Plastic waste management challenges in Cambodia
YIM MONGTOEUN, Solid Waste Management Specialist
Plastic waste management - future opportunities and private sector good practices in Cambodia
�
Plastic (bags)
Origin
Characteristics
Types of plastic bags
Style bags
EXCESSIVE USE
Globally
Cambodia
ACRA/EU
5
Countries | Consumption/year (Billion) | Population (2012) | Consumption/capita |
China | 300 | 1,343,239,923 | 223 |
US | 90 | 313,847,465 | 287 |
Japan | 30 | 127,368,088 | 236 |
Brazil | 12 | 205,716,890 | 58 |
Hong Kong | 9.8 | 7,153,519 | 1,370 |
United Kingdom | 8 | 63,047,162 | 127 |
South Africa | 8 | 48,810,427 | 164 |
Taiwan | 5.8 | 23,113,901 | 253 |
Australia | 4 | 22,015,576 | 182 |
Canada | 3 | 34,300,083 | 88 |
Israel | 2 | 7,590,758 | 263 |
Norway | 1 | 4,707,270 | 212 |
New Zealand | 0.872 | 4,327,944 | 201 |
Ireland | 0.072 | 4,722,028 | 15 |
Major Plastic bag consumption by countries
ACRA/EU
6
What Thought?
Impacts
About 46,000 pieces of plastic floating in each square mile of the oceans.
ACRA/EU
8
ACRA/EU
9
Plastic bag kills up to 1 million sea birds, 100,000 sea mammals and countless fish each year.
ACRA/EU
10
Challenges
ACRA/EU
11
Challenges (Cont)
13
ACRA/EU
Policy instruments
examples– FULL BAN
Rwanda – Full ban on non biodegradable polyethylene bags issued on 2008
Successful example
High enforcement put in place
Alternatives: paper bags
New Delhi – Full ban issued on 2012
Partly successful
Good result in the formal sector
Limited success in local markets – enforcement issues
Varity of alternatives and materials
examples– PARTIAL BAN BY THICKNESS
New Delhi – ban of ultra light plastic bags 2008
Failed
Difficulties in the implementation
No enforcement
South Africa – ban on ultra light plastic bags 2003 combined with a levy on thicker bags. Rwanda, Uganda, and Kenya are a plus.
Taiwan, France (Paris) – Non-biodegradable
Ethiopia, Ghana, Lesotho, and Tanzania are considering on banning thickness plastic bag.
examples– PARTIAL BAN BY DAY
Phnom Penh – Local Announcement N 11 2014
examples– PARTIAL BAN BY price
China – ban on free plastic bags 2008
the ban targeted both free bags (imposing a price) and ultra light bags (less 25 microns)
plastic bags were reduced by 2/3
in the informal sector still given freely in most of the cases
Phnom Penh – local announcement N 9- 2012
Voluntary
Request to supermarkets to stop providing free bags to consumers
No supermarkets follow the request unsuccessful
examples– LEVIES AND TAXES
Ireland – plastic bag levy 2002
Initially 15 cents per bag, increased to 22 in 2007
Consumption decrease from 328 per capita to 21
Very effective 93% reduction
All levies remitted to the environmental fund
Other countries had similar experience (Scotland, wales, UK, Honk Kong and several cities)
Vietnam –Environmental tax on plastic bags (2012)
taxes equal to 40.000 VND per kg
Charged to producers and importers
many producers elude the tax
enforcement issues
Not effective
examples– INCENTIVES
Rwanda
The full ban on 2008 was accompanied by a set of incentives aiming at promoting the local production of alternatives. These included tax exemption and state investments and resulted in the development of new industries
Thailand
The country is becoming a hub for bio plastics Thanks to a series of incentives.
other forms in which alternatives could be incentivized are lowering of import duties, VAT exemption, Infrastructure and value chain development for alternatives
LESSON LEARNT - BAN
Full Ban
Alternatives need to be identified and available at the market
Implementation requires very high enforcement capacity
Partial ban thickness
Hard to enforce, measurement is an issue
If enforcement issues are solved can be an appropriate tool to specifically target single use plastic bags
Partial ban day
Useful to introduce alternatives, but these have to be available at market
Can be used to prepare people to a future ban but no major impact on its own
Partial ban price
Can work without alternatives in place
In a highly competitive market could lead to plastic bag prices closed to 0
Hard to enforce in the informal sector
LESSON LEARNT – TAXES AND LEVIES
Levies – Minimum price polices
Similar to a ban on free plastic bags
Can work without alternatives in place
Determining a price could avoid competitive behaviors – if done on voluntary basis not so effective
Hard to enforce in the informal sectors but quite successful for the formal sector
Taxes
Several ways taxes can be imposed on producers and importers (VAT, custom duties etc. )
The existence of strong informal sector can hinder the implementation of such a policy
LESSON LEARNT – INCENTIVES FOR ALTERNATIVES
Industry
Raw materials needs to be available. Recovery of waste products is envisaged
In Cambodia there may be a potential in term of raw materials (palm oil residues, rice, shrimps skull) manufacturing infrastructure is low
Import of desirable alternative
Considering proximity with Thailand, it may be more effective to import alternatives rather than produce them locally
Alternatives
Several alternatives are already in the market. Once decision on what alternative is preferable is made, a full value chain may need to be created. i.e. compostable bags need segregation of waste and composting system in place to be a desirable alternative. Investments are needed.
RECCOMENDATIONS ON POSSIBLE WAYS FORWARD
Thank you for your kind attention!