diaQTL: �QTL mapping in outbred tetraploid diallel populations
Jeffrey Endelman, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Tools for Genomics-Assisted Breeding in Polyploids
January 15, 2021
Joint Linkage Analysis & Selection in Autotetraploid Potato & Blueberry
USDA NIFA AFRI (2019–2023)
PolyOrigin for haplotype reconstruction
bioRxiv 2020.12.18.423519
diaQTL for QTL mapping
bioRxiv 2020.12.18.423479
J. Endelman
R. Amadeu
C. Zheng
P. Muñoz
By “diallel” we mean partial diallel
2006
diaQTL
| A.1 | A.2 | A.3 | A.4 | B.1 | B.2 | B.3 | B.4 | C.1 | C.2 | C.3 | C.4 |
y1 | 1 | | 1 | | 1 | 1 | | | | | | |
y2 | 1 | 1 | | | | 1 | 1 | | | | | |
y3 | 1 | | | 1 | | | | | 1 | 1 | | |
y4 | | 2 | | | | | | | | | 1 | 1 |
y5 | | | | | | 1 | 1 | | | 1 | | 1 |
Phenotype
Haplotype Dosage
A
B
C
3x3 half-diallel
Use regression to estimate additive effect for each haplotype
Additive
Effect
Output from fitQTL function
Each haplotype has an estimated effect, even though in reality,
# QTL alleles < # haplotypes
Can hypothesize that haplotypes with similar effect contain the same QTL allele
A
B
C
Dominance effects
Effect | Predictor variable | Levels (examples) | No. parameters in 3x3 half-diallel without selfing |
additive | haplotype | A.1 A.2 B.1 | 12 |
digenic | diplotype | A.1+A.2 A.1+B.1 | 78 |
trigenic | triplotype | A.1+A.2+B.1 A.1+B.1+B.2 | 240 |
quadrigenic | tetratype | A.1+A.2+B.1+B.2 | 300 |
Dominance effects
Model | Effects |
additive | a |
digenic | a + d |
trigenic | a + d + t |
quadrigenic | a + d + t + q |
Complete dominance
Output from fitQTL
Above diagonal: digenic effects
Below diagonal: additive + digenic effects
In this Example:
C.4
C.3
C.2
C.1
B.4
B.3
B.2
B.1
A.4
A.3
A.2
A.1
C.4
C.3
C.2
C.1
B.4
B.3
B.2
B.1
A.4
A.3
A.2
A.1
QTL Discovery
scan1 returns LOD score at each marker
Markers with LOD score above the threshold are declared significant
Need to control genome-wide false positive rate
LOD threshold
Threshold increases with
Simulated half-diallel populations
Statistical Power
Simulated half-diallel populations
h2
0.2
0.1
Accuracy of haplotype effect estimation also depends on pph
Accuracy = correlation between simulated and estimated effects
h2
0.2
0.1
How does it work?
Current version is 0.91
Consult NEWS file to see what changes have been made
Vignette dataset
3x3 half-diallel
W6511-1R
VillettaRose
W9914-1R
Input files
Generate from PolyOrigin output using read_polyancestry
specifies maximum possible dominance that will be fitted
dominance | Model |
1 | additive |
2 | digenic |
3 | trigenic |
4 | quadrigenic |
r2 = squared correlation between predicted and observed response variable
deltaDIC = change in DIC relative to no-QTL model
Haplotype effects
Select the dominance model
Proportion of variance
Haplotype selection
| A.1 | A.2 | A.3 | A.4 | B.1 | B.2 | B.3 | B.4 | C.1 | C.2 | C.3 | C.4 |
id1 | 1 | | 1 | | 1 | 1 | | | | | | |
id2 | 1 | 1 | | | | 1 | 1 | | | | | |
id3 | 1 | | | 1 | | | | | 1 | 1 | | |
id4 | | 2 | | | | | | | | | 1 | 1 |
id5 | | | | | | 1 | 1 | | | 1 | | 1 |
Multiple QTL mapping
Binary Traits: GLM with probit link function
id | LB-Resistant |
W16215-100rus | N |
W16215-101rus | Y |
W16215-103rus | Y |
W16215-105rus | Y |
W16215-106rus | N |
W16215-108rus | Y |
W16215-109rus | Y |
W16215-110rus | N |
Code the trait as Y/N
Karki et al. (2021) doi:10.1101/2020.09.27.315812
QTL effects correspond to linear predictor of the GLM
Binary Traits
id | LB-Resistant |
W16215-100rus | N |
W16215-101rus | Y |
W16215-103rus | Y |
W16215-105rus | Y |
W16215-106rus | N |
W16215-108rus | Y |
W16215-109rus | Y |
W16215-110rus | N |
Code the trait as Y/N
diaQTL function fine_map
Bayesian Credible Interval (CI)