1 of 18

MCCPTA �School Resource Officer

Proposed Resolution

January 26, 2021

MCCPTA Diversity, Equity & Inclusion Committee

Yvonne Van Lowe, chair; Carla Morris, Idarah Umoh, vice chairs

Fred Azcarate, Jessica Berrellez, Debra Budiani-Saberi, Yeages Cowan, Evelyn Chung, Gillian Huebner, Mark Eckstein, Susan Kelly, Dalbin Osorio

2 of 18

MCCPTA Process

  • DEI Committee
    • Presented the MCCPTA Board of Directors the committee’s recommendation for the Delegates to rescind the 2010 resolution
    • Presented the MCCPTA Board of Directors the 2021 resolution with the recommendation to present to the Delegates at the Jan 26 Delegates Assembly
  • MCCPTA Board of Directors
    • Voted to have DEI present the two resolutions at the Jan 26 Delegate Assembly so the local units can be prepared to vote on the resolutions at the Feb 23 Delegates Assembly
  • MCCPTA Delegates Assembly (Jan 26)
    • DEI Committee presents their recommendations to the Delegates and answers clarifying questions of the Delegates as time allows
  • Local Units (February Meeting)
    • Local units should include discussion the resolutions on upcoming PTA agendas
    • Local unit Delegates may submit suggested edits to the resolution language - must be submitted to the DEI Comm by Feb 17th to be considered by the Delegates
    • At the Feb 23 Delegates Assembly the Delegates will cast their votes
      • Vote to rescind the 2010 MCCPTA Delegates Resolution on SROs
      • Vote to approve the 2021 MCCPTA Delegates Resolution on SROs (with any amended language)

2

3 of 18

Background

  • Goal: Safe Schools & a Positive Learning Environment for all MCPS students

  • Mandate: In June 2020, the BOE directed MCPS to examine the SRO program and determine whether the program has been implemented in a manner consistent with MCPS’ strategic plan

  • The DEI Committee was charged with reviewing the MCCPTA SRO Resolution and making a recommendation to MCCPTA

  • Review of the Program, not individual SROs

  • The SRO program needs to be addressed in the context of the current Anti-Racist Audit

3

4 of 18

MCPS’ Current SRO Program

  • SROs are in 25 high schools and one alternative program: 26 total police officers
  • MCPS security assistants in high school and middle schools: 224 (2019-2020 data)
  • Arrests are disproportionate to the student populations in school, particularly for black and brown students and those with disabilities - until last year, when arrests went “down” as paper arrests took place to remove arrests from campus reporting.
  • School administrators largely initiate SRO engagements; arrests remove all MCPS and family oversight
  • Protection vs policing
  • Safe to Learn Act of 2018: Requires SROs or adequate law enforcement coverage for public high schools, and calls for an expanded role of local school systems in coordinating students’ mental health services.

4

5 of 18

Arrest Data

The SRO Working Group and MCPS Board received data on student arrests

  • 460 student arrests over the past 3 years (physical + paper):
    • 2017-18: 226 (50 + 176)
    • 2018-19: 163 (60 + 103)
    • 2019-20: 71 (partial year data)
  • 3 questions:
    • Who has been arrested?
    • What were the charges?
    • Why was an arrest the outcome?

5

6 of 18

Arrest Data

Who has been arrested?

    • Of those 460 arrests, 382 (83%) were of Black and Hispanic students
    • MCPS’ student population is about 27% white, 21% Black and 32% Hispanic
    • Special education students were 115 (25%) of arrests

What were the charges?

    • 2017-18: Threat to Student (66); Other Weapons (49); Drugs/CS (40), Disruption (18)
    • 2018-19: Drugs/CS (48); Attack on Student (31); Other Weapons (27); Tobacco (8)
    • 2019-20: Drugs/CS (38); Other Weapons (10); Attack on Student (7); Theft (4)

Why was there an arrest?

    • 90% of arrests were initiated by a school calling for law enforcement service
    • Data not broken down by school or on the underlying incidents, charges, alternatives to arrest, or final outcomes

6

7 of 18

2018/19 Arrest Data

Statewide report on School Arrest Data -- 163 in Montgomery County

  • Schools
    • High (141) + Middle (16)
    • BCC (20), Northwest (14), Clarksburg (14), Blair (14), Watkins Mill (13), Paint Branch (13)
  • Grade Level and Outcomes
    • 12th (31), 11th (24), 10th (41), 9th (50)
    • 41 were special education students
    • Days of removal from regular ed: 10 (38), 5 (19), 3 (23), 2 (15), 1 (15), 0 (22)
    • 0 students placed in juvenile detention
    • 142 students returned to school

7

8 of 18

MCCPTA 2010 SRO Resolution

  • “RESOLVED that MCCPTA supports and will advocate for at least one SRO to be assigned to every high school and provide support to middle and elementary schools as needed: and

  • RESOLVED that MCCPTA expects improved coordination and support between Montgomery County Police Department and MCPS as well as SROs and MCPS Administration and Security at local schools, in order to provide the safe, secure learning environment to which Montgomery County school children and staff are entitled.”

The DEI Committee recommends:

  • Rescind 2010 Resolution on SROs
    • Outdated
    • Pre-dates Maryland Safe to Learn Act of 2018 which requires adequate law enforcement coverage/mental health supports

8

9 of 18

DEI Comm recommends adoption of:�New Proposed MCCPTA SRO Resolution

  • Be it Resolved: That the Montgomery County Council of Parent Teacher Associations urge Montgomery County Public Schools to discontinue placing police officers (SROs) on every high school campus.
  • Be it further Resolved: That MCCPTA urge MCPS to engage in a broad discussion with students, parents, staff and community stakeholders to solicit input on ways to enhance safety, security and meet the ongoing social and emotional needs of students in our schools without the bias and discrimination against black and brown students and  students with disabilities that have plagued the SRO program. This discussion should also yield alternative uses for the resources currently devoted to the SRO program.
  • Be it further Resolved: That MCCPTA urge MCPS to implement stronger data collection and publication, monitoring, and accountability with regard to school-initiated discipline and interventions.
  • Be it further Resolved: That MCCPTA urge MCPS to allocate more funds towards evidence-driven programs, including an increased curricular, staff development and programmatic focus on social emotional learning, mental health and well-being, restorative practices, conflict resolution, and behavioral threat assessments and crisis response. 
  • Be it finally Resolved: MCCPTA will advocate this position with the Board of Education, MCPS and other elected bodies, such as the Montgomery County Council, that has an interest in this issue.

9

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gsah84R91mAWQGoGgkAO720mHRpQ77FL/edit

10 of 18

What You Can Do

Prior to Your Next PTA Meeting

  • Delegate Next Steps:
    • Talk with your principals and ask them how their use of SROs compares to the public data available on who is arrested, who is disciplined, who is referred for suspension.
    • Ask students and parents for their responses to the program also. Document notes on your discussions.
    • See suggested questions listed here: https://forms.gle/arLBEhMydbePyJuJA
    • Local Units (February Delegates Assembly Meeting)
      • Local units should include discussion the resolutions on upcoming PTA agendas
      • Local unit Delegates may submit suggested edits to the resolution language - must be submitted to the DEI Comm by Feb 17th to be considered by the Delegates
      • At the Feb 23 Delegates Assembly the Delegates will cast their votes
      • Vote to rescind the 2010 MCCPTA Delegates Resolution on SROs
      • Vote to approve the 2021 MCCPTA Delegates Resolution on SROs (with any amended language)

10

11 of 18

Appendix

Organizations Supporting Removing SROs from MCPS Schools

Student Testimonies

Resources

11

12 of 18

List of Organizations Supporting Taking SROs out of

Montgomery County Public Schools

ACLU MD, Montgomery County Chapter • ACLU of Maryland • Asian American Progressive Student Union • Bethesda African Cemetery Coalition • Bonimot Tzedek (Justice Builders) • CASA • DC Teens Action • DMV Peaceful Protest • Hear Our Voices MoCo • Interfaith Works • Jews United for Justice • Maryland Poor People’s Campaign • MoCo Against Brutality • Moms of Black Boys United for Social Change • Montgomery County Democratic Socialists of America • Montgomery County Education Forum • Montgomery County Racial Equity (MORE) Network • Montgomery County Students for Change • Muslim Public Affairs Council • Poor People’s Campaign • Progressive Maryland • Racial Justice Now • Showing Up for Racial Justice - Montgomery County, MD • Silver Spring Justice Coalition • Sisterhood of Salam Shalom • Students Toward Equitable Public Schools • Sunrise Silver Spring • Takoma Park Mobilization-Equal Justice Committee • xMinds Partnership for Extraordinary Minds • Young People for Progress • Youth Creating Change • Youth For Equity

12

13 of 18

Student Obse Abebe's Public Comment on SROs for January 12, 2021 Board of Education Meeting



“I support the removal of the SRO program from Montgomery County Public Schools because the SRO program is not only a problem for students of color, but a problem for various student demographics in MCPS such as survivors of sexual assault. Over the summer, as many of you know, numerous posts were published on accounts such as @lgbtq+at____, @blackat___, so on and so forth. One that stood out to me was the @survivorsatbcc Instagram account and I remember seeing at least three different posts regarding the poor interactions victims had with SROs. Although I am currently thinking of only three, I know there are more similar posts not only on the account I checked, but the @survivorsat____ accounts of other MCPS schools.

The posts I saw stated that it took a long time (up to a year for some) for SROs to reach out to victims of sexual assault to finally help them get justice. This, among many other factors, indicates the inefficiency of the program. Furthermore, the posts also conveyed how SROs failed to de-escalate situations and, instead, many SROs re-opened the wounds of these sexual assault victims. This isn’t a surprise because SROs aren’t trained for this type of work, counselors are. This further reinforces the need to remove SROs and reallocate those funds to getting more school counselors that will truly help students instead of further traumatizing them.

Furthermore, many testimonies that have been collected over the past few weeks prove SROs often act off their implicit bias. This not only relates to how they assume the worst of students of color, but also the implicit bias SROs have towards other minorities. I have heard many MCPS teachers tell me they will not talk about their political and/or religious beliefs because they don’t want to ostracize any single student and take away from their teaching. However, I have heard just as many claims about SROs being racist, homophobic, etc. Now you may say those are baseless/false claims. No. They aren’t when the claims of multiple students corroborate one another and highlight how several SROs let their implicit bias impact the way they treat students. This fact is also another nudge to the need for more counselors who are trained to not let their implicit bias affect their work.”

13

14 of 18

Student Obse Abebe's Public Comment on SROs for January 12, 2021 Board of Education Meeting - continued

The only time I ever interacted with an SRO was when they thought I had stolen my own phone and told me to "drop my attitude" when I questioned why they would assume that. Such a microaggression made me, a black female student, feel unsafe around SROs from that point on. I can only imagine what else could have happened to me that day if I didn't "drop my attitude." Would they have written a referral to tarnish my school record and impact how colleges saw me in the future? Would the situation have escalated into an unnecessary and violent arrest? Too many students are being subjected to asking these questions; a reality that further contributes to the toxic environment SROs create in our schools.

There is so much intersectionality in our school district and the SRO program fails most, if not all, intersectional aspects. It’s also essential to note that SROs feed into the School-To-Prison pipeline and that pipeline is a direct feeder into the Prison Industrial Complex (PIC). So I urge you all to not let any more students of color, with disabilities, with sexual assault history, whatever the case may be, fall prey to neither the pipeline nor the PIC because of the SRO program at MCPS.

14

15 of 18

SRO Public Testimony from Student Louise Melchizedek

Good afternoon and thank you. My name is Louise Melchizedek and I live in Potomac, Maryland. I support the removal of SROs from schools. I had seen the SRO at my school before; she was always there just standing and watching my friends and me, but I never thought much of it. However, in one day all that changed. It was a hot day over the summer as we all gathered in front of the neighboring school, Cabin John Middle School, sitting in the silence of grief, as we, mainly people of color, all shuffled outside to the trunk of our cars six feet away from each other, preparing to start our eight minutes of silence in honor of George Floyd. When the SRO from my high school, Winston Churchill, was joined by 4 other cop cars, the officers proceeded to get out of their cars, walked closer and closer to us, then they stopped. And just watched us, hands crossed or on their belt ready to pull something out, when a white dad walked over and asked them if we were breaking any COVID guidelines or if this was permitted, and they said everything was alright, but they didn’t move an inch. They just watched us. Nothing was wrong, no noise was made, but there were ten cops surrounding us. The SRO program was created to enhance school safety and also to monitor and prevent gang or suspicious activity. We were kids, adults, even teachers from my school, mourning the loss of lives taken at the hands of law enforcement. There is the potential that that could have been me and I would just be another Black body lost by the cycle of police brutality to people of color. The SRO from my school decided to intimidate us and scare us since she couldn’t prove we were doing anything wrong. When we return to school, I must face my SRO, knowing that not only does she see me as a threat, but she will treat and use measures to treat me like one, even when I am not. I don’t see any safety in that.

15

16 of 18

Richard Montgomery High School Senior Lauren Payne Public Testimony

I'm here not only as a student, but as a young person of color who knows what it feels like to be in the presence of law enforcement. To be unlawfully stopped at traffic lights and to have police be in our school for our so called “safety.” Police don't make me feel safe. There is absolutely no data to support that police stop school shootings, that they stop gang violence or that they protect students! SROs are not placed in school to enforce MCPS policies, or help the students. Spending $3 million dollars on this program is a waste of money and limits our resources.

Starting my junior year of high school, I started suffering from anxiety attacks in and out of schools. These attacks severely affected my mental health and my performance in school. Many times, when I tried to find a school psychologist, they were not available. When I tried to get to my counselor, I was told by staff and sometimes by my SRO that I was skipping class and that I needed to go back to class. A common argument that I see from people who support this program is how SROs “are mentors to our students” that they are there for us. That is simply not the case. They are not there to support us, to help us or to guide us. They don’t make us feel safe.

We should not be turning to police officers to mentor students. Students need more counselors, psychologists and social workers. We need to start prioritizing students' mental wellbeing. The adults in this county have continued to make decisions and behalf students that do not represent us! It is time that you all listen and take into account our feelings and experiences regarding this issue. We want one thing, for the police to be removed from our schools. Black and Brown students are more likely to be targeted in our school. These officers perpetuated the school to prison pipeline. School should be a safe environment for students to learn and grow. We should not be at risk of being detained for minor offenses that could be solved if we started with helping students instead of policing them.

I hope that you listen to us, that you hear us and that you understand why this is so important!

16

17 of 18

Resources

The School to Prison Pipeline Report (OLO, 2016):

The School-to-Prison Pipeline in Montgomery County

Student Discipline and Restorative Justice Report for Montgomery County Board of Education October 5, 2020:

https://www.boarddocs.com/mabe/mcpsmd/Board.nsf/files/BU5RST6EDD44/$file/Student%20Discipline%20201005%20PPT.pdf

2018 Maryland Commission on the School-to-Prison Pipeline and Restorative Practices - Report to the governor and the General Assembly:

http://marylandpublicschools.org/stateboard/Documents/AAEEBB/CommissionSchoolPrisonPipeline.pdf

2019 MCCPTA Resolution on School Safety: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5c5dcd5efb22a50647d75583/t/5ddab1e79de5330a90b7bc25/1574613479344/November+2019+MCCPTA+Resolution+on+School+Safety.pdf

17

18 of 18

Resources

The SRO Program Memorandum of Understanding Between MCPS and the Police from 2017:

https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/departments/security-new/Executed%20SRO%20MOU.PDF

The Safe to Learn Act 2018:

https://www.mabe.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/2018-Safe-to-Learn-Act-Summary-4.16.18.pdf

MCPS Student Arrest Data and the School Resource Officer Work Group 2017-2020:

https://www.boarddocs.com/mabe/mcpsmd/Board.nsf/files/BU5PS965F571/$file/Arrest%20Data%20SRO%20Work%20Group%20201005%20PPT.pdf

Understanding the Role of the SRO Webinar on August 11, 2020:

https://documentcloud.adobe.com/link/review?uri=urn:aaid:scds:US:22be45de-ad99-422b-b9e8-b6eb1a6542bb

18