 6)

48,000.00

1,000.00

 

3.00

 

49,000.00

72,433.77

24,144.59

109 of 213

  • Recap sheet

BID PRICE

Item

Material

Labor

Equipment

Quantity

Lumpsum

Item Direct Cost

Item Price

Total Price

Unit Price

Doors Installation Works (wooden)

828,238.00

9,450.00

 

460.16

 

837,688.00

1,238,304.14

2,691.03

Doors Installation Works (aluminume)

12,757.50

400.00

 

7.29

 

13,157.50

19,449.95

2,668.03

Windows Installation Works

3,070,830.48

12,400.00

-

1,962.19

 

3,083,230.48

4,557,755.49

2,322.79

Signs Installation Works

25,600.00

3,000.00

-

8.00

 

28,600.00

42,277.67

5,284.71

Bayonet Installation Works (H 1.2 m)

115,200.00

6,750.00

-

12.00

 

121,950.00

180,271.40

15,022.62

Bayonet Installation Works(H 2.4 m)

153,600.00

6,000.00

 

8.00

 

159,600.00

235,927.15

29,490.89

Bayonet Installation Works(H 8 m)

64,000.00

3,000.00

 

1.00

 

67,000.00

99,042.10

99,042.10

Steel Mesh Installation Works (grill)

6,000.00

750.00

 

1.00

 

6,750.00

9,978.12

9,978.12

GRC Works (for domes)

8,898,000.00

 

 

3,559.20

 

8,898,000.00

13,153,382.01

3,695.60

GRC Works (cornice, H 2 m)

534,000.00

 

 

356.00

 

534,000.00

789,380.31

2,217.36

GRC Works (cornice, H 2.5 m)

810,000.00

 

 

432.00

 

810,000.00

1,197,374.63

2,771.70

GRC Works (cornice, H 2.75 m)

837,375.00

 

 

406.00

 

837,375.00

1,237,841.45

3,048.87

GRC Works (cornice, H 2.9 m)

691,650.00

 

 

318.00

 

691,650.00

1,022,424.89

3,215.17

GRC Screens Works

4,833,400.00

 

 

1,859.00

 

4,833,400.00

7,144,926.57

3,843.42

GRP Work (for domes)

9,552,000.00

 

 

3,184.00

 

9,552,000.00

14,120,151.15

4,434.72

GRP Work (for ceiling)

21,884,800.00

 

 

10,942.40

 

21,884,800.00

32,350,992.88

2,956.48

MEP Work

MEP Work

 

 

 

 

76,563,544.61

76,563,544.61

113,179,315.62

110 of 213

  • Recap sheet

BID PRICE

111 of 213

  • COST LOADING

BID PRICE

112 of 213

  • S - Curve

BID PRICE

113 of 213

  • Works that are progressing in every month

Foundation works – columns works

Backfilling – Foundation– SOG – columns

Foundation-SOG - insulation for foundation– Slabs– columns works

foundation - SOG – columns – Slabs - circular beam – deep beam – inverted beam – Electrical works - Block works - Plastering

34,339,887 M

53,545,864 M

42,397,366 M

37,887,645 M

Backfilling - foundation - insulation - SOG – columns –Slabs - circular beam – Domes – inverted beam- deep beam – Electrical works – Plastering – GRC - GRB

28,355,023 M

columns –Slabs - circular beam – Pre-cast ribs - Pre-cast slab – HVAC works – Fire fighting works - Electrical works – Cladding works – Bayonet works

28,355,023 M

BID PRICE

114 of 213

CASH FLOW

115 of 213

CASH FLOW

  • Cash flow
  • Advanced payment = 10% of total project price
  • Retention value = 15 % from every invoice, and it will be paid back to the contractor after one year after the last payment.
  • Owner’s payment delay is two months.
  • Total duration for the project 24 months.

116 of 213

CASH FLOW

  • Cash flow

Months

Cash out

Cum cash out

Cash in

Cum cash in

0

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

2

33,376,507.51

33,376,507.51

65,639,127.27

65,639,127.27

4

64,837,951.55

98,214,459.06

37,041,384.38

102,680,511.65

6

37,562,154.34

135,776,613.40

71,957,423.49

174,637,935.14

8

31,706,778.60

167,483,391.99

41,686,632.32

216,324,567.46

10

25,643,251.16

193,126,643.16

35,188,312.41

251,512,879.87

12

30,371,003.23

223,497,646.39

28,458,984.89

279,971,864.77

14

33,051,958.44

256,549,604.83

33,705,863.45

313,677,728.22

16

37,333,789.67

293,883,394.50

36,681,198.50

350,358,926.71

18

52,553,270.79

346,436,665.29

41,433,192.29

391,792,119.00

20

47,084,646.86

393,521,312.15

58,323,834.61

450,115,953.61

22

34,429,631.07

427,950,943.23

52,254,733.43

502,370,687.03

24

13,982,112.56

441,933,055.79

38,210,145.21

540,580,832.24

26

1,652,853.81

443,585,909.60

15,517,405.64

556,098,237.88

27

 

443,585,909.60

100,293,034.81

656,391,272.69

TOTAL

656,391,272.69

117 of 213

CASH FLOW

  • Cash flow diagram

118 of 213

CASH FLOW

  • Net Cash flow diagram

119 of 213

UPDATED SCHEDUALE

120 of 213

INTRODUCTION

121 of 213

INTRODUCTION

  • % Complete type

122 of 213

UPDATE SCHEDULE

  • Data date 11/3/2021

123 of 213

UPDATE SCHEDULE

124 of 213

UPDATE SCHEDULE

125 of 213

UPDATE SCHEDULE

126 of 213

UPDATE SCHEDULE

127 of 213

UPDATE COST

128 of 213

UPDATE COST

129 of 213

UPDATE COST

130 of 213

UPDATE COST

131 of 213

EARNED VALUE ANALYSIS

132 of 213

EARNED VALUE ANALYSIS

  • Earned Value Management (EVM)

Earned value management is a project management technique for measuring project performance and progress. It has the ability to combine measurements of the project

  • Keys
  • BCWS (PV): Budget Cost of Works Scheduled
  • BCWP (EV): Budget cost of Works Performed
  • ACWP (AC): Actual Cost of Works Performed
  • SV: Schedule Variance
  • BAC: Budget at Completion
  • EAC: Estimate at Completion
  • CV: Cost Variance

133 of 213

EARNED VALUE ANALYSIS

134 of 213

EARNED VALUE ANALYSIS

BCWS (PV) = 487,670,765.89

BCWP (EV) = 478,172,457.61

ACWP (AC) = 482,800,135.05

  • Schedule variance (SV)

(SV) = (EV)–(PV)

= 478,172,457.61– 487,670,765.89 = -9,498,308.28 L.E (Behind Schedule)

  • Cost variance (CV)

(CV) = (EV)–(AC)

=478,172,457.61– 482,800,135.05= -4,627,677.44 L.E (over budget)

135 of 213

EARNED VALUE ANALYSIS

  • Cost performance index (CPI)

CPI = EV/AC

= 478,172,457.61/ 482,800,135.05= 0.990

(over budget)

  • Schedule performance index (SPI)

 

SPI = EV/PV

= 478,172,457.61/ 487,670,765.89 = 0.980

(Behind Schedule)

136 of 213

EARNED VALUE ANALYSIS

Budget at Completion (BAC) = 656,391,268.32

Estimated at Completion (EAC)

  • EAC = AC + BAC – EV

= 482,800,135.05 + 656,391,268.32 - 478,172,457.61

= 661,018,945.8 L.E

  • EAC = AC + (BAC – EV) / CPI

= 482,800,135.05 + (656,391,268.32 - 478,172,457.61) / 0.990

= 662,819,135.8 L.E

  • EAC = AC + [(BAC – EV) / (CPI*SPI)]

= 482,800,135.05 + [(656,391,268.32 -478,172,457.61) / (0.990 * 0.980)] 

= 666,492,992.9 L.E

Take the biggest value

EAC = 666,492,992.9 L.E

 

​

 

137 of 213

UPDATE TIME SCHEDULE

138 of 213

UPDATE TIME SCHEDUALE

139 of 213

CONTRACT

140 of 213

WHY WE NEED CONTRACTS?

Contracts provide a description of responsibilities.

Contracts can secure payment.

Contracts bind parties to their duties.

Contracts provide recourse when the relationship falters.

Contracts can establish a time frame for duties.

141 of 213

TYPE OF CONTRACTS

  • Fixed - Price Contract.
  • Price - Adjustment Contract.
  • Cost - Plus Contract.
  • Target - Cost Contract.

142 of 213

  • When it is not possible to estimate its cost with reasonable accuracy due to unstable prices at the time the contract is undertaken or when the work is spread over a long period of time and prices of materials, rates of labor etc. are likely to fluctuate.
  • When there is an emergency and no time to negotiate a contract price and the work is more important than its cost.
  • Where contract is with a government department. In such cases cost-plus contracts are advantageous both to the contractor and contracted as neither party stands to lose; a fair price is offered by the contracted and a reasonable profit accrues to the contractor.

143 of 213

TYPES OF TENDERS

  • Open tender.
  • Selective tender.
  • Serial tender.
  • Negotiation Tender
  • Direct order

​

144 of 213

DELIVERY METHOD

  • Design-Bid-Build (Traditional Building).
  • Design-Build (D-B)

​

​

145 of 213

CONTRACT VS FIDIC

IN CONTRACT:

​

IN FIDIC:

​

Comment:

No Difference between contract and FIDIC

​

146 of 213

IN CONTRACT:

​

IN FIDIC:

​

Comment:

No Difference between contract and FIDIC

​

CONTRACT VS FIDIC

147 of 213

Risk name

 

Effect

 

Penalty

 

  • Unable to meet with customer requirements

 

Delay in delivery for the whole project

 

100000 EGP/Day

 

  • Workers and visitors in site who not wear safety hat or shoes.

 

affect the workers and visitor’s life’s

10000 EGP

  • Unhanged workers on heights.

 

affect the workers life's

30000 EGP

SOME RISKS AND PENALTIES

148 of 213

RISK MANAGEMENT

149 of 213

Risk has three components:

  1. Event.
  2. Probability.
  3. Impact.

RISK MANAGEMENT

150 of 213

Project risk management PROCESS

  1. Plan risk management.
  2. Risk identification
  3. Risk analysis.
  4. Risk response plan.
  5. Risk monitoring and control.

151 of 213

PLAN RISK MANAGEMENT

    • Project Management Plan.
    • Project Charter.
    • Enterprise Environmental Factors.
    • Organizational Process Assets.

Inputs:

    • Analytical Techniques.
    • Expert Judgment.

Tools & Technics:

    • Risk Management Plan.

Outputs:

152 of 213

RISK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE (RBS)

153 of 213

LIKELIHOOD EXPECTATION MATRIX

154 of 213

CONSEQUENCES SCALE MATRIX

155 of 213

RISK MATRIX

156 of 213

Risk IDENTIFICATION

​

    • Project management plan (Risk, Cost, Schedule, Quality and Human resource).
    • Scope baseline (Scope statement, WBS, WBS dictionary).
    • Project documents.
    • Organizational process assets.
    • Enterprise Environmental factors.

​

Inputs:

    • Expert Judgment.
    • Information gathering.
    • SWOT analysis.
    • Checklist analysis.
    • Assumption analysis.
    • Diagramming techniques.

Tools & Technics:

    • Risk Register.

Outputs:

157 of 213

INFORMATION-GATHERING TECHNIQUES

  1. Expert Judgment.
  2. Checklist Analysis.
  3. Brainstorming.
  4. Root cause analysis.
  5. Assumptions Analysis.
  6. SWOT Analysis.

158 of 213

RISK REGISTER

Risk Management Register For Egypt Mosque

Risk Identification

Categories

Risk ID

Risk Name

Risk Type

Trigger

Risk Owner

Primary Objective

Design

D2

Delay in design drawings

Threat

multiple changes by the owner

Design team

Time

D8

Release of new construction material

Opportunity

regular upgrades in construction material

-

Cost

Organizational

O2

Losing critical staff member at crucial point of the project

Threat

-

Management Organization

Time

O10

Functional units not available, overloaded

Threat

-

Project manager

Time

Technical

T2

inadequate or insufficient site information

Threat

lack of designs

Construction team

Time

T5

A technology currently being developed that will save time if released

Opportunity

regular upgrades in construction technology

-

Time

159 of 213

Risk Management Register For Egypt Mosque

Risk Identification

Categories

Risk ID

Risk Name

Risk Type

Trigger

Risk Owner

Primary Objective

Economical

E1

Inflation

Threat

-

-

Scope

E4

Change in equipment rent price

Threat

-

Project Manager & Procurement

Cost

E6

annual market challenge

Opportunity

-

-

Cost

Management

M1

Tight schedule

Threat

contract document

Planning team

Cost

M8

Delay in supply marble

Threat

-

procurment team

Time

M10

Communications problem between construction team and design team

Threat

absence of coordinator

project coordinator

Time

Construction

C1

Failure if happen to use of the bailey bridge formwork for the first time in building construction

Threat

-

Construction team & PM

Cost

C5

Failure during placing the main dome

Threat

failure in the lifting machine

Construction team & PM

Quality

C8

Failure of the lifting machines

Threat

something wrong with the machine

Construction team & PM

Cost

160 of 213

Risk Management Register For Egypt Mosque

Risk Identification

Categories

Risk ID

Risk Name

Risk Type

Trigger

Risk Owner

Primary Objective

Safety

S2

Lack of safety signs

Threat

there are no signs in the site

Safety team

Quality

S3

Reuse existing safety Plan

Opportunity

-

Safety team & PM

Time

S10

The death of one of the workers at any acceding

Threat

lack of safety plan

HSE (insurance)

Cost

Labor

L5

Labor disputes

Threat

-

-

Quality

Environmental

N4

Earthquake

Threat

-

-

Cost

Political

P4

reduce in steel costs

Opportunity

-

procurment team

Cost

P6

Coercive force

Threat

increase the number of the infected civilians

-

Time

Quality

Q1

Testing fails

Threat

test usually fail

Quality team & PM

Quality

Q2

Formwork failure during pouring

Threat

cracks in the formwork

Quality control

Cost

161 of 213

QUALITATIVE RISK ANALYSIS

​

    • Risk Management Plan.
    • Scope Baseline.
    • Risk Register.
    • Enterprise Environmental Factors.
    • Organizational Process Assets.

​

Inputs:

    • Risk Probability and Impact Assessment.
    • Probability and Impact Matrix.
    • Risk Categorization.
    • Expert Judgment.

Tools & Technics:

    • Project Documents Updates.

Outputs:

162 of 213

RISK SCORING MATRIX

163 of 213

Risk Management Register For Egypt Mosque

Qualitative Risk Analysis

Categories

Risk ID

Risk Name

Probability

Impact

Risk Score

Risk Probability Rate

Level

Rate

Level

Rate

Design

D2

Delay in design drawings

2

Low

3

Moderate

6

Moderate

D8

Release of new construction material

3

Moderate

3

Moderate

9

Major

Organizational

O2

Losing critical staff member at crucial point of the project

3

Moderate

3

Moderate

9

Major

O10

Functional units not available, overloaded

2

Low

2

Low

4

Minor

Technical

T2

inadequate or insufficient site information

3

Moderate

3

Moderate

9

Major

T5

A technology currently being developed that will save time if released

2

Low

4

High

8

Moderate

Economical

E1

Inflation

2

Low

3

Moderate

6

Moderate

E4

Change in equipment rent price

2

Low

3

Moderate

6

Moderate

E6

annual market challenge

2

Low

4

High

8

Moderate

QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS

164 of 213

Risk Management Register For Egypt Mosque

Qualitative Risk Analysis

Categories

Risk ID

Risk Name

Probability

Impact

Risk Score

Risk Probability Rate

Level

Rate

Level

Rate

Management

M1

Tight schedule

4

High

5

Extreme

20

Catastrophic

M8

Delay in supply marble

4

High

4

High

16

Major

M10

Communications problem between construction team and design team

2

Low

3

Moderate

6

Moderate

Construction

C1

Failure if happen to use of the bailey bridge formwork for the first time in building construction

4

High

5

Extreme

20

Catastrophic

C5

Failure during placing the main dome

5

Extreme

4

High

20

Catastrophic

C8

Failure of the lifting machines

3

Moderate

3

Moderate

9

Major

Safety

S2

Lack of safety signs

3

Moderate

4

High

12

Major

S3

Reuse existing safety Plan

3

Moderate

3

Moderate

9

Major

S10

The death of one of the workers at any acceding

1

Very low

5

Extreme

5

Moderate

QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS

165 of 213

Risk Management Register For Egypt Mosque

Qualitative Risk Analysis

Categories

Risk ID

Risk Name

Probability

Impact

Risk Score

Risk Probability Rate

Level

Rate

Level

Rate

Labor

L5

Labor disputes

1

Very low

3

Moderate

3

Minor

Environmental

N4

Earthquake

1

Very low

5

Extreme

5

Moderate

Political

P4

reduce in steel costs

1

Very low

5

Extreme

5

Moderate

P6

Coercive force

3

Moderate

3

Moderate

9

Major

Quality

Q1

Testing fails

2

Low

4

High

8

Moderate

Q2

Formwork failure during pouring

2

Low

4

High

8

Moderate

QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS

166 of 213

QUANTITATIVE RISK ANALYSIS

​

    • Risk Management Plan.
    • Risk Register.
    • Enterprise Environmental Factors.
    • Organizational Process Assets.

​

Inputs:

​

    • Data Gathering and Representation Techniques.
    • Quantitative Risk Analysis and Modeling Techniques.
    • Expert Judgment.

Tools & Technics:

    • Project Documents Updates.

Outputs:

167 of 213

QUANTITATIVE RISK ANALYSIS TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES

  1. Sensitivity Analysis.
  2. Expected Monetary Value (EMV) analysis.
  3. Decision tree analysis.
  4. Three Point Estimate.

We tried to mitigate the risk of (Failure during placing the main dome) as possible by using the 3rd method of placing the main dome, the analysis steps are detailed in the Alternatives Study chapter.

168 of 213

QUALITATIVE EXAMPLE USING EXPECTED MONETARY VALUE (EMV)

EMV = (Probability %) x (Impact)

Example 2:

The costs of the building material undefined increase in material cost from November 2020 it was equal to 10,600 LE/Ton and in 2021 year as the steel costs increased by 20% from the beginning of the year till now the steel price were 12,250 LE/Ton but now it costs 14,500 LE/Ton (Ezz steel company) price, And the steel cost increased in 23 May 2021 by nearly 1000 LE/Ton. Then in 26 May 2021decreased by 150 LE/Ton.

Risk Event Alternative

Probability (%)

Impact (cost)

Expected Monetary Value (EMV)

Reduce in steel costs

10%

200 L.E/Ton

20

Increase in steel costs

20%

150 L.E/Ton

30

Expected Monetary Value

50

 

169 of 213

The main causes of increasing the steel prices:

  • The raw material costs increased in the global stock exchange by 20 dollars which equal to 300 L.E.
  • Resuming the issuance of building

permits after the temporary suspension.

  • National Mega projects.

​

QUALITATIVE EXAMPLE USING EXPECTED MONETARY VALUE (EMV)

170 of 213

RISK RESPONSE PLAN

​

    • Risk Management Plan.
    • Risk Register.

​

Inputs:

​

    • Strategies for Negative Risks or Threats.
    • Strategies for Positive Risks or Opportunities.
    • Contingent Response Strategies.
    • Expert Judgment.

Tools & Technics:

​

    • Project Management Plan Updates.
    • Project Documents Updates.

Outputs:

171 of 213

RISK RESPONSE STRATEGIES

  • Response Strategies For THREATS:
    1. Avoid.
    2. Mitigate.
    3. Transfer.
    4. Accept.
    5. Escalate.
  • Response Strategies For OPPORTUNITIES :
    1. Exploit.
    2. Enhance.
    3. Share.
    4. Accept.
    5. Escalate.

172 of 213

Risk Management Register For Egypt Mosque

Risk Response

Categories

Risk ID

Risk Name

Response Strategy

Response Actions

Design

D2

Delay in design drawings

Mitigation

making weekly meetings

D8

Release of new construction material

aceept

-

Organizational

O2

Losing critical staff member at crucial point of the project

accept

-

O10

Functional units not available, overloaded

avoid

spare Functional units

Technical

T2

inadequate or insufficient site information

Mitigation

detailed site investigation

T5

A technology currently being developed that will save time if released

accept

-

Economical

E1

Inflation

accept

-

E4

Change in equipment rent price

accept

-

E6

annual market challenge

accept

-

Management

M1

Tight schedule

Mitigation

obtain a professional management team

M8

Delay in supply marble

Mitigation

alternative procurement route by utilizing an alternative contract strategy

M10

Communications problem between construction team and design team

Mitigation

obtain a professional management team

RISK RESPONSE

173 of 213

Risk Management Register For Egypt Mosque

Risk Response

Categories

Risk ID

Risk Name

Response Strategy

Response Actions

Construction

C1

Failure if happen to use of the bailey bridge formwork for the first time in building construction

avoid

accurate calculations Then use the bailey bridge till the height of 18 meters above ground then establish plat form then execute with cup- lock formwork

C5

Failure during placing the main dome

avoid

detailed studies to avoid any failure could happen in placing the dome

C8

Failure of the lifting machines

Mitigation

checking the equipment used

Safety

S2

Lack of safety signs

Mitigation

follow the safety plan

S3

Reuse existing safety Plan

exploit

-

S10

The death of one of the workers at any acceding

Transfer

insurance.

Labor

L5

Labor disputes

transfere

HR

Environmental

N4

Earthquake

Accept

-

Political

P4

reduce in steel costs

Accept

-

P6

Coercive force

Accept

-

Quality

Q1

Testing fails

mitigate

choosing different suppliers

Q2

Formwork failure during pouring

mitigate

Strengthening the formwork ( Having the proper ties)

RISK RESPONSE

174 of 213

QUALITY MANAGEMENT

175 of 213

QUALITY MANAGEMENT

Plan Quality

    • defining standards for quality that are relevant for the product or service, and deciding how these standards will be met.

​

Perform Quality Assurance

    • actions that are carried out in order to determine the reliability and general consistency of a particular service or product.

​

Perform Quality Control

    • Monitoring results to ensure meeting the standards

176 of 213

QUALITY MANAGEMENT

  1. Selection and specifying sources of raw materials.
  2. Approval of sources of raw materials.
  3. Receiving procurement of different raw materials at the site.
  4. Allocating & storing raw materials at inventories.
  5. Design of concrete mixture & mixing of concrete.
  6. Transporting of ready mixed concrete to the site.
  7. Field tests for concrete.
  8. Pouring & hardening.
  9. Compaction & treatment

177 of 213

CONTROLLING QUALITY

  • Water leakage Test:

The purpose of the Water leakage test is to ensure that no water leaks inside after installing the dome when it is exposed to rain.

178 of 213

CONTROLLING QUALITY

  • Lifting trial Test

The test is an attempt to lift the dome.

179 of 213

CONTROLLING QUALITY

Metal cube mold

the specimen

Compression testing machine

  • Compressive strength Test

180 of 213

�

INSPECTION REQUESTS

181 of 213

SAFETY MANAGEMENT

182 of 213

SAFETY IS IMPORTANT

Humanitarian

Financial

183 of 213

CONSTRUCTION IS HIGH HAZARD INDUSTRY

184 of 213

LIST OF HAZARD

  • Working at height.

�

  • Falling objects.

�

  • Slips, trips, and falls.

�

  • Noise.

�

185 of 213

LIST OF HAZARD

  • Hand arm vibration syndrome.

�

  • Material and manual handling.

�

  • Caught-In/Between

�

  • Covid-19

​

186 of 213

CLASSIFICATION OF INCIDENTS

187 of 213

RESPONSIBILITY

  • Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has produced a comprehensive set of safety and health regulations, inspection procedures, and record-keeping requirements.
  • Responsible Persons According To The Occupational Safety And Health Act Of 1970 (Osh Act) Standers Part 1926

​

188 of 213

RESBONSIBILTY

Employers MUST

    • Inform employees about hazards through training, labels, alarms, color coded systems, chemical information sheets and other methods.
    • Keep accurate records of work-related injuries and illnesses.
    • Provide safety training to workers in a language and vocabulary they can understand.
    • Perform tests in the workplace, such as air sampling required by some OSHA standards.
    • Provide required personal protective equipment at no cost to workers*
    • Provide hearing exams or other medical tests required by OSHA standards.
    • Post OSHA citations, injury and illness data, and the OSHA poster in the workplace where workers will see them.
    • Notify OSHA within 8 hours of a work-related fatality or within 24 hours of all

189 of 213

RESBONSIBILTY

WORKERS ALSO HAVE THE RIGHT TO:

    • File a confidential complaint with OSHA to have their workplace inspected.
    • Receive information and training about hazards, methods to prevent harm, and the OSHA standards that apply to their workplace. The training must be done in a language and vocabulary workers can understand.
    • Receive copies of records of work-related injuries and illnesses that occur in their workplace
    • Receive copies of the results from tests and monitoring done to find and measure hazards in their workplace.
    • Receive copies of their workplace medical records.
    • Participate in an OSHA inspection and speak in private with the OSHA inspector.
    • File a complaint with OSHA if they have been retaliated or discriminated against by their employer as the result of requesting an inspection or using any of their other rights under the OSH Act.
    • File a complaint if punished or discriminated against for acting as a “whistleblower” under the 21 additional federal laws for which OSHA has jurisdiction

190 of 213

PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT(PPE)

  • Hard hat
  • Eye protects
  • Vis clothes
  • Face mask
  • Ear plugs
  • Protective boots
  • Safety gloves

191 of 213

WORKING AT HEIGHTS (FALL PREVENTION)

There is real danger and unsafe act

  • No safety harnesses
  • Unsafe path
  • not following the guidelines and safety instruction in the site

192 of 213

SCAFFOLDING

  • No barriers
  • platforms not closely boarded, fenced and securely fastened
  • There are no chin straps, leather gloves and safety harness
  • platforms and area around the scaffold not cleared of debris and unneeded equipment, material and other hazards that will cause a worker to trip or fall.

​

193 of 213

EXCAVATION

Shoring

Stepping or Benching

Sloping

Pilling Sheets

Types of Excavation edge Protection System:

 

  • Shoring
  • Stepping or benching
  • Sheet Pilling
  • Sloping

Stepping is used in site

194 of 213

TRAFFIC MANAGMENT

Avoid Death & Injury, SEPARATE People & Vehicles

Provide:

  • Walkways for workers.
  • Barriers or Rails, especially at workers exits & entrances.
  • Separate vehicle & workers entrances into site
  • Designated crossing points.

These simple steps save lives.

 

195 of 213

SAFETY INDICATION SIGNS

196 of 213

RISK ASSESSMENT

Hazard

Who is at risk

Severity

Likelihood

Risk Impact

Recommended Action

Person Responsible

Buried objects

Excavation workers

Fatality

Likely

High

Doing soil borings and examining them using a mine detection device

Project manager

Covied-19

All the company employees

Fatality

very likely

High

provide Coronavirus Vaccine to all employees

External

Fall

All site workers

Fatality

Unlikely

High

Edges and Slopes must be Inspected in the morning and in the evening. Special materials will be put away from edges

Project manager

Not wearing personal protection system (PPE)

All site employees

Minor Injuries

Likely

Medium

Hire competent person and Provide training for workers

Project manager

Extreme weather

All site employees

Negligible Injuries

Unlikely

Low

Provide first aid and places for emergency situations

External

​

​

SCALE OF LIKELIHOOD

​

 

Very Likely

Likely

Unlikely

Highly Unlikely

SCALE OF SEVERITY

Fatality

High

High

High

Medium

Major Injuries

High

High

Medium

Medium

Minor Injuries

High

Medium

Medium

Low

Negligible Injuries

Medium

Medium

Low

Low

197 of 213

BIM

198 of 213

INTRODUCTION

  • 3D Modeling
  • Clash Detection
  • Quantity Surveying
  • Construction 4D/5D
  • Facilities management
  • Cost estimating
  • Fabrication/shop drawings

​

199 of 213

BIM TECHNOLOGY IN OUR PROJECT

  • 3D Modeling
  • Quantity Surveying
  • Simulation
  • Clash Detection

200 of 213

BIM TECHNOLOGY IN OUR PROJECT

3D Modeling

3D Modeling

2D Plan

201 of 213

BIM TECHNOLOGY IN OUR PROJECT

3D Modeling

3D Modeling

2D Plan

202 of 213

BIM TECHNOLOGY IN OUR PROJECT

3D Modeling

3D Modeling

2D Plan

203 of 213

BIM TECHNOLOGY IN OUR PROJECT

3D Modeling

3D Modeling

2D Plan

204 of 213

BIM TECHNOLOGY IN OUR PROJECT

3D Modeling

  • 3D Model View 1

205 of 213

BIM TECHNOLOGY IN OUR PROJECT

3D Modeling

  • 3D Model View 2 (STR. V.S ARCH.)

206 of 213

BIM TECHNOLOGY IN OUR PROJECT

3D Modeling

  • 3D Model View 3

207 of 213

BIM TECHNOLOGY IN OUR PROJECT

3D Modeling

  • 3D Model View 4

208 of 213

BIM TECHNOLOGY IN OUR PROJECT

Clash Detection

  • Some clashes in our project model

209 of 213

BIM TECHNOLOGY IN OUR PROJECT

Quantity Surveying

  • Quantity Surveying in Revit

210 of 213

BIM TECHNOLOGY IN OUR PROJECT

Quantity Surveying

  • Manual Q.S V.S BIM Q.S

211 of 213

BIM TECHNOLOGY IN OUR PROJECT

Simulation

  • Simulation video

212 of 213

BIM TECHNOLOGY IN OUR PROJECT

Simulation

  • Presentation video

213 of 213

THANK YOU