What’s in a name?
Photo credit: GOOD Meat
Agenda
Importance of harmonised nomenclature
Studies done to date on harmonised nomenclature:�1. Mattson
2. Rutgers
3. GFI Europe
Industry alignment
Nomenclature MOU
2
1
2
3
4
Photo credit: Shiok Meats
Why is a common term important?
3
Objectives
✔ To build a sector that has a shared and compelling identity
✔ To ensure clear messaging using harmonised nomenclature and explanations
GFI partnered with Mattson to explore, test, and hone communication materials and to find a name for meat produced through cellular agriculture.��Through this work, we developed three different tools:
Outcome 1 of the Mattson study was an explanation drawing on parallels in cultivation
4
Sources: https://gfi.org/blog/cultivatedmeat/
Mattson
1
Rutgers
2
GFI Europe
3
“Rather than raising and slaughtering animals, we can cultivate meat. We can grow the same cells in what’s known as a cultivator, as this cultivator facilitates the same biological process that happens inside an animal. Cultivating meat is similar to the way we help plant cuttings to take root in a greenhouse which provides warmth, fertile soil, water, and nutrients, as is shown in this narrative visual.”
Outcome 2 of the Mattson study was the distillation to one term with the most clarity
5
Sources: https://gfi.org/blog/cultivatedmeat/
clean meat, cell-based meat, craft meat, cultured meat, slaughter-free meat, cell-cultured meat, cell-raised meat, cultivated meat, made meat, cellstock meat, nanopastured meat, propagated meat
cell-based meat, cell-cultured meat, cultured meat, �cultivated meat
cultivated meat
Over 400 names from the media and industry in use were identified
1
2
3
Identify:�✔ neutral,�✔ descriptive, and�✔ differentiated terms
Triangulate with term most appealing to consumers
Mattson
1
Rutgers
2
GFI Europe
3
Another in-depth study on nomenclature
6
A seafood study from Rutgers University, funded by BlueNalu, involved a quota sample of more than 3,000 US adults
Mattson
1
Rutgers
2
GFI Europe
3
European messaging for cultivated meat
7
GFI Europe commissioned international communications agency Team Lewis to conduct a study focused on nomenclature that would help consumer adoption in French, German, Italian and Spanish languages.
Mattson
1
Rutgers
2
GFI Europe
3
European messaging for cultivated meat
8
Takeaway 2: �There is a substantial potential market for cultivated meat. �
�
Takeaway 1�Scientific language was universally off-putting, but using the metaphor of growing plants from cuttings in a greenhouse to explain meat cultivation resonated in all four countries.��
% representing participants who would buy cultivated meat
Mattson
1
Rutgers
2
GFI Europe
3
Germany Italy Spain
France
0%
25%
50%
75%
European messaging for cultivated meat
9
| Overfishing | Feeding a growing population | Environment | Land use | Antibiotic-free | Disease |
France | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | | | |
Germany | ✔ | | ✔ | ✔ | | |
Italy | | | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | |
Spain | | ✔ | | | ✔ | ✔ |
Takeaway 3: �Messages that persuaded consumers of the benefits for buying “cultivated meat” varied significantly for each country.
Mattson
1
Rutgers
2
GFI Europe
3
GFI analysis shows broad global alignment around the term "cultivated"
10
75%
20%
5%
2020: GFI’s analysis of industry players’ preferences
2021: Company CEOs’ preferences
MOU aligns APAC stakeholders
11
MOU signatories in APAC
12
Japan Association for Cellular Agriculture
Interested in signing the nomenclature MOU?
13
Visit our website:
�https://gfi-apac.org/aligning-cultivated-food-nomenclature-across-apac/