1 of 29

MISSING VOICES�DATA GAPS, LIBRARY WORKERS, AND ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE

CALC 2026

2 of 29

INTRODUCTIONS

Autumn Piette

  • Seneca Polytechnic
  • Job Title: Information Literacies Technician

Fiona Inglis

  • Wilfrid Laurier University
  • Job Title: Liaison Librarian, Science

Joanna Blair

  • Wilfrid Laurier University
  • Job Title: Liaison Librarian, Science

Stephanie Lindsay

  • Centre for Addiction & Mental Health
  • Job Title: Library Assistant

3 of 29

DEFINITIONS &�TERMINOLOGY

4 of 29

WHAT IS A DATA GAP?

The gender data gap

  • Gender data gaps occur “both because we don’t collect the data in the first place and because when we do we don’t usually separate it by sex” (p.xiv).
  • Not generally malicious, or even deliberate” (p.xii)
  • A type of unthinking that conceives of humanity as almost exclusively male…it distorts the supposedly objective data that increasingly rule our lives” (p.xv)

5 of 29

CANADIAN LIBRARY CONTEXT

Librarian

  • The term “library technician” refers to an individual who has completed a recognized diploma program at a college or university in Canada (CFLA,2026)

  • A master's degree in library science or a master's degree in library and information studies or a master's degree from a program accredited by the American Library Association is required.

Library Technician

Library Assistants and Clerks

  • Completion of secondary school is usually required
  • * University libraries will often require an undergraduate degree

6 of 29

ALA - LIBRARY SUPPORT STAFF RESOURCE CENTRE

Who are "library support staff"?

  • "Library support staff, or library paraprofessionals, are involved in all library operations at all levels. They may manage libraries or they may contribute very specialized expertise in some specific field. They may engage in routine activities or supervise and direct other staff."

What are they called?

  • "What to call support staff is as perplexing a problem as pinning down a job description. They are called library assistants, paraprofessionals, non-MLS staff, paralibrarians, and more. We have even seen the terms "non-professionals" and "sub-professionals." While no consensus has yet formed on a name for this group, support staff are solidly against these last two labels. They do not reflect the dedication and talent workers bring to their jobs."

7 of 29

WHAT'S IN A NAME?

They [all] describe what I am not. None of them describe what I am.”

8 of 29

WHAT IS YOUR JOB TITLE?

9 of 29

SCOPING REVIEW � INITIAL PLAN

  • Anecdotal evidence of disparities across types of libraries and types of workers,
  • Personal experience of communication barriers/ enablers,
  • Interested in finding out more,
  • Wanted to practice using Covidence and completing a review from start to finish.

10 of 29

AND THEN CAME COVID

  • We noticed that lines of communication were changing,�
  • Made visible some of the disparities between library workers,�
  • In our workplaces, policies around remote work were different for different staff groups after the lockdowns were lifted.

11 of 29

SCOPING REVIEW QUESTIONS

Question

How have remote and hybrid work policies developed since the start of the covid-19 pandemic been implemented across employee groups in libraries?

Follow-up questions

  • How have these changes impacted communication between library employee groups or teams?
  • What are the barriers to effective knowledge sharing in libraries?
  • What are the best strategies/workplace conditions to encourage/enable effective knowledge sharing in libraries?

12 of 29

SCOPING REVIEW PROCESS

Build A Systematic Search Strategy

  • Concepts: library staff and remote work
  • Publication date: 2020 onwards

Search multiple databases

  • Library, Information Science and Technology Abstracts - EBSCO
  • Ovid MEDLINE
  • Information Science Collection - Gale
  • Library Science Database - ProQuest
  • ERIC - EBSCO
  • Science Direct
  • Web of Science

13 of 29

SCREENING PROCESS

Title & Abstract

731

Full Text

214

Final Studies Included

102

14 of 29

CHALLENGES

Lack of information

  • Data not being collected
  • Or only some employee groups included

Lack of clarity

  • Terms used vaguely and without definitions

Lack of data disaggregation

  • Data not being separated
  • Distinctions lost

Not enough data to answer our question

  • However, we did notice some interesting research trends

15 of 29

LACK OF INFORMATION (N=102)

Employee groups

  • Librarians =56
  • Managers =20
  • Library staff =18
  • Students =14

Types of libraries

  • Academic =77
  • Public =7
  • Hospital =4
  • School =1
  • Other =13

Data disaggregation

  • No data =50
  • Not disaggregated =42
  • Disaggregated =10

16 of 29

LACK OF CLARITY

Referring only to the department

“Digital Services returned to campus with staggered schedules to maintain social distancing while planning to work remotely the remainder of the time”

Inconsistent synonyms

“library staff”, “respondents”, “librarians”, “reference staff”

17 of 29

LACK OF DISAGGREGATED DATA

Survey respondents

71% librarians

29% library staff.

Example questions

Did you feel you had the support of your employer to make work from home possible?

Did you have to alter your job to make it possible to work from home?

Did you feel that you were productive working from home?

No survey responses were disaggregated

“To the investigators surprise, responses were mixed…answers were a lot more spread out than expected”

18 of 29

LIBRARY DATA GAP

  • This all results in huge data gaps
  • The voices of many library workers are lost
  • As mentioned, these data gaps are neither deliberate nor malicious
  • They result in incomplete and inaccurate information about libraries as workplaces

19 of 29

IMPACT OF DATA GAPS

“Staff should be invited to collaborate on committees and library initiatives, and at the very least, included in any discussions about potential library changes in ways that amplify their ideas and voices.” (Glusker et al., 2022)

I think that the opinions and ideas of library technicians (who are usually the first point of contact for library users) are often discounted or ignored by librarians and library management teams …This can create tension, because while librarians often make the decisions about service, library technicians deal with the day to day effectiveness of such decisions.”

(Hill, 2014).

20 of 29

IMPACT OF DATA GAPS

Missed opportunities for professional development & awards

Inaccurate portrayal of service delivery

Mutual lack of respect

Lack of knowledge transfer

Library staff not consulted about workplace decisions (e.g. space planning)

Low morale

Low retention

High staff turnover

Recognition

Working Relationships

Decision Making

Staffing

21 of 29

DISCUSSION

What are some ways we can promote and advocate for the various library staff roles in our own workplaces?

22 of 29

SUGGESTIONS & GUIDELINES

23 of 29

GUIDELINES FOR FUTURE RESEARCHERS

  • Clearly define terms
  • Use terms consistently
  • If data is collected from more than one employee group, report results for each group
  • Think about who is included in, or missing from, your participant pool and the impact this will have

24 of 29

GUIDELINES FOR WORKPLACES

  • Look for opportunities to work together e.g. diverse committees
  • Build communication between different groups
  • Foster learning opportunities for all staff

25 of 29

CONCLUSION

  • Data disaggregation matters,

  • Unheard voices in the research literature reflect workplace inequities,

  • We all have a role to play in improving communication in our workplaces.

26 of 29

QUESTIONS?

27 of 29

RECOMMENDED READINGS

Hill, C. (2014). The professional divide: examining workplace relationships between librarians and library technicians. The Australian Library Journal, 63(1), 23-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049670.2014.890020

Glusker, A., Emmelhainz, C., Estrada, N., & Dyess, B. (2022). “Viewed as Equals”: The Impacts of Library Organizational Cultures and Management on Library Staff Morale. Journal of Library Administration, 62(2), 153–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2022.2026119

Vela, S. (2018). Knowledge Management, Diversity, and Professional Hierarchies in Libraries. Journal of Library Administration, 58(8), 835–860. https://doi-org.libproxy.wlu.ca/10.1080/01930826.2018.1516950

28 of 29

REFERENCES

American Library Association. Library Support Staff Resource Center: overview of library support staff. Retrieved November 28, 2024, from https://www.ala.org/aboutala/offices/hrdr/librarysupportstaff/overview_of_library_support_staff

Canadian Federation of Library Associations. (n.d.).Guidelines for the education of Library Technicians Retrieved April 15, 2026, from https://cfla-fcab.ca/en/guidelines-and-position-papers/guidelines-for-the-education-of-library-technicians/

​​

Criado Perez, C. (2019). Invisible Women: Data bias in a world designed for men. Abrams Press

Glusker, A., Emmelhainz, C., Estrada, N., & Dyess, B. (2022). “Viewed as Equals”: The Impacts of Library Organizational Cultures and Management on Library Staff Morale. Journal of Library Administration, 62(2), 153–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2022.2026119

29 of 29

REFERENCES CONTINUED

Government of Canada. 2026, March, 17. Job Bank. Librarian in Canada. Retrieved April 15, 2026 from https://www.jobbank.gc.ca/marketreport/summary-occupation/5263/ca

Government of Canada. 2026, March, 17. Job Bank. Library Technician in Canada. Retrieved April 15, 2026 from https://www.jobbank.gc.ca/marketreport/summary-occupation/5263/ca

Government of Canada. 2026, March, 17. Job Bank. On Call Library Assistant in Canada. Retrieved April 15, 2026 from https://www.jobbank.gc.ca/marketreport/summary-occupation/5263/ca

Hill, C. (2014). The professional divide: examining workplace relationships between librarians and library technicians. The Australian library journal, 63(1), 23-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049670.2014.890020 

Schilperoort, H., Quezada, A., & Lezcano, F. (2021). Words matter: interpretations and implications of “para” in paraprofessional. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 109(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2021.933