Down with the Sickness:
Measuring the Propensity to Work While Sick
Zenopia Aghajanian and Christopher R. Warren
California State University, Long Beach
Western Psychological Association Annual Conference
Las Vegas, Nevada
2025
Over 80% of People attend work while sick, despite believing they should have stayed home (Aronsson et al., 2000)
Introduction
Purpose of the Current Study
To validate a new measure of Sickness Presence, investigate relationships between sickness presence and other related constructs, and assess changes in sickness presence from pre- to post-pandemic.
Self Esteem and Sickness Presence
According to Rosenberg (1965a), self-esteem is one's positive or negative attitude toward oneself and one's evaluation of one's own thoughts and feelings overall in relation to oneself.
High levels of self-esteem will relate to lower levels of showing up to work during illness and higher levels of concern regarding infecting others. |
Hypothesis 1 |
Work Ethic and Sickness Presence
Work ethic is one of the most notable constructs that has endured over a long period of time. Among other things, it indicates the extent to which a person considers work as his or her central life interest (Blood, 1969).
High levels of work ethic will correlate with a higher degree of showing up to work with an illness and a lower degree of concern regarding potentially infecting others. |
Hypothesis 2 |
Conscientiousness and Sickness Presence
Conscientiousness is the Big Five personality trait capturing individual differences in the degree of organization, persistence, and motivation in goal-directed behavior: people high in conscientiousness are described as organized, reliable, and ambitious (Costa et al., 1992, John & Srivastava, 1999).
A higher score on conscientiousness will correlate positively with showing up to work during illness and more concern about affecting others. |
Hypothesis 3 |
Prosocial Behavior and Sickness Presence
The Prosocial scale is designed to measure individual differences in a global tendency to behave in prosocial ways during late adolescence and adulthood (McNeely & Melingo, 1994)
Higher scores on the Prosocial scale will correlate negatively with showing up to work during illness and concern about infecting co-workers. |
Hypothesis 4 |
Participants and Procedures
Phase 1 (pre-COVID)
Phase 2 (post-COVID)
Phase 3 (post-post COVID)
441 respondents took a 59-item survey based on a Likert type Scale ranging from disagree to strongly agree (ɑ = .75).
Approximately 125 respondents, aged 18-30 who are working, were recruited to determine if any proposed items should be eliminated or further altered to better measure SP (ɑ = .78).
200 respondents took the final version of the scale for overall validity, assessing its distinctiveness from related constructs.
Sickness Presence Items
My workload would be affected if I took sick days, so I generally work through illness. |
I would show up to work even though I had a contagious illness. |
Due to job financial concerns, I would consider showing up to work knowing that I might infect co-workers. |
I feel selfish while taking a sick day, because I could have gone to work and performed well. |
A contagious illness affects my decision of showing up to work. |
If a co-worker has a cold or flu, they should stay home. |
Sickness Presence Items
I use sick days when I feel like I could be contagious and affect co-workers. |
When/if I go to work while being contagious, I am concerned about infecting my co-workers. |
When/if I go to work while being contagious, I take precautions to prevent spreading my illness. |
If my work task depends on others, I would avoid showing up if I was contagious. |
If I have noticeable symptoms of a contagious illness (e.g., flue), but don’t feel like it would affect my work performance, I would go to work. |
If I have noticeable symptoms of a contagious illness (e.g., flu), I would take a sick day, even if it would affect my salary.. |
Scales/Measures
Blood’s Protestant Work Ethic Scale (1969)
Propensity to Work Sick Scale
Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (1965)
Prosocial Scale by McNeely & Melingo (1994)
Sarnoff’s Survey of Attitude Towards Life Scale (Bray & Grant, 1966)
Turnover Intent Inventory (Adams & Beehr, 1998)
Conscientiousness (John & Srivastava, 1999)
Correlations
Time 1
Time 2
Time 3 Correlations
Sickness Presence Item Means
Sickness Presence Item Means
Sickness Presence Item Means
Sickness Presence Item Means
Key Findings
(α = .78 at time, α = .77 at time 2, and α = ..88 at time 3).
Next Steps
Practical Implications
Thank You!
Acknowledgements:
Thank you to my graduate research assistants Muskan Jumani, David Guirgus, the Research, Scholarly and Creative Activities funding, and my many research assistants and survey participants!