Parents or siblings �are police officers
CLASS 20��Thursday – March 27th��BEGIN - XXXX
Watch your language
A growing list of words are “being scrubbed from government websites and documents” in order to remove references to all things DEI, climate change, vaccines, and other “dangerous” topics.
Race��Ethnicity��Culture
Team “Freedom”��vs.��Team “Censorship”
CLASS 20��Thursday – March 27th��Mandatory Selfie
Edd from Peru asked on Discord:
“Many countries around the world, such as mine, Peru,
there are voter ID laws.
Why do some Americans find requiring IDs to vote racist or prejudicial?”
Questions from Live Stream
Class #20
Watch Your Language
Mark commented on the
YouTube Live Stream Chat:
“I want to see how many banned words I can say in a sentence:
Do you support a homosexual Jewish man to get his measles vaccine while reading Orwell’s 1984 while living in the world of Bradbury's
Fahrenheit 451?”
Ian from KCK asked on the YouTube Live Stream Chat:
“Was the purpose of PC [Politically Correct] Culture to self-censor ourselves enough so we do it without our knowledge and little resistance?
Could that possibly ever work?”
Jason from California commented on the YouTube Live Stream Chat:
“Growing up on the border in the
mid 70s, the border was a three wire cattle fences. The migrant workers were not an issue until
the government made it an issue.”
Mark asked on the YouTube Live Stream Chat:
“Do you guys think there should be banned words for only certain people?”
Questions from Comments
Class #20
Watch Your Language
JonPaulie commented on the
YouTube Comment Section:
“’Scrubbing’ the words from the website are drastically different than banning. Scrubbing allows the administration to change the way those words are used and thereby change and create a new culture.”
jackiechilds8047 commented on the
YouTube Comment Section:
“If you live in a town crushed by illegals, where taxes increase to pay for ESL teachers, where ERs are used for doctor appts, then you know the price of cabbage can tripple before remotely caring about "benefits" of illegals”
Juze81 from Finland commented on the YouTube Comment Section:
“It can't be fraud if state law says there is no need ID to vote Sam! And that is wrong that you can vote without need to proof you are citizen.”
kyro1732 and crshircliff commented on the YouTube Comment Section:
“The irony of the audio muting every 5 seconds.”