Procedure for Testing the Stability of Distal Third Tibia Fracture Fixtures on an MTS machine
Tabitha Cacheris
BME 4965: Capstone Project
Guidance from Dr. Gary Bledsoe
Introduction
Distal Third Tibia Fracture: What is it?
MTS Machine: What is it? How is it involved in project?
Methods and Procedure
Results
Conclusion
The designed (fractured) bone has a greater stiffness than the intact bone. This is beneficial because:
Overall, the procedure was well-designed and effective, and it helped produce accurate data.
Future Work
References
A.
Figure 5.
B.
B.
Figure 2: A. Normal Intact tibia bone is loaded into the MTS machine following the procedure guidelines. The test completed is for the conditioning of instrumented samples. B. Command set up for the intact bone. Type of testing is cyclic, and the control mode is force. This yields the standard force, displacement, and stress for the intact bone.
Figure 3: A. Designed (fractured) bone with intramedullary nailing with reduction plating is loaded into the MTS machine following the procedure guidelines. The test completed is for the stiffness measurement. B. Command set up for the designed bone. Type of testing is monotonic. This yields the experimental displacement of force applied and stress for the designed bone.
Figure 4: Graph yields an average stiffness of 717 N/mm with a standard deviation of 37 N/mm of the 3 trials for the intact bone.
Figure 5: Graph yields an average stiffness of 1239 N/mm with a standard deviation of 32 N/mm of the 3 trials for the designed (fractured) bone.
A.
Figure 4.
Three trials were completed for each bone. Figure 4 is the data from trial 1,2 and 3 of the intact bone. Figure 5 is the data from trial 1,2, and 3 of the designed (fractured) bone. The overall stiffness of the tibia is increased by nearly 75% when fixed with intramedullary nailing and reduction plating.
Figure 1.
Figure 1: Shows a distal third tibia fracture