AGENDA
Alliance; Professor of Civil Engineering, Northeastern Univ.)
and Engineering) and AJ Tourigny (Ombudsman)
Hybrid Zoom Meeting Protocol/Recording
A Moment of Silence for Road Traffic Victims This Year
World Day of Remembrance - Nov 17
Start: Cambridge Common
Goals for Today’s Meeting
(e.g. sign up for email updates - see clipboard signup or
email kencarlson8@gmail.com).
Thank you to:
Boston University Bridge Safety Alliance
Formed in Jan 2023 to address road safety issues on the BU Bridge corridor
Boston University Bridge Safety Alliance
Formed in Jan 2023 to focus on improving traffic safety on the BU Bridge corridor
Boston University Bridge Safety Alliance
Formed in Jan 2023 to focus on improving traffic safety on the BU Bridge corridor
BU Bridge Traffic Corridor
The bridge is narrow.
10’ travel lanes
5’ bike lane
5’ bike lane
9’ sidewalk
9’ sidewalk
10’ travel lanes
10’ travel lanes
Both ends have complex traffic conditions.
-------------------- 40 feet ----------------------
BU Bridge Traffic Corridor
It’s busy.
It’s multi-jurisdictional.
BU Bridge Safety Alliance - Our Approach
Shared Recommendations with:
Worked Closely with:
DCR
BTD
Make the BU Bridge Better for All Users�
Make it safer for bikes.
Make it safer and more convenient for pedestrians.
Reduce congestion, because that will:
- Decrease delay for buses.
- Decrease gridlock that traps Cambridgeport residents.
- Reduce crashes, particularly
in the rotary.
Students who helped with traffic signal & crash analysis:
What’s Wrong?
A. Pedestrian & Bike Safety
Mouth of the BU Bridge at Mem Drive On-ramp
What’s Wrong?
B. Massive Congestion Makes Buses Slow and Unreliable, Traps Cambridgeport Residents
What’s Wrong?
C. Too Many Crashes and Injuries
87 crashes reported between 2018-2022
Crash Map: Large yellow circles are crashes with 3+ parties. While map includes crashes on grade-separated roads (Mass Pike, Storrow Dr, Mem Dr overpass), they have been filtered out of the crash analysis.
Our Proposal: Low-Cost, Quick-Build,
Responsive to All These Issues
* Championed by Boston Transportation Department
Peter
Safer for Bikes, #1: Protected Bike Lanes on the Bridge
Current
No separation from traffic.
Proposed
Flexpost-separated bike lanes for full length of the bridge.
Harvard St at Coolidge Corner (Brookline)
Museum of Science Bridge (MassDOT)
Flexposts are placed within the bike lane, so there is no change in travel lane width (10 ft).
Safer for Bikes, #2: Signal Separation Leaving the Bridge
Distinct phases for bikes and right turns, at both Comm Ave and Mem Drive.
bike
car
Current
Bikes and turning cars get green at the same time.
15 sec
30 sec
car
bike
ped
Proposed
Distinct phases for bikes leaving the bridge and for right turns.
45 sec
Mem Drive intersection
Right Turn Volumes | vehicles per hour | vehicles per cycle |
MassDOT standard for signal separation | 150 | ~ 4 |
@ Mem Drive | 496 | 10 |
@ Comm Ave | 322 | 11 |
Right turn volumes at both intersections demand signal separation.
Similarly at Comm Ave intersection (shown later)
Safer for Bikes (and Peds), #3: A Full-Width, Shared Use Path on Mem Drive
Current
Bikes headed west (down the ramp) have to use a narrow sidewalk.
Proposed
Shift the curb and convert bike lane space into bike path space.
Safer for Bikes, #4: Multiple Additional Fixes in the Rotary
Pedestrian Safety & Convenience, Part 1: Signal Separation and Single Pass Crossing for Crossing Comm Ave
Current
Across western leg: After a 4-second head start, peds compete with heavy right-turning traffic
Across eastern leg: Peds heading south get only enough time to cross halfway.
Proposed
Middle 34 s
Peds, bikes, and thru traffic.
Final 25 seconds:
turning vehicles and thru traffic.
First 12 seconds:
turning vehicles and thru traffic.
Bike lane moved to the edge; middle lane converted to a right turn lane.
Comm Ave Intersection Video
Showing safety improvements and a 20% increase in southbound capacity
BUBridge at Comm Ave - Our Timing Plan_edited.mp4
Another plan with same safety improvements but little or no increase in southbound capacity
BUBridge at Comm Ave - Timing Plan with Long RT red.mp4
Ped Safety & Convenience, Part 2: Synchronize crossings so that pedestrians don’t have to wait twice; eliminate pushbuttons
Also, Pedestrian Safety, Part 3 & 4: Wider Mem Drive path and fixes to the rotary.
26 seconds
16 seconds
West crossing
East crossing
time
Cambridge Side Intersection Video
https://youtu.be/YJr0JnyRxGo (YouTube link)
Reducing Southbound Congestion - It Takes Two
Comm Ave Side |
| 20% increase in capacity 920/hr* becomes 1,074/hr* |
Cambridge Side |
| 12% increase in capacity 995/hr becomes 1,120/hr |
Net |
| 20% increase in capacity |
* Limiting bottleneck
Potential Timeline for Improvements
Where | What | Who | When |
Charles River paths and Rotary | Widen paths, fix some crossing geometry | DCR | Now! |
Charles River path by boathouse | Add crash barrier | DCR | Early 2025, we hope |
Rotary, other sides | Lane reduction, protected bike lanes | DCR | 2025, we hope |
Cambridge side intersection | New signal mast-arm and controller; retiming signals | DCR | 2025, we hope |
Bridge, northbound side approaching Cambridge | Lane reassignment; flexposts for bike lane | MassDOT | Simultaneous with DCR signal separation |
Comm. Ave. intersection | A few new signal heads; retiming signals | Boston Trans. Dept | 2024??? Or 2025 |
Bridge, southbound side approaching Comm Ave | Lane reassignment; flexposts for bike lane | MassDOT | Simultaneous with BTD signal separation |
Stakeholder Perspectives
Progress and Plans from
Agencies and Municipalities
Design and Engineering) and AJ Tourigny (Ombudsman)
Questions,
Answers,
and
Discussion