Equity, Diversity & Inclusion Workshop�Hosted by: EDI Advisory Group & REWS Diversity
ga4gh.org
Agenda
INTRODUCTION: EDI Work across GA4GH
TOPICAL SESSION 1: Onboarding
TOPICAL SESSION 2: Participation Levels
TOPICAL SESSION 3: Equity by Design: EDI Standards Review
BRINGING IT TOGETHER: Whiteboarding Session
15 min
25 min
25 min
25 min
30 min
ga4gh.org
E.D.I?
ga4gh.org
EDI in two related levels
Global Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion
Reflected in our teams
Reflected in our standards
ga4gh.org
Why these issues impact technical standards
Credit to Amel Ghoulia
ga4gh.org
EDI Goal
Outside the scope:
This will impact how you work.
We want teams using this future guidance to be involved in its creation. You know what changes are realistic!
ga4gh.org
Key EDI Issues to Resolve Across GA4GH
Onboarding
Participation Levels
Equitable Standards Review
GA4GH EDI Advisory Group
Regulatory & Ethics Work Stream
ga4gh.org
Working Session 1: Onboarding�Ashley Hobb (DNAstack)
ga4gh.org
Onboarding: Objectives
Help newcomers to the GA4GH community:
ga4gh.org
How People Join GA4GH
Discovery
Joining
ga4gh.org
Topical Session 1: Onboarding
What are the key elements to equitable and inclusive community onboarding?
?
ga4gh.org
Topical Session 1: Onboarding
What supports do you wish had been available when you started participating in GA4GH?
?
ga4gh.org
Onboarding: Roadmap Proposal
Initial Roadmap
Longer Term:
ga4gh.org
Working Session 2: Participation Levels�Geraldine Van Der Auwera (Broad Institute),
Elijah Oladipo (Adeleke University)
Presented by Angela Page (GA4GH)
ga4gh.org
Participation Levels Roles: Roadmap Proposal
GA4GH Participation Levels / Roles
ga4gh.org
Topical Session 2: Participation Levels
Discussion Questions
?
ga4gh.org
Working Session 3: EDI in the Standards Review / Development Process
Yann Joly (McGill University),
Michael Beauvais (McGill University)
ga4gh.org
EDI in Standards Development: Roadmap Proposal
Overarching objective: “EDI by design”
Working out a definition of EDI that is specific to genomic standards (serving an educational purpose and then informing future work)
Explicitly recognizing the geographic areas that were considered and/or the expertise of the working group who developed such a standard (e.g., DUO is developed with predominantly Western notions of consent)
Adopting a "design decision" framework for EDI - explicitly engaging with EDI concerns and then publicly justifying choices (e.g., the Design Decisions doc for the Variation Representation Specification)
ga4gh.org
Topical Session 3: EDI in Standards Development
Discussion Questions
?
ga4gh.org
Whiteboarding Session
ga4gh.org
Whiteboarding Session: Bringing the ecosystem to reality
ga4gh.org
EDI Planning
Wrap Up & Actions
Want to join? Email stephanie.li@ga4gh.org
ga4gh.org