1 of 23

Driving Distracted after Cannabis Use

Timothy Brown

January 11, 2025

Driving Safety Research Institute

2 of 23

Acknowledgements

Collaborators

  • University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
    • Ashely Brooks-Russell, Sam Wang, Michael Kosnett
  • Emory University
    • Julia Wrobel
  • University of Iowa
    • Gary Gaffney, Gary Milavetz

Driving Safety Research Institute

3 of 23

Introduction

  • Taking eyes and attention off the road increases risk of crashes
  • Cannabis impairs driving performance
    • Observed impacts vary between individuals
  • Cannabis users report different levels of confidence in driving after use based on usage patterns

  • What happens when mixing cannabis use with distracting tasks while driving?

Driving Safety Research Institute

4 of 23

High Speed Freeway Driving

Driving Safety Research Institute

  • miniSim™ research driving simulator
  • Driving parameters sampled at 60 Hz

Intake

Baseline Simulator Drive

Cannabis Dosing

Post-Dose Simulator Drive 1

Post-Dose Simulator Drive 2

5 of 23

Conditions

  • Use Condition
    • Non-users (NU)
    • Daily Concentrates (DC)
    • Occasion Flower (OF)
    • Daily Flower (DF)
  • Time Points
    • Baseline, prior to use
    • Post-dose 1 (near peak) – ~60 minutes after dosing
    • Post-dose 2 (late) – ~120 minutes after dosing

Driving Safety Research Institute

  • Tasks
    • HVAC
    • Music Selection
    • Text Reading
  • Difficulty
    • Easy
    • Hard

6 of 23

Prior to Use

Driving Safety Research Institute

7 of 23

Are there interaction differences prior to use?

  • Engagement durations with the tasks differed based on difficulty
    • NU, OF & DC - Hard tasks ~1 second longer
    • DF – Hard task 2.8 seconds longer
    • DF has shortest duration for easy task and longest for hard task.
  • Speed reduction also varied based on difficulty

Driving Safety Research Institute

8 of 23

Inconsistent differences in speed reduction

Driving Safety Research Institute

9 of 23

Are there visual attention differences prior to use?

  • Complex interactive effect for use condition with task type and task difficulty for
    • Average percent road center
    • Maximum percent road center
  • Interactive Effects between use condition and task difficulty for
    • Variability in horizontal gaze
      • Occasion flower users did not show increased variability in horizontal scanning for harder tasks

Driving Safety Research Institute

10 of 23

Average Percent Road Center

  • Overall Non-users spent less time on roadway as task difficulty increased
  • For HVAC task
    • Less time on road for cannabis users for more difficult task
  • Other tasks have a more muddled interaction

Driving Safety Research Institute

11 of 23

Are there eye behavior differences prior to use?

  • Interactive Effects between use condition and task type for
    • Average eye opening
      • Occasional users had smaller eye opening across tasks
  • Interactive Effects between use condition and task difficulty for
    • Blink frequency
      • Non-users blinked more
      • Daily users showed increased blink frequency with more difficult tasks
    • Average eye opening
      • Daily users didn’t differ from non-users but occasional flower users had smaller
    • Variability in pupil diameter
      • Daily users didn’t differ from non-users, but occasion flower users had more variability for the hard tasks only.

Driving Safety Research Institute

12 of 23

After Use

Driving Safety Research Institute

13 of 23

Are there interaction differences right after use?

  • No differences in time engaged with tasks
  • Differences in start of task engagement
    • For Baseline and near peak, cannabis users started task sooner than non-users
    • For later timepoint, non-users started sooner
  • Differences in speed reduction independent of task
  • No differences in lane control

Driving Safety Research Institute

14 of 23

Larger and Longer Speed Reduction by OF

Driving Safety Research Institute

15 of 23

Continued Larger Speed Reduction by OF

Driving Safety Research Institute

16 of 23

Are there visual attention differences after use?

  • Some inherent effects associated with users of cannabis, but don’t change after use
    • Minimum Percent Road Center (17 seconds)
      • Daily flower users generally have a greater minimum PRC then non-users and daily concentrate users.
    • Variability in horizontal gaze
      • Occasion flower users generally have less variability than non-users and daily concentrate users

Driving Safety Research Institute

17 of 23

Are there eye behavior differences right after use?

  • Blink Frequency - Complex interaction but generally more blinks by non-users
  • Average Eye Opening – Decreases after use for cannabis users and rebounds for daily users
  • Variability in Eye Opening – Generally less for cannabis users. Increasing variability over time for non-users, but no similar pattern for cannabis users.
  • Pupil Diameter – Non-users decrease over the visit, but for cannabis users, it increases after use.

Driving Safety Research Institute

18 of 23

Discussion

Driving Safety Research Institute

19 of 23

Differences in Approach

  • There were some systematic differences between non-users and cannabis users that were evident even absent cannabis use
    • How much they slowed down when engaging in distracting tasks
    • Daily flower users had shortest engagement durations for easy tasks and longest durations for hard tasks
    • Time spent focused on forward roadway decreased for non-users but patterns of cannabis users did not track non-users
    • Some eye measures showed difference from non-users even without acute cannabis use (e.g., fewer blinks)

Driving Safety Research Institute

20 of 23

Effects of Acute Cannabis use

  • Total task engagement time didn’t vary, but time to start the task did.
    • Task accuracy wasn’t captured, so it is possible tasks were abandoned
  • Persistent greater speed reduction during task after cannabis use
  • Occasional cannabis users seemed to scan less back and forth between the road after use

Driving Safety Research Institute

21 of 23

More Work Needed

  • Explore abandoned or inaccurate tasks
  • Deeper look at eye scanning
    • Number of glances to the secondary in-vehicle display
    • Total eyes-off-road time
  • Additional studies should explore longer tasks
    • Phone conversations
    • Speech to text messaging

Driving Safety Research Institute

22 of 23

Driving Safety Research Institute

2401 Oakdale Blvd.

Iowa City, IA 52242

319-335-4673

dsri.uiowa.edu

Find us on:

23 of 23