MIZIARA DECENTRALIZED WASTE MANAGEMENT�LEBANON
Peer-to-Peer Socioeconomic Governance
The 4th Sector
“Human nature is not a machine to be built after a model, and set to do exactly the work prescribed for it, but a tree, which requires to grow and develop itself on all sides, according to the tendency of the inward forces which make it a living thing.”
John Stuart Mill, On Liberty (1859)
�
WHAT ARE WE DOING HERE?
Building a
Real-Time Public Ledger Organization
��
RTPLO
is a fully decentralized organization that follows the governance of
the 4th sector - P2P decentralized economy.
This RTPLO offers civic services to local municipalities
WHAT IS THE 4TH SECTOR?
HISTORY
The 4th Sector term was proposed by Sensorica during their effort to create a legal framework for the Collaborative Economy in Quebec, Canada. Sensorica published the 4th Sector Rationale in 2019 to inform this initiative. This was done in the context of the NOICE project.
The NOICE project's main goal was to create a special economic zone in Montreal, Canada, to explore and experiment with p2p practices, Collaborative Economy, Commons-Based Peer Production.
The term 4th sector was strategically chosen by Sensoricans to relate to the past development of the 4th sector in Quebec and make it easier for politicians to digest.
It provided a roadmap based on the historical achievements of Le Chantier de l'Economie Sociale (https://chantier.qc.ca/), a Quebec advocacy group that help institutionalize the social economy in Quebec and throughout Canada. This lead to the creation of social economy ministries at the provincial and the federal level.
Motivation
The p2p, open and collaborative economy cannot be subsumed to the social economy.
The legal forms created to channel efforts in the social economy are not adequate for open network type organizations that are prevalent in the p2p sphere.
Moreover, the governance and economic models used in the p2p economy do not map into the social economy.
RTPLO
An RTPLO is a P2P, decentralized organization with a Public Ledger that can be accessed in Real-Time.
It is also able to offer services similar to its counterparts in the first 3 sectors.
�RTPLOs do not employ or buy any specific assets - Instead it opens the door for collaborators to contribute:
WHAT MATTERS HERE?
Ownership
Value
Economic Organization
Structure
Operations
Management
Transparency
Reward Mechanism
GOVERNANCE
The higher the responsibilities.
CIVIC SERVICES
Micro - Factory
COLLABORATIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT
Our RTPLO’s 1st project will be to install a plastic and waste recycling Micro-Factory in Miziara, North Lebanon.
Our aim is to build the Micro-Factory and its components using P2P open-source socioeconomic tools inherent to the RTPLO.
The Micro-Factory will include:
PHASE I - INITIALIZATION, RESEARCH, AND MOBILISATION
The aim of this research is to conduct a baseline data collection, socio-economic research, and in-depth analysis of the geographical, social, and administrative landscape of the region. �
This research guideline will allow PlastiSkul to help set achievable and realistic targets, create a project design, and determine the progress for setting up a micro-factory in Lebanon.
PHASE II - ESTABLISHMENT & OPERATIONALISATION OF PSK MICRO-FACTORY
We are in agreement that the flow of materials needs to be established (collection, transformation / upscaling and distribution).
Our experience suggests that it is very difficult to reach economic sustainability by emphasizing on a product-based approach (i.e. selling of upscaled plastic products):
We favor a network and multi-value system approach. In other words, we propose the creation of a small ecosystem around the locally created upscaling capacity, which can involve schools (educational programs), artists (creation of public works of art), artizans (product oriented) and other local businesses, which may want to incorporate some of the materials in their own manufacturing processes.
This document distributed by Sensorica to local authorities in Quebec, Canada.
Sensorica’s OVN infrastructure allows such an ecosystem to form and operate.
PHASE III - TRANSITIONING TO COMMUNITY ENTERPRISE�
�The phase 3 of Plastiskul initiative in Lebanon will engage the selected individuals to help them transition the micro-factory as a community enterprise and own these micro-factories. PlastiSkul would provide support for marketing, product design, documentation, and reporting throughout this phase through a hand holding approach.
�We agree on the fact that this upscaling economic activity must be co-owned by the local community.
Being a P2P decentralized organization, our RTPLO proposes a collaborative entrepreneurship model, which would be implemented from the start.
RESEARCH OBJECTIVES�
Stakeholder Mapping | Population mapping | Waste Assessment Lebanon & targeted region | PSK Programmes | Market Linkages |
Stakeholder mapping for research would allow PlastiSkul to gain information on the relevant stakeholders in Lebanon, map them, and visualize the relationship that exists between these stakeholders. | Mapping socio-economic trends in the local area, current economic conditions of the targeted individuals, challenges and barriers faced by them, and current income earning capacity. | Waste assessment of Lebanon and the targeted region would be carried out to determine the extent of the plastic waste crisis, the kind of attitudes present socially towards plastic waste, and identify different types of plastic waste being generated. | To explore the potential need, impact, and outcome of PlastiSkul catalogical programmes in Lebanon and the targeted region. | To ensure financial sustainability and feasibility of PlastiSkul micro-factory in Lebanon, there is a need to conduct in-depth assessment of existing and potential market linkages, acceptability of upcycled products, and feasibility of upcycled products in Lebanon and for exports. |
Further on in-depth analysis of the data would allow PlastiSkul to create an impactful analysis. | This objective of the research would allow us to analyse the positive economic impact that the PSK Micro-factory would have in the targeted region. | This objective towards research would allow PlastiSkul to create the ideal mix of machinery needs w.r.t. To maximise impact over all types of plastic waste generated in Lebanon. | These programmes explore various dimensions of interventions for plastic waste crisis like waste worker capacity building, developing microentrepreneurship, upskilling waste workers, sensitisation and outreach for students, and online foundational courses. | This would be critical to ensure the micro-factories are profitable and the value addition can be spread across the supply chain. |
We are in agreement with this point. | We are in agreement with this point. | We are in agreement with this point. | We are in agreement with this point. | We are in agreement with this point. |
We would achieve this objective through participatory action research. | We would achieve this objective through participatory action research. | We would achieve this objective through participatory action research. | Use a multi-value system approach, incorporating various incentives for participation (not just baked on money) and attract a multiplicity of benefits (reputation, tax exemptions, learning experiences, artistic expression). This approach would be embodied by a network of open & collaborative enterprises built around a micro-factory (a makerspace and the entrepreneurial ecosystem around it). This network is a more complex entity than a micro-factory embodied as a traditional corporation, but this complexity is dealt with by using the OVN IT infrastructure (the OVN model), which helps structure and coordinate relations and operations within this local ecosystem. The OVN model has been designed for collaborative entrepreneurial ecosystems built around shared utilities such as fablabs and makerspaces, allowing even strong interfaces between these ecosystems. |
Sensorica’s novel OVN model has encountered adoption resistance:
This is why we think that a collaboration between PlastiSkul and Sensorica would be beneficial to both organizations and especially to CarpeVerum, as we can better navigate the local reality using more degrees of freedom.
Our data shows that this model can reduce the financial barrier to entry by over 90%, by allowing local stakeholders to contribute / invest in the venture in various ways (time, materials, space, money, reputation).
Locals are incentivized and secured to contribute through the use of the NRP-CAS, which makes possible recording of all these contributions, promising future benefits - see info about the benefit redistribution algorithm.
Do more with less, by leveraging local latent capacity.