1 of 11

Practice Learning Think-Tank�Investigating online portfolio solutions for clinical assessment

Stephen Pyne – Learning Technologist

2 of 11

Initial investigation

  • Current solution creates silos for single points of failure
  • Robust and agile software
  • Futureproofing
  • Enhance student experience

  • Scoping exercise required
  • Phase 1 – high level fact finding
  • 3 tools (as per professional network advice)

  • PebblePad
  • MyKnowledgeMap
  • OnlinePARE (Practice Assessment Record & Evaluation)

3 of 11

4 of 11

5 of 11

List of considerations for online portfolio tool – Pebble Pad

  • Students to enter statements which are graded pass/fail or present/not present - Yes
  • Provision for a logbooks and timesheets - Yes
  • Option for staff & patient feedback using a ratings – Likert scale/Emoji
  • integration into Moodle – Yes LTI -1.3. SSO included
  • Turnitin integration – No (copy and paste)
  • Any other marking tools such as plagiarism checker or student marks/ feedback options – No (captured in ATLAS)
  • Tool will need to be accessible to staff, students, NHS supervisors and patients (patients can use it while the students is logged in) – Yes possible *Check data collection with patients – how is it verified for authenticity*
  • What levels of support are offered to staff/students? No support after onboarding
  • Amazon web services – Cloud hosted
  • Free alumni accounts for life

How much does it cost? Is it per student, is there a cost for staff?

Approx. £11,000 = 1000 licenses plus 10% free external accounts *expected 5% YOY increase*

6 of 11

7 of 11

List of considerations for online portfolio tool – My Knowledge Map

  • Students to enter statements which are graded pass/fail or present/not present – Yes, standardised templates,
  • Provision for a ratings scale of students work - Likert scale/other
  • Student tracking – Yes, logs and practice hours/timesheets
  • Option for patient feedback using a ratings/ smiley face scale - Yes, offline forms for patients or direct feedback
  • integration into Moodle – Yes LTI 1.3 & SSO
  • Turnitin integration - No
  • Any other marking tools such as plagiarism checker or student marks/ feedback options – Rubrics/marking forms
  • Tool will need to be accessible to staff, students, NHS supervisors and patients (patients can use it while the students is logged in) – Yes, NHS supervisors can request access which is managed by MKM
  • Cloud/Web hosted via Microsoft Azure
  • What levels of support are offered to staff/students? – Onboarding to include academic and admin staff training. Live copy test server, 3rd line support function for limited staff. Student training bespoke
  • Progress/analytics dashboard available to teaching staff and practice facilitators

8 of 11

https://onlinepare.net/

Online Practice Assessment Record and Evaluation (PARE) has been funded by Health Education England (North) since 2013 as both the definitive healthcare practice placement quality monitoring tool, and as a means of shaping information technology integration and development across healthcare practice learning. Designed by a team hosted within the University of Chester, PARE is the result of a substantial collaboration of Northwest universities and healthcare provider organisations.

Core Features of PARE include:

  • Collaboration and standardisation of online practice learning assessment and practice hour monitoring.
  • Online portfolio of anonymised evidence for practice assessor / supervisor activities.
  • Instant messaging and cross organisation communication aids to support clinical educator / learner / university integrated working.
  • Multi professional, and cross organisation 'real time' educator registers.
  • Generation of real-time multi professional practice capacity, usage, learner results, and placement quality metrics.
  • Online PARE can be accessed from any web browser on any device, via the PARE website.

What is PARE?

9 of 11

10 of 11

List of considerations for online portfolio tool – Pebble Pad

  • Students to enter statements which are graded pass/fail or present/not present – Yes + electronic signitures
  • Provision for a ratings scale of students work – Yes, Likert/other
  • Option for patient feedback using a ratings/ smiley face scale - Yes
  • integration into Moodle – no – Url only
  • Turnitin integration – No (document download in full, upload to TII)
  • Any other marking tools such as plagiarism checker or student marks/ feedback options – Standard evaluation tools, Algorithms to support marking
  • Tool will need to be accessible to staff, students, NHS supervisors and patients (patients can use it while the students is logged in) – Various roles built into the tool – *Manual creation and management of accounts*
  • Can we use SSO? Not available
  • Are there examples of portfolios we can view or videos? - Yes (Demo site)
  • What levels of support are offered to staff/students? Onboarding, document design

Development costs – 5-6k per document build

License fee – (inc 2 x a year changes) 1-500 student £14:90 per license per year up to 1000 students £12:20. 500 licenses = £7.450

Yr 1 = £13,450

11 of 11

Please scan the QR code or navigate to the URL in the Teams chat

Questions and feedback?