1 of 19

DNA, IQ, racism and science

Reading “The mismeasure of man”

In memory of Stephen Jay Gould

Jon Hareide Aarbakke, Tvedestrand, Norway - 2025

2 of 19

Contents

Who was Stephen Jay Gould?

What is his message? (science as human endeavour)

Specific axes to grind: abuse of IQ, racism, scientific justifications for racism

The origins of “IQ”

The craniologists and brain weighers

The Bell Curve (1995)

Some observations

3 of 19

Stephen Jay Gould

From Wikipedia

1941-2002, Queens, New York, Jewish mother, secular upbringing. Activist during student days:

Objectivity must be operationally defined as fair treatment of data, not absence of preference

Gould was anti-racist

Evolutionary biologist, paleontologist

Age 5 saw the T-rex in the American Museum of Natural History, NY

4 of 19

Racism

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/apr/23/when-cleopatra-was-alive-she-wasnt-categorised-by-colour-of-her-skin

Does the term race even make sense?

Cleopatra

5 of 19

“The mismeasure of man” 1981

Revised edition 1996 with critique of The Bell Curve.

Other titles by Gould:

  • Ever since Darwin
  • The Panda’s thumb
  • Hen’s teeth and horse’s toes
  • The Flamingo’s smile
  • Bully for Brontosaurus

6 of 19

Weighing brains

“In general, the brain is larger in mature adults than in the elderly, in men than in women, in eminent men than in men of mediocre talent, in superior races than in inferior races… other things being equal, there is a remarkable relationship between the development of intelligence and the volume of the brain” (Broca, 1861)

In general: big scull -> big brain

(but does “big” mean “better”)

7 of 19

Crania Aegyptiaca 1844 (Morton)

8 of 19

Crania Americana 1839 (Morton)

Auracanian Indian…

9 of 19

Craniology 1850s, 1985, 2011, 2015

Morton had a collection of about 900 skulls from many parts of the world

Measured the cranial capacity = volume of brain, first with seed, then with lead shot (blykuler)

Then calculated averages

White men “won”

10 of 19

Craniology 1981 and 2011

Gould (1981) regrouped Morton’s findings and achieved very different results. Gould’s regrouping was apparently along logical lines, like sex, and the variation Morton had found vanished.

Gould claims Morton was unconsciously biased when he grouped and selected measurements (in order to get the result he wanted) - but Morton did publish all his source data, allowing Gould to make new calculations

2011: Lewis et al, from same University as Morton, re-measured 380 skulls and found the sizes had been measured well - hence no bias on Morton’s part… but that’s not what Gould claimed!

11 of 19

Craniology 2015

Kaplan et al state (2015):

  • Morton’s methodology was useless
  • But so was Gould’s re-calculation of Morton’s data
  • Lewis was wrong in vindicating Morton
  • “You have to know what question you want to ask of your data when you collect the data”
  • Do the categories even make sense? Caucasian, “indian”, negro, egyptian

12 of 19

Looking at faces (Lombroso, Montessori (of Montessori school fame)..)

Can you spot the German murderers?

Group E

13 of 19

IQ - Intelligence quotient

Origin: Alfred Binet (France) 1903-1904 (Binet-Simon scale)

Child’s age/measured-age-ability:

Perform like an 11-year old, biological age 10 -> 110 IQ score

But only while the child is growing

Purpose: assist the children that are at risk of falling behind

And that’s it!

Not a number that says anything else about this human being

Binet was forthright about the limitations of his scale. He stressed the remarkable diversity of intelligence and the subsequent need to study it using qualitative, as opposed to quantitative, measures. Binet also stressed that intellectual development progressed at variable rates and could be influenced by the environment; therefore, intelligence was not based solely on genetics, was malleable rather than fixed, and could only be found in children with comparable backgrounds.[6] Given Binet's stance that intelligence testing was subject to variability and was not generalizable, it is important to look at the metamorphosis that mental testing took on as it made its way to the U.S

(Wikipedia)

14 of 19

IQ test questions ca 1900

Terman: “An Indian (!) who had come to town for the first time in his life saw a white man riding along the street. As the white man rode by, the Indian said - “The white man is lazy; he walks sitting down” - what was the white man riding on that caused the Indian to say, “he walks sitting down”?

Binet: “My neigbo(u)r has been having queer visitors. First a doctor came to his house, then a lawyer, then a minister. What do you think happened here?”�(this was one of the harder test questions)

15 of 19

DIY IQ test

Forming the basis for e.g. US Army IQ tests

16 of 19

Walter Lippman debating Terman

“Without offering any data on all that occurs between conception and the age of kindergarten, they announce on the basis of what they have got out of a few thousand questionnaires that they are measuring the hereditary mental endowment of human beings. Obviously, this is not a conclusion obtained by research. It is a conclusion planted by the will to believe. It is, I think, for the most part unconsciously planted. .. If the impression takes root that these tests really measure intelligence, that they constitute a sort of last judgement on the child’s capacity, that they reveal “scientifically” his predestined ability, then it would be a thousand times better if all the intelligence testers and all their questionnaires were sunk without warning in the Sargasso Sea.”

17 of 19

IQ

From a scale developed to assess children and thus be able to best help them

to a number supposed to say something about who we are

Re-ification (res, thing in Latin): to make into a thing

“The tendency has always been strong to believe that whatever received a name must be an entity or being, having an independent existence of its own. And if no real entity answering to the name could be found, men did not for that reason suppose that none existed, but imagined that it was something peculiarly abstruse or mysterious”

JOHN STUART MILL

18 of 19

The Bell Curve: IQ 1995

1995 book by Herrnstein, Murray

Argues that intelligence is biologically determined and condemns certain groups, at group level, to staying indefinitely as an underclass in societies:�“Those with high intelligence, the "cognitive elite", are becoming separated from those of average and below-average intelligence, and that this separation is a source of social division within the United States

The book argues that there are differences in IQ between “races”

Gould vociferously attacks the conclusion and the scientific soundness of the book - and he’s not the only one

19 of 19

Observations (USA)

Miscegenation - how long did it take to strike the anti-miscegenation laws off the law books?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Negro_Motorist_Green_Book

Reconstruction and what followed