The centipede game at school: does developing backward induction logic drive behavior?
Short summary
It has been shown that adults do not play at equilibrium in the well-known centipede game, a behavior often attributed to failure of backward induction. In a recent study, we asked children and adolescents (ages 8 to 16) to play the centipede game in the laboratory and we leveraged knowledge about developing abilities to assess the contribution of backward induction logic. In line with the literature, we find that the ability to perform backward induction increases with age. However, it predicts behavior only in elementary school children. Starting in middle school, students who reason logically know that the unraveling argument should not be applied blindly. They utilize Theory-of-Mind (ToM) abilities to form beliefs about others’ play and (optimally) refrain from stopping immediately. Developing ToM leads to a gradual decrease in stopping stages with age, which is accompanied by a decrease in payoffs with age. The results indicate that ToM is the key contributor of behavior that helps departing from backward induction when beneficial.
Task
Participants
Predictions
Quick results
Stopping immediately in the short game (Round 2) improves with age (as cognition develops)
Stopping immediately is rare in the long game (Round 1). Players who know how to apply backward induction do not stop, suggesting ToM abilities are kicking in.
Quick results
Reference
I. Brocas and J. Carrillo, ”The centipede game at school: does developing backward induction logic drive behavior? ” LABEL working paper.
Read the paper HERE