1 of 26

Single Photon Interference

Jeff, Jacob, Bryce, Edward, and Julie

2 of 26

Young’s Double Slit Experiment

YAY!

3 of 26

What is it?

  • First conducted in 1801 by Thomas Young
  • Light passed through a barrier with two slits (before it usually passed through a single slit to make the light coherent)
  • The light diffracted through each slit
  • Created interference pattern
  • In order to interfere the light that passes through the slit must be of the same frequency and polarization and it must be coherent

4 of 26

5 of 26

Particles vs. Waves

Particle

  • If light acts as a particle, only two slits will appear on the screen

Wave

  • The light will diffract and interfere, making many fringes

6 of 26

Why is this important?

  • This proves light acts not only as a particle, but also as a wave!

7 of 26

Equations for the Fringes

8 of 26

Many Photon Interference

Acquisition Time: .1 sec

Attenuation: 3 optical depths

Amplification: x1

9 of 26

Single Photon

  • When a single photon is used, wave interference is still present
  • It is impossible for a photon to act as a wave as it is can only go through one slit
  • If one slit is blocked, there is no interference

10 of 26

Energy of a Single Photon

11 of 26

  • Power of 1 photon per meter
  • P=9.421∗10−11W
  • The power of our laser is
  • P=9.1∗10−7W
  • So we use 3 optical depths to attenuate the beam to single photon energy levels.

12 of 26

Single Photon Interference

Acquisition Time: .1 sec

Attenuation: 3 optical depths

Amplification: x100

13 of 26

Single Photon Interference

Acquisition Time: .1 sec

Attenuation: 3 optical depths

Amplification: x200

14 of 26

Single Photon Interference

Acquisition Time: 1 sec

Attenuation: 3 optical depths

Amplification: x100

15 of 26

Interferometry

Mach-Zehnder Interferometer

16 of 26

  • Power of 1 photon per meter
  • P=9.421∗10−11W
  • The power of our laser is
  • P=6.17∗10−5W
  • So we use 5 optical depths to attenuate the beam to single photon energy levels.

17 of 26

Strong field

Acquisition Time: .1sec

Attenuation: 5 optical depths

Amplification: x100

18 of 26

Single Photon

Acquisition Time: .1 sec

Attenuation: 5 optical depths

Amplification: x100

19 of 26

Single Photon – Horizontal Polarization Blocked

Acquisition Time: .1 sec

Attenuation: 5 optical depths

Amplification: x100

20 of 26

Single Photon – Vertical Polarization Blocked

Acquisition Time: .1 sec

Attenuation: 5 optical depths

Amplification: x100

21 of 26

Important Observations

  • When path of photon is unknown, fringes are observed
  • When path of photon is known, fringes are not observed

22 of 26

Summary

  • Young’s Double Slit Experiment
    • Fringes were observed under high intensity, as well as with only a single photon.
  • Interferometer
    • Fringes were observed under high intensity as well as with only a single photon.
    • When either path of the interferometer was blocked, fringes were not observed.

23 of 26

What Problems Did We Encounter?

Single Photon Interference

Acquisition Time: .1 sec

Attenuation: 5 optical depths

Amplification: x100

24 of 26

25 of 26

Conclusion

  • Single photons behaved the same way as the high intensity beam.
  • In the double slit experiment, the single photon appeared to interfere with itself – going through both slit simultaneously.
  • In the interferometer the single photon appeared to take both paths simultaneously – blocking a path removed interference fringes.

26 of 26

Sources