1 of 50

PROJECT UPDATERSU-14 Middle School

2 of 50

“SIMPLE” 21 STEP STATE BUILDING AID PROCESS

1

21

20

19

18

17

16

15

14

13

12

11

10

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

School

Admin.

Unit

School

Admin.

Unit

School

Admin.

Unit

APPLICATION

Evaluation

Team

Visitation

Project

Rating

Priority List

Designer

Selection

Regional

Study

New v. Reno

Site Review

Public Hearing

Site Selection

Department of Education

SITE

APPROVAL

Ed.

Specs

Pre-Design

& Program

Conference

Begin

Concept

Design

Concept

Review

Concept

Conference

Second

Public

Hearing

Local

Referendum

Design

Development

Contract #2

Design

Development

Review

Design

Development

Conference

Final

Review

State Sign Off

Contract

Bidding

& Award

Bonding

Construction

Compliance

Review

Department

of

Education

Department

of

Education

Department

of

Education

Department

of

Education

Department

of

Education

Department

of

Education

Department

of

Education

Department

of

Education

Department

of

Education

School

Admin.

Unit

School

Admin.

Unit

School

Admin.

Unit

School

Admin.

Unit

School

Admin.

Unit

School

Admin.

Unit

School

Admin.

Unit

School

Admin.

Unit

School

Admin.

Unit

School

Admin.

Unit

School

Admin.

Unit

School

Admin.

Unit

Project

Admin

Project

Admin

Project

Admin

Project

Admin

Project

Admin

Project

Admin

Bond

Counsel

(BAN)

Bond

Counsel

Referendum

Architect

Architect

Architect

Concept Design

Architect

Concept Design

State

Board

Of

Education

Critical

Approval

CONCEPT

APPROVAL

State

Board

Of

Education

Critical

Approval

DESIGN &

FUNDING

APPROVAL

State

Board of

Education

Critical

Approval

FINAL

FUNDING

APPROVAL

Commissioner

Department

of Education

Critical

Approval

Architect

Pre-Design

School

Admin.

Unit

Dept of

Transportation

Dept of

Environmental

Protection

Dept. of

Human

Services

US Army Corp

of Engineers

Review

Other State &

Local Agency

Review

Dept of

Transportation

Dept of

Environmental

Protection

Dept. of

Human

Services

State Fire

Marshal

Other State &

Local Agency

Review

Dept of

Transportation

Dept of

Environmental

Protection

Dept. of

Human

Services

State Fire

Marshal

Other State &

Local Agency

Review

Dept of

Transportation

Dept of

Environmental

Protection

Dept. of

Human

Services

State Fire

Marshal

Other State &

Local Agency

Review

Architect

Bond

Counsel

Final Bond

Architect

3 of 50

Site Construction

Pre-Referendum

(18-20 Months)

Nov 2023

Aug

2021

Dec 2024

Aug

2027

Referendum

Design Documents

(12-14 Months)

Building Construction

(31-33 Months)

Bid

Occupy

TIMELINE & MILESTONES

FOR A NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL

June 2024

Site Permits

Early Bid Package

4 of 50

Staff and Community Engagement & Maine DOE Submissions

Site Selection

Educational Planning

Programming

Concept Design

Explore 

Options

Solution

Roll Out

Kick Off

Cost Review & Control

Public Hearing

Concept Approval

Local Referendum

Referendum

Population Projections

Gather Information

Analyze 

Information

Oct ‘21

May ‘22

Mar ’23 - Sept ‘23

August

2021

Mar/ Jun ‘22

Jun ‘22 Feb ‘23

Nov

2023

Aug

2023

UPDATED TIMELINE & MILESTONES

Consolidation

District Study

New vs Reno

Site Design / Costs

Site Approval

5 of 50

CONCEPT STRAW POLL

REQUIRED STEP IN STATE PROCESS

SHOW SUPPORT = CONTINUE MOVING FORWARD

DISAGREE WITH THIS SITE = POTENTIAL TO DELAY/STOP PROCESS

6 of 50

AUGUST 24th 6:30PM WHS AUDITORIUM

CONCEPT STRAW POLL

  • ABOUT OUR MIDDLE SCHOOL PROJECT 10 MINUTES
    • WORK TO DATE
  • DESIGN PHILOSOPHY / EDUCATIONAL IMPACT 10 MINUTES
  • ABOUT OUR SOLUTION 10 MINUTES
    • BASIC INFORMATION
    • PROPOSED PLANS / RENDERINGS / DESIGNS
  • COSTS 10 MINUTES
    • TOTAL COST, TAX IMPACT, LOCAL COSTS, STATE COSTS
  • LIFE CYCLE COSTS 10 MINUTES
    • ENERGY & SUSTAINABILITY
    • COST TO OWN / MAINTAIN
  • WHY? WHAT ARE THE BENEFITS? 10 MINUTES
  • BRIEF QUESTIONS RELATED TO CONCEPT 30 MINUTES
  • STRAW POLL 8:00 PM

7 of 50

ABOUT

OUR NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL PROJECT

CURRENT FACILITIES ARE INADEQUATE

    • LOTS OF BUILDING ISSUES (STRUCTURAL, ENERGY, CODE, END OF LIFE SYSTEMS, ETC)
    • UNDERSIZED EDUCATION AREAS
    • POOR ORGANIZATION
    • MISSING SPACES

ONCE IN A LIFETIME OPPORTUNITY

    • LEVERAGES STATE FUNDING
    • IMPROVES EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES
    • OFFERS COMMUNITY ASSETS
    • LOWERS LONG TERM COSTS (ENERGY, MAINTENANCE, ETC)
    • FREES UP SPACE AT ALL ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS AND ALLOWS FOR EXPANDED PRE-K OPPORTUNITIES

WINDHAM AND RAYMOND HAVE A UNIFIED EDUCATIONAL VISION

    • PROGRAM EQUITY AND OPPORTUNITY

8 of 50

STANDARD MS

CORE ONLY TEACHER TEAMING

SEPARATED “SPECIALS”

DISCONTINUITIES FOR TEACHERS

+ STUDENTS

DICTATED BELL SCHEDULE

DIFFERENT PLANNING TIME

RSU14 MS

ALL TEACHER TEAMING

“SPECIALS”

PART OF�THE TEAM

CONTINUITIES FOR TEACHERS

+ STUDENTS

SCHEDULE

BY TEACHER�& PROJECTS

PLANNING TIME

TOGETHER

NEED

LOOPING?

9 of 50

PROPOSED SITE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN

10 of 50

Our Plan

11 of 50

*Not showing: Solar Panels all roofs

12 of 50

13 of 50

14 of 50

15 of 50

16 of 50

*Not showing: Solar Panels all roofs

17 of 50

*Not showing: Solar Panels all roofs

18 of 50

MASCOT

19 of 50

20 of 50

21 of 50

22 of 50

Community Level 1

23 of 50

Community Level 1

Athletics / PE

Music

Auditorium

Specialty Education

Areas

Admin /

Student Services

Spec’ty

Educ

Areas

Café’

Outdoor Learning Areas

Library

Learning

Commons

Main Entry

SRO

Health

24 of 50

Community Level 1

25 of 50

Community Level 1

26 of 50

Student Level 2

Grade Level

Grade Level

Indoor Track

Auditorium

Balcony

27 of 50

Student Level 3

Grade Level

Grade Level

28 of 50

Grade Level

Grade Level

Team

Team

Team

Team

Team

Team

On Team Specials

On Team Specials

29 of 50

Team

Team

Team

Art

WL

STEM

Grade Level Commons

30 of 50

31 of 50

32 of 50

33 of 50

34 of 50

35 of 50

36 of 50

Central Learning Commons / Dining

Quiet Dining

Agora / Presentation Area

Entrance

37 of 50

38 of 50

Quiet Dining

Secure Entrance

Agora / Presentation Area

Central Learning Commons / Dining

39 of 50

40 of 50

VISUAL CONTROL / CLEAR SIGHT-LINES

STUDENT & STAFF MAIN ENTRANCE

VISITOR & DELIVERY ENTRANCE

ACCESS TO CONFERENCE ROOMS

SRO

HEALTH / NURSE AREA

41 of 50

Main Community Gym

-2 courts with

- Bleachers for 1200

Small Community Gym

- Full Sized Court

- Bleachers for 200

Running Track (upper floor)

42 of 50

Stage Build Area

Stage

Control

Catwalk

43 of 50

A PARTNERSHIP WITH THE STATE

State Funded Space (Green)

Community Funded Space (Blue)

44 of 50

A PARTNERSHIP WITH THE STATE

FINAL PROJECT BUDGET

TOTAL PROJECT: $171.5M

STATE FUNDING: $131.7M

LOCAL FUNDING: $39.8M

APPROXIMATE TAX IMPACT*

$0.79/1000 WINDHAM $0.56/1000 RAYMOND

*ACCOUNTS FOR RETIRING WHS BOND

ASSUMES CURRENT INTEREST RATES. (LIKELY TO REDUCE)

ADJUSTMENTS TO BE MADE AS BUDGET IS REVIEWED AND APPROVED

WITHOUT STATE FUNDING, IMPACTS WOULD BE $3.76/1000 WINDHAM, $2.18/1000 RAYMOND.

77% State Funded!

45 of 50

A PARTNERSHIP WITH THE STATE

APPROXIMATE TAX IMPACT

HOME VALUE TAX IMPACT WINDHAM TAX IMPACT RAYMOND

250,000 $198/YEAR $16.46/MOS $140/YEAR $11.67/MOS

300,000 $237/YEAR $19.75/MOS $168/YEAR $14.00/MOS

350,000 $277/YEAR $23.04/MOS $196/YEAR $16.33/MOS

400,000 $316/YEAR $26.33/MOS $224/YEAR $18.66/MOS

450,000 $356/YEAR $29.63/MOS $252/YEAR $21.00/MOS

ADJUSTMENTS TO BE MADE AS BUDGET IS REVIEWED AND APPROVED

46 of 50

TAX IMPACT WITHOUT STATE SUPPORT

APPROXIMATE TAX IMPACT

HOME VALUE TAX IMPACT WINDHAM TAX IMPACT RAYMOND

250,000 $940/YEAR $78.33/MOS $545/YEAR $45.42/MOS

300,000 $1128/YEAR $94.00/MOS $654/YEAR $54.50/MOS

350,000 $1316/YEAR $109.67/MOS $763/YEAR $63.58/MOS

400,000 $1504/YEAR $125.33/MOS $872/YEAR $72.67/MOS

450,000 $1692/YEAR $141.00/MOS $981/YEAR $81.75/MOS

ADJUSTMENTS TO BE MADE AS BUDGET IS REVIEWED AND APPROVED

47 of 50

LOCAL OPTIONS RECOMMENDED BY BUILDING COMMITTEE

48 of 50

SUSTAINABILITY

DURABLE, LOW MAINTENANCE, LONG LASTING MATERIALS

    • MASONRY CONSTRUCTION
    • NON-WAX FLOORING,
    • HIGH QUALITY FINISHES

LOW ENERGY USAGE

    • HEATING AND COOLING THROUGH NON-FOSSIL FUELS
    • SUSTAINABLE AIR-SOURCE HEAT PUMPS – 4 PIPE
    • PREDICTED EUI (ENERGY USAGE INDEX) = 34.9
    • OTHER BUILDINGS IN DISTRICT ARE 60-70, NATIONAL AVERAGES ARE 100

HIGHLY EFFICIENT EXTERIOR ENVELOPE

    • EXCEEDS ENERGY CODE
    • HIGHLY INSULATED
    • WELL DETAILED

EUI:

34.9

49 of 50

HEALTHY BUILDINGS

GOOD AIR QUALITY

    • MEET/EXCEED ASHRAE STANDARDS WITH AIR CHANGES
    • SIGNIFICANT FILTRATION
    • COMFORT OF STUDENTS AND STAFF

NATURAL LIGHTING

    • THROUGHOUT ALL EDUCATION AREAS
    • DAYLIGHT HARVESTING TO REDUCE ENERGY

GREAT ACOUSTICS

BENEFITS

    • LOWER ABSENTEEISM
    • BETTER LEARNING (IMPROVED COGNITIVE FUNCTIONS AND TEST SCORES)
    • BETTER MENTAL HEALTH
    • REDUCED CARBON FOOTPRINT / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (THE RIGHT THING TO DO)

50 of 50

TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE