1 of 8

BRIDGING DIGITAL THEOLOGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE: A RESEARCHER’S AND INFRASTRUCTURE PROVIDER'S PERSPECTIVE

The intersection of theology and computational methods is a rapidly evolving frontier in academic research. Scholars are discovering new ways to analyze texts, visualize patterns, and extract insights from theological data/corpora using increasingly AI-based digital tools.

This presentation will explore the current challenges of computational theology from the perspective of a research infrastructure provider and suggest ways to foster research opportunities and enhance visualization.

June 4 2025 | Global Network for Digital Theology 2025

by Timotheus 창회 Kim | https://bsky.app/profile/ixtheo.bsky.social

2 of 8

Challenge 1: Visibility and Discoverability

Fragmented Distribution

Projects scattered across multiple platforms

Interdisciplinary Boundaries

computational theology Projects occurs mostly within the digital humanities

Limited Indexing

No centralized repository for computational theology projects

Digital theology projects are currently scattered across various interdisciplinary websites, databases, and institutional repositories. Without standardized metadata or a centralized index, researchers struggle to discover relevant computational projects within their specific theological domains.

This fragmentation creates significant barriers to building upon existing work, leading to duplication of efforts and missed opportunities for collaboration between researchers working on similar problems across different institutions.

3 of 8

Challenge 2: Access to Data and Code

Publication

Research findings published in journals or books

Raw Data

Underlying data often unavailable or in proprietary formats

Analysis Code

Computational methods rarely shared in executable form

Disconnection

Weak links between publications, data, and code repositories

Even when theological researchers do share their computational methods, the raw data and executable code often remain inaccessible or disconnected from the published findings. This lack of transparency inhibits verification of results and limits the potential for others to build upon methodological innovations.

Journal policies increasingly mandate data and code availability, yet implementation remains inconsistent in theological disciplines compared to other scientific fields.

4 of 8

Challenge 3: Code Reusability and Reproducibility

Technical Barriers

Programming expertise required to use existing tools

Environment Dependencies

Code tied to specific software configurations

Documentation Gaps

Insufficient instructions for implementation

Computational tools developed for specific theological research projects often remain difficult to adapt or execute by scholars without advanced programming skills. Project-specific code rarely undergoes the refactoring necessary to make it generalizable across different research contexts.

This creates a significant barrier for theological researchers who could benefit from computational methods but lack the technical expertise to implement them. As a result, innovative computational approaches remain siloed within technically-proficient research groups rather than benefiting the broader theological community.

5 of 8

Integrated Data & Code Linking

Repository for code: Github, GitLab ZENODO, figshare

Making code available

● Code repositories: GitHub / GitLab (citable, no DOI)

● Generic repositories: Zenodo / Figshare (citable, DOI)...

Using code as part of a publication

● Cite your code on GitHub / Zenodo etc.

● Deposit your code in a (journal) data and code repository (citable)

● As supplemental material (not citable)

https://openeconomics.zbw.eu/en/knowledgebase/introduction-to-open-science/

6 of 8

Enhanced Indexing at Index Theologicus

Comprehensive Project Indexing

Creating detailed metadata schemas specifically designed for computational theology projects, capturing methodology information, tool usage, and data characteristics

Integrated Resource Linking

Establishing permanent connections between publications, project websites, data repositories, and code repositories to enable seamless navigation across the research ecosystem

Specialized Facet Search

Implementing advanced filtering capabilities allowing researchers to discover projects by computational method, theological subject area etc.

Our first initiative addresses the discoverability challenge by enhancing the Index Theologicus database to specifically accommodate computational theology projects. By creating specialized metadata fields and search capabilities, we'll enable researchers to easily find relevant computational publications or projects within their theological domains of interest.

7 of 8

Lower-threshold Environment for Computational Theology

Code Adaptation

Creating and adjusting existing project code into standardized, well-documented libraries accessible to non-technical users

Interactive Notebooks

Creating Jupyter and Google Colab notebooks with pre-configured environments for immediate use

Community Hub

Establishing platforms and collaborative spaces for theological researchers using computational methods by collecting, sharing, and creating or improving Jupyter Notebooks collaboratively

Our second initiative focuses on reducing technical barriers by creating accessible computational environments. We enable theologians without programming expertise to apply computational methods to their research questions by developing lightweight, executable scripts with comprehensive documentation.

Example of a prototype: : https://github.com/socheres/text-data-mining-examples/blob/main/README.md

8 of 8

Best Practices for Digital Theology Research

100%

Research findings freely accessible to all scholars regardless of institutional affiliation

100%

Open Raw Data

Complete datasets available in standardized formats with clear documentation

100%

Open Code

Well-documented, executable code available through public repositories

The future of digital theology depends on embracing principles of transparency and openness. By committing to these best practices, researchers contribute to a more collaborative, reproducible, and innovative scholarly environment.

At Index Theologicus, we aim to promote and facilitate these practices through our enhanced infrastructure services. We invite researchers and institutions to help us build a more accessible, interconnected ecosystem for computational theological research. Ultimately, this will advance our collective understanding of theological texts and traditions.

Open Publication