1 of 27

Sharing: Collaborating & Publishing

2 of 27

Outline

  • What is sharing?

  • Collaboration
    • Project Organization
    • Data and document sharing
    • Collaborative writing

  • Publishing
    • Preprints
    • Protocols and reagents
    • Data

3 of 27

What does sharing mean to you?

Discussion

4 of 27

Sharing

  • For colleagues

  • Access control

  • Sensitive data*
  • For the public

  • Publicly available

  • No sensitive data

Publishing

Collaboration

5 of 27

How do you share files with collaborators?

Discussion

6 of 27

Considerations for collaboration

  • Standardization - choose a strategy and document it

  • Access - can all my collaborators get to our files?

  • Security - is the platform secure enough for out research?

  • Capacity - Can I fit everything ?

  • Cost- can i afford it?

7 of 27

Standardization

  • Document your organizational strategies
  • Organize your files into folders
  • Use descriptive file names
  • Be consistent!
  • Use similar strategies across projects and files

Crafternoon by Stephen Kennedy

8 of 27

Collaboration platforms available at UW-Madison

  • LabArchives, Box, GoogleDrive, OneDrive, Research Drive

  • Free to UW-Madison faculty/staff/students*

  • NetID login

  • Cross-platform

9 of 27

Collaboration platforms available at UW-Madison

Platform

Location

Login

Sensitive data

ResearchDrive

Local

VPN

Yes*

LabArchives

Cloud

anywhere

Soon?

Box

Cloud

anywhere

Yes*

GoogleDrive

Cloud

anywhere

NO

OneDrive

Cloud

anywhere

NO

10 of 27

ResearchDrive

  • Securely store, encrypt and backup research data locally
  • Easy to share with anyone on campus*
  • Cross-platform - access from anywhere with VPN
  • PI requests storage allocation
    • 5TB per PI at no cost
    • $200/TB/year for additional storage and off-site data protection
  • Will support restricted data like HIPAA and CUI in early 2020

https://it.wisc.edu/services/researchdrive

11 of 27

Collaborative writing

  • GoogleDrive, Office365, Box support real-time coauthoring

  • What about citation management?

  • Options:
    • Google drive + Zotero
    • Mendeley Office365
    • EndNote Office365

12 of 27

Google Drive + Zotero

Demo

13 of 27

Publishing research outputs

  • Manuscripts: Journals and Preprint publishing

  • Data: repositories

  • Protocols: Protocols.io

  • Reagents: RRID portal

14 of 27

Publishing manuscripts

  • Most common way to share research findings

  • Gets you academic “credit”
    • Tenure, promotion, graduation

  • Can take a LONG time

  • Journal restrictions
    • Short methods sections
    • Data sharing policies

  • May not tell the whole story

15 of 27

Preprint publishing

Sharing a draft of your manuscript publicly on a preprint server

Examples:

16 of 27

Preprint publishing

Pros:

  • Distribute your work quickly, fewer limitations
  • Feedback before formal peer review
  • Ensures open access

Cons:

  • Not common in all fields
  • May exclude publication in some journals
  • Could get “scooped”

17 of 27

Sharing Protocols

  • Free for public protocols
  • Collaborate with lab
  • Create your own protocols
    • Guidelines and warnings
    • Materials - searchable
    • Steps
    • Versioning
  • Copy and modify any protocol
    • “fork”

18 of 27

protocols.io

Demo

19 of 27

Sharing reagents

  • RRID portal :Aggregates unique identifiers for reagents into one place

  • Cell lines, antibodies, plasmids, databases etc.

  • Let colleagues know EXACTLY what you used
  • Contribute to source databases: https://scicrunch.org/resources/about/resource

20 of 27

RRID portal

Demo

21 of 27

Publishing data

  • making your data available so that they can be accessed and used - by yourself or by others - in the future

  • FAIR principles

22 of 27

FAIR principles

  • Findable: How will users know it exists?
  • Accessible: How will users get the data?
  • Interoperable: Can it be combined with similar datasets for meta-analyses?
  • Reusable: Can users use it for new purposes?

23 of 27

Data Repositories provide

  • A place to put (meta)data

  • Unique IDs for each dataset

  • A search interface

  • Metadata requirements

24 of 27

Types of Repositories

  • Discipline specific

  • General purpose

  • Institutional
    • MINDS@UW - COMING SOON

25 of 27

How to pick a repository

  • Findability: is there a discipline-specific repository that people in your field look for data? If not, is the repository searchable and provides unique identifiers?
  • Accessibility: does the repository allow open access to data? If not, what restrictions are there?
  • Interoperability: Does the repository use discipline specific (meta)data standards?
  • Reusability: does the repository offer reuse licenses for deposited data?

26 of 27

Where would you publish your data?

Discussion

27 of 27

Summary

  • Sharing = collaboration + publishing
  • UW-Madison provides collaboration tools
  • Citation managers integrate with these tools
  • Manuscripts aren’t the only way to publish research outputs
    • Preprints
    • Protocols and reagents
    • Data
  • Sharing these resources will help make your research more reproducible