June 11, 2025
Wei Lin (林瑋)
Development of Laser-Accelerated Ion Beams and Diagnostics Using Solid and Gaseous Targets
Advisor: Chih-Hao Pai (白植豪)
1
State-of-the-art overview
Introduction to Laser-Driven Ion Acceleration
Micrometer-scale source size
Ultrafast ion bunch duration (fs-ps)
S. S. Bulanov et al. (2016)
2
Introduction to Laser-Driven Ion Acceleration
ion
Ultrafast Laser
Target
General concept
Laser
Ions
accelerate
Electrons
Heating processes (Brunel heating, j×B heating, ponderomotive force, etc.)
Ions
Accelerating electric field from charge separation
Blow-Off
Plasma
3
Laser-driven ion acceleration for p-B fusion
p
11B
12C*
α
α
α
Boron-11 is the dominant isotope (80 %) in natural boron
Direct conversion of fusion energy into electricity
Introduction to Laser-Plasma Ion Acceleration
4
Ion acceleration in gaseous target
ion
Introduction to Laser-Plasma Ion Acceleration
5
Ion diagnostics – Thomson Parabola Spectrometer
Introduction to Laser-Plasma Ion Acceleration
Charged
particles
Electrodes
Magnets
Scintillator
ion
Side view
Front view
6
Energy filter
Tasl imageTM
Introduction to Laser-Plasma Ion Acceleration
Ion diagnostics – CR39 detector
7
Outlines
Development of Physics-Based Algorithm for Pit Geometry Detection on Etched CR39 Ion Detectors
9
Fundamentals for Pit Formation
G. Somogyi and S. A. Szalay, Track-diameter kinetics in dielectric track detectors, Nucl. Instrum. Methods, 1973
10
G. Somogyi and S. A. Szalay, Track-diameter kinetics in dielectric track detectors, Nucl. Instrum. Methods, 1973
The Identification of major and minor axis:
Fundamentals for Pit Formation
11
For proton with 1 MeV and incident angle 70°
x (μm)
y (μm)
Fundamentals for Pit Formation
Evolution of the CR39 surface
12
Literature Review
A. P. Fews (1992)
13
M. Seimetz et al., 2018
Literature Review
14
M. S. Schollmeier et al., 2023
Literature Review
15
This Work
Precisely identifying peak position and the major/minor axes
Works well even at highly dense regions
16
5 μm
Procedures for Pit Detection
Test image
17
Procedures for Pit Detection
Peak detection
Otsu global thresholding on gray level gradient
Hough transform line accumulator space
18
Procedures for Pit Detection
Oval detection
Unit radiating arrows represent the ideal pits
Oval is fitted by the dot product with the ideal pits
19
0.5 μm
Procedures for Pit Detection
Overlapping pits separation
20
Procedures for Pit Detection
Detection results
Phosphor Response of P43 Scintillator to Multi-MeV Protons in TNSA Experiments
22
Fundamental of Scintillators
Damaged molecules
Quenching…
Fluorescence!
Ion
Excitons
J. B. Birks, Scintillations from Organic Crystals : Specific Fluorescence and Relative Response to Different Radiations (1951)
23
Composition: Gd2O2S:Tb
Light emission: 360 - 680 nm (peak at 545 nm)
Aluminum layer
Phosphor layer
Fundamental of Scintillators
Introduction to P43 scintillator
24
Setup
Thomson Parabola Spectrometer
P43
Magnetic dipole
0.31 T
Electric dipole
1.6 kV/cm
Collimator
500 μm
P43
1.6 μm Al
25
Thomson Parabola
Spectrometer
Main Laser Beam
CR39
20 μm C-H foil
Target-Normal-Sheath-Acceleration (TNSA) Scheme
Setup
(800 nm / 7 μm / 42 fs / 5 × 1019 W∙cm-2)
26
Calibration Method
Fence-like CR39 and signals
10 mm
P43
Proton Signal
Zero Point
Proton
Carbon
(7.25N NaOH at 70°C for 30 mins)
27
Proton energy (MeV)
0.10
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0.00
0.12
0.14
Results
Fluorescent and number surface densities related to proton energy
28
Proton energy (MeV)
Fitting curve
Results
Fluorescent response function
Laser-Driven Ion Acceleration Using Tailored Hydrogen Gas Jets via Machining Pulse Preconditioning
30
ion
Simulation
0.12
Mixed gas (N:H = 2:1)
2D Particle-In-Cell (EPOCH) simulation
Polarization | linear |
Wavelength | 800 nm |
Duration | 42 fs |
Spot size | 7 μm |
| 5 |
Numerical resolution parameters:
Laser parameters:
Δx | 12.5 nm |
Δy | 25 nm |
Δt | 0.037 fs |
ppc | 10 |
y
31
Transverse direction (micron)
Propagation direction (micron)
Propagation direction (micron)
Transverse direction (micron)
Transverse direction (micron)
Propagation direction (micron)
Propagation direction (micron)
Transverse direction (micron)
Magnetic field (Gigagauss)
y
Simulation
32
Simulation
33
Thomson Parabola
Spectrometer
Machining Beam
Nozzle
Main Laser Beam
(800 nm / 3.4 μm / 42 fs / 1 × 1020 W∙cm-2)
y
z
Ion acceleration in gaseous target
Setup
Timeline
Machining Pulse
Main Pulse
11-17 ns
Nozzle
34
Gas jet
Nozzle
Mask
Machining beam
Sharp ramp
Controllable
thickness
Machining beam preconditioning
Setup
Timeline
Machining Pulse
Main Pulse
11-17 ns
Nozzle
35
100 μm
Machining beam preconditioning
Setup
0.5 - 6 mm
M = 0.0816
Relay Imaging
Timeline
Machining Pulse
Main Pulse
11-17 ns
Nozzle
36
150 μm
150 μm
Tailored structure from shadowgraph
Results
Timeline
Machining Pulse
Main Pulse
11.4 ns
Nozzle
Probe Pulse
37
150 μm
150 μm
Tailored structure from scattering imaging
Results
Timeline
Machining Pulse
Main Pulse
Probe Pulse
Scattering light
Nozzle
11.4 ns
38
150 μm
150 μm
Minimizing target structure
Results
Timeline
Machining Pulse
Main Pulse
Probe Pulse
15.8 ns
Scattering light
Nozzle
39
150 μm
Shock front broadening using mixed gas
Results
N : H = 1 : 1
Timeline
Machining Pulse
Main Pulse
Probe Pulse
Scattering light
Nozzle
15.8 ns
40
10 mm
10 mm
Observe electron signals only
Results
Timeline
Machining Pulse
Main Pulse
Probe Pulse
Scattering light
Nozzle
15.8 ns
Phosphor
41
5-μm Al
10-μm Al
20 μm
Proton signals from CR39
Results
450 - 900 keV
42
Prepulse of the Laser Observed from Shadowgraph
Nozzle
10 ps Prepulse
Main Pulse
Results
43
CsI(Tl) scintillators for higher sensitivity
Results
Uranium at 269 MeV/u, 0.3 s pulse length
K. Renuka, et al., (2012)
44
Conclusions
Thank you for your attention