1 of 124

AREA Solar1 Pilot Project

Research, Implementation, and Promotion of Solar Power and Policy in Alberta

2 of 124

Original Goals:

  • educate (ourselves and the public)
    • barriers, regulations, implementation details
  • practical knowledge, get data
    • can we point to an experiment that proves ROI
    • can act as an unbiased resource for installs
  • promote new policy that drives solar adoption
    • 1$/watt policy? Ken’s 20000 rooftops by 2020
    • if we can make a system work, so should anyone

3 of 124

Core Point:

We wanted to have the technical data and economic evidence to the support the “solar” choice.

(and provide evidence that a simple policy incentive would go a long way to push Alberta into the 21st century with renewable energy - would $1/watt preinstall do it?)

Unspoken assumption: the initial cost and ROI are the major barriers to adoption in Alberta.

(I was personally hoping to keep an install under the magic $10,000 mark and 10 year breakeven on system capital)

4 of 124

Current Alberta Policy:

Historically, not very encouraging:

See Alberta Energy -> Micro-Generation for policy:

http://www.energy.alberta.ca/electricity/microgen.asp

“Micro-generators receive credit for any power they send into the electricity grid” but

“The intent of the Micro-generation Regulation is not to provide financial incentives, but to give Albertans choice in the source of their electricity”

5 of 124

Effect of Current Alberta Policy:

The numbers, though growing, seem to bear the “effective drag” of this policy (especially in one of the most expansive & sunniest places on earth).

(We should see how this relatively compares with other provinces and states)

6 of 124

Effect of Current Alberta Policy:

Too few data points and too early to tell, but looks like a linear progression, not an exponential one.

7 of 124

Anticipated Issues and Barriers :

What we expected as real and illusory barriers to adoption:

  • Economic Feasibility and Sticker Shock / Upfront Costs
    • Cost of Hardware
    • Cost of Installation
    • Cost of Operation
    • Return on Investment
  • Technical and Physical Installation
    • Operation - reliability, generation,
    • Sizing, Structural Considerations, Placement/Alignment
  • Regulatory and Corporate (AESO, AUB, etc)
    • Energy Producers (Transalta, etc)
    • Distributors (Enmax, etc)
    • Political - for policy support
  • Psychological and Cultural Resistance

8 of 124

Rates in Alberta

Pretty volatile in the last decade (likely due to deregulation and some major tremors in the world economy), but still low in terms of global comparison.

The psychological effect is to paralyze effective action on energy issues.

Source: government of Alberta

http://www.ucahelps.alberta.ca/historic-rates.aspx

9 of 124

Psycho-Economic Barrier

But with

  • rates so low (at least in comparison to the rest of the world) and
  • externalities so indirect and
  • power being available whenever we demand it

Is there anything we really need to be worried about?

how can we make the argument that there is a better way to power Alberta’s electrical grid? That there is a problem? and to ask Albertan’s to change their choice of generation?

10 of 124

Psycho-Economic Barrier

The problems are a psychological - economic combination:

  • we aren’t truly aware how much energy we use or how (especially in Alberta) but we are completely addicted (or at least take for granted with little appreciation - every been in a blackout for more than an hour? or remember the gasoline crisis of the 70s?)
  • we really are not aware where our energy comes from (it’s all the same from the socket end) or “feel” how much our energy costs (especially in Alberta) in other, less-direct ways

“Don’t ask how the sausages are made”

(paraphrased - John Godfrey Saxe)

11 of 124

Overcoming the

Psycho-Economic Barrier

  • Bringing more awareness attention to
    • energy generation (it’s extremely unlikely we will enjoy cheap energy forever (likely even in our lifetime)
    • our own use, and
    • efficiency - now and for our future

There are few good signals in Alberta to indicate the current and future state of Alberta electrical generation.

    • Need to cut through the noise of our own market rates/billing/sourcing
    • (real or imagined) Alberta is perceived as a major polluter
    • Alberta is also seen as lagging in developing other forms of generation, or infrastructure for other generation - is trending from an energy leader to laggart in the world’s eyes.

12 of 124

Comparing Rates in Alberta

What’s happening outside of Alberta?

Ontario stats.

Looks more steady, but this needs more research and analysis.

But the trend is clear here - this would be a clear motivator to pay attention to energy related issues.

Source: Ontario Energy Board

http://www.ontarioenergyboard.ca/OEB/Consumers/Electricity/Electricity+Prices/Historical+Electricity+Prices

13 of 124

Comparing Rates in Alberta

Source: https://www.hydro.mb.ca/regulatory_affairs/energy_rates/electricity/utility_rate_comp.shtml

Manitoba Hydro statistic.

In comparison, we seem to be paying at least as much or more than many of our Canadian counterparts, in spite of our “cheap” coal generation, especially at the residential level.

More research is needed to understand these numbers.

(would like to see the CO2 / kWh and generation type-stats as well)

14 of 124

Global Rates:

Source: http://knoema.com/cxoxwg/global-energy-statistics

We clearly enjoy cheap energy in North America, in comparison to the rest of the world.

(makes it easy to neglect and be ambivalent - it’s too trivial)

15 of 124

Alberta Generation

Most of Alberta’s electrical energy comes from:

  • coal (51% - trending downwards)
  • natural gas (38% - trending upwards)
  • wind (4% - trending slightly upwards)
  • hydro (~3% - static)

If coal is discontinued (likely due to particulate and CO2 emissions) something will need to pick up base load demand.

Nuclear, geothermal & solar are the

current candidates.

Source: government of Alberta (Alberta Energy)

http://www.energy.alberta.ca/electricity/682.asp

16 of 124

Solar Potential in Alberta

For a region that has so many sunny days, it seems like a enormous lost opportunity to ignore solar.

Source: http://www.currentresults.com/Weather/Canada/Alberta/sunshine-annual-average.php

17 of 124

1st Step to Energy Awareness - Monitoring Consumption

Kill-A-Watt measurements (single plug monitor)

  • monitors a single appliance at a time
  • can borrow from the library

18 of 124

1st Step to Energy Awareness - Monitoring Consumption

TED 5000 (The Energy Detective) - http://www.ted5000.ca/

  • about $300-400 CAD (price as of July 2015)
  • monitors mains to breaker panel
    • can monitor 4 high consumption devices by energy profile
  • great visibility into consumption

patterns and profiles over time

  • great reporting on long term usage

19 of 124

Monitoring Consumption

Kill-A-Watt - gave me a pretty good idea of how much certain appliances used over a short period of time. Highly recommended (especially borrowed from the library). Just plug in for a period and it totals consumption.

TED 5000

- excellent transparency in the profile/patterns of my electrical energy use.

- excellent zoom in and out

- on the large side, I can see seasonal changes

- EG, my freezer is in a uninsulated room (little cost in winter)

- looking for changes in lighting efficiency over the months (need more)

- on the small side, I can see immediate usage (~5 seconds)

- especially important for use by microwave, clothes dryer, etc

20 of 124

TED 5000

Real Time Dashboard

21 of 124

TED 5000

Time

Profiles

22 of 124

TED 5000

Time

Profiles

(Real time profiles of appliances)

23 of 124

TED 5000 Time Profiles

Minute History

24 of 124

TED 5000 Time Profiles

Hour History

25 of 124

TED 5000 Time Profiles

Day History

26 of 124

TED 5000 Time Profiles

Month History

This is an error! (I hope!)

27 of 124

Use of the Data for Sizing System

System Sizing: how big does my system have to be for all my needs?

  • data on graph says under 500 kWh / month
  • divided by 30 days = ~17 kWh / day average to “feed” my home

28 of 124

Use of the Data - Usage Patterns

what is my usage and when?

  • consistent base load of fridge, freezer.
  • I peak at just under 30kwh for a day on the weekend (or double my consumption - likely the dryer & stove and more time at home using electrical devices).

this uncovers any obvious ways to improve

  • reduce peak usage? - *!@#*$ dryer. Microwave oven recipes? Suggestions?
  • storage? near fridge, freezer?
  • extra generation?

29 of 124

An Aside - Energy Efficiency

Go for the biggest impact for least cost

(Hat tip - Darryl Kaminski and ThinkEnergy’s approach)

Quick wins:

  • bulbs - changing out to LED on most frequently used
  • freezer in the coldroom (good in winter)
  • eliminate phantom loads where possible
    • chargers, instant on TVs, computers, TV box*?
  • (wishlist) TV, better dryer, fridge, limit oven use

30 of 124

An Aside - Energy Efficiency

31 of 124

An Aside - Energy Efficiency

PRACTICAL STEPS:

reducing consumption

  • consumption and bills before - a baseline
  • reducing consumption - replacing easy wins, esp high impact wins
  • monitor consumption - estimate max size of array
    • NOTE: Alberta utilities will NOT write you a check

KEY GOAL: Smaller footprint = smaller system.

32 of 124

An Aside - Energy Efficiency

33 of 124

Sizing - PVWatts Online

http://pvwatts.nrel.gov/pvwatts.php

Simple as plugging in the parameters:

  • Location
  • System Info (in most cases - just leave defaults)
  • Draw your system area with Google Maps / Earth

And let it calculate!

34 of 124

Sizing - PVWatts Online

35 of 124

Sizing - PVWatts Online

I used a conservative inverter efficiency of 90%

36 of 124

Sizing - PVWatts Online

  • Average cost / kwh = ~$.175 / kwh (CAD)
  • Assumed $3.30 / watt (with our intended subsidy)

37 of 124

Sizing - PVWatts Online

Drawing out solar region

Produces max amount of solar generation for that area indicated by drawing.

38 of 124

Sizing - PVWatts Results

39 of 124

Sizing - PVWatts Results

Note: Money & Power Savings: This would be the savings / production IF:

  • All my power was used by me and saved me from being charged by my utility company for the full rate (including fixed fees, which it doesn’t)

OR

  • All this power was generated and paid back to me (at $.175/kwh, or the real rate of what I am paying $/kWh)
    • currently this isn’t the case in Alberta.

40 of 124

Research into Panels

Pretty much all the same for large panels -

  • About $1/watt for large panels

(Hat tip to Luc - this is a dramatic change from his costs - requires mass production to come down in price.)

  • All conventional panel dimensions about 60 x 40” (1.5 x 1m)
  • Still trending downwards
  • Lots of cheap panels coming from China
  • Technology getting better - future trend likely much lower
    • solar shingles (currently 10x asphalt, but still closing)
    • printing solar panels from printer using silicon ink

41 of 124

Research into Panels

Source: Bloomberg: New Energy Finance

Src: US Dept of Energy

http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy14osti/62558.pdf

NOTE: Figures in USD

42 of 124

Inverters - Converting DC to AC

Solar Panels create variable DC (Direct Current)

Need to convert that to AC (Alternating Current) in-phase current for household use.

NOTE: AC generated by inverter must be “in phase” with grid AC

Inverters also have other functions - safety and monitoring

43 of 124

Research into Inverters

Two types

- microinverter (one per solar panel)

- system inverter (one per system)

44 of 124

Research into Inverters

MICRO INVERTERS

SYSTEM INVERTERS

$.75 / watt fixed (CAD)

3kw ~$.75 and up / watt

10kw ~.60/watt

30kw ~.59/watt

90-95% efficiency

98% and up

monitors individual panel output

monitors system output only

generally scalable and easy single panel replacement

scalable to inverter capacity threshold - whole system repair or replacement

generally wired in parallel

- single panel shading or malfunction does not disrupt system

(wiring dependent) - single panel shading can have disruptive effect on full system (if required to have threshold voltage)

45 of 124

Research into Inverters

For the busy, on-the-go exec, who just can’t wait to “plug-in”

46 of 124

Research into Inverters

Decided to go with microinverters -

  • monitors on each one: can tell you if a single panel/inverter has a problem
  • work in parallel: a single inverter or panel does not bring the whole system down, or can be fixed independent of others.
  • scalable - option to add more in the future without paying for extra capacity today

47 of 124

Research into Support Structures

HIGH VARIATIONS:

  • materials and connecting structures!
  • quality of structure
  • costs and hassles for structure types
    • flat mounted vs. tilted

Each vendor had different advice on how to install.

Mostly square aluminum pipe, connected with lag bolts and (in the better vendors) aluminum cowling to cover connection.

48 of 124

Support Structures Regulation

Anything other than flush mount:

  • more complex
  • far higher cost
  • regulations - 60cm above peak of structure required special permits
  • tilting structure required wind/weight loading study
  • panel interference / shading

Was far cheaper to just purchase more panels with flush mount to roof.

49 of 124

Support Structures Regulation

Also would have been easier to redesign and remake roof:

50 of 124

Putting It All Together

Technical and Economic Barriers / Factors:

  • (Continuing Down) Solar Panels
  • (Down but Stabilizing) Inverters
  • (Down but Stabilizing) Structural Components
  • (Trending Highest) Labor to Install
  • (High - Moderate) Electrical Panel Prep
  • (Moderate to Trivial) Grid Connection

51 of 124

Putting It All Together

A Typical Estimate*

52 of 124

Putting It All Together

53 of 124

Total System Cost Trends

Source: US Dept of Energy (USD)

54 of 124

Grid Connection Regulations

Much simpler than expected!

(Hat Tip - Richard Wilton - his/Alberta’s streamlined 10 step process for self installations)

Note: it was even simpler for me with KCP, who handled all of this for me. They also had a 10 step process to get my solar online quickly.

55 of 124

Grid Connection Regulations

The process (in short):

  1. File a copy of your Land Title Certificate.
  2. File a copy of an electricity bill and information on the service provider.
  3. File a signed a microgeneration application
  4. Schedule a date to install the modules
  5. Schedule an electrician to connect the solar pv system to the your existing electrical lines (but don’t turn it on yet!)
  6. Schedule electrical inspection for your wires provider
  7. Send the approved electrical inspection to your wires provider.
  8. schedule a service technician install a bi‐directional electrical meter
  9. TURN IT ON!

56 of 124

Regulations for Off Grid Connection*

*Actually only a few, and more of a guideline, really:

Don’t Kill Yourself, Anyone Else, Your Devices or Your Equipment. Structural regulations still (mostly) apply.

57 of 124

Choosing a Vendor

Tried to weigh all variables in a spreadsheet, cradle to grave, for all vendors and installers (including ourselves):

  • install costs
  • warranty on labor and system
  • operational (near nil)
  • payback (estimates)
  • decommissioning, replacing, or moving (missing disposal)

(missing - externalities, social costs? benefits?)

58 of 124

Choosing a Vendor

Warranty tipped the scales in favour of KCP doing the work:

  • Enmax would warrantee system for life of financing term
  • Paid 95% of cost up front, 5% left, for 15 year finance

Anything goes wrong, call KCP (or Enmax) and they will fix

Also, monitoring software is also a definite boon

(hat tip Ken Hogg, who bargained Enmax to add it for free - $250 on time cost savings)

59 of 124

Installing

Preparation:

  • repair the garage roof
  • connect the garage to power, and prep panel for grid and solar power.

(hat tip: Ken and group for copious amounts of planning for different implementations, contacting vendors, etc)

60 of 124

Installing

61 of 124

Prep - fixing the garage roof

62 of 124

Prep - Getting Power to the Garage

Moving the Power line from:

  • Grid to House Panel

To:

  • Grid to Garage Panel (reversible meter in between)
  • Garage Panel to House
  • Solar into Garage Panel ready

63 of 124

Prep - Electrical Preconfiguration

64 of 124

Installing

Installation (pretty anti-climatic):

KCP attached structure and panels in a day.

(hat tip: Tom Jackman and Richard Wilton for running us through a solar install program. After that session, I would not hesitate to make my own “guerilla” solar install)

65 of 124

Support Structure

(Hat Tip to Paul for great pics!!!)

66 of 124

Support Structure

67 of 124

Support & Connection Structure

68 of 124

Research into Support Structures

69 of 124

Emergency Cutoff Switch

70 of 124

Completed Array

71 of 124

Installing and Inspections

Enmax and Inspection:

  • Enmax requires inspection before solar panel system is connected to the grid
  • Also requires reversible meter swap/installation
  • took a little time to get the DC/AC inverter monitors working, and for the full footprint system to function

Note: found a single panel/inverter production problem right away - KCP fixed immediately - would not have caught without the individual panel system monitoring.

72 of 124

Operational Circuit

  • Grid From the back alley to my garage
  • electrical meter between grid and garage -> measures power pulled or pushed to the grid
  • solar on the garage
  • mixed at the garage panel
  • power from the garage panel to the house panel

73 of 124

Grid Connection

74 of 124

Grid Connection

75 of 124

Grid Connection Regulations

76 of 124

Operation

We are PRODUCING!

77 of 124

Operation

Daily use is sized matched pretty well with production for summer.

Daily flow from

Pretty close to projected

stats!

78 of 124

Problems and Challenges

Snow. And a low pitch roof. (doesn’t shed snow well)

(probably require at least 15+ deg pitch).

79 of 124

Problems and Challenges

Almost no production

while snow is on top.

fixed by a ladder, $60 in a squeegee and telescoping handle, and “elbow grease”.

80 of 124

Problems and Challenges

Billing - a mess.

Not easy to compare numbers:

  • ~¾ of the bill is... admin, transmission and (?) fees
  • Billed half-way (sort of) through month for a month
  • Billing Spread (what I am billed vs. what I sell to grid for)
  • Even when I am consuming:
    • am I consuming my own power or Enmax’s? (time of generation not easy to match with time of consumption without direct monitoring on the meter)

How is this calculated? Need transparency...seems opaque and very difficult to determine offhand.

81 of 124

Problems and Challenges - Billing

April 15 to May 12 2015 - Detailed Bill

82 of 124

Problems and Challenges - Billing

April / May’s Bill - relative comparison by service charge:

83 of 124

Problems and Challenges - Billing

April 15 to May 12 2015 - Detailed Generation:

Would like to know how Enmax is calculating this credit.

84 of 124

Problems and Challenges - Billing

  • What is being monitored? And Where is it being monitored?
  • What am charged, or being given for each kWh? When I generate?
  • How to keep track & maintain records?

85 of 124

Problems and Challenges - Billing

86 of 124

Problems and Challenges - Billing

Complicated by Time of Generation vs. Consumption:

NOT

USE YOUR ELECTRONS!!!

(Hat Tip to Ken: his insight - better to do your laundry during the day when you are generating)

87 of 124

Problems and Challenges - Billing

Jan 15 to May 12 2015 - Slightly More Detailed Comparison:

Billing Period

Enmax (kWH)

Rate

($)

Home Use (kWh)

Solar Gen (kWh)

Est Grid Return (kWh)

Enmax Cred ($)

May 1 - May 12

96

0.045

158

192

34

15.06

Apr 15 - Apr 30

127

0.051

196

246

50

Apr 1 - Apr 14

140

0.051

182

169

-13

11.2

Mar 12 - Mar 31

206

0.049

278

169

-109

Mar 1 - Mar 15

158

0.049

211

143

-68

8.56

Feb 12 - Feb 28

183

0.059

243

79

-164

Feb 1 - Feb 11

114

0.059

168

13

-155

???????

Jan 15 - Jan 31

162

0.074

144

51

-93

88 of 124

Problems and Challenges - Billing

So, how much is Enmax paying me for my electrons?

Unless I break out both flows:

  • Solar Electrons Personal Use

vs.

  • Solar Electrons to Grid and back from Grid

I won’t really know for sure - I need a way to monitor flow to and from the Grid.

89 of 124

Problems and Challenges - Billing

Rephrased :

The problem is the reversible meter

IE - information is thrown away.

Solar Electrons going to Grid and

back from Grid (Red flow)

Are combined for a final figure (by Enmax), and the original numbers that arrive at the final result are thrown away

(EG is $4 cred = 104 - 100 or is $4 cred = 14 - 10?)

(need to hookup monitoring to mains on electrical meter)

90 of 124

Analysis - Economic Success?

Could we achieve $3/watt install all in?

With a small subsidy - Yes. Probably won’t be necessary.

  • continuously falling costs of solar panels
  • increased technology for efficiency and manufacturer (solar shingles?)
  • labor and structural costs are overshadowing other costs - with more installs and mass produced tech - likely will be reduced further.

91 of 124

System Cost Trends

Source: US Dept of Energy (USD)

*(VERY ROUGH calculation: assuming current trends - solar dropping and asphalt the same, by 2026 solar will be cheaper than asphalt)

92 of 124

Analysis - Economic Success?

Currently

  • very impressed with output - matches our expectations
  • not impressed with it’s effect on the bill to date

(though it is still early to tell.)

Billing is too opaque, but the overall effect doesn’t have a large effect, even when I am making nearly all my energy.

Payback this way seems exceedingly long (50+ years for payback, if at all), even though I am generating a significant part of my own electricity.

93 of 124

Analysis - Enviromental Success?

Also need data for full “cradle to grave” analysis:

  • manufacture
  • disposal (or hopefully recycling)

for full disclosure of overall benefit environmentally (even though this seems obvious, it would be best to have data)

Operationally - no environmental impact whatsoever (so far? probably even a benefit - shading my sun beaten garage roof)

94 of 124

Analysis - Policy Success?

NDP - As a majority government?

We might be able to get a better policy for installing systems.

My opinion - the best driver would be better utility power purchase policy. This is where the ROI would improve dramatically.

May align with the recent changes in attitude with the new government - Might have a fighting chance now.

95 of 124

Analysis - Barriers to Adoption

  • Psychological / Cultural (esp in O&G town)
  • Political
  • Aesthetic factors
  • Physical problems with install - leakage and structure
  • Direction roof facing / positioning / shading
  • Safety
  • Connection regulations
  • Economic (installation, operation, payback, profit) - ROI
  • Environmental

96 of 124

Psychological / Cultural Resistance

“This is an O&G town”

My experience so far talking to other people:

  • fascination
  • ambivalence (more often now)

97 of 124

Political Resistance

“This is an O&G town” - probably was more prominent with PCs - looking forward to seeing how NDP handles this.

Historically the Alberta government’s approach and policy essentially embodied the voice for the conventional O&G corporate sector.

And it almost seems too obvious to mention - public coffers filled by “known” O&G corporate royalties - makes this the “sacred cow” of revenue stream for the government. Likely many other hidden subsidies and ‘boomerang payments’.

98 of 124

Aesthetic Concerns

Completely out of the way on the roof. Wires & poles are more of an eyesore, in my neighborhood, but they existed before and there isn’t much difference at all.

(I could have opted to have the garage to house connection underground.)

In my case, solar panels almost invisible - not easy to see on my garage from any angle.

99 of 124

Aesthetic Concerns

100 of 124

Structural Concerns

Leakage or Risks from Structure

  • Connecting structure REQUIRES puncturing roof.
  • Quality of workmanship and materials extremely important here.
    • vendors suggested everything from just tarring over connectors to using quality cowling connector covers.
    • (I suspect solar shingles and built-in’s will be the future, and negate this fear entirely)
  • Simpler the structure, the better (rack and rail).

101 of 124

Concerns About Siting the System

Siting - Direction roof facing / positioning / shading. Not everyone has this suitability.

MUST have a suitable site - Optimal parameters, in order:

  • East/South facings (most significant)
  • Shading from other structures / trees (signficant)
  • around the 30-45 deg (less significant).

My low pitch has predicted slightly lower efficiency especially in winter, but that was the only siting issue.

102 of 124

Concerns About Siting the System

PVWatts calculator

  • completely took the guesswork out of trying to predict my generation
  • so far, it’s proven to be an excellent predictor of the suitability of a site in terms of facing, pitch and tilt, latitude, direction, etc.
  • Would not be able to predict shading, cloud or weather conditions, etc., but generally pretty that is obvious.

103 of 124

Safety Concerns

Absolutely no issues.

  • Cables, Panels, Connections all out of the way.
  • Biggest safety issue is clearing panels of snow in winter

(with my high-tech ladder & squeegee)

  • Rumored to have electrical hazard for firemen/EMT
    • shut-off switch above and external to building

104 of 124

Safety Concerns

105 of 124

�Regulation Concerns and Hassle

Turns out there is very little hassle

*(to provide cheap power at your expense to the grid to enrich your utility company)

This turned out to be far less difficult

  • Richard Wilton’s 10 steps
  • KCP took care of this for me, including citations for work done by my electrician (apparently a common event)

106 of 124

Economic Concerns - Upfront Costs

Purchase & Installation

    • materials dropping quickly (and dropping)
    • labor costs still moderately high (and stable)
    • likely under $3/watt residential (and dropping)
    • net wash as value addition to house value (today)

Good chance this will continue to fall or get integrated into home renovation or home purchase costs in the future.

107 of 124

Economic Concerns - Operation

Operation - so far, no obvious costs or issues.

It reliably creates power with no fanfare at all.

This is almost too boring to mention:

Power produced every sunny day*.

*(assuming snow shed)

108 of 124

Economic Concerns - Operation

Payback and ROI (Return on Investment)

  • All things as they are - ?? need to know how much it saves when I use my power first + my microcredits
  • Alberta policy not intended to produce profit (or even fair payback) for residents.
  • Paradox - I am creating more power than I consume, yet my bill is nearly unchanged. None of the administration costs or transmission costs have been significantly diminished from the bill*

*(Due to low energy cost, but really high admin, transmission and distribution costs)

109 of 124

Economic Concerns - Operation

Prediction on Payback - PVWatts great calculator of probable production

(at least in theory, and assuming I can project a roughly precise “cost to each kWh” without fixed fees)

Begs the question: Would it be better to “cut the cord” and buy battery backup, or other means of generation?

110 of 124

Economic Concerns - Rates

Rate volatility in Alberta

- I believe this has a Psycho-Economic effect

  • Why is it so very volatile?
  • No general trend
    • leaves public ambivalent or confused
    • doesn’t seem to have the same trend as our provincial, national, or global counterparts?
  • general effect is to dissolve any local desire to take action (thrwarts urgency without a trend)

This is more of a

111 of 124

Environmental Concerns

A cradle to grave analysis needed:

  • manufacture (we need data)
  • install - near zero impact
  • Operation - nearly zero footprint
  • disposal or recycling (we need data)

And then a “apples to apples” comparison needs to be made to other forms of generation.

112 of 124

Real Barriers to Adoption

(no) psychological / cultural (esp in O&G town)

(yes) political (might change with NDP)

(no) aesthetic factors

(no) leakage and structure (tell you in 10 years)

(yes) direction roof facing / positioning / shading

(no) safety

(no) connection regulations

(maybe?) economic (install, operation, payback, rates)

(no?) environmental, but more full analysis req’d

113 of 124

Next Steps - Political & Economic

Overcoming political and economic barriers:

  • Better billing and tracking, and unfair economic treatment of (local) solar electrons. (go Ken go!)
  • Policy Incentives for putting up (or job incentives)
  • Creating a fair political environment (go Roger go!)
  • Policy Dis-incentives for using polluting ways, or ways that cause high cost externalities.

114 of 124

Potential Extensions to Project

Seems that to make a real dent in the bills, I need to consider how to “cut the cord” completely (the real cost is subscribing to expensive wires)

Also, are there any other ways to improve or extend the system?

115 of 124

Time of Day Data both ways

A Must - Extend my monitoring system - Get that TOD data!

Measure and record the flow of electricity going into the grid (extend current TED5000 (or put in another) monitor.

(Need to Tinker - my panel is in the garage and seems too far for TED)

116 of 124

More Effective Consumption

I should know when I am using my power and when I am using the grid:

  • alter my usage behavior, supported by transparency in TOD generation and usage (hopefully can get my TED system to show - but would be handy to have some form of simple indicator - green/red LED)
  • Smart energy use devices? Synched with my production? Definitely coming in the future.

117 of 124

Power Storage - Short Term

Short term storage seems good for night-time use of power generated during the day, or for managing spikes in usage.

  • storage batteries on the panel itself.
  • storage in devices
    • Elon Musk’s Powerwall
    • programmable UPS (Uninterruptable Power Supply) ?

(would need to be sized to handle my peak usage periods, or perhaps attach to the appliance itself)

118 of 124

Power Storage - Long Term

Long term storage is required for seasonal cycles - to last long periods without sunshine (days or weeks).

Most electrical storage devices (batteries) bleed charge over days or weeks. And capacity (and energy density) would have to be enormous.

This issue might improve over time, with new engineering techniques.

I don’t know of anything currently suitable for month long storage of electrical power for residential use. Maybe reversible or regenerative fuel cell technology - but currently incurs low conversion efficiencies.

119 of 124

Other Types of Power Generation

  • Wind? Definitely would complement, but still-air winter nights might be a problem.
  • Residential Cogen (gas powered electricity and heat generation)? would definitely work at the right time.
  • Gas Fuel Cell? (The Bloomboxes are coming)
  • Unconventional home generation? (Ken’s Sterling?)
  • Low-Tech, Simple Propane or Gasoline generator?

(more research is required)

120 of 124

Using Solar Power Directly

Observation 1: Regulations only (mostly) apply to:

  • connection to the grid
  • (dramatic?) changes to your home structure

and/or generally any hazard or liability to the public.

Important Observation:

DOES NOT APPLY to connecting solar panels up to DC (Direct Current) storage and loads off the grid.

(EG Electric Bike/Car/Lawnmower batteries, storage and use for devices consuming DC voltage which includes ALL digital devices like TVs, computers, etc).

121 of 124

Using Solar Power Directly

So why do we use AC (alternating current) electricity? Mostly this is a legacy technological issue - we have used AC for the last 1½ centuries - it’s easy and there is a infrastructure to support it.

  • AC power is easy to step up (increase in voltage) and down (decrease in voltage), and current is inversely affected.
  • It’s easy to generate from spinning machinery (a magnet and a coil of wire)
  • Transmission losses are typically related to current travelling through the wires, and low current results in smaller losses* - (BTW transmission losses can be large!)
  • Devices use standard mechanisms to convert to their required power.
  • Also, any machine that uses a 1 horsepower or larger electrical motor - Some old Fridges, Freezers, Washers, Dryers, Fans, Tablesaw - uses an AC motor due to large torque requirements (AC motors are capable of incredible torque - though this is changing with better DC motors and higher-tech circuitry).

122 of 124

Using Solar Power Directly

Could we consume DC directly?

Technically, this is entirely possible and already happens.

  • portable solar chargers
  • engineering improvements have already found ways to step up and down DC electricity (a previous hurdle)
  • currently no standard voltage level for devices, variety of voltage outputs, mostly 3, 4.5, 5, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 etc

123 of 124

Using Solar Power Directly

improvements to DC motors in the last 10 years have considerably stepped up torque and efficiency (EG fridge <~ 1 hp) which was the main hurdle to using them in these devices.

Currently, any appliances that natively consumes DC power converts it from AC. In the solar case, losing the double conversion (DC -> AC, then AC -> DC) would increase efficiency.

In the future, perhaps a society’s large (smart) appliances (plus storage) might store and consume DC.

124 of 124

Thanks

Thanks to Ken and the AREA steering committee, as well as the whole renewable group for their support in driving this project forward.

The hope is to:

  • continue to collect data,
  • extend the project in one of the ways mentioned,
  • evolve our direction based on the data, and publish/promote as much as we can.

Suggestions, feedback - RichKHall@Gmail.com