1 of 8

Instructional Scaffolds to Facilitate Scientific and Critical Comparisons of Geological Phenomena

This research was funded, in part, by the US National Science Foundation (Grant No. 2027376).

Stogianos, T., Lombardi, D., Mohan, S., Jaffe, J., & Governor, D

2 of 8

Goal: Examine relationships between scientific evaluations, judgements about alternative models, and knowledge of controversial geology topics (fracking and fossils) per Lombardi et al.’s (2016) theoretical framework.

Fracking pcMEL

3 of 8

Research Question:

We specifically asked: How do students’ (a) evaluations about the connections between lines of scientific evidence and explanatory models, (b) shifts in plausibility judgements, and (c) changes in knowledge about geology compare between the two instructional scaffolds, the (fracking) pcMEL and (fossil) baMEL?

Fossils baMEL

4 of 8

Methods

  • N=40 students enrolled in Earth and environmental science courses participating.

5 of 8

Results

6 of 8

Results

7 of 8

Results

8 of 8

Discussion

  • Knowledge scores increased about 5% for both the Fracking pcMEL and Fossils baMEL, an appreciable gain for about 90 minutes of classroom instruction.
  • Students had more background knowledge about fossils due to prior science learning experiences compared to the novel concept of fracking and earthquakes, which are not covered in the elementary curriculum.
  • Regardless, the results are promising and suggest that both instructional scaffolds can promote geology learning.