1 of 1

Gayaneh Nazarian B.S1, Vardan T. Karamyan Ph.D2

Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine

Gender Differences in Stroke Recovery

  • Stroke is the world’s 2nd leading cause of long-term disability, with >13 million new cases and 5.5 million deaths annually¹,².
  • Despite advances in acute care, ~50% of survivors face lasting functional challenges³.
  • Recovery differs between men and women, influenced by biological and social factors⁴,⁵.
  • This study explores gender disparities in functional outcomes, rehabilitation responses, and emerging neurorestorative therapies⁶-⁸.

Introduction

Aims and Objectives

  • Examine gender differences in stroke recovery.
  • Evaluate functional outcomesrehabilitation responses, and neurorestorative therapies.
  • Highlight biological and social factors influencing recovery disparities.

  • Narrative systematic review: population-based studies, prospective cohorts, systematic reviews, RCTs¹,⁴,⁷-⁹.
  • Focus areas: post-stroke function, physical activity, rehabilitation effectiveness, quality of life¹⁰,¹¹.
  • Neurorestorative interventions: vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), non-invasive brain stimulation, task-specific motor therapy, pharmacologic adjuncts¹⁰,¹¹.
  • Population: ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes to reflect real-world recovery⁷.

Methods

Functional Recovery

  • Women have poorer outcomes despite similar survival.
  • Poor functional outcomes at discharge (40% vs 31%), 3 months (32% vs 21%), 1 year (31% vs 19%)⁷ [Figure 1].
  • Women experience higher pain scores and persistent deficits after rehab¹².

Physical Activity

  • Men increase and maintain activity; women’s activity declines, linking to worse recovery¹³ [Figure 2].

Long-Term Outcomes

  • Women report lower quality of life, higher care needs, and greater likelihood of long-term institutionalization¹³,¹⁴.

Neurorestorative Therapies

  • VNS + rehab improves motor function⁷.
  • Other therapies (VR, task-specific rehab) show mixed results; few studies examine sex-specific responses¹².

Biological & Social Factors

  • Hormonal changes and lower caregiver support worsen outcomes.
  • Only 37% of women vs 93% of men have a primary caregiver⁵ [Figure 3].

Results

References

 �

  1. Katan M, Luft A. Global burden of stroke. Semin Neurol. 2018;38(2):208–211. doi:10.1055/s-0038-1649503
  2. GBD 2016 Stroke Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. 
  3. Kim JS, Lee KB, Roh H, Ahn MY, Hwang HW. Gender differences in the functional recovery after acute stroke. J Clin Neurol. 2010;6(4):183–188. doi:10.3988/jcn.2010.6.4.183
  4. Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Stroke. 2009;40(6):2348–2355. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.192064
  5. Roth DL, Haley WE, Clay OJ, et al. Race and gender differences in 1-year outcomes for community-dwelling stroke survivors with family caregivers. Stroke. 2011;42(3):626–631. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.595322
  6. Buvarp D, Viktorisson A, Axelsson F, et al. Physical activity trajectories and functional recovery after acute stroke among adults in Sweden. JAMA Netw Open. 
  7. Kim JS, Lee KB, Roh H, Ahn MY, Hwang HW. Gender differences in the functional recovery after acute stroke. J Clin Neurol. 2010;6(4):183–188. 
  8. Circulation Research. Sex differences in post-stroke outcomes and recovery. 2021. doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.319915
  9. Buvarp D, Viktorisson A, Axelsson F, et al. Physical activity trajectories and functional recovery after acute stroke among adults in Sweden. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(5):e2310919. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.10919
  10. Dawson J, Liu CY, Francisco GE, et al. Vagus nerve stimulation paired with rehabilitation for upper limb motor function after ischemic stroke (VNS-REHAB): a randomized, blinded trial. Lancet. 2021;397:1545–1553. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00575-2
  11. Saposnik G, Cohen LG, Mamdani M, et al. Efficacy of non-immersive virtual reality rehabilitation in patients with chronic stroke. Stroke. 2016;47:1020–1026. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.011616
  12. Kautzky-Willer A, Harreiter J, Thomas A, et al. Women with cerebral infarction feature worse clinical profiles at admission but comparable success to men during long-term inpatient neurorehabilitation. Front Aging Neurosci.2021;13:663215. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2021.663215
  13. Ahmadi J, et al. Sex differences in long-term quality of life among survivors after stroke. Stroke. 2018;49:1171–1179. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024437
  14. Yu AYX, Maclagan LC, Diong C, et al. Sex differences in care need and survival in patients admitted to nursing home poststroke. Can J Neurol Sci. 2020;47(2):153–159.
  15. Branyan TE, Sohrabji F. Sex differences in stroke comorbidities. Exp Neurol. 2020;332:113384. doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2020.113384

Acknowledgements

Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine

  • Functional recovery remains a major challenge for stroke survivors, despite improved survival.
  • Women experience worse outcomes, slower recovery, and lower long-term quality of life.
  • Gender differences in recovery are underrecognized and need more research.
  • Sex-specific analyses in clinical trials and targeted rehabilitation addressing hormonal and social factors may improve recovery and reduce long-term disability.

Conclusions