training and consultancy ��for researchers and research stakeholders
Podcast
Podcast
Mapping the DOST Landscape
Key pressures on the DOST ecosystem.
A) Clustering overview of all tools sorted by workflow step (url: https://kumu.io/a2p/dost#dataset/workflow-step); B) Clustering overview by geographical location of the tool or the respective host institution (url: https://kumu.io/a2p/dost#dataset/workflow-step); C) Clustering overview by host institution for the tool (url: https://kumu.io/a2p/dost#dataset/host); D) Focus view on self-hosted tools – closeup from square in C).
Visual map using the software Kumu.io �
Regions displayed are the United States of America (US), the European Union (EU), the United Kingdom (UK) and other parts of the world with concentration on US territory. ‘Other’ includes Argentina (n=1), Australia (n=2), Brazil (n=1), Canada (n=7), Colombia (n=1), Mexico (n=1), South Africa (n=1), Switzerland (n=5), with a total of n=242.
Number of tools per host location.
The funding sources for the respective tools were classified as a) Commercial (n=56, 23.1%); b) Grant (n=19, 7.9%); c) mixed (commercial and grant, n=122, 50.4%), and d) Institutional (n=44, 18.2%). 0.4% of the tools (n=1) had no funding source specified. n=242.
Illustration of the funding models of DOSTs.
Tool providers across workflow showing the number of tools per workflow step.