1 of 25

Plastic waste management challenges in Cambodia

YIM MONGTOEUN, Solid Waste Management Specialist

Plastic waste management - future opportunities and private sector good practices in Cambodia

2 of 25

Plastic (bags)

Origin

  • Plastic bags were introduced in the market in 1960’s.
  • Fast developed becoming part of today’s life.
  • In Cambodia plastic bags arrived in the 90s
  • Almost all transaction/purchasing goods involve a plastic bag.

3 of 25

Characteristics

  • plastic bag (Polyethylene) made from crude oil. The most produced plastic in the world.

Types of plastic bags

  • 2 types: HDPE commonly found in grocery stores and LDPE boutique

Style bags

  • water proof, foldable, resistant, light, cheap, non biodegradable (last forever). 700-1000yrs

4 of 25

EXCESSIVE USE

Globally

  • Each year 500 Billion to 1 trillion plastic bags consumed worldwide, nearly 2 million per minute.
  • 64% of the world's annual leakage of plastic waste into the ocean.

Cambodia

  • 10-15 million bags are used everyday in Phnom Penh City alone
  • An average urban Cambodian uses more than 2000 bags per year.

5 of 25

ACRA/EU

5

Countries

Consumption/year (Billion)

Population (2012)

Consumption/capita

China

300

1,343,239,923

223

US

90

313,847,465

287

Japan

30

127,368,088

236

Brazil

12

205,716,890

58

Hong Kong

9.8

7,153,519

1,370

United Kingdom

8

63,047,162

127

South Africa

8

48,810,427

164

Taiwan

5.8

23,113,901

253

Australia

4

22,015,576

182

Canada

3

34,300,083

88

Israel

2

7,590,758

263

Norway

1

4,707,270

212

New Zealand

0.872

4,327,944

201

Ireland

0.072

4,722,028

15

Major Plastic bag consumption by countries

6 of 25

ACRA/EU

6

  • To most consumers, plastic bag appear to be “free of charge”; this is a false impression.

  • The cheapness leads to wasteful consumption and disposal.

What Thought?

7 of 25

Impacts

  • Environment and natural resources

  • Biodiversity

  • Health

  • Floods

  • Tourism

8 of 25

About 46,000 pieces of plastic floating in each square mile of the oceans.

ACRA/EU

8

9 of 25

ACRA/EU

9

Plastic bag kills up to 1 million sea birds, 100,000 sea mammals and countless fish each year.

10 of 25

ACRA/EU

10

11 of 25

Challenges

  • All kinds of waste are mixed and disposed at landfill (there is no sanitary landfill in Cambodia) without any precaution and treatment.

  • Recycling and reuse of plastic bag is gaining importance as a sustainable method for plastic waste disposal.

  • Unfortunately, plastic bag is much more difficult to recycle than materials like glass, aluminum or paper.

ACRA/EU

11

12 of 25

  • Cost USD$ 4000 to process and recycle 1 ton of plastic bag – Sold on the market for USD$32.
  • A common problem with recycling plastic bag is that they are often made up of more than one kind of polymer or there may be some sort of fiber added to the plastic.

Challenges (Cont)

13 of 25

13

ACRA/EU

14 of 25

Policy instruments

  • Full Ban
  • Partial Ban
      • Thickness
      • Day
      • Price
  • Minimum price – fee per bag
  • Taxes on producers/importers
  • Incentives for alternatives

15 of 25

examples– FULL BAN

Rwanda – Full ban on non biodegradable polyethylene bags issued on 2008

Successful example

High enforcement put in place

Alternatives: paper bags

New Delhi – Full ban issued on 2012

Partly successful

Good result in the formal sector

Limited success in local markets – enforcement issues

Varity of alternatives and materials

16 of 25

examples– PARTIAL BAN BY THICKNESS

New Delhi – ban of ultra light plastic bags 2008

Failed

Difficulties in the implementation

No enforcement

South Africa – ban on ultra light plastic bags 2003 combined with a levy on thicker bags. Rwanda, Uganda, and Kenya are a plus.

Taiwan, France (Paris) – Non-biodegradable

Ethiopia, Ghana, Lesotho, and Tanzania are considering on banning thickness plastic bag.

17 of 25

examples– PARTIAL BAN BY DAY

Phnom Penh – Local Announcement N 11 2014

    • Local announcement on no plastic bag at weekend
    • Voluntary not binding
    • No alternative
    • Limited success

18 of 25

examples– PARTIAL BAN BY price

China ban on free plastic bags 2008

the ban targeted both free bags (imposing a price) and ultra light bags (less 25 microns)

plastic bags were reduced by 2/3

in the informal sector still given freely in most of the cases

Phnom Penh – local announcement N 9- 2012

Voluntary

Request to supermarkets to stop providing free bags to consumers

No supermarkets follow the request unsuccessful

19 of 25

examples– LEVIES AND TAXES

Ireland – plastic bag levy 2002

Initially 15 cents per bag, increased to 22 in 2007

Consumption decrease from 328 per capita to 21

Very effective 93% reduction

All levies remitted to the environmental fund

Other countries had similar experience (Scotland, wales, UK, Honk Kong and several cities)

Vietnam –Environmental tax on plastic bags (2012)

taxes equal to 40.000 VND per kg

Charged to producers and importers

many producers elude the tax

enforcement issues

Not effective

20 of 25

examples– INCENTIVES

Rwanda

The full ban on 2008 was accompanied by a set of incentives aiming at promoting the local production of alternatives. These included tax exemption and state investments and resulted in the development of new industries

Thailand

The country is becoming a hub for bio plastics Thanks to a series of incentives.

other forms in which alternatives could be incentivized are lowering of import duties, VAT exemption, Infrastructure and value chain development for alternatives

21 of 25

LESSON LEARNT - BAN

Full Ban

Alternatives need to be identified and available at the market

Implementation requires very high enforcement capacity

Partial ban thickness

Hard to enforce, measurement is an issue

If enforcement issues are solved can be an appropriate tool to specifically target single use plastic bags

Partial ban day

Useful to introduce alternatives, but these have to be available at market

Can be used to prepare people to a future ban but no major impact on its own

Partial ban price

Can work without alternatives in place

In a highly competitive market could lead to plastic bag prices closed to 0

Hard to enforce in the informal sector

22 of 25

LESSON LEARNT – TAXES AND LEVIES

Levies – Minimum price polices

Similar to a ban on free plastic bags

Can work without alternatives in place

Determining a price could avoid competitive behaviors – if done on voluntary basis not so effective

Hard to enforce in the informal sectors but quite successful for the formal sector

Taxes

Several ways taxes can be imposed on producers and importers (VAT, custom duties etc. )

The existence of strong informal sector can hinder the implementation of such a policy

23 of 25

LESSON LEARNT – INCENTIVES FOR ALTERNATIVES

Industry

Raw materials needs to be available. Recovery of waste products is envisaged

In Cambodia there may be a potential in term of raw materials (palm oil residues, rice, shrimps skull) manufacturing infrastructure is low

Import of desirable alternative

Considering proximity with Thailand, it may be more effective to import alternatives rather than produce them locally

Alternatives

Several alternatives are already in the market. Once decision on what alternative is preferable is made, a full value chain may need to be created. i.e. compostable bags need segregation of waste and composting system in place to be a desirable alternative. Investments are needed.

24 of 25

RECCOMENDATIONS ON POSSIBLE WAYS FORWARD

    • To ban plastic bags only after viable alternatives have been identified and introduced in the market.

    • To consider minimum price policies starting with the formal retail sector (feasible, doesn’t require alternatives)

    • Policies targeting local markets should be shaped having this in mind. Ways to address the informal economy (majority of shops in the country) should be assessed.

25 of 25

Thank you for your kind attention!