1 of 18

TBM

Jordan Baker

Benny Hogan

Ashim Pant

Juan Perez

Ashim Pant

Jordan Baker

Juan Perez

Benny Hogan

2 of 18

2

3 of 18

Introduction

  • Tennis is a sport that is almost impossible to play alone
  • Tennis ball machines can substitute a playing partner by artificially creating a tennis shot
  • Models that adequately replace a human are very expensive and cheaper models lack functionality

Problem Definition

Through the application of newly accessible technology and modern prototyping methods a fully automated tennis ball machine could be produced for a fraction of the cost of existing, equivalently functional designs.

3

4 of 18

Design Requirements & Constraints

Requirements

  • Spin control
  • Velocity control
  • Launch Angle
  • Rotation Angle
  • Feed timing variation
  • Wirelessly Controllable
  • Programmable

4

Constraints

  • Time
  • Budget
  • Skills and labor

5 of 18

Ideas & Concepts proposed

5

Three-wheel design

  • Different planes of spin
  • Complicated and expensive

Two-wheel design

  • Multiple planes of spin
  • Infeasible

Stationary, Two-wheel design

  • One plane spin
  • Simple, cheap and feasible

6 of 18

Magnus effect

6

References:

  1. Cross, R., 1987, “Ball Trajectories; Factors Influencing the Flight of the ball,” pp. 367–374.
  2. Cross, R., and Lindsey, C., 2009, “Tennis Ball Trajectories,” p. 2009.

  • The spin rate of tennis ball has a dramatic effect on it’s trajectory
  • The magnus effect accounts for the force on a ball perpendicular to its velocity, proportional to its spin rate
  • Drag also places a significant role in a ball’s trajectory

7 of 18

Exit Velocity & Spin Rate

7

Reference:

  1. Wójcicki, K., Puciłowski, K., and Kulesza, Z. S., 2011, “Mathematical Analysis for a New Tennis Ball Launcher,” Acta Mech. Autom., Vol. 5(No. 4), pp. 110–119.

Wheel 1

Wheel 2

Radius (m)

ω (rad/s)

ω (rpm)

V-tangential (m/s)

ω (rad/s)

ω (rpm)

V-tangential (m/s)

0.060

433.67

4141.26

26.02

733.00

6999.59

43.98

0.065

400.31

3822.70

26.02

676.61

6461.16

43.98

0.070

371.72

3549.65

26.02

628.28

5999.65

43.98

0.075

346.94

3313.01

26.02

586.40

5599.67

43.98

0.080

325.25

3105.94

26.02

549.75

5249.69

43.98

0.085

306.12

2923.24

26.02

517.41

4940.89

43.98

0.090

289.11

2760.84

26.02

488.66

4666.39

43.98

0.095

273.90

2615.53

26.02

462.94

4420.79

43.98

0.100

260.20

2484.75

26.02

439.80

4199.75

43.98

  • The rotation of the firing wheels determines both the launch velocity and the spin rate of the ball
  • Required launch velocity was a balance between motor RPM and firing wheel radius

8 of 18

FEA

  • Minor load bearing components
  • Simple simulations used to justify geometry and material
  • 3/16th, 6061 Aluminum
  • Plasma cut, then welded
  • Safety factors > 15

8

Stress experienced by the base

Stress on legs

Stress analysis of the wheel frame

9 of 18

Shafts

  • Critical Location of system
  • Withstanding dynamic movement
  • Bending moments and Torsion coming from the tennis ball

9

10 of 18

Fatigue Analysis

Combined Loadings

10

(Fatigue Safety Factor)

(Langer Yield Check)

References:

  1. Budynas, G. R., and Nisbett, K. J., 201AD, Mechanical Engineering Design, McGraw-Hill Education, New York.

11 of 18

Fabrication

11

Ball bearing

Coupler

Carbon steel shaft.

Wheel with rubber spray

Frame with shaft and bearings

Challenges

  • Firing wheel spacing
  • Increasing friction of the firing wheels
  • Precision of bearing fit
  • Secure shaft coupling
  • Shaft walking
  • Noise reduction
  • 3D printer inaccuracies

12 of 18

3D Printing

  • Stereolithography
  • Fused Deposition Modelling
  • Some components too large for a single print
  • Allowed for rapid and unique prototyping at reduced cost

12

3D printed sorting ring

Sorting ring

Drive Motor housing

PVC flange

Stepper housing

Horizontal oscillation gears

Ball feeder

13 of 18

Electrical Components

  • Three different power supplies
  • Arduino controls power supply and recognises user’s input
  • Components respond to the control unit and perform their function

13

Voltage regulation from the power supply

Block diagram

14 of 18

User Control

14

15 of 18

Final Design

15

16 of 18

Testing & Validation

Top speed = 92 mph

Twist angle = 30 °

Launch angle = 23 °

Ball timing = 2 seconds

Battery life = 2 hours

Final Cost = $909.27

16

17 of 18

Conclusion & Recommendations

  • This design has made a two person sport into a one player sport.
  • Elite level coaching and recreational play can be achieved using the flexibility achieved from open source programming
  • No other existing market product has all these features for under $2000
  • Coupling of motor shafts and drive wheels may be unnecessary
  • Slightly more expensive batteries may be worth the weight savings
  • Further iterations and successive prototypes should address secondary objectives such as portability and aesthetics
  • Be an electrical engineer

17

18 of 18

Acknowledgements & Demonstration

  • Andy Pimentel
  • Dr. Emily Hunt
  • Dr. Matt Jackson
  • Dr. Joshua Partheepan
  • Jay McGaugh
  • WT Softball team
  • Trace Hansen, WT Baseball G.A.
  • RCC Brass

18

Symbol

Function

A

Linear Actuator up

B

Linear Actuator down

C

Stepper Clockwise

D

Stepper Counter-Clockwise

E

Increase top wheel speed

F

Decrease top wheel speed

G

Increase bottom wheel speed

H

Decrease bottom wheel speed

I

Begin feeding balls