1 of 15

Broken Transmission and Cultural Identity: The Underlying Reality of Puerto Armuelles English (PAE) in the 21st Century

Universidad de Panamá

Elías De León

Relación de la Universidad con movimientos sociales, los pueblos originarios, la cultura popular y la inclusión de la educación superior en entornos rurales.

2 of 15

TOPIC OVERVIEW

  • Context: Puerto Armuelles relevance
  • Background: Puerto Armuelles English (PAE).
  • PAE emerged from the linguistic universe of the United Fruit Company (UFCo) and the Chiriqui Land Company (CLC).
  • A history of West-Indian/Antillean immigration creating a melting pot of English and Creole varieties in a Spanish-dominant region.
  • A national English variety in Panama left unaccounted by scholars is worth registering.

​

3 of 15

Reasons for the study

  • Problem: �Analyze the factors driving the sociolinguistic vulnerability of PAE speakers and explore possibilities for cultural and linguistic preservation.
  • Question: �How have the historical, social, and educational forces shaped the acquisition, transmission, and current sociolinguistic status of Puerto Armuelles English (PAE)?

4 of 15

Objectives

  • General Objective: �Trace the historical origins and socio-economic context that shaped the development of Puerto Armuelles English (PAE).
  • Secondary Objectives:
    • Explore the diverse pathways of English language acquisition among PAE speakers.
    • Analyze the phenomenon of broken intergenerational language transmission in the context of PAE.
    • Evaluate the current sociolinguistic status of PAE and propose recommendations for linguistic revitalization strategies based on lived community experiences.

5 of 15

METHODOLOGY

  • Qualitative Approach
  • Snowball sampling (“near-dead” language context)
  • Approved by the Bioethical Committee of the University of Panama (CBUP). [Note No. CBUP/199/2025]

Method

Description

Data Collection

Data Analysis

6 of 15

DATA COLLECTION INSTRUMENT: �Semi-structured Interview Process

  • Ethical standards.
  • Participant’s identity protection.
  • I conducted or supervised the research.
  • Objectives’ disclosure.
  • Data sovereignty.

Informed Consent Guiding Principles [Note No. CBUP/199/2025]

7 of 15

Semi-structured Interview Process

Inclusion Criteria

  • Male/female subjects from 18 years or older living in the community or in contact with English speaking population within Puerto Armuelles. (P.A.)
  • English Creole speakers within P.A.
  • Subjects whom the researcher considers sources of contact with subject networks.

Exclusion criteria

  • Poor compliance with the visit schedule.
  • Severe medical, neurological, and psychiatric disorders that might compromise the subject’s health. (i.e., hospitalized seniors, mental disorders, among others.)
  • People younger than 18 years old.

8 of 15

Semi-structured Interview Process

9 of 15

PRELIMINARY RESULTS

  • Evidence of a break in language transmission from parents to children.
  • Demise:
    • Economic Collapse: Post-plantation era leading to local economic instability.
    • Migration/Emigration: Loss of fluent speakers moving to Panama City or abroad.
    • Assimilation: The dominance of Spanish and the push toward "Standard English" in formal settings.
  • Homes with English-speaking heritage, the language is being lost due to a lack of active use.

10 of 15

Pedagogical Implications & Opportunities

  • Addressing the Instructional Gap: The study identifies "inadequate formal language instruction" in the public system; there is a clear opportunity to redesign curricula to better support local linguistic needs.
  • Language Revitalization as Pedagogy: Moving beyond teaching "Standard English" to include "Heritage Language" preservation strategies.
  • Bridging Home and School: Creating educational partnerships that involve the community/family to repair the broken intergenerational link.

11 of 15

Pedagogical Implications & Opportunities

  • Sociolinguistic Awareness in the classroom: Using the PAE context to teach students about World Englishes, variety, and the impact of socio-economics on language.
  • Leveraging Technology: Utilizing modern tools to provide the "English input" that is currently lacking in the regional public education system. (Extension projects)

12 of 15

Timeline

Activity

Description

Timeframe

Presenting the research proposal

Presenting the proposal to the pre-proposal workshop evaluator for their review, comments, and approval.

June 2024

Presenting the proposal to the committee evaluators for their review, comments, and approval.

June 2024

Bioethics approval

Presenting the research proposal and data collection instruments to the Bioethics committee.

June – October 2024

On-site data collection

Prolonged stay on the destination to collect speech samples and interview PAE native speakers. Renting house/apartment in Puerto Armuelles for 3 months.

February-March 2026

Travel to the destination to collect speech samples and interview PAE native speakers. Approx.10 weekend travels (AirPanama round-trip flights).

June-September 2026

Focus group follow-ups

Programming the social media group follow-up virtual meetings.

June-September 2026

13 of 15

Timeline

Activity

Description

Timeframe

Preparing the progress report

The reception of results is closed and progress report of results is prepared through the Research Progress Form for the thesis advisor (TA).

August – October 2026

Presenting the progress report to the DLI committee, and VIP (Vice-presidency of Research and Postgraduate for its Spanish acronym) for review, comments, and approval.

October – November 2026

Data analysis

Cataloguing voice excerpts’ transcriptions.

November 2026

Atlas.ti software training.

November 2026

Acquisition of QDA software license (Atlas.ti) for one year (as an Educational License).

November 2026

Transcription parsing and coding.

December 2026

Compiling results

Conclusions are drawn based on the results of the instruments. The theoretical constructs generate hypotheses, and the validity of the hypotheses are checked. A written report draft is presented to TA.

January – February 2027

Presenting final report

The results are presented to the DLI committee and VIP (Vice-presidency of Research and Postgraduate for its Spanish acronym) for its archiving.

March 2027

14 of 15

References

  • Aceto, M. J. (1996). Variation in a Variety of Panamanian Creole English (Dissertation). The University of Texas at Austin.
  • Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language. Cambridge University Press.
  • De Leon, E. (2026). Panamanian Linguistic Landscape: A systemtatic Literature Review of the Panamanian Languages. Editorial Universitaria Carlos Manuel Gasteazoro.
  • Escure, G. (2008). Belize and other central American varieties: morphology and syntax. In B. Kortmann, & E. W. Schneider, The Americas and the Caribbean (pp. 732-762). De Gruyter Mouton.
  • Espinoza, E. A. (1984). A Brief Syntactic and Morphologic Comparison and Contrast of the English Dialect of Puerto Armuelles with the English Dialect of Colón (Thesis). University of Panama.
  • Herzfield, M. (1983). Signs in the field: Prospects and issues for semiotic ethnography. Semiotica, 46(2/4), 99-106.

15 of 15

Elias De Leon

elias.deleon@up.ac.pa

Universidad de Panamá

OrcID: 0000-0001-9099-160X