The Business of Medicine
Copyright © 2016 AAPC
Copyright © 2014 AAPC
Objectives
2
Copyright © 2016 AAPC
Objectives
3
Copyright © 2016 AAPC
4
Copyright © 2016 AAPC
Coding As A Profession
5
Copyright © 2016 AAPC
Coding As A Profession
6
Copyright © 2016 AAPC
Coding As A Profession
7
Copyright © 2016 AAPC
Coding As A Profession
8
Copyright © 2016 AAPC
Coding As A Profession
9
Copyright © 2016 AAPC
Hospital vs. Physician Services
10
Copyright © 2016 AAPC
Hospital vs. Physician Services
11
Copyright © 2016 AAPC
Hierarchy of Providers
12
Physician
Radiology Tech
Physician Assistant (PA)
Nurse Practitioner (NP)
Physical Therapist
Lab Tech
Nurses
Copyright © 2016 AAPC
Payers
13
Copyright © 2016 AAPC
Medicare
14
Copyright © 2016 AAPC
The Medical Record
15
Copyright © 2016 AAPC
Evaluation and Management Documentation
16
Copyright © 2016 AAPC
Operative Report Documentation
17
Copyright © 2016 AAPC
Operative Report Documentation
18
Copyright © 2016 AAPC
Operative Report Coding Tips
19
PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: Right knee lateral discoid meniscus. �
POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: Right knee lateral discoid meniscus. �
PROCEDURES PERFORMED: Right knee arthroscopy, lateral meniscus saucerization, lateral meniscal repair. �
SURGEON: T. Smith M.D.
ASSISTANT: M.D., Resident. �
ANESTHESIA: General. ��ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS: Minimal.
Copyright © 2016 AAPC
Operative Report Coding Tips
20
PROCEDURES PERFORMED: Right knee arthroscopy, lateral meniscus saucerization, lateral meniscal repair. �
SURGEON: T. Smith M.D.
ASSISTANT: M.D., Resident. �
ANESTHESIA: General. ��ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS: Minimal. �
COMPLICATIONS: No complications noted. The patient was taken to the recovery room in stable condition. ��TOTAL TOURNIQUET TIME: 57 minutes. � �INDICATIONS: The patient is a 15-year-old female with right knee painful popping. She has a lateral discoid meniscus. After discussions of options, risks and benefits, it was elected to proceed with surgical management. ��DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: The patient was taken to the operating suite, placed on the operating table in the supine position. She was administered preoperative antibiotics, general anesthetic, followed by intubation by the anesthesia team. The standard 3-portal knee scope was performed. On evaluation of the intraarticular space, cartilage throughout the knee looked in great condition. The medial meniscus looked in good condition as well. ACL was intact. We turned our attention to the lateral meniscus where it was noted to be a complete tear. We saucerized the meniscus out to a rim of 8 mm. The anterior horn was noted to be detached. So we roughened up this area and placed two number 2 Fiber wires using the spectrum technique. These were tied down with SMC knots. She was also noted to have a horizontal cleavage tear of the posterior horn, which was roughened with the shaver and the rasp and a single Fast-Fix was placed to close the space down. The instruments were then removed. Portals were closed using 3-0 Monocryl followed by Steri-Strips, 0.25% Marcaine with epinephrine was injected around the portal sites. Sterile dressing was placed. The patient was awoken, taken to the recovery room in stable condition.
Copyright © 2016 AAPC
Operative Report Coding Tips
21
DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: The patient was taken to the operating suite, placed on the operating table in the supine position. She was administered preoperative antibiotics, general anesthetic, followed by intubation by the anesthesia team. The standard 3-portal knee scope was performed. On evaluation of the intraarticular space, cartilage throughout the knee looked in great condition. The medial meniscus looked in good condition as well. ACL was intact. We turned our attention to the lateral meniscus where it was noted to be a complete tear. We saucerized the meniscus out to a rim of 8 mm. The anterior horn was noted to be detached. So we roughened up this area and placed two number 2 Fiber wires using the spectrum technique. These were tied down with SMC knots. She was also noted to have a horizontal cleavage tear of the posterior horn, which was roughened with the shaver and the rasp and a single Fast-Fix was placed to close the space down. The instruments were then removed. Portals were closed using 3-0 Monocryl followed by Steri-Strips, 0.25% Marcaine with epinephrine was injected around the portal sites. Sterile dressing was placed. The patient was awoken, taken to the recovery room in stable condition.
Copyright © 2016 AAPC
Operative Report Coding Tips
22
DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: The patient was taken to the operating suite, placed on the operating table in the supine position. She was administered preoperative antibiotics, general anesthetic, followed by intubation by the anesthesia team. The standard 3-portal knee scope was performed. On evaluation of the intraarticular space, cartilage throughout the knee looked in great condition. The medial meniscus looked in good condition as well. ACL was intact. We turned our attention to the lateral meniscus where it was noted to be a complete tear. We saucerized the meniscus out to a rim of 8 mm. The anterior horn was noted to be detached. So we roughened up this area and placed two number 2 Fiber wires using the spectrum technique. These were tied down with SMC knots. She was also noted to have a horizontal cleavage tear of the posterior horn, which was roughened with the shaver and the rasp and a single Fast-Fix was placed to close the space down. The instruments were then removed. Portals were closed using 3-0 Monocryl followed by Steri-Strips, 0.25% Marcaine with epinephrine was injected around the portal sites. Sterile dressing was placed. The patient was awoken, taken to the recovery room in stable condition.
Copyright © 2016 AAPC
Operative Report Coding Tips
23
Example of extra time documented in an operative report:
Once this was identified, there was an obvious hernia, and this was incised. Two hours were spent in lysis of adhesions and to identify the point of obstruction, and the limits of the hernia. After the hernia defect had been identified in its entirety, there was no gross evidence of ischemic bowel, however, there was obvious obstruction, which went beyond on what was visible.
Copyright © 2016 AAPC
Medical Necessity
24
Copyright © 2016 AAPC
National Coverage Determinations
25
Copyright © 2016 AAPC
Sample LCD
26
Source: Novitas Solutions https://www.novitas-solutions.com
Copyright © 2016 AAPC
Sample LCD
27
Copyright © 2016 AAPC
Sample LCD
28
Source: Novitas Solutions https://www.novitas-solutions.com
Copyright © 2016 AAPC
Sample LCD
29
Source: Novitas Solutions https://www.novitas-solutions.com
Copyright © 2016 AAPC
Sample LCD
30
Source: Novitas Solutions https://www.novitas-solutions.com
Copyright © 2016 AAPC
Sample LCD
31
Source: Novitas Solutions https://www.novitas-solutions.com
Copyright © 2016 AAPC
Advance Beneficiary Notice
32
Copyright © 2016 AAPC
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)
33
Copyright © 2016 AAPC
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)
34
Copyright © 2016 AAPC
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)
35
Copyright © 2016 AAPC
HITECH
36
Copyright © 2016 AAPC
Violation of Privacy Act (HIPAA)
Large Health Care Provider Restricts Use of Patient Records�Covered Entity: Multi-Hospital Healthcare Provider�Issue: Impermissible Use�
A nurse practitioner who has privileges at a multi-hospital health care system and who is part of the system’s organized health care arrangement impermissibly accessed the medical records of her ex-husband. In order to resolve this matter to OCR’s satisfaction and to prevent a recurrence, the covered entity: terminated the nurse practitioner’s access to its electronic records system; reported the nurse practitioner’s conduct to the appropriate licensing authority; and, provided the nurse practitioner with remedial Privacy Rule training.
37
http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/privacy/hipaa/enforcement/examples/allcases.html#case1
Copyright © 2016 AAPC
Need for Compliance
38
Copyright © 2016 AAPC
OIG Compliance Plan
39
http://oig.hhs.gov/fraud/PhysicianEducation/05compliance.asp
Copyright © 2016 AAPC
Office of Inspector General (OIG) Workplan
40
Copyright © 2016 AAPC
OIG Work Plan – 2016
Physical Therapists – High Use of Outpatient Physical Therapy Services
We will review outpatient physical therapy services provided by independent therapists to determine whether they were in compliance with Medicare reimbursement regulations. Prior OIG work found that claims for therapy services provided by independent physical therapists were not reasonable or were not properly documented or that the therapy services were not medically necessary. Our focus is on independent therapists who have a high utilization rate for outpatient physical therapy services. Medicare will not pay for items or services that are not “reasonable and necessary.”
(Social Security Act, §1862(a)(1)(A) Documentation requirements for therapy services are in CMS's Medicare Benefit Policy Manual, Pub. No. 100-02, Ch. 15, § 220.3. (OAS; W-00-11-35220; W-00-12-35220; W-00-13-35220; W-00-14-35220; W-00-15-35220; various reviews; expected issue date: FY 2016)
41
Copyright © 2016 AAPC
OIG Work Plan – 2016
Sleep Disorder Clinics – High Use of Sleep-Testing Procedures
We will examine Medicare payments to physicians, hospital outpatient departments, and independent di-agnostic testing facilities for sleep-testing procedures to assess the appropriateness of Medicare payments for high utilization sleep-testing procedures and determine whether they were in accordance with Medicare requirements. An OIG analysis of CY2010 Medicare payments for Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes 95810 and 95811, which totaled approximately $415 million, showed high utilization associated with these sleep-testing procedures. Medicare will not pay for items or services that are not “reasonable and necessary.”
(Social Security Act, §1862(a)(1)(A).) To the extent that repeated diagnostic testing is performed on the same beneficiary and the prior test results are still pertinent, repeated tests may not be reasonable and necessary. Requirements for coverage of sleep tests under Part B are in CMS’s Medicare Benefit Policy Manual, Pub.No.100-02, ch.15, §70.
(OAS;W-00-10-35521; W-00-12-35521; W-00-13-35521; W-00-14-35521; various reviews; expected issue date: FY2016)
42
Copyright © 2016 AAPC
43
Copyright © 2016 AAPC
Welcome to AAPC!
Copyright © 2016 AAPC