1 of 49

Panel:Dealing with Data

Do you have questions for our final panel?�Join Slack and ask in #higher-ed-conference by 4:00 Eastern

Resources, schedule, Zoom: thegradingconference.com �Slack community: tinyurl.com/join-alt-grading

2 of 49

Recording and posting

We are recording this session.

We plan to post recordings and slides so you can review them later.

We retain the right to rebroadcast and distribute the recording.

By participating, you are agreeing that your contributions become part of the recording. This includes video, audio, chat, and Q&A.

3 of 49

The Grading Conference is hosted by

college-bridge.org

4 of 49

Today: Time to start building

Now Parallel sessions

Rethinking Assumptions� Dealing with Data� Managing Workload� Generating Reassessments�

2:45 - 3:30 More parallel sessions

3:30 - 4:00 Coffee break (offline)

4:00 - 5:00 Keynote speaker: Robert Talbert

5:00 - 5:15 Tea break (offline)

5:15 - 6:15 Town Hall & Wrap Up

5 of 49

Today’s Panelists

Debbie GaydosPenn State University

Jacquie RischeMarymount University

Rebecca ReckUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

Nathan FoxCanisius College

6 of 49

About Me

  • Canisius College
    • Buffalo, NY
    • ~2000 undergraduates, mostly local, not many math majors
  • Department of Mathematics
  • 📧 fox42@canisius.edu
  • Typical Class Size: 10-20 (100-level), 5-15 (upper level)
  • Started using alternative grading in Fall 2020 (mostly Standards-Based)
  • LMS: Desire2Learn (D2L)

7 of 49

D2L Basic Info

  • Gradebook is feature-rich but unfriendly to technical users
    • “User experience” prioritized
    • Customizability and automatability deprioritized
  • Creating a gradebook is time consuming and rage inducing
  • Changing the grading scheme in the middle of the term is time consuming and rage inducing
  • Once everything is scaffolded well, everything else can go smoothly
  • What the students see is customizable

Tip for alternative grading: By default, don’t plan to link grade items to course content (Dropboxes etc.)

8 of 49

Summary of Data Tracking Process

  • Set up entire D2L Gradebook before term starts.
    1. Define “Schemes.”
    2. Work through “Setup Wizard.”
    3. Create “Categories.”
    4. Create “Items.”
  • Use spreadsheets as auxiliary tracking tools.

9 of 49

Case Study: Spring 2022 Differential Equations

  • 200-level course, 5 students
  • Standards-Based Grading
    • P: “Proficient”
    • R: “Revision/Reattempt Needed”
    • R*: It’s an R, but you’re really close to a P. You can meet with me and attempt to correct orally.
  • 20 “Learning Targets,” each with:
    • A homework assignment (can revise and resubmit unlimited times)
    • Two in-class quizzes
    • A midterm exam question
    • A final exam question
  • Need 2 P’s out of those 5 opportunities to get a P on the Learning Target
  • A few other items influence grade too (e.g. engagement, Python activities)

10 of 49

Grade Schemes

11 of 49

Setup Wizard

Keys:

  • Step 1: Choose “Points” Grading System 🤮
  • Step 2: Do not “Automatically Release Final Grade”
  • Step 4 (recommended): Set a custom Scheme as “Default Scheme”
  • Step 6: Students see only “Grade scheme symbol”
  • Step 6: Do not “Display final grade calculation to users”

12 of 49

Setup Wizard, Step 6

13 of 49

Categories

  • I use one category per “Learning Target.”
  • (If did Setup Wizard right), mostly default settings
    • Check “Override display options for this item.”
    • Uncheck all boxes below that.

14 of 49

Items

  • “Selectbox” to use custom Schemes
  • Assign Item to Category
  • Choose a “Grade Scheme”
  • Otherwise: Default settings

Doesn’t matter

15 of 49

What Students See

16 of 49

Shortcomings of D2L Gradebook

  • Bulk creation of Items… 😡
    • Create one of each Item template
    • Export the Gradebook
    • Copy/edit the Items in a spreadsheet
    • Import, and “Create new grade item when an unrecognized Item is referenced”
    • Fill in some missing info on each Item
    • “Manage Grades” and patch everything up
  • Can’t import/export feedback on grade items
  • Aggregating raw data is convoluted
    • “Formula” Item type
    • External spreadsheet
  • How do students know if their pace is sustainable?

17 of 49

“Formula” Grade Items

18 of 49

Spreadsheets

  • Offer more fine-grained control of data
  • Can export from D2L and import into D2L
  • Let you verify that D2L is calculating correctly
  • Can give students tools to explore grade scenarios

19 of 49

20 of 49

21 of 49

Tracking in Canvas for Standards Based Grading

Debbie Gaydos�Lecturer in Mathematics

Penn State University Greater Allegheny

dmg34@psu.edu

22 of 49

My SBG Format in Calculus 1

30 Learning Targets, of which:

    • 13 Checkpoint Targets completed via online assessments (MyOpenMath LTI)
    • 17 Challenge Targets completed via in-class exams/office hour reassessments
    • Of these 17, 10 deemed “CORE” targets

BASE GRADE: determined mostly by LT completion

    • Base grade can be adjusted up/down based on “grade modifiers”: overall percent grade in “assignments” category and final exam

23 of 49

Canvas Setup

  • Enable Learning Mastery and Student Learning Mastery gradebooks
  • Create (or import) Outcomes for each Learning Target
  • “Attach” each outcome to an assignment rubric

24 of 49

Tracking LT Completion in Canvas’ Mastery Gradebook

25 of 49

Compiling the Data and Communicating Progress

  • Export the Learning Mastery results to Excel
  • Export the Canvas standard gradebook to Excel
  • Use spreadsheet to aggregate data:
    • Total targets completed
    • CORE targets completed
    • Score in “Assignments” (% graded category)
  • Estimate students’ “tracking toward” grade based on current progress

26 of 49

Mailmerge to “Learning Target Progress Reports”

27 of 49

Mailmerge to “Learning Target Progress Reports”

28 of 49

Tips… and Possible Pitfalls

  • NOTE: Students can NOT view the Learning Mastery gradebook from the Canvas app
  • Must use Canvas website in a browser

29 of 49

Tips… and Possible Pitfalls

  • Want students to be able to see category average scores, but do NOT want an “overall total %” to be displayed (this can cause confusion)
  • Used weighted categories with all category weights set to 0%

30 of 49

Tips… and Possible Pitfalls

  • Communicating with students about where they stand in terms of progress on targets is key and will likely require repetition….
  • …but this can start to feel like the focus is on “grades” over deeper learning.

31 of 49

Rebecca M. Reck, Ph.D.

Bioengineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

Contact�Email: rreck@illinois.edu�Twitter: @rebeccaee�Or on the Alternative Grading Slack

Background�I use specifications grading in an upper-level required engineering laboratory course.

32 of 49

Specifications Grading in Canvas

  • Use built-in rubric tool with one row for each specification
  • Set assignments to complete/incomplete
    • Note: you have to manually change to incomplete. Canvas will set complete as long as the score of the rubric is greater than 0.
  • Turn off the final grade calculation
  • Revise and resubmit to the same assignment
    • Pro: only one column in the grade book
    • Con: hard to track if revisions are submitted on-time
  • Final grade calculation in Excel

33 of 49

Specifications Grading in GradeScope

  • I decided not to use it for specifications based assignments for the following reasons:
    • Difficult to track assignments that can be revised
    • Hard to split assignments by section (for dividing grading)
    • Rubrics aren’t available to students before submitting the assignment
  • I did use it for assignments that were still based on points (exams and pre-labs)
    • Graded assignments as usual then exported scores from GradeScope and uploaded to Canvas

34 of 49

Tip: Provide a Final Grade Calculator to Students

35 of 49

36 of 49

Jacquie Rische

Marymount University

Assistant Professor of Mathematics

jrische@marymount.edu

Using Canvas “Outcomes” and “Learning Mastery Gradebook”

37 of 49

Standards-based Grading in Calculus with Precalculus

  • I break my class down into “Skills” that I want my students to learn during the semester
  • Weekly quizzes
  • Each Skill appears on three consecutive quizzes
  • I grade each Skill out of 3 points
  • To complete a Skill, students need to get a 3 on it on two different quizzes
  • Once a Skill stops appearing on the quizzes, students can do retakes

38 of 49

Grading

  • Skills: 60%
  • Homework: 15%
  • Cumulative Final: 25%

39 of 49

Keeping Track of Quiz Scores

  • In Canvas I use
    • “Outcomes”
    • Rubrics
    • “Learning Mastery Gradebook”
  • I also use an Excel spreadsheet to keep track of each student’s current grade on the Skills

40 of 49

Outcomes

41 of 49

Rubrics

42 of 49

43 of 49

Learning Mastery Gradebook

44 of 49

45 of 49

46 of 49

47 of 49

48 of 49

Excel

49 of 49

What’s next?

Now Parallel sessions

Labs

I came, I tried, I learned (I wish I’d known)

Blending ideas

What could reassessments look like?�

3:30 - 4:00 Coffee break (offline)

4:00 - 5:00 Keynote speaker: Robert Talbert

5:00 - 5:15 Tea break (offline)

5:15 - 6:15 Town Hall / Wrap Up